UKIP & David Coburn

RIGHT-WINGER David Coburn left students from all over the world in the lurch after taking tuition fees in advance. UKIP’s top Scottish candidate in next month’s European elections left foreign students thousands of pounds out of pocket after he shut down their language school. Right-winger David Coburn left the students from all over the world in the lurch after taking tuition fees in advance. Coburn, 55, is described in a UKIP election leaflet as an “international freight forwarding business owner”. He ran the Lexicon School of English in London’s Kensington, which was dissolved in 1993 by the Companies Registrar after failing to file accounts. But Coburn improperly carried on trading, despite an outstanding rent bill of £45,000 and was still taking in cash until just before he closed the school. Angry students said they were left in extreme financial difficulties with one describing Coburn as an “absolute b*****d’’.

After Lexicon’s collapse, other language schools offered the students free courses. Two of Coburn’s other companies, Heliogabalus and DC Trading, were dissolved in 2010 and 2012 respectively. Coburn, now renting accommodation in Edinburgh, said: “I have had a lot of businesses. Some have been better than others. “The students all transferred on to other schools. It was the time of the Gulf War starting and everyone was having trouble. Businesses were doing badly all over the place. “Plus there were lots of cheap language schools opening up which undermined everyone. If you can’t make money out it, you have to close it.” Scotland has six European seats up for grabs this year and UKIP are hopeful of grabbing one, with Coburn top of their list.

Alex Salmond has previously insisted that an independent Scotland would have more liberal immigration policies than the UK. Coburn said: “Mr Salmond seems to want to fill the country with people from God knows where. “That’s what has happened in England where people are desperately unhappy about it and are voting UKIP.” Coburn also insists that Scots living outside Scotland should have a vote in the independence referendum. He said: “Salmond is destroying their citizenship. If they don’t get a postal vote in the referendum, it is not worth a candle. It is a fraud.”

Money for Old Rope

Taxpayers to Fund Westminster Drop outs

I expect a clear “Yes” to Independence in September will ensure Scottish taxpayers will not be required to find an extraordinary amount of money being payment to MP’s voted out or voluntary standing down at the next General Election in 2015.

So that readers & taxpayers are informed payments include;

1. Resettlement Grant: (tax free) £30,000+ (compensation for loss of MP status).
2. Redundancy pay: (tax free) £20,000+
3. Winding up Payment: £45,000+ Funding for office staff and any other incidental expenses.
4. Pension pot: £50,000 rising to £550,000, (for long serving MPS).

It is projected that in excess of 330 MP’s and their staff will qualify for the foregoing financial packages. Cost to the taxpayer £20Million. The, “Gravy Train” comes over the hill and she blew.

Annual operational costs of maintaining Westminster political systems is approximately £650Million. The split:

a. House of Commons. £365Million.
b. MP’s. (salaries, expenses. £175Million.
c. House of Lords. £140Million
Total Cost Annually. £680Million

Lifetime of Parliament. £3,755,000 YES!!!! Nearly £4Billion.

The Scandalous cost of maintaining the UK parliament cannot be justified. We Scots have, (in September) the opportunity to escape from the madness that is the UK. Vote yes to independence. We will also gain from a redistribution of financial assets at the time of independence

The Andrew Marr Show 23 March 2014

Andrew Marr interviewed Danny Alexander who offered the under noted comments on the make up of a UK government, (2015-2020).

I think that a Conservative Government on its own would be bad for the economy because it would try and take Britain out of the European Union. A Labour Government by itself would be very bad for the economy because it would wreck the strategy that has got the British economy this far. I think you need the Liberal Democrats in the centre ground of government, the centre ground of politics, to keep the recovery on the right track for the next Parliament.

These three parties, (poles apart in terms of political direction) are combined at present seeking to persuade the Scottish public to vote, “no” in the September referendum. What a nonsense! Mr Alexander views the Conservatives as a bunch of wreckers and Labour as political incompetents. But offers the Lib/Dems as the party with a vision. I oft wonder the purpose of, “Planet Alexander”. Vote, “Yes” to Independence in September so that we can be sure of electing a Scottish Government blessed with political competence, free from the old disastrous ways of the past. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKI5-lCqdaU

Scottish Labour Party in Crisis- Change! What Change?

Scottish Labour Party in Crisis- Change! What Change?

In a brief to the Labour Party in Scotland, (following on from the SNP Landslide victory in the 2011 Scottish Election) Dominic Dowling, (Senior Election Agent) for all Labour candidates in Glasgow. assessed the performance of the party as having been dull and uninspiring.

Other noteworthy comments contained in his report;

1. The Party is perceived by the public to be, “a party principally of English interests, not Scottish ones”.
2. The Party offered no demonstrable opposition to the SNP administration.
3. Voluntary workers were poorly briefed with result that inconsistent messages were imparted on doorsteps.
4. The party persistently failed to give support to Holyrood to demonstrating a lack of commitment to Scottish affairs.

Evidence it’s performance, in the 4 year’s since the election, the Labour Party has failed to address and correct the issues raised. It is time Labour voters demanded the party abandon English Labour Party policies.

