Lord Howell, former Tory Energy Secretary and father-in-law of the Chancellor, George Osborne, said that there were, “justified worries” about, “fracking” a method of extracting shale oil and gas and that this should not be inflicted on the “beautiful” South. But he offered a way forward stating, “there are large uninhabited and desolate areas, certainly up in the North East, where there’s plenty of room for fracking well away from anyone’s residence… without any kind of threat to the rural environment.” Recognising his close affinity with his Son-in-law it might be he is foretelling the future of the North East.
The 1707 Act of Union, Scotland & England (A Recap)
The 1707 Act of Union, (A Recap)
Although ruled by one monarch, (from 1603 – 1707) England & Scotland remained to be separate countries, each with their own Parliament’s. There continued to exist a deep seated lack of trust between the 2 Nations. The Scots were fearful, (reflecting on the fate of the Welsh Nation 400 years before) that joining with England would, (in time) bring about the demise of Scotland, rendering it a, “region” of England. Always to the forefront of their thought’s, the English were consumed by fear that the Scot’s might, once again join in an alliance with the Roman Catholic French. It was crucial that the much feared, “Scottish Army” did not join with the French.
Subsequent to his death, in exile, in France, of the Roman Catholic, Charles 11 his Roman Catholic brother James 11 inherited the throne. He was a disaster, favouring Roman Catholic over Protestant. A, “fed up” English establishment secretly invited, the Dutch warlord, William of Orange to seize the throne saving England from the, “Romans” He willingly accepted and came to England supported by a substantial Dutch force. William engaged and defeated James in battle in Ireland and was crowned King William 111.
Enjoying the confidence of the newly crowned King, the Scotsman, “William Paterson” a worldly traveller who had made a substantial fortune through trade persuaded King William to create a , “Bank” to be supported by gold held in a central vault in London. William was an astute man with a long history of plotting, duplicity and deviousness and in 1694 he issued a decree requiring all gold deposits, (held by goldsmiths) in England to be given up, in exchange for notes and coinage, to a newly formed, “Bank of England”. With the gold safely under it’s control the, “Bank of England” printed notes and minted coinage far in excess of the gold reserves. In a very short period of time the, “Bank of England” became a very powerful banking force.
Building upon his success, “William Paterson” then convinced King William and the, “Bank of England” to jointly finance settlement and colonisation of ports in the, “Indus of Panama”. A successful venture which would reduce shipping times to the financially lucrative, “Far East” market by half. Eager to be in favour of the Scot’s, King William authorised the creation and funding of the, “Company of Scotland”. The board of directors were to be equally comprised of English and Scot’s. Financial and any other risks would be borne, half by the English and Dutch the remainder by the Scot’s.
Full of confidence that all aspects of funding and support was in place, William Paterson went off to Scotland to organise the expedition. In July 1698, 5 ships, (1200 souls) set sail from Edinburgh to Panama. William Paterson led the party. Not long after the flotilla left news was released from England that King William had ordered English and Dutch elements of the, (Company of Scotland) to withdraw from the venture, leaving the Scot’s to their own devices.
The trip was an ordeal, many pioneers died from disease and only about 700 souls landed in Panama.
Over a period of some months the almost defenseless settlers were attacked by Spanish forces on numerous occasions, (with the full knowledge of King William and the English parliament who had instructed English ships that no assistance was to be provided to the Scot’s in Panama).
Malaria was rife and food scarcity resulted in malnutrition and death of a further 400. Because it was not possible to communicate with those that had gone before a further 11 ships sailed to Panama the following year. The bulk of those that travelled did not return succumbing to similar fates. Eventually 1 ship returned with a few survivors.
The collapse of the, “Darien Scheme” brought financial chaos to Scotland.
King William, (seizing the moment) briefed, (in secret) the Scottish aristocracy and sympathetic Scottish MP’s that the, (Bank of England) would provide finance replacing their losses, with the rider that they would need to vote to unite the Parliaments. Many of the, “Scottish Gentry” took the money.
Robert Burns captured the betrayal in his heartfelt poem, (Scottish MP’s were “bought and sold for English gold”).
Verse 1
Fareweel to a’ our Scottish fame, fareweel our ancient glory
Fareweel ev’n to the Scottish name, sSae famed in martial story
Now Sark rins over Salway sands, an’ Tweed rins to the ocean
to mark where England ‘s province stands, such a parcel of rogues in a nation
Verse 2.
