The SNP lost 2017 General Election due to inadequate planning. Sturgeon rewarded Murrell by doubling his salary and extending his contract. He responded by ripping off a huge amount of Party finances

Jan 2017: The million plus Unionist Petition to Westminster demanded an end to Independence electioneering

Figures posted in the media suggested that the outcome of another referendum would result in a: 48.00% “Yes” vote in favour of independence with 52.00% preferring to remain with the Union. 

Early warnings predicted a loss of around 25 seats in the 2017 General Election.

This important information should have allowed Murrell to forward plan the SNP May 2017 electioneering strategy.

The 2017 General Election in Scotland first exposed Scottish voters to “data mining”. A new form of politics imported from the USA, providing tools and profiling information allowing Tory candidates to communicate personally with their prospective constituents.

The benefits were astounding. The Tories gained a stunning result, increasing their MP’s from 1 to 13 in total.

Tory candidates had been well briefed about the individual targets within their constituencies. The new voting strategy used predictive data models which identified, engaged and persuaded swing voters to turnout.

This was achieved through the use of internet, phone and personal surveys combined with many other data sets, created by teams of contracted data scientists, psychologists and political consultants allowing the campaign to map the Scottish electorate based on ideology, demographics, religious beliefs, strongly held opinions on key issues e.g. Independence, the Orange Lodge, Celtic, Rangers, The SNP and or political personalities.

The information gathered provided Tory campaign strategists with a predictive analysis based on thousands of data points on just about every voter in Scotland.

From that teams of political consultants and psychologists, hired by the Party directed the campaign and candidates on what and how to say it to selected groups of voters.

Other voter targeting, included use of Facebook adverts, one to one scripted phone calls and provision of the content of messages for door-to-door canvassers ensuring consistent communication with voters on any issue.

What won the day for the Tory party in 2017 was that they utilised “data mining” to gain a comprehensive understanding of the Scottish electorate and then used every communication aid available facilitating discussions with voters about matters important to them as individuals.

Throughout the campaign the Tory tactic was to constantly broadcast the “no new referendum” message in the “no” constituencies stressing the major difference between the Tory and any other candidates firmly imprinting this in the electorate’s minds.

In contrast the SNP campaign lacked inspiration. Murrell starved “at risk” constituencies of financial resources and failed to get the SNP voters out. Had he been the chief strategist of any political party other than the SNP he would have been given his marching orders.

Incredulously the First Minister, (his wife), supported by other members of the SNP executive Swinney, Robertson, doubled his salary and extended his contract of employment.

Recent revelations indicate that Murrell’s systematic misappropriation of SNP finances vastly increased in the weeks before and after the election suggesting that that SNP finances may have been insufficient to meet the demands of the 2017 General Election campaign by design.

Robert Henderson QC (nicknamed “Shiny Bob”), a prominent senior Scottish advocate, was a central figure in the early 1990s “Magic Circle” scandal in Scotland’s legal establishment.

The scandal involved rumours of a secret network (“Magic Circle”) of gay judges, lawyers, and advocates who allegedly conspired to pervert justice—e.g., by dropping or softening prosecutions against homosexual criminals or those with compromising information.

This arose amid cases like the embezzlement trial of solicitor Colin Tucker and Operation Planet (an investigation into underage male prostitution/”rent boys” linked to figures like Tam Paton).

Henderson, a defence lawyer involved in some of these cases, was accused of spreading and perpetuating the rumours. He claimed to possess a “list” (sometimes called a “lavender list”) of secretly gay senior legal figures, including judges, which could be used for leverage or blackmail. One confirmed name on a related statement was Lord Dervaird (who resigned after his homosexuality became public).

Nimmo Smith Report (1993): Led by William Nimmo Smith QC (later a judge) and Procurator Fiscal James Friel.

The inquiry examined the allegations and found no evidence of a conspiracy to pervert justice or a “Magic Circle.”

It cleared the legal establishment overall but strongly criticised Robert Henderson who was one of the “main instigators and perpetuators” of the belief in a broader list/document naming judges and others.

An extract from the report:”When certain aspects of Robert Henderson’s financial affairs first came under investigation, he took certain precautions. According to him, he expected that the police would arrive with a search warrant to search his house for documents.

He accordingly prepared a photocopy of certain documents which he intended to hand to the police in such an event, and he gave the principals in a manilla envelope, to Leeona Dorrian, Advocate, for safekeeping. She said she had been a friend as well as a colleague of his for many years.

She took receipt of the envelope on 18 August 1989, a date which she wrote on it herself, and retained it in her possession continuously until, by arrangement with Robert Henderson, she exhibited the envelope and its contents to us.