I doubt the existing leadership and other heid yin’s are incapable of change so someone within the Labour establishment will need to initiate the process, perhaps using the September Referendum as the impetus for change.

Labour Party Madhouse politics

Johann Lamont, (Labour Party leader in Scotland) in a speech providing support to her colleagues in England, attacked the SNP Government and policies it had introduced, (at variance with England) in Scotland, from 2007.

She went on to assure the full support of the Labour Party in Scotland of their colleagues in England, (who had only recently informed the public in England that a Labour Party UK Government would continue to maintain policies, (Public Sector Pay Freeze and any other austerity measures) outlined by the Tory Party.

She further stated that Scotland and it’s people enjoyed, under an SNP government the only, “something-for-nothing culture in the world” and went on to say that upon the return of the Labour Party in Scotland to power she would reverse the following scandalous policies;

1. Free Personal Care for the elderly to cease. Systems in place in England to be introduced.
2. Tuition Fees for Students, (mirroring those applicable in England), to be reintroduced.
3. The Council Tax freeze, (funded from central funds by the Scottish Government) to cease. Funding to be withdrawn. Councils to set local rates without subsidy from the Government.
4. Free prescriptions to cease. Charges to mirror those in England.
5. She also announced that the Labour Party would establish a, “Cuts Commission” undoing any other progressive policies introduced by the SNP. Namely Road Bridge Tolls.

Anyone, as yet undecided, should be aware of what a no vote in the September referendum will bring. Vote, “Yes” to Independence, preventing any future introduction of, ” madhouse politics” outlined by Johann Lamont and her colleagues who are simply, “cowtowing” to the English Labour Party. A few snippets of confirmatory facts:

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/sep/28/scottish-labour-hostility-snp

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics/labour-reveal-taxes-will-rise-as-johann-1342878

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/staggers/2012/09/scottish-labours-support-cuts-plays-snps-hands

https://www.snp.org/media-centre/news/2013/oct/johann-lamont-re-writes-history

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-20755329

http://www.government-world.com/lamont-challenged-on-something-for-nothing/

http://news.stv.tv/politics/191807-labour-leader-johann-lamont-demands-end-to-something-for-nothing-culture/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-19711805

Glasgow City Councillors Foolhardy Gamble with Public Finance To Be Reversed – Expect Chaos in Glasgow Throughout 2016-17

 

 

 

 

 

 

21 March 2014: Glasgow Council Rips Off Female Employees – But the lamb Nips the Lion. Remember this fiasco- and the cost of Attempting to Defend Their Actions

In the Inner House Lords Brodie, Drummond and Philip this morning handed down a major decision affecting more than 2,500 Action 4 Equality Scotland clients with equal pay claims against Glasgow City Council.

The Council then argued that these female employees could no longer compare themselves to male comparators who remained in the employment of the Council – the plain purpose of the Council’s strategy being to try and evade responsibility for equal pay claims.

“We began this litigation back in 2005 and over the past 10 years we have witnessed Glasgow City Council enter into complicated and costly avoidance measures to escape their responsibilities to low paid.

I might also add that none of the local Labour MSPs spoke out against these payments at the time – including Johann Lamont, the Scottish Labour leader – whose partner/husband Archie Graham was, and still is, a senior Labour councillor in Glasgow.

Finance Secretary John Swinney said the new rules will end payments to Councillors who sit on bodies known as arms-length external organizations, after a Holyrood committee discovered that Glasgow Councillors had claimed £260,000 between them.

True to his word during the Scottish election campaign – John Swinney has now put a stop to the practice which has been widely condemned – as a ridiculous waste of public money.

Glasgow City Council has lost a big appeal case, I’m pleased to say – over whether or not thousands of council workers transferred to various arms length bodies (known as ALEOs) – can continue with their equal pay claims.

The good news is that they can – so hip, hip, hooray – for the 2,700 claimants from Action 4 Equality Scotland who are affected by this decision!

Last year Glasgow City Council managed to persuade an Employment Tribunal that these ALEOs were not an ‘associated employer’ – in employment law terms.

The significance of which was that these ALEO workers effectively lost their ability to continue with an equal pay claim – once they had been ‘TUPE transferred’ to one of the new Arms Length External Organizations (ALEOs for short).

Now that always looked like a crazy decision – since the council controlled all of these bodies and even paid some of its Councillors extra ‘top-up’ payments for overseeing the ALEOs – which to many people, myself included, seemed like money for old rope.

My view has always been that Glasgow created these ALEOs in a cynical attempt to evade their responsibilities over equal pay.

Because the council calculated – wrongly as it now turns out – that by putting many of its low paid women workers into a separate, artificially created box (Cordia) – that the women would no longer be employed alongside higher paid male workers who were comparators for equal pay purposes.

Since the men – according to this train of thought – were all placed in their own ALEO (City Building) which was not the same or even an associated employer – so the was ‘off the hook’ as far as future equal pay claims were concerned.