What force or guile could not subdue Thro’ many warlike ages
Is wrought now by a coward few for hireling traitor’s wages
The English steel we could disdain, secure in valour’s station
But English gold has been our bane, such a parcel of rogues in a nation
Verse 3.
O, would, or I had seen the day that treason thus could sell us
My auld grey head had lien in clay wi’ Bruce and loyal Wallace
But pith and power, till my last hour I’ll mak this declaration
We’re bought and sold for English gold, such a parcel of rogues in a nation
The 1956 Suez Crisis – The Special Relationship Stretches in One Direction Only

Eisenhower with Nasser
Lessons from history – The Suez Crisis
Anthony Eden, (Conservative Party) took on the role of Prime Minister of the UK in 1955, shortly after the death of Churchill. His party had a healthy parliamentary majority and for the first year things went well. Problems arose in the course of 1955 when Eden started to suffer from recurring illnesses and many important policies were left to, “Rab Butler” to attend to including forming partnership with other european countries. Rab failed to take up the invitation to meet with, “the europeans” and the chance to be in at the start of the EEC was missed.

At around the same time Colonel Abdul Nasser came to the fore in Eygpt and nationalized the Suez Canal. Eden and the Conservative Party still believed the UK to be one of the World’s great powers, (although the country was skint and up to it’s ears in debt to the USA). Fearing the canal would be closed to Europe, acting together with France and the fledgling state of Israel, Eden ordered the invasion of Egypt taking the Suez Canal back under the control of the UK, France and Israel.
The invasion was costly. Eden, seeking support from the, “special relationship” was shocked to be informed that the USA would not aid the UK. Instead, giving support to the United Nations, (who had ordered the UK to withdraw from Egypt) the USA threatened to impose aid, trade and financial sanctions on the UK. UK forces withdrew from Egypt within days. In a later parliamentary inquiry Eden admitted lying to Parliament and to ordering civil servants to destroy anything that might provide evidence of the conspiracy he had entered into with France and Israel. He was forced to resign not long after.
Eisenhower threatened to bankrupt Britain unless it complied with US intructions and withdraw from Suez immediately
Harold Macmillan and President Dwight Eisenhower
Harold Macmillan, (supermac) took over the Party and limiting damage, set about modernising the country, increasing living standards, putting, “the pound in the pocket of the working man”. His 1959 electoral boast was, “You’ve never had it so good”. The Conservative party increased its majority in the General Election. The Suez fiasco was erased from history, (almost). Eden might have avoided disgrace had he heeded the content of the extract from Harold Macmillan’s diaries from September 27th 1952. The Special Relationship:
“We are threatened by the Americans with a mixture of patronizing pity and contempt. They treat us worse than they do any other country in Europe. They undermine our political influence all over the world. They really are a strange people. Perhaps the mistake we made is to continue to regard them as an Anglo-Saxon people. That blood is very much watered down. Now they are a Latin-Slav mixture with a fair amount of German and Irish. They are impatient, mercurial and panicky.”
John F Kennedy & Harold mcMillan
Fast forward from 1956 to 2003. Change the headline name to Blair then change Suez Canal to Iraq and you have history repeated. Oh!! one difference this time the USA assisted by the, “puppy dog UK” invaded a middle east country and created chaos resulting in the deaths of in excess of 650,000 Iragi’s and 5000 USA/UK servicemen and women, (casualties an additional 30,000+. Just what gave Blair & Bush cause to wreak such horror on nations?
1. Eden & Blair, both Westminster Prime Ministers, sent UK armed forces to invade a middle eastern country, having lied to Parliament, to gather support to their decision. Many Scottish soldiers were wounded, maimed and died. Independence will allow our parliament to decide when it is right to commit our armed forces to war.
2.The, “special relationship” quoted by, Blair, Brown, Cameron, Obama and Clinton is a myth since it implies mutual support. At the time of Suez the USA ordered Eden to withdraw UK armed forces from Egypt within 48 hours or suffer sanctions, withdrawal of financial support and other restrictions.
3. The, “special relationship” enjoyed a rebirth, through Blair & Bush, so that they would be able, (through emotional blackmail) to garner support of the UK public for invasion of Iraq. When the strategy failed the, “Weapons of Mass Destruction” story was concocted.