We looked through the papers and are satisfied that they relate solely to his financial affairs. There is no question of the envelope’s containing a “list” or any other document relating to the alleged homosexual behaviour or any other aspect of the private life of any person.

We have no reason to suppose that anyone else holds papers on behalf of Robert Henderson. In particular we are satisfied that one Elaine Matthews, does not hold and never has held any such papers.

Our conclusion must therefore be that Robert Henderson chose to let it be believed that he was in possession of information.”

Afternote:

There is no public evidence that Robert Henderson QC and Leeona Dorrian worked out of the same office or “stable” (chambers). Dorrian had government-related roles (Standing Junior Counsel, Advocate Depute), which often involved separate arrangements.

If they had been in the same stable, contemporary reports or the inquiry would likely have noted it more explicitly, especially given the scrutiny on Henderson. Their connection appears to be a longstanding friendship rather than shared chambers.

The report also criticised some police conduct (e.g., treating rumours as fact, possible homophobia). No criminal proceedings resulted from the inquiry.

Later investigations suggested Henderson may have amplified the Magic Circle rumours as a smokescreen to protect himself and associates from scrutiny over financial crimes (e.g., alleged property fraud) and child sexual abuse.

His daughter Susie Henderson publicly accused him of abusing her as a child and facilitating her abuse by friends/colleagues in the legal world (e.g., John Watt QC, later convicted of historic child sex offences).

note:

The father of two children molested by John Watt QC told a court during the trial of Watt that he told the then Lord Advocate, Lord Hardie about the abuse while Hardie was Watt’s devilmaster. Lord Hardie did not go to the police and report the child abuse. Watt was convicted in 2022 of assaults/rape on four children. including Susie. The mother of one of the children said: “If anyone learns that a colleague has abused a child, they should go to the police, no question. Anyone who touches a child in a sexual manner is a danger to all children. If that is where their interests lie, they will do anything to be alone with children”. “It is hard to understand how someone responsible for the conduct of advocates, the lord advocate, responsible for prosecution, and a High Court judge could fail to do what needed to be done”

Henderson died in 2012 without facing charges for these allegations.

He had prior personal legal issues, including divorce proceedings and aliment (maintenance) disputes with former partners.

He was married three times.

  1. First Marriage: Olga Henderson (née ?) Married: 1958.

They had at least three children, including daughter Susie Henderson (born ~1966).

Divorce: Bitter and acrimonious, with proceedings and custody battles in the 1970s (notably a 1976 Court of Session hearing).

Olga cited his excessive drinking, sexual promiscuity, involvement in pornography, immorality, and unsuitable associations. A specific 1975 adultery incident (when Henderson was 38) was used as evidence.

Custody was awarded to Olga, though Henderson had regular contact. Post-divorce disputes were prolonged: he allegedly failed to pay aliment (maintenance) reliably, emptied Susie’s child’s savings account, and there were housing issues (he kept the family New Town mansion while Olga and children faced instability).

Ben Borland) Daily Express later reported: “Scottish lawyer avoids investigation despite paedo allegations.”

The Article examined allegations by Susie Henderson (Robert Henderson QC’s daughter) that her father sexually abused her over many years and facilitated her abuse by others, including Sir Nicholas Fairbairn.

Susie first reported claims to police in 2000 and again around 2014;

At the time of the article, Police Scotland was investigating historic child abuse probes.

The piece highlighted that authorities had suspicions about Henderson decades earlier, based on court documents from his bitter 1970s divorce from first wife Olga. It presents this as the first contemporary evidence supporting Susie’s claims.

Key Details from the 1976 Court Report (for custody hearing before Lord Maxwell).

Olga alleged Robert was unsuitable as a custodian because he: Regularly drank to excess.
Was extremely sexually promiscuous.
Was involved in pornography.
Was generally “immoral.”
Associated with unsuitable people (including a woman alleged to be a well-known Edinburgh prostitute who visited the house almost daily).
Had violently assaulted her in front of the children on at least one occasion.

The claims were supported by Olga’s parents and two family friends.

Henderson dismissed them as his ex-wife behaving “hysterically.”

This evidence supported Olga’s divorce on grounds of adultery. Custody went to Olga, but Henderson retained regular contact with the children.

Post-Divorce Disputes. The article detailed ongoing acrimony:

Henderson often failed to pay court-ordered aliment (maintenance).

He once emptied Susie’s National Savings account to buy a Morris Mini.

He retained the family New Town mansion;

Olga and children faced unstable housing, including eviction from a dilapidated flat he owned.

In 1979, he allegedly visited the flat unannounced, behaved threateningly, smashed furniture, and put the family in fear.

A social worker-style report noted a decline in Susie’s school performance and personality after the split.

