Israeli secret service (Mossad) and Tory government – friendly relations re-established – But what a can of worms

 

Adam-Werritty-and-Liam-Fo-005Fox & WerrityfoxwerrGabby-Bertin-leaving-10-D-007

 

 

 

20 October 2011: British political scandal a push-back against Israeli Mossad activities

Britain’s intelligence services are taking off the gloves over Mossad’s high-level penetration of the British government. As a result of leaks to the press, one high-level Tory Cabinet minister, Defence Secretary Liam Fox, was forced to resign over his granting of access to classified defence information to his reputed homosexual love partner and Israeli-connected lobbyist Adam Werritty.

On October 16, the Independent on Sunday (IOS) reported that Werritty arranged for a high-level 2009 dinner meeting in Herzliya, Israel, the location of Mossad headquarters, between Fox, British ambassador to Israel Matthew Gould, and top Mossad officials. The major item on the menu was the overthrow of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The IOS reported that Werritty was working closely with neo-cons in the United States to carry out the Iranian operation.

 

 

 

matthew-gould_212Matthew GoldDr_AhmadinejadIranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

 

 

 

Werritty, who falsely passed himself off as Fox’s chief of staff, also attended high-level meetings between Fox and government officials of Sri Lanka and Dubai. In addition, Werritty used his connections to Fox to approach the governments of South Sudan and Iraq, as well as the Libyan rebel leadership in Benghazi, for lucrative contracts.

According to The Guardian, Werritty used a charity called Atlantic Bridge, which succeeded an entity known as Security Futures, to fund his lobbying operations. Atlantic Bridge, via Pargav Ltd., a not-for-profit firm set up by Werritty, was partly funded by pro-Israeli lobbyist and head of the British Israel Communications and Research Centre (BICOM) Poju Zabludowicz, a Finnish Jew based in London who owns Liechtenstein-based Tamares Investment Group, formerly a major investor in casinos in Las Vegas with its partner Barrick Gaming Corporation.

A former vice chairman of BICOM Michael Lewis , is reported by The Guardian to have made payments directly to Pargav, Atlantic Bridge, and Fox. Werritty’s travel expenses were paid for from Pargav funds.

Another major donor to Pargav, according to The Guardian, was Good Governance Group (G3), a private intelligence firm started by South African Andries Pienaar, formerly with the CIA-connected Kroll special investigations firm. A number of ex-MI6 officers work for G3.

 

 

Anita-and-Poju-Zabl_228561kPoju Zabludowicz  BICOM

bod9 Michael Lewis  BICOM

 

 

A U.S. branch of Atlantic Bridge was set up by the right-wing Republican entity American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), which is backed by major U.S. corporations, including Koch Industries. The U.S. Atlantic Bridge was a contrivance to launder U.S. corporate funds to Tory politicians in the U.K. in the same manner it laundered campaign funds for Tea party candidates in the Republican Party.

Zabludowicz, whose father founded the Israeli weapons firm Soltam, which mainly manufactured mortars, is the chairman of Pocal Industries, Inc. of Scranton, Pennsylvania, which supplied mortars to the U.S. military.

Werritty was an important British liaison between Fox, American neo-cons and Israel supporters, and the Republican-controlled Tea Party.

During the 2009 trip to Herzliya, Werritty passed himself off as “Dr. Adam Werritty, Advisor, Office of Shadow Defence Secretary; UK Executive Director, The Atlantic Bridge.” Werritty was invited by an entity called the Atlantic Forum of Israel.

Michael Hintze, the chief of the Convertible & Quantitative Strategies (CQS) hedge fund in London and a former Australian Army captain who served as the head of equity trading for Goldman Sachs before starting CQS, provided Werritty with an office at CQS and provided the CQS private jet to fly Fox and Werritty to the United States in May.

Hintze also serves as a papal knight in the Order of St. Gregory. The new Defence Secretary, Philip Hammond, who has praised his predecessor, has been hosted by Hintze at plush political fundraising dinners.