4. The so called “Special Relationship” is more astutely described by, Harold “Supermac” McMillan. Additionally, since that time the population of the USA is markedly changed. There are more citizens of Spanish, Asian and Indian descent than white Anglo Saxons. Gives substance to my view that there is no, “special relationship”. There never was.
5. Recent, “staged” press conference statements, (blatantly organized by Cameron) in support of the, “no” campaign by, Obama and Clinton should be treated by the UK public with contempt.


Lessons from History.
1. The, “Special Relationship” is easy to explain. The UK supports the USA.
2. Westminster politicians are well versed in the matter of being, “economical with the truth”. Remember Thatchers representative’s performance in Australia at the time she sought to block diary revelations damaging to the Conservative Party?
3. Committing UK forces to war, on a lie is commonplace in Westminster.
Vote, “Yes” to independence in September free Scotland from the sickness that is Westminster.
Living in the East End of Glasgow in the 1940’s
Living in the East End of Glasgow in the 1940’s
My first brush with the politics of Glasgow came in July 1946. I was a teenager, living, with my family, in a single end in Kent Street, Calton. Myself and two of my friends were returning from a Socialist Party political meeting being held on, “the Green”. Speakers had been extolling the benefits of a new, “inclusive post war nation”.
My mate had been given a leaflet on which was printed the words of the, “Red Flag”. He insisted on singing the song as we entered the, “Gallowgate” and proceeded up the road towards Kent Street. I noted two, “Bobbies” on the other side of the street, standing near to, “the Sari Heid” and told him to stop singing so as to avoid trouble. We still got it. A gang of, “Billy Boys” steamed out of, “Doo-Hill Road” shouting, “Communist Bastards” and gave us a severe beating. The policemen, (who witnessed the incident) did not come to our assistance. We managed to get back to my place and cleaned up.
Later, my father, (a committed communist) offered the reason we were beaten up was most likely my mate’s singing since there were very strong links between, (the Scottish Protestant League), (the Billy Boys), (the Police), (the Orange Order) and the Tories. He went on to say that the only way to bring about change, improving housing, health and wealth and gaining full employment was for, “oor sort” to stick together and gain power through the, “ballot box”. From that time, (the bulk of Roman Catholic Glasgwegians have voted Labour). My father was right, from 1945 -to date, through the ballot box, the Glasgow electorate has been committed to, (a contract of care) under control of the, “Labour Party”.
When Glasgow was declared host to the 2014 Commonwealth Games the urgent need for new sports facilities, accommodation, removal and redevelopment of run down parts of the east end of the city, (where the bulk of Roman Catholics live) exposed a disgraceful lack of progress, over 70 years, under the auspices of Labour councils that had been returned to power unchallenged. Poor health continues to plague families. Early death, (55y) is the sad fate of many Glasgow Eastenders. Poverty is rife. Unemployment remains higher than the national average and housing stock is run-down.
Labour Councillors have also, (through a litany of dodgy deals enhancing their personal finances) brought ridicule and anger upon themselves and their offices in Glasgow District Council and the Labour Party. Deals since exposed and banned by the Scottish National Party Government. The referendum provides opportunity for change. I know it will be difficult for Roman Catholics in the East End of Glasgow to vote other than Labour. But there is an alternative. Vote, “Yes” in the independence referendum. In our country, freed from the excesses of the past it will be possible to elect Councillors who will work for their constituents not themselves or the Labour Party in England.
Glasgow City Council and New Labour a Systematic Transfer of Finance and Assets From the Public Purse to the Wallets of Friends of Labour
These two Guys Led Glasgow City Council
The Empire That Was – Glasgow & the Labour Party
Steven Purcell, leader of Glasgow City Council, (GCC) quit office without warning amid increasingly fevered allegations of drugs, corruption and sleaze. The Labour Party, “shut up shop” and said nothing. The Scottish Labour party’s control of life in the West of Scotland is wide reaching across civic life.
This has always been accepted as, “that’s just how it is”. That familiarity, which at times can feel too close for comfort, can also be a benefit but a much darker side was exposed. Politicians, businessmen, media and the law were so interlinked in this tale that it is difficult to see the wood for the trees.