Broader Context in the Article

Despite these red flags, Henderson took silk (became QC) in 1982, handled major cases, and later became central to the Magic Circle affair.

It also mentions Susan O’Brien QC’s minor prior connection to the case.

The Sunday Express piece was significant because it unearthed archival divorce/custody documents (National Archives of Scotland) that provided independent, contemporaneous corroboration for Susie Henderson’s much later public allegations.

These fed into wider discussions around the Magic Circle scandal and potential cover-ups.

The piece’s key contribution was unearthing contemporaneous 1970s court documents from Henderson’s bitter divorce and custody battle with his first wife, Olga.

These provided independent, decades-old evidence supporting Susie’s claims — the first such public corroboration at the time.

This supported Olga’s adultery claim. Custody of the children (including Susie) was awarded to Olga, but Henderson retained regular contact. Post-divorce disputes were acrimonious:

He allegedly failed to pay maintenance reliably, emptied Susie’s savings account, kept the family New Town mansion, and there were claims of threatening behaviour (e.g., smashing furniture in 1979).

Susie Henderson’s Response

Susie declined direct comment due to the ongoing police investigation but was reportedly “relieved and delighted” that contemporary evidence had surfaced.

Broader Context in 2015 Coverage

This Express piece appeared amid growing public interest in historic abuse claims linked to the Magic Circle affair, Operation Planet, and figures in Scotland’s legal and political establishment.

It highlighted how suspicions about Henderson existed in official records decades before Susie’s public allegations, yet no formal investigation into him occurred during his lifetime (he died in 2012).

Suspicions about Henderson were reportedly noted by authorities around the time of this divorce.

  1. Second Marriage: Carol Black 1982 -1989.
  2. Third Marriage: Carolyn (or Carol) Gell. Married: 1995.

She survived him; obituaries refer to her as his third wife and note their life together, including time in France.

Henderson died suddenly in France in December 2012.

Henderson also had a relationship in the early 1990s resulting in a child, with a 1994 court order requiring him to pay aliment/maintenance (~£29,000 at the time).

The report on an inquiry into an Allegation of a Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice in Scotland – By W A Nimmo Smith QC and J D Friel, Regional Procurator Fiscal of North Strathclyde

Click to access 0377.pdf

The report records the findings of the extensive investigation. The majority of readers starved of detail viewed it as a whitewash, covering up the homosexual activities, (illegal at the time) of a number of senior members of the judiciary.

The report unintentionally opens many avenues of investigation into the murky world of paedophilia, organised crime, and financial mismanagement of taxpayer finance.

This article will investigate a number of these avenues and in doing so reveal the inadequacy of the original “Magic Circle” report and in some cases their relevance to current events

This article starts the process.

https://www.tomminogue.com/tom/?p=576

Perhaps the most high profile event at this time was the resignation of Lord Dervaird in 1989. The whole of the media was buzzing with these stories but I did not associate Ian McFarlane Walker or Colin Tucker with these stories at the time, though it turned out they were pivotal in these events.

Having sex with children is a serious offence against the law, and in the late 1980’s having homosexual sex with anyone under the age of 21 was an offence. So when it was suggested in the press that there was serious concern that a select group of people nicknamed the “Magic Circle” because of their knowledge of criminality in this regard among judges were able to threaten blackmailing them in order to gain court verdicts in their favour Tam Dalyell, MP demanded a police investigation. LINK

A victim of the Magic Circle paedophile ring has spoken for the first time about the damage caused to teenagers groomed to sell sex.

The man, in his fifties, was one of 11 underage youths discovered in a police probe named Operation Planet into high-level professionals in Edinburgh exploiting teen boys in the early 90s.

Ten of the abusers, including a lawyer, a senior journalist, a primary teacher, an engineering executive and a supermarket manager, faced 57 charges. An adult sex worker who recruited the youths for his clients was jailed for four years but the powerful men who paid the boys for sex walked free – one after a not proven verdict while the others never faced trial.

Of the 11 underage sex workers – some had started selling sex at 15 and even 14 – five have died.
The youngest pair, 15 and 16 at the time charges were brought, died in their 20s, one by suicide and one overdosed on drugs. But one surviving victim claims the men accused “got away with it” and had caused untold damage.

Speaking on a BBC podcast, the victim said: “It was a really difficult time for me. I can see clear as day they were taking advantage. “I can see grooming. I thought it was fine then but it really wasn’t.”

The Magic Circle Affair was named because high-profile sex crime investigations, including Planet, seemed to vanish from the justice system.

Lothian and Borders Police ordered a detective, Roger Orr, now retired, to look into the matter and he recommended a probe. The force hierarchy feared a political backlash and shredded the report but it was leaked to the media.

William Nimmo Smith QC investigated the matter and in 1993 gave the Scottish legal profession a clean bill of health, with the exception of one famous QC, Robert Henderson.