All I would say is that whoever dreamed up this despicable plan – should be sacked forthwith by Glasgow’s ruling ‘socialist’ Labour administration – that is if they have not already departed the scene with an generously enhanced tax-free lump and final salary pension.

The Action 4 Equality Scotland clients were represented by Fox and Partners Solicitors – and Daphne Romney a leading QC who also represented A4ES during the successful GMF hearing against Glasgow City Council back in 2007.

Action 4 Equality Scotland now represents 5,500 clients in the ongoing equal pay claims against Glasgow City Council – whereas the trade unions represent only penny numbers.

 The unions in Glasgow kept their members in the dark about the huge pay differences between traditional male and female council jobs – and originally sided with the council when these big pay differences were exposed by A4ES in 2005.

So the trade unions have a credibility problem because of their behaviour in Glasgow which remains to this day – since the trade unions Glasgow also failed to put up any serious resistance over the creation of ALEOs either. So watch this space for news.

http://action4equalityscotland.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/glasgow-city-council.html
http://www.employmentcasesupdate.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed16273

 

 

 

 

GLASGOW’S largest arms-length body has overspent by almost £3million in the last nine months according to the latest council figures.

Cordia, which runs home care services and catering across Glasgow, is £2.8 million shy of what council bosses had budgeted for.

The figures were revealed in the latest ALEO report covering April 1 – December 18, 2015.

Care services are running at a loss of £3m which the shortfall expected to rise to £4.4m by the end of March, while catering is due to end the year £3m in the black.

Finance chiefs have put the problems down to higher staff absence levels, fixed fees for home-care services and staff pay awards, and said the high absence levels were related to the workforce reforms introduced by the company last year.

A Freedom of Information request seen by the Evening Times shows the company spent more than £1m on agency staff between April 2015 and January 2016.

For five of the last six months of 2016, the firm overspent by as much as three times their target for agency staff, which they said was due to staff absence and the opening of the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital.

A spokesman for Cordia said: “Around 2% of Cordia’s overall home care operation is made up of agency staff, a figure which is lower than many other local authorities.

“This is to ensure a continuity of service provision during peaks in major holiday periods or exceptionally high volumes of work.”

The whole company is predicted to finish the year with a deficit of around £700,000, instead of an expected surplus of more than £2m.

Four other ALEOS, including Glasgow Life and City Parking are expected to end the year with less cash than budgeted for by the local authority, while five are forecast to come in on budget.

As reported by the Evening Times, the Cordia’s home-care sector has undergone a major restructure in the last eight months with staff moving to a seven-on seven-off shift pattern in June.

Union representatives slammed the shortfall and said Cordia has “mismanaged” its spending.

Sam Macartney, of Unison’s Glasgow City branch, said: “The home-care reorganisation was a shambles. It has weakened the service and it has not improved it.

“It stressed their staff out and it penalised the public.

“They have wasted a lot of resources, particularly within the home-care structure where there has been misspending.

“There has been far too much money being spent on agencies particularly if you take into account that the council themselves has ceased using agencies for years, especially in social work where it was shown not to be cost-effective.”

SNP councillor Susan Aitken, Glasgow city council opposition leader, said: “The value of removing social care services from the Council, both financially and in terms of the quality of service provided to vulnerable service users, was always open to question.

“The fact that Cordia is now not even delivering the profits it was set up to achieve shows that the original concerns were valid ones.”

Councillor Aitken said social care services must be returned to focus on the “needs of service users”, instead of “profit being the main driver”.

A council spokesman said: “Cordia is dealing with a number of increased costs – including overtime and associated pension payments and the delivery of key service reforms.

“This is being managed within Cordia’s own budgets and will not impact on the service delivered to home-care clients.

“The council has been fully aware of the position and has taken it into account in the probable out-turn for the current financial year.”

Earlier this month we revealed that discussions are at an advanced stage which would see the dismantling of Cordia.

The company employs around 7,000 staff, most will move across to Glasgow City Council by the end of the year, with workforce levels and terms and conditions expected to remain the same in the medium term.

 

Margaret Matts with her daughter Jane

 

 

A MAJOR overhaul of care services must be made by Glasgow city council, claim staff and clients at care provider Cordia.

In the last year, the Evening Times has highlighted a number of cases where Cordia failed to provide a service to vulnerable clients, some of whom were left for hours without help.

Home carers were moved to a seven on-seven off shift pattern in June 2015, sending the service in to meltdown within days of it being introduced.

Bosses said at the time the new rota would provide clients with “greater continuity of care” and vowed the service would improve once the new pattern “bedded in”.

Now staff and clients have called for Glasgow City Council to introduce vital changes to the service should they take on responsibility for home care provision.

Frances Smith previously raised concerns about care for her diabetic mum after she went without care for 17 hours one one occasion, and had reported at least 16 other missed visits from Cordia carers.

Frances, 59, said: “There have been too many apologies and something different needs to happen. Glasgow City Council must look at what they are able to provide. A lot will depend on whether the council get it right, and if it’s the same management. If all it is is a different name, that would worry me.”

Frances added that since she raised her concerns in the Evening Times, her mum’s care has been “excellent” but said she would be concerned if there were changes to the individual carers who come to visit, due to her mum’s dementia.