Blair once hailed Purcell as a, “visionary civic leader”, and his rise from, “deprived” Yoker, to leader of the Council at the City Chambers seemed to personify the Blairite fantasy of meritocracy.
But the entrepreneurial narrative is implicitly an individualizing discourse: being, “excluded” is at least partly one’s own fault for having the wrong skill set, the wrong character traits or the wrong kind of family life.
In this context, alternative, and more importantly collective models for dealing with one’s personal situation, (workplace or community organizing, grass-roots campaigns, etc.) become inconceivable. To disagree is to be, “against aspiration”, to be recalcitrant and against change, to want to keep people, or one’s self, in the ghetto.
The positivist aspects associated with this discourse have unravelled of late with Purcell quitting his posts amidst cocaine and alcohol confessions; the quoted strain of running the local authority; the pressures of planning the Commonwealth Games; and controversies over Strathclyde Partnership for Transport. The recession has also worked to de-legitimise the modus operandi of the market calculus personified by Purcell’s administration, though hardly as much as it should have.
Following Purcell’s fall, the dominant Labour Party within the Council quickly sought to distance themselves from his once venerated Leadership, concerned that, “everything the council achieved during Mr Purcell’s time as leader has somehow been devalued”.
This acute reversal suddenly averred that the, “City is not just about one man”, that the, “transformations” were, “not because of the person who was in charge but because of the hard work and dedication of you and your colleagues” at the Council.
But recriminations over Purcell’s personal life shouldn’t obscure the fact that he’d been heading a local authority caught up in a web of, “cronyism” and an, “elaborate system of political patronage”. The real issue – that which, “scandal” obfuscates – is the restructuring of local government along lines of market largesse at public expense.
Purcell’s, “State of the City Economy” address in 2008 is an exemplary document in that it expresses quite clearly his, “vision” for the city. Regurgitating the dull rote of neo-liberal convention, he promised that, “Team Glasgow” (a self elected cabal of business leaders purporting to represent the wider interests of ‘Glasgow’) would do everything they could to help businesses, “cope with the downturn”, “The first thing that all public bodies, including my own Council, must do, is to examine where we can help business by being more flexible and willing to do things differently.
This is no time for unnecessary rules and processes; this is a time to do everything we can to help”. The message couldn’t be clearer, “My main priority is helping business in the city through the economic difficulties ahead”, he said.
Purcell’s, “vision” included a, “flexible” land disposal policy that gave away, “empty” commercial premises owned by the Council to new businesses rent free, so that they can do without, “the burden of rent costs”.
Purcell argued that this showed how Glasgow City Council is, “willing to do things differently, willing to be flexible to help businesses”, willing to, “relax” rules in order to promote development and safeguard businesses. “We are willing to look at deferred payment arrangements, profit sharing, joint ventures and greater risk taking on the part of the Council”, he promised.
One beneficiary of this largesse at the public’s expense are the developers of the Commonwealth Games Village, who obtained the site rent-free, alongside an undisclosed, “profit-sharing agreement” with the Council.
As a commercial property market magazine concluded in March 2010 (under the headline, “Loss of council’s, “Team Glasgow” is huge blow for property’), the scandal surrounding Purcell may grab the headlines but the loss will also be felt by a feather bedded property industry.
Another means by which the City Council has shown its willingness to prioritize neo-liberal enclosure and restructuring has been in the privatization of basic services run previously by the authority.
Since the council housing, “stock-transfer” in 2003 (the largest transfer in the UK), there has been an acceleration of Council functions carved off to arm’s-length external organisations (ALEOs): care services, culture and leisure, catering, construction and maintenance services, parking, community safety and city marketing.
Against a backdrop of diminishing terms, conditions and salaries for those employed by ALEOs, the, “cronyism at the heart of Purcell’s council” ensured friends and allies – sitting on the boards of these companies which met just a few times a year – were being paid enhanced salaries for doing what the Council was already paid to do.
“Political patronage”, at work? Willie Haughey (a good friend of Purcell, key member of, “Team Glasgow”, and the largest Scottish donor to the Labour Party) received £680,000 (plus VAT) for a plot of land in Rutherglen from Clyde Gateway Developments, an ALEO run by Purcell’s former political advisor, Iain Manson.
Haughey had leased the land from the then-Glasgow District Council but bought it outright in the mid-1990s. Despite an independent valuation of £7.4 million, Haughey also received a £17 million compensation package for his business premises, which had to be relocated due to the construction of the M74 motorway.