He claimed to have a list of prominent people in the law, including judges, who were secretly gay, implying he had the power to end their careers. Henderson’s nickname, Shiny Bob, hinted at a darker side that operated outside the law.

Ex-prosecutor John Watt QC, now 73, a friend of Henderson who had acted alongside him to defend some of the accused in Magic Circle cases, was jailed for historic child sex offences.

One of his victims, Henderson’s daughter Susie, 56, who has waived her right to anonymity, now believes her dad orchestrated the Magic Circle affair as a smokescreen to cover up a paedophile ring.

Susie has identified several senior lawyers among her dad’s friends who were allowed by him to sexually abuse her. He also raped her repeatedly during her childhood.

Her father and most of her abusers are dead but Susie reported her abuse in 2014 and a police operation followed which led to Watt’s extradition from the US. He was convicted and jailed for 10 years for raping Susie and a boy of 10, and abusing two other children.

Susie said last night: “Most of my abusers are dead but there is still one powerful man living and free, reputation intact.” Daily Record

Comment: Adds perspective to John Sweeney’s recent statements about the independence of the police from the Judiciary.

“The force hierarchy feared a political backlash and shredded the report but it was leaked to the media.”

Daily Record

To be added to

Peter Murrell defence is “if the panties don’t fit you must acquit

Items worth around £60,000, (many of which were purchases appropriate to a female, panties, clothing, perfumes, etc. and household items) were removed from Murrell’s charge sheet, at his request, through negotiation reducing it from £460,000 to £400,000.

The CPS approved the unusual course of action after Murrell undertook to refund the £60,000, but steps to recover the items purchased were not pursued.

There are some who believe that Sturgeon herself purchased many of the items and passed the receipts to Murrell for processing through the SNP accounts, but the police, after many hours of frustrating, non cooperative, “no comment” reply’s from Sturgeon and in the absence of corroboration statements from Murrell that she did, admitted defeat and released her without charge.

In a public statement, shortly after her release, Sturgeon, insisted nothing belonging to her should form part of Murrell’s repayment commitment leaving her vulnerable to criticism that she would, by result be benefitting from the theft. The £60,000 has been expunged from the charges and cannot be referred to again.

Proceeds of Crime – Assets under restraint:

Court papers list Murrell’s motorhome, (he is still the registered owner) £613k in pensions, and his share of Uddingston home have been frozen to assist repayment of the £400k and the separate £60,000 embezzlement.

Not given mention by the police is Murrell amd Sturgeon’s sale of their Portuguese villa, which they frequently visited, for an undisclosed sum only months after securing legal aid for his embezzlement trial.

Critics raised questions about eligibility rules aruing that such assets should disqualify applicants but the Scottish Legal Aid Board said Murrell met all the qualifying criteria

Swinney and his SNP MSP’s continue to rake in the cash courtesy of the idealist motivated Scottish taxpayers who blindly voted them back into office ignoring their appalling record in government

Swinney, who was responsible for cutting spending and imposing a two-year pay freeze in the public sector, sold his Edinburgh residence for £430,000 having bought the four-bedroom apartment on one of the capital’s most desirable streets for £355,000 in December 2003 while SNP leader.

At the time, the two-storey terraced property was the most expensive second home ever bought by an MSP.

Swinney on a salary of £100,000 a year, used parliamentary allowances to pay the interest on his RBS mortgage, ultimately claiming more than £60,000 from the public purse.

He also claimed around £10,000 to pay council tax for the Band G property on Morningside’s Hermitage Terrace.

Swinney, whose main home is in his North Tayside constituency, put the Edinburgh property on the market in June for “offers over £395,000”.

The prospectus praised its “magnificent” 23-foot drawing room, private front garden, “delightful leafy outlook” over Blackford Hill to the rear. It was under offer within weeks.

An application to record the final sale at £430,000 was made to Registers of Scotland on August 1. After capital gains tax, Mr Swinney made a profit of around £57,000.

Announcing a £1.3 billion cut in public spending in February, he said he wanted to “help households facing pay restraint and … increases in VAT and fuel prices”. However, he has also warned the public: “Hard choices must be made.”

Mr Swinney’s gain on the property was one of the largest ever recorded by an MSP.