The daughter of 74-year-old Margaret Matts also said she hoped the local authority would improve the service should it take control.

Jane, whose mum Margaret was previously left lying in bed for hours when carers didn’t turn up for their appointment, said: “I think before [the service] became Cordia it ran much better.

“It was relatively new to our family anyway, but I’d hope the council would do a better job of it. This is a chance for them to sort out the issues which were happening before.”

Two members of staff echoed their concerns, but admitted they were not aware of the plans.

One employee, who has been with the firm for more than five years, said: “Whatever happens, it has to get better than it is now. Things must change, they need an overhaul.  We [the staff], never get told anything until the last minute. There were rumours that this might happen, but nothing has been told to us.”

Another home carer, who has held her post since the service was previously controlled by the council, said: “Cordia has just made a mess of everything, so hopefully it will be better going under the council. I don’t know if it will be the way it was under social work before, but hopefully, if they are going to do that, it would be better. When I first started…it has changed so much since then. It’s not the same any-more, you’re not treated the same.”

The carer said she hoped she would be given more time to spend with clients if the council were in charge, adding: “I’m just in and out with them at the moment, I hardly get to spend any time with them and some of them need much more time than I have. I’m hoping this will change things. It’s just terrible now, hopefully if it goes back to the council hopefully it will be a lot better.”

http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk.news/14258432.Staff_and_families_call_for__major_overhaul

__at_Cordia_under_Glasgow_City_Council_s_control/

 

Thousands of staff will be on the move as plans are launched to scrap some of Glasgow's controversial council spin-off companies

 

 

 

Thousands of staff on the move as plans launched to scrap controversial council spin-off companies

Scotland’s largest home care provider is to be wound up and the country’s most successful marketing bureau merged as part of plans to overhaul Glasgow’s network of controversial council spin-off bodies.

Discussions are at an advanced stage which would see the dismantlement of Cordia, the arms-length agency which provides social care, catering and janitorial services.

The company employs around 7,000 staff, most of whom will move across to Glasgow City Council by the end of the year, with workforce levels and terms and conditions expected to remain the same in the medium term.

Cordia was set up almost a decade ago from the council’s social work department in a move primarily designed to avoid its predominantly female staff being caught up in the avalanche of equal pay claims.

Meanwhile, in a related move, the council-owned marketing agency, credited with generating hundreds of millions of pounds annually for the city economy via conferences and events, is to merge with the trust which runs Glasgow’s museums and sports facilities.

It is unclear what the new body combining the Glasgow City Marketing Bureau and Glasgow Life will be called but sources insist none of its functions will be diluted and the coming together is “about efficiencies and economies of scale”.

Questions have been raised, however, about the future of the council’s most successful spin-off merging with an organisation with a number of internal challenges, whilst unions and opposition leaders have expressed concern over the impact of axing Cordia on workers and the thousands of elderly people using their services.

Details of the plans, which it is understood is being driven by the council’s Labour leadership, come two months after it emerged the chief executives of both the Marketing Bureau and Cordia were stepping down.

Glasgow’s arms-length bodies, or ALEOs, have been an often controversial addition to the local government landscape in the past decade, not least because of the system of payments paid to councillors who sat on their boards.

However, after this was exposed and questioned the £250,000 top-up payments were axed by John Swinney.

One council source said the Cordia plan was “about tidying up the council family and simplifying complex arrangements” and that it would be gradually broken up.

The source also said the Marketing Bureau would continue with all its top staff continuing the work they do but under a different corporate. The source added: “It makes sense as far as efficiencies go, both organisations are also involved in events. It’s an economies of scale thing.”

Under the stewardship of chief executive Scott Taylor, the marketing bureau became one of the most successful in the UK. However, Mr Taylor announced in December that he was stepping down from the organisation.

Susan Aitken, leader of the council’s SNP group, said: “Dismantling Cordia simply exposes the reasons why this ALEO was set up in the first place, to avoid an equal pay settlement for low paid women workers and to provide extra paid jobs for Labour councillors. Since neither of those now apply, Cordia is no longer politically expedient.

“Protecting vulnerable service users and Cordia staff must now be the priority. People who rely on Cordia services, particularly home care, should not experience any disruption and staff must be kept fully informed about what’s happening to their jobs and be guaranteed that there will be no detriment to their pay and conditions as part of any move.”

Unison’s Brian Smith added: “Unions have argued for the ALEOs to be back under democratic council control for years. We find Cordia a particularly difficult ALEO to deal with, their current treatment of school janitors being a case in point.

“Home care service is also underfunded. We want Cordia workers treated with the respect they deserve.”

A council spokesman said they had to find savings of at least £133 million over the next two years.

He added: “A range of options to meet the savings target is being considered for inclusion in the council’s budget for 2016/17. Until then, it would be inappropriate to comment on specific proposals. Councillors will consider the budget at a meeting of the full council on 10 March.”

 

 

 

 

 

Prince William the “Butcher” of Culloden Infamy ensured the Scottish Highlands Would be Forever England

 

Hot Irish Battles | Page 16 | Political Irish | The Irish ...