 

 

m hinzeMichael Hintze

Defence Secretary Philip Hammond stands in front of a Rapier System ground-to-air missile launcher during a visit to RAF Waddington near Lincoln, England on February 29, 2012, to observe a London 2012 Olympic Games air security training exercise, codenamed Exercise Taurus Mountain 2. Aircraft including RAF Typhoon interceptors, RAF E-3D Sentry and RN Sea King surveillance aircraft, sniper-carrying RAF Puma and RN Lynx helicopters took part in the exercise. AFP PHOTO / ANDREW YATES (Photo credit should read ANDREW YATES/AFP/Getty Images)Philip Hammond

 

 

 

 

Another one of Fox’s “advisers” was identified by the Daily Mail as John Falk, an American who is managing director of Kestral-USA in Washington, DC.

Kestral-USA is a branch of the Pakistan-based Kestral Holdings, which was a sub-contractor in Pakistan to the former Blackwater, now known as Xe Services.

Kestral Holdings was sub-contracted to Blackwater SELECT, which was based in Karachi.

Kestral is linked to former Blackwater head Erik Prince; Vision Americas, a firm run by former U.S. State Department chief for Latin American affairs, Roger Noriega, and former State Department South Asian affairs chief and CIA South Asian specialist Christina Rocca; and Firecreek Ltd., self-described as a “Washington D.C. based Advisory Firm providing its clients with International government relations, federal contracts and procurement law expertise, and strategic business development advice in the Defence, Homeland Security, Law Enforcement and Advanced Technology sectors.”

Firecreek’s managing director is John Falk. One of Vision Americas’ partners is Demoman International Ltd., a military and intelligence training firm based in Israel that has briefed members of Congress on the battle of Fallujah, Iraq.

 

 

roger-noriega3Roger Noriega
FalkJohn_SCJohn Falk

 

 

 

 

In addition, intelligence surveillance information was tipped off to the Daily Mirror about Tory Cabinet Policy Secretary Oliver Letwin, who is closely connected to Israeli intelligence assets in London, tossing over a hundred classified and sensitive Cabinet documents in St. James Park rubbish bins for later retrieval by Israeli embassy intelligence operatives.

Letwin’s document dumping operations were secretly photographed and published by the Mirror.

Only due to the Mirror retrieving some of Letwin’s documents from the rubbish bins, does the public know about their contents: five letters from the parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee, Al Qaeda links to Pakistan, Afghanistan, Libya, Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, and the Dalai Lama of Tibet.

Letwin’s “disposal” of documents for his Mossad handlers arose at the same time that the scandal involving the Israeli-connected Fox and Werritty had reached a crescendo. The Mirror has reported that one of the documents thrown away by Letwin involved a defence company that was under the purview of Fox.

The British media is under tremendous pressure from Israeli and Jewish interests in London not to link the Fox/Werritty and Letwin scandals because of the exposure factor for Israel.

However, British intelligence is having none of it and there is an expectation that further information on Mossad’s thorough penetration of the British Conservative-Liberal Democratic government, including Number 10 Downing Street, will be forthcoming.

The chairman of the parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee, Sir Malcolm Rifkind, a Tory, has defended Letwin, even though one letter “thrown away” by Letwin was addressed to Rifkind.

Along with Letwin, Rifkind is a major supporter of Israel. Letwin and Rifkind are both Jewish. Letwin covered his activities by being a vocal critic of government security breaches.

 

 

Oliver Letwin - Rothschild agent-in-place - LondonOliver Letwin
rifkindSir Malcolm Rifkind

 

 

 

British intelligence has been on the warpath with Mossad ever since the Israeli intelligence agency was implicated by MI-6 in the murder of Gareth Williams, the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) employee who was seconded to the British Secret Intelligence Service (MI-6) and whose badly decomposed body was found stuffed into a sports bag in an MI-6 safe house in the Pimlico neighbourhood of London on August 23, 2010.