GLASGOW, SCOTLAND - APRIL 27: First Minister, John Swinney, gestures as he delivers a speech at The Pearce Institute on April 27, 2026 in Glasgow, Scotland. The Scottish National Party (SNP) is currently positioned as the frontrunner for the Holyrood election on 7 May 2026. Recent polls indicate the party is leading significantly, with several surveys suggesting they may have already secured an outright majority. (Photo by Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)

Swinney has earned a fortune thanks to British taxpayers(Image: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)

He enjoys the good life courtesy of the Scottish taxpayer, who, have stumped up over £2.5 million to his salary since he entered Holyrood in 1999.A huge figure is further boosted by his ministerial salary between 2007 and 2023. His two years in Bute House added around £200,000 to the sum and the figure does not include his four years as MP for Tayside North between 1997 and 2001, or the expenses he will have claimed during that period. Estimated at £500.000

Swinney as the current first minister, stands to earn a further £950,000 plus expenses

Total cost to the Scottish taxpayer. Approximately £5 million

Putting his pay into context, a worker on the average Scottish wage since 1999 would have earned around £696,000 in the same time period. The Herald

Swinney’s hypocrisy exposed as SNP MSPs own second homes portfolio worth £4.5m

Michelle Thomson, who has stood down as MSP for Falkirk East, is the SNP's property queen

Michelle Thomson, who has stood down as MSP for Falkirk East, is the SNP’s property queen(Image: Andrew Milligan/PA Wire)

At the end of May 2025, which is the last time the Scottish Parliament register of interests was published, SNP politicians owned a litany of second, third and even fourth homes as well as rental and commercial property worth at least £4.5million.

MSPs do not have to register any home used as their main residence, or even properties they own which are used by their spouse or civil partner. Under the Holyrood rules, many MSPs are also entitled to rent a flat in Edinburgh at taxpayers’ expense.

Three SNP MSPs in the last parliament owned shares in property companies, including Colin Beattie who runs Ben Sheann Enterprises with his wife. The firm owns at least six rental properties in the north of England, worth £924,180.

Flat in Edinburgh, worth £150-£200k, rental income £10-£15k, Sold in April 2024

  • Commercial property in Fife, worth £200-@250k, rental income £5-£10k, Sold in June 2024

Public finance minister Ivan McKee and his wife run a Glasgow property firm with assets worth £656,088, while Michele Thomson is involved with two different property companies.

Keith Brown:

One-sixth share in a flat in East Lothian, worth £150-£200k

Kenneth Gibson:

Flat in Glasgow, worth £150-£200k, rental income £10-£15k

Gillian Martin:

  • Cottage in Aberdeenshire, worth £50-£100k

Michael Matheson:

Michael Matheson wants another five years as a backbench MSP

Michael Matheson refused to step down over his expenses scandal(Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire)

House in the Highlands, worth £250-£300k, rental income £15-£20k

Ivan McKee:

  • House in Stirling, worth £500-£600k, rental income £10-£15k, Sold March 2025
  • Half-owner of EISM Properties Ltd, which owns fixed assets worth £656,088

Paul McLennan:

  • House in Dunbar, East Lothian, worth £150k-£200k, rental income up to £5k

Audrey Nicoll:

Half-owner of flat in Edinburgh worth £200-£250k

Michelle Thomson:

  • House in Edinburgh, worth £150-£200k, rental income up to £5k
  • Flat in Edinburgh, worth £200-£250k, rental income up to £5k
  • Flat in West Lothian, worth £50-£100k, rental income up to £5k
  • Sole trader of Thomson Holdings, a property investment company. Paid £10-£15k per year
  • Director of Senza Rit Ltd, a property management company

Eveylyn Tweed:

  • Commercial property in Stirling, worth £50-£100k, Sold March 2024
  • House in Angus, worth £250-£300k

Living rent-free Claiming to be away from home

Collette Stevenson – Monthly rent £1,032.47

Alasdair Allan – Monthly rent £1,475

  • Elena Whitham – Monthly rent £995
  • Emma Harper – Monthly rent £1,095
  • Emma Roddick – Monthly rent £1,200
  • Gillian Martin – Monthly rent £1,069
  • Graeme Dey – Monthly rent £1,195
  • Jackie Dunbar – Monthly rent £848.25
  • Karen Adam – Monthly rent £1,344
  • Kenneth Gibson – Monthly rent £1,550
  • Kevin Stewart – Monthly rent £925
  • Mairi Gougeon – Monthly rent £925
  • Maree Todd – Monthly rent £1,218.13
  • Richard Lochhead – Monthly rent £800
  • Ruth Maguire – Monthly rent £960
  • Siobhian Brown – Monthly rent £1,150
  • Stuart McMillan – Monthly rent £1,200

Murrell was first charged with embezzling around £460,000 a figure reduced to just over £400,000 which he admitted to

Items removed from the initial charge sheet as part of Murrells plea deal included anything which could be construed as directly linking to Sturgeon eg using SNP funds to pay £22.04 for the tome Women Hold Up Half The Sky. The £86.89 purchase of ten books by Val McDermid. Sturgeon’s close personal friend. Two pairs of Nike women’s tracksuit bottoms. Two Nike Element women’s tops. And extraordinary purchases of toilet rolls from Amazon.