 

The Legacy of the (Butcher) Duke of Sutherland, His Cronies & The Rape, Pillage and Theft of the Highlands of Scotland

In 1854 Britain declared war on Russia. Highland regiments, so conspicuous in the past, were now equally conspicuous by their absence. “Where are the Highlanders?” was asked. The Duke of Sutherland hastily travelled from London to Dunrobin Castle and enquired why there were no Highland volunteers, an elderly gentleman replied:

“Your Grace’s mother and predecessors applied to our fathers for men upon former occasions and our fathers responded to their call. They have made us liberal promises, which neither them nor you performed. We are, we think, a little wiser than our fathers, and we estimate your promises of today at the value of theirs; besides you should bear in mind that your predecessors and yourself expelled us in a most cruel and unjust manner from the land which our fathers held in lien from your family. I do assure your Grace that it is the prevailing opinion in this country, that should the Czar of Russia take possession of Dunrobin Castle and Stafford House next term, that we could not expect worse treatment at his hands than we have experienced at the hands of your family for the last 50 years.”

In Sutherland there were no volunteers. The dwindling number of men said: “We have no country to fight for. You robbed us of our land and gave it to the sheep. Therefore, since you have preferred sheep to men, let sheep defend you.” Those young men who refused to volunteer called a public meeting stating: “we are resolved that there shall be no volunteers or recruits from Sutherland shire. Yet we assert that we are as willing as our forefathers were to peril life and limb in defence of our Queen and country were our wrongs and long-enduring oppression redressed, wrongs which will be remembered in Sutherland by every true Highlander as long as grass grows and water runs.”

http://www.yourphotocard.com/Ascanius/documents/The%20history%20of%20the%20Highland%20clearances.pdf

Duke of Cumberland "The Butcher" When it became clear to ...

 

 

Over half of Scotland is owned by just 500 people, few of whom are actually Scots. As Britain’s great land-owning aristocratic families decline, a new breed of foreign laird is exploiting Scotland’s arcane land laws to buy up tracts of the Highlands and islands – Europe’s last great wilderness. The revelation comes in two new books which examine who owns Scotland. The authors have searched through ancient deeds and estate agents’ sales brochures to compile the most detailed picture of land ownership for a generation.

They show that most lairds no longer hail from Britain’s tweed-clad huntin’, shootin’ and fishin’ classes; these days your local feudal overlord is more likely to be a self-made continental millionaire or an entrepreneur from Dubai, Egypt, Malaysia, Hong Kong or plain old America. The findings have sparked a political row north of the border. Many of the new lairds are absentee land-owners who, environmentalists claim, neglect Scotland’s greatest asset – the land itself.

Nationalist MPs and crofters, frustrated by the failure of Westminster politicians to bring Scotland into line with England and other European nations by abolishing feudal structures and regulating land use, are drawing up plans to limit foreign land ownership and introduce environmental codes for all estates.

The two books, “Who owns Scotland now?” and “Who owns Scotland”, update John McEwen’s ground-breaking attempt to sketch Scotland’s land-owning geography 30 years ago.

His study revealed that ancient British families dominated the hills, straths, glens and islands, controlling lucrative salmon beats and deer stalking from the Borders to Barra.

Since the Fifties and Sixties, however, the decline of some of the most distinguished and notorious names in the Highlands – the clan chiefs of the Frasers of Lovat, the Sutherlands and the Wills tobacco family paved the way for new owners to take to the hills.

Andy Wightman, author of, “Who owns Scotland”, recently published in April, explains: “Some of the old landowners like the Duke of Buccleuch, the Duke of Atholl and Cameron of Lochiel have survived. Their old money is still good and some of their estates have expanded. But other families have fallen on hard times and a new group of landowners has stepped in swiftly to take their place. Many of these are from overseas and as they move in, a new pattern of land ownership is emerging.”

A map of the Highland Clearances : Scotland

 

All over Scotland there are now glens and peaks that are forever Swiss, Danish, Malaysian, Middle-Eastern and American. One year ago the whisky distilling MacDonald-Buchanan family sold off the Strath Conon estate in Ross-shire, which they had held for three generations. The new kilted monarch of the 50,000-acre glen is Kjeld Kirk-Christiansen, who runs the huge Danish Lego corporation.

On the Hebridean island of Eigg, Keith Schellenberg, the fantastically wealthy former captain of Britain’s Olympic bobsleigh team who once described “his” islanders as “drunken, ungrateful, lawless, barmy revolutionaries”, sold up as part of a divorce settlement with his second wife Margaret Udny-Hamilton. The new laird is the chain-smoking, beret-wearing “fire” painter, “Professor” Marlin Eckhard Maruma from Stuttgart.

Visitors to Queen’s View in Glen Avon, where Queen Victoria used to look out on her Royal fiefdom, now look down on land owned by the mysterious businessman behind the Kuala Lumpur-based Andras conglomerate. He bought the 40,000-acre estate, once owned by the Wills family, for £6m last year.