” a nation of sheep results in a government of wolves”, “For evil to flourish, all that is needed is for good people to do nothing.” “The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.”
Another ALEO, City Building, was awarded two large contracts to Haughey’s City Refrigeration Holdings, worth £11.2 million, despite his bid being significantly higher than other competitors.
Clyde Gateway’s board includes four Councillors, all Labour, including George Ryan, Mr Purcell’s right-hand man when he became council leader in 2005. The head of City Building is Willie Docherty. His wife, Sadie Docherty, is a Glasgow Labour Councillor. Garnering further accusations of cronyism, Scottish Labour’s former general secretary Lesley Quinn was recruited as City Building’s first business development manager.
City Building’s £20,000-a-year chair, Gerry Leonard, is also a Labour councillor in Glasgow, as are three other board members. Just one board member is an SNP Councillor as with Culture and Sport Glasgow, whose Chief Executive is Bridget McConnell, partner of former First Minister Jack McConnell.
Glasgow’s Labour-dominated Council was also found to be passing public money into party political funds via at least one ALEO run by Labour activists, in the form of buying tables at party fundraisers. City Building treated Labour grandees, including Scottish leader Iain Gray and his wife, to a £2,000 dinner at a party fund-raiser.
David Miller, at Strathclyde University, helped disclose Purcell’s free use of public cash as he used Encore catering service, one of the authority’s spin-off companies, to host lavish dinners for fellow Labour politicians.
Within days of Purcell resigning lawyers and a PR company arrived on the scene attempting to gag his former colleagues who sought to distance themselves and their Party from Purcell’s personal peccadilloes.
But what exactly, behind the morality tales, might they wish to distance themselves from? It was offered that ALEOs had not been established for the sole purpose of buying loyalty, they, “provided a convenient vehicle for purchasing patronage”.
But to personify the system of largesse in Purcell alone is to erroneously perpetuate the story of, “one bad apple”. Polite press commentary consisted primarily of emotive stories of Purcell’s personal habits, obfuscating the high degree of institutional aggregation at work in Glasgow in marketing the, “success” of Glasgow’s urban renaissance.
What was perceived as a dearth of mainstream media reporting led bloggers to speculate on west-coast failure to hold power to account.
The Sunday Herald, driven to comment, reacted defensively to, “suggestions of a network of powerful figures working behind the scenes to influence the workings of the city … that this so-called network included leading figures from the media [and] threatened to undermine public confidence in the integrity of the Scottish press”.
Responding to, “hints” that some Scottish newspapers had, “pulled their punches on the controversy because editors had been too close to Mr Purcell or, worse, they had been cowed into submission by Peter Watson and PR firm Media House”, these allegations were rebutted but unconvincingly, “Glasgow is a large city but its political and business centre is small. Personal and business relationships meld together, contacts extend and overlap, boundaries blur. Business dinners become social occasions, colleagues become friends”.
Herald and Evening Times editor-in-chief Donald Martin told his sister-paper the Sunday Herald: “I was glad to play a role in Team Glasgow along with other individuals who believed in co-operating for the good of the city. Our aim was to encourage actions which would help the city. As a newspaper editor it is an important part of my job to make contacts in the political, business and other spheres and I also believe it is part of my job to work for the good of Glasgow and indeed Scotland”.
This suggests, even confirms, an all-too-cosy political compact between Glasgow governance and certain sectors of the crisis-riven Scottish media. Indeed, Martin was part of a regular Friday afternoon drinking date, dubbed, “The Ritz Club”, which, Holyrood magazine spilled, “included the editors of rival red tops [David Dinsmore], the Herald’s departing editor-in-chief [Donald Martin] and Purcell himself”.
That Martin could be so open about these relationships suggests not a conflict of interests but a convergence of interests, effacing any significant debate of the underlying economic antagonisms in Glasgow. None of the above points to any, “conspiracy” of course, just politics as usual: the same old revolving doors network of legalized looting avid viewers of, “The Wire” have become accustomed to.
No laws, moral or otherwise have been broken – no matter how much money has been channelled into the Labour Party via publicly owned companies, or how many members, relatives and friends are employed in senior positions in such companies.