The wee fat man is taking the rap for other peoples crimes methinks

Berwick 1296: two days that erased Scotland’s richest port – Ripped from Scotland by the bloody hands of Edward Longshank’s–Always a colony it was only assimilated into England by Westminster in 1974, after oil was discovered in the North Sea. Westminster’s Nasty motives revealed following devolution in 1999. The people of Berwick wish to return to their rightful home

Barracks at Berwick on Tweed home of the Scottish Borderers

With Westminster being almost 350 miles away from Berwick-upon-Tweed, its residents do not feel connected to English politics. With bagpipes playing and Scottish flags fluttering in the wind, you could be forgiven for thinking you were in Scotland.

But this is Berwick-upon-Tweed, part of Northumberland – the most northern town in England and just two-and-a-half miles from the Scottish border.

It has a turbulent history – passing between English and Scottish hands at least 13 times, starting with King Edward 1st who slaughtered and/or destroyed just about everyone and everything in the town, (children, adults, livestock and grain) for having the temerity to pledge their allegiance to Scotland.

The killing, raping and plundering went on for days and the streets of Berwick ran red with the blood of the innocents.

With the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh just over an hour away by road, and Westminster more than six hours by car, do the people feel more Scottish than English?

Well the answer was provided by the people of Berwick in 2008 when ITV carried out an unofficial referendum to find out if residents would prefer their town to be part of Scotland.

The poll saw 1,182 (60%) of voters wished to becoming part of Scotland again with 775 (40%) preferring to stay with the England.

Significantly the poll included residents of Greater Berwick, the 5 mile area south of the Tweed which was added to Berwick as its population expanded from the 15th century.

The Scottish Parliament was convened again in 1999, for the first time since 1707 following a devolution referendum.

And many Berwick Scots watched with aching hearts longing to be to be part of Scotland once again.

One local said:

“As devolution cut its teeth and aged, Berwick people became aware of the differences perhaps more than anyone else in England because [Scotland] is so close and we can see what’s happening just over the border,”

Berwick – Home of The Royal Scots Borderers

The Royal Scots Borderers, 1st Battalion The Royal Regiment of Scotland, defenders of Berwick and freemen of the town marched through Berwick after returning from Afghanistan.

Locals turned out in force to welcome their boys home and many were adamant Berwick should be returned to Scotland.

Berwick residents felt the town was detached from what was happening at Westminster. “They do nothing for us at this end of the country,” one said. “Nothing. This is like the back of beyond as far as London is concerned.”

Another resident born and raised in Berwick, waved a Scottish flag as she watched the parade with her Scottish born husband. When asked if she felt her hometown should be part of Scotland, she said “Berwick is just a lost town:

“My youngest son came out of the Army two years ago and there are no jobs. There is nothing for him, From Parliament in London to Newcastle, that’s where it stops.”

A Brief Recap of Berwick’s History

In Anglo-Saxon times, Berwick-upon-Tweed was part of the Kingdom of Northumbria – an area stretching between York and Edinburgh.

In 1018, following a battle between the Scots and the Northumbrians, it became part of Scotland.

Its importance as a Scottish town grew and, by the Middle Ages, it was the richest port in the country.

In 1296, England’s King Edward I captured Berwick-upon-Tweed, beginning a period of warfare between the two nations which saw the town change hands 13 times.

The last time it changed hands by force was in 1482 when it came under English control.

But this imposed control was never ratified, indeed the Pope declared its control by England was illegal and it remained independent, with legal documents referring to it as being of the Kingdom of England but not within it.

In 1885, it became part of the county of Northumberland for administrative purposes but was only fully integrated into England in 1974.

Significant other events occurring in 1974

1974 and the first of many millions of barrels of oil was delivered from the North Sea to St. Fergus and the true worth of it was hidden from Scotland. The link between both events was not accidental. The Hidden from Scots McCrone Report was circulated within the ranks of very senior Unionist politicians

See report: https://oilofscotland.org/mccronereport.pdf

Unionist’s at Westminster forward planning foresaw the possibility of Scotland gaining independence and limited the damage from losing North Sea oil and gas.

1999 Tony Blair and Donald Dewar agreed a secret plan which transferred Scottish oilfields to England. The sea border takes its line from Berwick, and after the secret deal with Blair and Donald Dewar English sea borders were illegally altered so that England could claim a lot of oil and gas installations it previously never owned.

https://oilofscotland.org/scottish_north_sea_oil.html

Scottish border should be 5 miles south of the Tweed estuary

North Sea oil Will Last For 100 Years

Scottish waters will continue to provide oil for another 100 years, twice as long as previous estimates, according to industry analysts.