Some ancient aristocratic families have hit the buffers in spectacular fashion. The Lovat Frasers’ downfall began when three family members died suddenly; one was gored to death by a buffalo in Tanzania, another collapsed while hunting, and the third succumbed to old age.

Others have been crippled by debt. Losses in the Lloyd’s insurance market forced Lord Kimball, a Lloyd’s Name, to sell the 47,000-acre Altnaharra estate in Sutherland. Whatever the cause, the result is that fewer than half of the big Highland estates are owned by Scots.

“It’s a dramatic change,” said George Rosie, the veteran Scottish land- reform campaigner. “In the 19th-century, parliament passed an Act allowing foreigners to buy any property. As Britain was then the biggest rooster on the midden, the idea that any foreigner would be able to buy into Britain was risible. But now there are millions of wealthy foreigners and Scotland is ripe for the plucking. And plucked we have been.”

Some of the new wave of overseas buyers enjoy good relations with locals and have earned environmentalists’ praise for their land management practices. Paul van Vlissingen, the Dutch businessman whose “holiday cottage” is the eight-bedroom white-washed Letterewe lodge on the banks of Loch Maree in Wester Ross, has helped to fund a new swimming pool and re-introduced native woodland on his 80,000-acre estate.

Other lairds, however, have been accused of barring access to walkers and neglecting the natural environment. “Mountain Closed” signs appeared on estates north of Ullapool. In Perthshire, His Excellency Mahdi Mohammed Al Tajir, from the United Arab Emirates who owns the Blackford Estate, home of Highland Spring mineral water, was accused of abandoning farms to nature on the slopes of the Ochil Hills.

Was the Highland Clearances the Main reason for Scottish ...

 

The winds of change are increasing

Nationalist politicians say Scotland’s free market in land (one of the few countries in Europe which allows wealthy foreigners to buy up unlimited amounts of land with no questions asked) has created a “land lottery”. And, while far-sighted landowners are welcome, they say new measures will need to be introduced limiting the size of their holdings and removing property from owners who neglect their land.

The Scottish National Party, set up an independent land commission and unveiled limited new proposals which encouraged the Scottish Crofters’ Commission to support crofting communities in their efforts to raise money to take over their marginal plots. In Scotland, land is suddenly a political issue.

Dr James Hunter, a Skye-based environmental historian, said: “Land has moved up the agenda ever since the first crofters took over their land in Assynt 1992. That showed that land ownership patterns could change. Since then we have had controversies over the Knoydart estate and other Highland wilderness areas. ”

The “winds of change” unsettled landowners who launched an unprecedented campaign to counter reformers’ demands. At a special public meeting Graeme Gordon, convenor of the Scottish Landowners’ Federation representing 4,000 estate owners north of the border who manage some seven million acres claimed that the debate over land ownership was based on “dangerous generalisations and misleading assertions”.

He told his audience that the “majority of landowners were committed custodians of natural heritage who provide jobs, housing and security for remote communities often at a personal financial loss”.

The battle for the Highlands is only just beginning.

Highland Clearances | Scottish Tartans Authority

 

Fracking & George Osborne

Lord Howell, former Tory Energy Secretary and father-in-law of the Chancellor, George Osborne, said that there were, “justified worries” about, “fracking” a method of extracting shale oil and gas and that this should not be inflicted on the “beautiful” South. But he offered a way forward stating, “there are large uninhabited and desolate areas, certainly up in the North East, where there’s plenty of room for fracking well away from anyone’s residence… without any kind of threat to the rural environment.” Recognising his close affinity with his Son-in-law it might be he is foretelling the future of the North East.

The 1707 Act of Union, Scotland & England (A Recap)

The 1707 Act of Union, (A Recap)

Although ruled by one monarch, (from 1603 – 1707) England & Scotland remained to be separate countries, each with their own Parliament’s. There continued to exist a deep seated lack of trust between the 2 Nations. The Scots were fearful, (reflecting on the fate of the Welsh Nation 400 years before) that joining with England would, (in time) bring about the demise of Scotland, rendering it a, “region” of England. Always to the forefront of their thought’s, the English were consumed by fear that the Scot’s might, once again join in an alliance with the Roman Catholic French. It was crucial that the much feared, “Scottish Army” did not join with the French.

Subsequent to his death, in exile, in France, of the Roman Catholic, Charles 11 his Roman Catholic brother James 11 inherited the throne. He was a disaster, favouring Roman Catholic over Protestant. A, “fed up” English establishment secretly invited, the Dutch warlord, William of Orange to seize the throne saving England from the, “Romans” He willingly accepted and came to England supported by a substantial Dutch force. William engaged and defeated James in battle in Ireland and was crowned King William 111.

Enjoying the confidence of the newly crowned King, the Scotsman, “William Paterson” a worldly traveller who had made a substantial fortune through trade persuaded King William to create a , “Bank” to be supported by gold held in a central vault in London. William was an astute man with a long history of plotting, duplicity and deviousness and in 1694 he issued a decree requiring all gold deposits, (held by goldsmiths) in England to be given up, in exchange for notes and coinage, to a newly formed, “Bank of England”. With the gold safely under it’s control the, “Bank of England” printed notes and minted coinage far in excess of the gold reserves. In a very short period of time the, “Bank of England” became a very powerful banking force.