As for multi – million pound contracts and shady land deals being awarded to Party donors, well, that just shows that an entrepreneurial spirit is rewarded in an age of entrepreneurialism. What is perhaps remarkable about Glasgow’s economic policies and system of political patronage is that the dis-juncture between the myth of market provision and, “urban renaissance”, and the reality of a city with 40 per cent of it’s residents living below the poverty line, hasn’t been more consistently and effectively exposed. (Composed by Neil Gray & Leigh French)
Probably the main reason the Labour Party is against Independence. Scotland, free of Westminster control will be able to address the excesses of the ruling Labour Cabal in Glasgow and adjacent Councils of similar ilk.
The UK Taxpayer’s Alliance recently published a list of UK Town Hall top earners. Glasgow employed 27 members of staff earning over £100,000 p/a. Of these 5 featured in the top 10 highest paid executives.
Commenting the, ” Alliance”, said, “Residents won’t be impressed when their council pleads poverty then demands more and more council tax, (Glasgow’s annual operating budget is around £3 Billion) only to spend it creating more town hall tycoons.”
1. In second place. Linda Hardie. South Lanarkshire Council, £543,538, (Retired April 2011.)
2. In third place. Thomas McDonald. Former Assistant Director of Land and Environment Services, £520,590 total remuneration inclusive of £342,957 in pension contributions, (Retired.)
3. In fourth place. William Docherty. Glasgow Council (subsidiary company) City Building, £485,698.
4. In fifth place. Steven Kelly. Glasgow Council (subsidiary company) City Building, £481,166.
5. In ninth place. Robert Booth. Former Director of Land and Environment Services, £382,789 total remuneration inclusive of 171,929 in pension contributions, (retired.)
6. In tenth place. Kenneth Harkness. Ex Head of Service development, £371,610.
7. The largest pay package overall, excluding larger than usual, one-off payments, was that of John Sharkey, group chief executive of SEC, (a private company whose majority shareholder is Glasgow City Council) which owns and operates the Scottish Exhibition and Conference Centre. He received £314,553.
The residents of Glasgow and the West of Scotland, (45%+ of whom live below the poverty line) need to abandon the past and seize the opportunities for a much better standard of life independence will bring. Vote, “yes” in the referendum.
Johann Lamont & Scottish Labour
Johann Lamont & Scottish Labour
It is a fact that from the time she took up office as leader, (Johan Lamont and the Scottish Labour Party) meekly toe the line sent down by Ed Miliband and his cohorts. Entirely suited only to the needs of English voters, (not Scots) policies are to be foisted upon Scotland, should Labour win the next General Election, (which it is increasingly uncertain.)
Mindful of the foregoing, Johan Lamont and her Labour Party’s support of a, “no” vote in the Referendum is becoming ever more savagely hysterical claiming, “cybernats” are unfairly conducting personal vendettas online against those who might voice disagreement with their views. At long last, “The Sun” has, “climbed off the fence” and sided with the, “Yes” campaign, publishing disparaging comment in regard to the aforementioned concerns, mocking Johan Lamont and her Labour colleagues for pursuing childish witch-hunts on social media outlets. Paraphrasing an extract from, The Sun Editorial;
“The left-wing, (Labour Party) mob on Twitter fuel their self-righteousness, taking offence at their political opponents, whipping up frenzies of phony outrage willfully ignoring the context in which things are said”.
Scots do not take kindly to Labour Party officials warping the truth to suit their political aspirations. Vote, “Yes” in the referendum. Cleanse English control from of Scottish politics.
Work or Want – The Impact of Welfare Changes
Work or Want – The Impact of Welfare Changes
A recent court case in Dundee highlighted the brutality of Ian Duncan Smith’s changes to Social Security systems, in place to protect those in need of assistance. A young mother fled her abusive husband. She asked for assistance at her local social services office only to be told any financial benefits which she might be afforded would not be paid to her for at least 6 weeks. Desperate and needing to feed her children she went to a local supermarket and stole food sufficient for her needs. She was caught and ended up in court. The Sheriff, trying the case, contacted Social Services and was assured no-one would be required to go without food as a result of benefits changes. In summary he said, “this case however was an example of that not having worked. As such there were significant mitigating circumstances allowing the young mother to be admonished”. Increasing use of sanctions against claimants is becoming commonplace, even for the most minor of misdemeanors, (late for an appointment due to a late bus. Is this the Scotland for our families. I think not. We need to care for those less fortunate. Vote, “Yes” in the referendum move Scotland away from the harsh right wing policies that have done so much damage to our society.