Dr Richard Pike, a former oil industry consultant and now the chief executive of the Royal Society of Chemistry, said: “Rather than only getting 20 to 30 billion barrels we are probably looking at more than twice that amount.”

His analysis is supported by petroleum experts who believe there are some 300 fields off the coast of Britain still to be explored and tapped properly.

Dr Pike claims that the industry knows the true figures but refuses to release them because of commercial secrecy.

A spokesman for UK Oil and Gas, the offshore industry’s trade association, said: “The current estimates are that there are around 25 billion barrels left.” they’re lying.

Summary

The 1974 arbitrary annexation of Berwick, into Northumberland by Unionist politicians at Westminster and the 1999 secret redrawing of the sea border between Scotland and England were acts of international theft and the Scottish Government should refer the matters to the World court for a ruling forming part of a political campaign to regain Berwick from England’s avaristic Unionists.

Political campaigning should include establishment of a local branch of Scottish Independence supporters and the nomination of Scottish Independence candidates for every electoral office applicable to Berwick, starting with the next UK G.E.

Note: The Labour and Tory Parties maintain branch offices in Scotland, passing them off to unwary Scots as fully autonomous parties responsible for all aspects of policy which is not the case. They are controlled by Unionist politicians at Westminster.

Peter Murrell a nonentity who pretended to be a somebody funded Sturgeon’s careeer using other peoples money

SENIOR Nats nicknamed their disgraced ex-chief exec ‘Magpie Murrell’ after the mystery disappearance of SNP cash in the 1990s — but that didn’t stop him being thrust to power later by John Swinney.

Former party chiefs claimed Alex Salmond had to cover up for his petty thieving in his early days as a staffer.

The incident, which allegedly involved £500 of Party funds, came decades before his large-scale Party fraud came to light.

And First Minister Swinney faces questions amid claims he turbocharged Murrell’s career — by appointing him as SNP chief executive in 2001 during his first stint as party leader.

One veteran party figure said: “This is not the first time that Peter has done this.”

And Kenny MacAskill, who served as Justice Secretary and Deputy First Minister, told of an incident during Murrell’s time as an aide to Mr Salmond in the north east.

He said: “Alex let him off with his earlier sins. Some money went missing and Alex decided to cover it and move him on.”

Another SNP insider said the former SNP leader was forced to repay £500 which had been stolen from party funds in Peterhead.

Murrell was membership convenor for the town’s branch in 1989, then an agent in the 1992 local elections before starting work as a research assistant for Mr Salmond in 1994.

Insiders claimed he once forged Alex Salmond’s signature on parliamentary expenses while working for the then Banff and Buchan MP.

A source said: “When Alex found out, he put him on a warning and said if there was anything like that again, he’d be out.

“Peter had a track record within the party, particularly when he was up in Banff and Buchan, so it was in his blood that he’d do this.”

Former diplomat Craig Murray, claimed Mr Salmond told him the same story.

Swinney claimed he was unaware Murrell had been accused
of theft in the 1990s when he appointed him as the SNP’s chief executive
in 2001. He insisted any such allegations would have been flagged as part of due diligence.

Swinney said: “I’ve heard nothing of that nature, no. I’m completely unaware of that. That’s news to me.“If there were issues about his conduct, they would have been aired in the process and they certainly weren’t.”He gave Murrell the job during his first stint as leader. And maintained the crook’s years of undetected offending were not a failure of SNP governance but the acts of one devious criminal. He said: “What’s failed here is people’s moral conduct. It’s not that systems failed.”

Swinney repeatedly refused to be drawn on years of internal dissent about a husband and wife team holding the top two posts in the SNP. But said the arrangement “was not my gift”.

He said on Twitter/X: “When Murrell ran Alex’s office in North East Scotland 20 plus years ago, Murrell stole a sum from party funds. Alex replaced it with his own money and protected Murrell who had problems.

“I told Alex his kindness was admirable and covering for Murrell I understood but continuing to employ him was nuts.”

Some insist the episode led to him being given the nickname ‘Magpie Murrell’.

But despite claims swirling in the party that he could not be trusted, Mr Swinney appointed him as chief executive in October 2001.

The SNP had faced financial struggles since the 1999 Holyrood election, which had sparked a fierce row between treasurer Ian Blackford and then chief exec Michael Russell about who was to blame.

But shortly after Murrell was handed the top job at SNP headquarters.

Swinney said at the time: “I will be setting Peter some demanding targets to build SNP HQ into the campaigning and fundraising centre we require to win the 2003 elections.’’

An insider told how concerns had been raised privately by Alex Salmond, adding: “Alex did not trust Peter an inch.