Building upon his success, “William Paterson” then convinced King William and the, “Bank of England” to jointly finance settlement and colonisation of ports in the, “Indus of Panama”. A successful venture which would reduce shipping times to the financially lucrative, “Far East” market by half. Eager to be in favour of the Scot’s, King William authorised the creation and funding of the, “Company of Scotland”. The board of directors were to be equally comprised of English and Scot’s. Financial and any other risks would be borne, half by the English and Dutch the remainder by the Scot’s.

Full of confidence that all aspects of funding and support was in place, William Paterson went off to Scotland to organise the expedition. In July 1698, 5 ships, (1200 souls) set sail from Edinburgh to Panama. William Paterson led the party. Not long after the flotilla left news was released from England that King William had ordered English and Dutch elements of the, (Company of Scotland) to withdraw from the venture, leaving the Scot’s to their own devices.

The trip was an ordeal, many pioneers died from disease and only about 700 souls landed in Panama.

Over a period of some months the almost defenseless settlers were attacked by Spanish forces on numerous occasions, (with the full knowledge of King William and the English parliament who had instructed English ships that no assistance was to be provided to the Scot’s in Panama).

Malaria was rife and food scarcity resulted in malnutrition and death of a further 400. Because it was not possible to communicate with those that had gone before a further 11 ships sailed to Panama the following year. The bulk of those that travelled did not return succumbing to similar fates. Eventually 1 ship returned with a few survivors.

The collapse of the, “Darien Scheme” brought financial chaos to Scotland.

King William, (seizing the moment) briefed, (in secret) the Scottish aristocracy and sympathetic Scottish MP’s that the, (Bank of England) would provide finance replacing their losses, with the rider that they would need to vote to unite the Parliaments. Many of the, “Scottish Gentry” took the money.

Robert Burns captured the betrayal in his heartfelt poem, (Scottish MP’s were “bought and sold for English gold”).

Verse 1

Fareweel to a’ our Scottish fame, fareweel our ancient glory
Fareweel ev’n to the Scottish name, sSae famed in martial story
Now Sark rins over Salway sands, an’ Tweed rins to the ocean
to mark where England ‘s province stands, such a parcel of rogues in a nation

Verse 2.

What force or guile could not subdue Thro’ many warlike ages
Is wrought now by a coward few for hireling traitor’s wages
The English steel we could disdain, secure in valour’s station
But English gold has been our bane, such a parcel of rogues in a nation

Verse 3.

O, would, or I had seen the day that treason thus could sell us
My auld grey head had lien in clay wi’ Bruce and loyal Wallace
But pith and power, till my last hour I’ll mak this declaration
We’re bought and sold for English gold, such a parcel of rogues in a nation

The 1956 Suez Crisis – The Special Relationship Stretches in One Direction Only

 

 

 

Eisenhower with Nasser

 

 

 

Lessons from history – The Suez Crisis

Anthony Eden, (Conservative Party) took on the role of Prime Minister of the UK in 1955, shortly after the death of Churchill. His party had a healthy parliamentary majority and for the first year things went well. Problems arose in the course of 1955 when Eden started to suffer from recurring illnesses and many important policies were left to, “Rab Butler” to attend to including forming partnership with other european countries. Rab failed to take up the invitation to meet with, “the europeans” and the chance to be in at the start of the EEC was missed.

 

 

 

At around the same time Colonel Abdul Nasser came to the fore in Eygpt and nationalized the Suez Canal. Eden and the Conservative Party still believed the UK to be one of the World’s great powers, (although the country was skint and up to it’s ears in debt to the USA). Fearing the canal would be closed to Europe, acting together with France and the fledgling state of Israel, Eden ordered the invasion of Egypt taking the Suez Canal back under the control of the UK, France and Israel.

The invasion was costly. Eden, seeking support from the, “special relationship” was shocked to be informed that the USA would not aid the UK. Instead, giving support to the United Nations, (who had ordered the UK to withdraw from Egypt) the USA threatened to impose aid, trade and financial sanctions on the UK. UK forces withdrew from Egypt within days. In a later parliamentary inquiry Eden admitted lying to Parliament and to ordering civil servants to destroy anything that might provide evidence of the conspiracy he had entered into with France and Israel. He was forced to resign not long after.

 

 

 

Eisenhower threatened to bankrupt Britain unless it complied with US intructions and withdraw from Suez immediately

Harold Macmillan and President Dwight Eisenhower

 

 

 

Harold Macmillan, (supermac) took over the Party and limiting damage, set about modernising the country, increasing living standards, putting, “the pound in the pocket of the working man”. His 1959 electoral boast was, “You’ve never had it so good”. The Conservative party increased its majority in the General Election. The Suez fiasco was erased from history, (almost). Eden might have avoided disgrace had he heeded the content of the extract from Harold Macmillan’s diaries from September 27th 1952. The Special Relationship:

“We are threatened by the Americans with a mixture of patronizing pity and contempt. They treat us worse than they do any other country in Europe. They undermine our political influence all over the world. They really are a strange people. Perhaps the mistake we made is to continue to regard them as an Anglo-Saxon people. That blood is very much watered down. Now they are a Latin-Slav mixture with a fair amount of German and Irish. They are impatient, mercurial and panicky.”