The Royal Mail and the Future
The Royal Mail and the Future
The, part-privatised, (on the cheap) Royal Mail derives about 50% of it’s annual revenue from delivery of, “snail mail.” It is contracted, “by law” to deliver such mail on a universal basis throughout the UK. Retention of a, “Universal Mail Delivery” service is more expensive to maintain in the large rural areas of Scotland. Measures, correcting matters, reducing costs are ready for early implementation after the next general election. The measures; Universal home delivery of mail is to be withdrawn, (over a period not exceeding one year), in urban areas, with a population exceeding 5000, to be replaced with Post-Box, (PO) delivery. This will require homeowners to, “collect” their mail in person, (no exceptions) from a designated PO-Box which will be located locally, supermarket, Newsagent, Garage or similar enterprise. Inconvenient!!! Tough!!! will be the response of the new Conservative government.
Read the article; “http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/royal-mail/10850281/Royal-Mail-demands-Ofcom-curbs-rivals.html.”
The above changes can only be implemented in Scotland with the authority of UK Government. Vote, “Yes” in the September referendum. Let the Scottish Parliament decide the future of mail delivery.
Benjamin Franklin – A Great Empire Reduced To A Small One
Benjamin Franklin – A Great Empire Reduced To A Small One
Benjamin Franklin, one of United States of America’s founding fathers, loved Scotland and the company of it’s highly respected philosophers of the, “Great Scottish Enlightenment.” Had he lived in these times he would have encouraged Scotland to vote, “Yes” to independence. In discussion with, Thomas Jefferson, (a fellow founding father and friend) referring to a nation’s right to be free he said; “He who sacrifices Freedom for security deserves neither”
His advice is clear and unambiguous. Do not succumb to the, “no” campaign’s patronising unspecified promises of jam tomorrow, (remember 1979.) Have confidence take the opportunity and elect for freedom.
He also wrote, “Rules By Which A Great Empire May Be Reduced To A Small One”. Clearly Westminster politicians have either not read it or choose to ignore the advice contained therin, which is possibly the reason why Scottish independence will bring about all that is predicted therin.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Rules_By_Which_A_Great_Empire_May_Be_Reduced_To_A_Small_One”
Tony Blair Money & Religion
Tony Blair & Religion
Tony Blair’s religion first became a political issue because of his role in the Northern Ireland peace process. His critics said the denial of his Roman Catholism beliefs was for political reasons, rather than constitutional ones, that he delayed his conversion until after he had left office. Blair had of course been attending Mass (and on some occasions receiving communion) for years before he converted. It isn’t a case of simply Protestant v non-Protestant. In England there are a very different set of historical influences associated with being a Jew and a Catholic, and they would be viewed quite differently. The long antipathy towards Roman Catholicism in England needs to be understood. England is a nation that rejected the power of Rome, destroyed Catholic monasteries and churches, and still has an annual celebration, (Guy Fawkes) built around the execution of a bunch of Catholics who tried to destroy Parliament. He would not have been allowed to undertake the role of Prime Minister of the UK as a Roman Catholic.
Blair’s Son Director of City Job Firm
28 year’s old company director!!!! Owner of a listed house, (valued around £1,500,000) in a smart area of Central London touted by Tony & Cheri for a safe seat in Coventry.
Tony Blair – Conflict of Interest
Expanding knowledge of the many affairs of Tony. So now we know just a, “wee” bit more about the wheeling & dealing of ex-politicians. Perhaps 75% of such earnings should be returned to the Exchequer given they are provided with opportunity to attract large amounts of money through extensive use of information gained whilst they are in office.
Tony Blair worth over $123 million
Wake up Scotland!! At a time many Scot’s are being denied, (through newly introduced tough social security systems), even basic financial assistance of £60 weekly, Tony Blair and, (his sons) are raking it in. Our country needs to be released from ambitious rampant capitalism and opportunism clearly evident in the article included below.
A, “Yes” vote in the September referendum will ensure Scotland is able to ensure avoidance of systems allowing political, “rags to riches” events.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/ex-british-pm-tony-blair-worth-123-million-article-1.1543102


Purcell