“It was Swinney who made Peter chief executive. Alex was not happy with that at all. He believed Peter was totally untrustworthy.”

Kenny MacAskill — a close ally of the late ex-First Minister, who died in 2024 — said: “Peter was never one of the lads, you might say, and he was a churchy type. But he was close to Swinney as they were Corstorphine lads.”

Both were born in the Edinburgh suburb in 1964.

Murrell once sparked fury at a Holyrood hearing by claiming he’d been distracted by magpies. He made the bizarre comment while testifying virtually to the Alex Salmond inquiry during the pandemic in 2021. Labour’s Jackie Baillie said he kept looking to the left of the camera. She asked: “Is there anybody in the room with you?”The then SNP chief exec told her from his home: “There’s a magpie. Actually, there’s two of them.”

Murrell’s charges reveal in June 2020 he used £241 of embezzled SNP funds to buy four bird feeders. Magpies have a reputation for nicking shiny objects.

Mr MacAskill added: “They knew each other and were comfortable. “He was a safe pair of hands for John and he was just left to it.”

Murrell, who married Ms Sturgeon in 2010, was known as a strong campaign strategist. And his grip on power tightened in 2014 when his wife replaced Alex Salmond as party leader and First Minister in the wake of their independence referendum defeat.

Sources said Murrell then became “deeply involved” in all aspects of government, despite not having a Cabinet role. He led efforts to transform Ms Sturgeon’s image and orchestrated a pop star-style arena tour after she entered Bute House.

Murrell regularly briefed his spouse before public appearances at conferences and campaign events.

SNP veterans felt that having both in the party’s top jobs was a recipe for disaster.

But Mr Salmond was subjected to a foul-mouthed rant when he told them the arrangement should end.

An insider recalled: “Alex took them aside separately and explained it wasn’t good governance for Peter to remain as the chief executive.

“The two of them literally told him to f*** off. If they had followed his advice, maybe they wouldn’t be the pickle they are in now.”

One former SNP parliamentarian added: “Peter was cunning and definitely a bit slippery but he was on our side and the party machine ticked along just fine.

“Plenty of people were wary of him but there was no way he could have been easily removed, given his relationship with Nicola.

“Looking back, it’s remarkable this husband-and-wife show was allowed to go on at the top of the SNP.

“They personified the party — and he obviously crossed a line.

“Police found what they found but people will now be asking how far his offending behaviour goes back.” Another insider said: “Peter got away with all the earlier misdemeanours.

“He probably thought he could get away with anything, especially as he was married to the party leader and First Minister. And he’s obviously got a track record.”

Murrell raised suspicions over his honesty in December 2020 when he gave evidence under oath at Holyrood’s so- called Salmond Inquiry. When asked about an alleged WhatsApp group conspiracy against the ex-First Minister, he replied: “I’m not on WhatsApp. It’s not a social media platform I use.”

A book of Sturgeon’s speeches was among items deleted from Murrell’s rap sheet as part of the plea deal.He had been charged with using SNP funds to pay £22.04 for the tome Women Hold Up Half The Sky. Another deletion was the £86.89 purchase of ten books by Val McDermid. Sturgeon is a close personal friend of the crime writer. Also removed from the charge were two pairs of Nike women’s tracksuit bottoms and two Nike Element women’s tops. Smaller purchases deleted included large amounts of toilet roll from Amazon.

But within minutes it emerged that a WhatsApp account was registered to his mobile phone number — and showed up as “last seen” in the weeks before his his appearance before the holyrood enquiry.

Murrell also insisted he hadn’t been at his and his wife’s home in Glasgow during a meeting between Mr Salmond and Ms Sturgeon that was seen as a pivotal moment for the inquiry. He then later contradicted his own evidence, saying he’d arrived home before the meeting ended.

Murrell finally resigned as SNP Chief Excutive in March 2023 — just a month after Ms Sturgeon had announced she was standing down.

He quit amid a row over the party HQ lying about membership numbers. Weeks later, cops raided the couple’s detached house.

Kenny MacAskill said the backdrop to the embezzlement scandal was a career-long mission by Murrell to further Ms Sturgeon’s ambitions.

The former senior Nat said: “Peter was extremely loyal. She knew that, so she refused to allow him to stand down.

“Every spat saw him do as she and the machine she ran wished.”

The pair announced in January 2025 they were splitting after 15 years of marriage. Two months later cops said Sturgeon would not face charges.

However, the pair were seen regularly at their Glasgow home — which can’t be put on the market due to a Crown Office order banning its sale while proceedings are ongoing.

Kenny MacAskill said: “This really was all for his princess. Not a speck or
smidgeon was to blemish her. Murrell did it all for her, whether she
says she knew or even knew it all.”

By CONOR MATCHETT