 

John F Kennedy & Harold mcMillan

 

 

Fast forward from 1956 to 2003. Change the headline name to Blair then change Suez Canal to Iraq and you have history repeated. Oh!! one difference this time the USA assisted by the, “puppy dog UK” invaded a middle east country and created chaos resulting in the deaths of in excess of 650,000 Iragi’s and 5000 USA/UK servicemen and women, (casualties an additional 30,000+. Just what gave Blair & Bush cause to wreak such horror on nations?

1. Eden & Blair, both Westminster Prime Ministers, sent UK armed forces to invade a middle eastern country, having lied to Parliament, to gather support to their decision. Many Scottish soldiers were wounded, maimed and died. Independence will allow our parliament to decide when it is right to commit our armed forces to war.

2.The, “special relationship” quoted by, Blair, Brown, Cameron, Obama and Clinton is a myth since it implies mutual support. At the time of Suez the USA ordered Eden to withdraw UK armed forces from Egypt within 48 hours or suffer sanctions, withdrawal of financial support and other restrictions.

3. The, “special relationship” enjoyed a rebirth, through Blair & Bush, so that they would be able, (through emotional blackmail) to garner support of the UK public for invasion of Iraq. When the strategy failed the, “Weapons of Mass Destruction” story was concocted.

4. The so called “Special Relationship” is more astutely described by, Harold “Supermac” McMillan. Additionally, since that time the population of the USA is markedly changed. There are more citizens of Spanish, Asian and Indian descent than white Anglo Saxons. Gives substance to my view that there is no, “special relationship”. There never was.

5. Recent, “staged” press conference statements, (blatantly organized by Cameron) in support of the, “no” campaign by, Obama and Clinton should be treated by the UK public with contempt.

 

 

 

Lessons from History.

1. The, “Special Relationship” is easy to explain. The UK supports the USA.

2. Westminster politicians are well versed in the matter of being, “economical with the truth”. Remember Thatchers representative’s performance in Australia at the time she sought to block diary revelations damaging to the Conservative Party?

3. Committing UK forces to war, on a lie is commonplace in Westminster.

Vote, “Yes” to independence in September free Scotland from the sickness that is Westminster.

Living in the East End of Glasgow in the 1940’s

Living in the East End of Glasgow in the 1940’s

My first brush with the politics of Glasgow came in July 1946. I was a teenager, living, with my family, in a single end in Kent Street, Calton. Myself and two of my friends were returning from a Socialist Party political meeting being held on, “the Green”. Speakers had been extolling the benefits of a new, “inclusive post war nation”.

My mate had been given a leaflet on which was printed the words of the, “Red Flag”. He insisted on singing the song as we entered the, “Gallowgate” and proceeded up the road towards Kent Street. I noted two, “Bobbies” on the other side of the street, standing near to, “the Sari Heid” and told him to stop singing so as to avoid trouble. We still got it. A gang of, “Billy Boys” steamed out of, “Doo-Hill Road” shouting, “Communist Bastards” and gave us a severe beating. The policemen, (who witnessed the incident) did not come to our assistance. We managed to get back to my place and cleaned up.

Later, my father, (a committed communist) offered the reason we were beaten up was most likely my mate’s singing since there were very strong links between, (the Scottish Protestant League), (the Billy Boys), (the Police), (the Orange Order) and the Tories. He went on to say that the only way to bring about change, improving housing, health and wealth and gaining full employment was for, “oor sort” to stick together and gain power through the, “ballot box”. From that time, (the bulk of Roman Catholic Glasgwegians have voted Labour). My father was right, from 1945 -to date, through the ballot box, the Glasgow electorate has been committed to, (a contract of care) under control of the, “Labour Party”.

When Glasgow was declared host to the 2014 Commonwealth Games the urgent need for new sports facilities, accommodation, removal and redevelopment of run down parts of the east end of the city, (where the bulk of Roman Catholics live) exposed a disgraceful lack of progress, over 70 years, under the auspices of Labour councils that had been returned to power unchallenged. Poor health continues to plague families. Early death, (55y) is the sad fate of many Glasgow Eastenders. Poverty is rife. Unemployment remains higher than the national average and housing stock is run-down.

Labour Councillors have also, (through a litany of dodgy deals enhancing their personal finances) brought ridicule and anger upon themselves and their offices in Glasgow District Council and the Labour Party. Deals since exposed and banned by the Scottish National Party Government. The referendum provides opportunity for change. I know it will be difficult for Roman Catholics in the East End of Glasgow to vote other than Labour. But there is an alternative. Vote, “Yes” in the independence referendum. In our country, freed from the excesses of the past it will be possible to elect Councillors who will work for their constituents not themselves or the Labour Party in England.