Williams was a victim of a professional Mossad hit team. A “Mediterranean looking” young man and woman, believed to be between 20 and 30 years of age, are still suspects in Williams’s death, now believed by British police to have been due to poisoning. “Mediterranean” is a politically-correct code phrase used by British police to describe the Israeli Mossad hit team. The FBI uses a similar code phrase, “Middle Eastern-looking,” to describe Israeli spies in the United States. The Mossad duo was last seen entering the MI-6 residence where Williams lived in July 2010.

 

satchel0

Gareth Williams British Secret Intelligence Service (MI-6) and whose badly decomposed body was found stuffed into a sports bag

 

 

 

 

With an Israeli-connected duo, Fox and Werritty, exposed and Letwin feeding rubbish bins Cabinet documents for Mossad handlers, MI-6 and MI-5 have had enough of Israeli espionage in the United Kingdom.

The word is that other gay caballero Tory officials with connections to Israel are in MI-6’s exposé sights — with Foreign Secretary William Hague at the top of the list.

 

 

_80766885_hague_afpForeign Secretary William Hague  (retired from politics 2015)

 

 

 

 

 

Previously published in the Wayne Madsen Report. Wayne Madsen is a Washington, DC-based investigative journalist and nationally-distributed columnist. He is the editor and publisher of the Wayne Madsen Report – See more at:

http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/3708#sthash.GuG1XTIC.dpuf

 

 

liam-fox-the-most-committed-tory-brexiteer-still-in-the-cabinet-is-lurking-like-a-snake-in-the-grass-waiting-to-strike-at-theresa-may-take-a-look-at-who-is-supporting-him/

 

 

 

Liam-Fox-with-Lady-Thatch-007

 

 

The wee boy from East Kilbride who embraced Thatcherism

Liam Fox is a Tory MP. He was elected to Westminster in 1992 and was Secretary of State for Defence from 2010 to 2011.

In the 2009 expenses scandal, he was found to have the largest over-claim on expenses and was forced to repay £22,476 .

It was also reported in 2009 that Fox had claimed expenses of more than £19,000 over the previous four years for his mobile phone. He claimed the high bill was due to regular trips overseas, in his capacity as Shadow Defence Secretary and said he was looking for a cheaper tariff.

In 2012, the Commons Speaker blocked the release of data showing which MPs were renting their homes to other MPs for financial gain. A study of parliamentary records was published and showed that Liam Fox to be in receipt of rental income from his London home while simultaneously claiming rental income from the taxpayer to live at another residence.

In 2013, Fox hit the news again, after documents showed he claimed 3p for a 100 metre car trip a year earlier. He also made an additional 15 claims under £1 for car travel approved in 2012–13, two of which were for 24p and 44p. He said: “I don’t do my expenses. My office does them. But they are all done according to the rules for travel distances.”

In 2010, he was appointed Defence Secretary, a position from which he was forced to resign over allegations that he had given a close friend, Adam Werrity, inappropriate access to the MoD and allowed him to join official trips overseas.

He has twice stood unsuccessfully for the leadership of the Conservative Party, in 2005 and 2016.

 

Related image

 

 

 

October 2011: Civil Service report slams the conduct of Liam Fox

The Minister of Defence, Liam Fox, put the security of himself and his officials at “risk” on overseas visits by releasing details of his diary to Adam Werritty, the cabinet secretary Sir Gus O’Donnell concluded in his report

In a damning assessment O’Donnell said that Fox was guilty of multiple breaches of the ministerial code by “blurring” the lines between his private and official responsibilities.

Downing Street said that David Cameron had accepted the report, which recommended a tightening of the rules governing relations between ministers and civil servants.

 

David-Cameron-and-Liam-Fo-007

 

 

The report,  findings:

The public disclosure of MoD diary details about future visits overseas posed a degree of security risk not only to Dr Fox, but also to his accompanying official party.

The risks of his association with Werritty were raised with Dr Fox by both his private office and the permanent secretary. In ignoring their concerns Dr Fox made an error of judgment that his contact with Mr Werritty would continue.

Over the course of a year, Fox allowed Werritty to be present at 18 meetings on government business and alone representing Fox, at a meeting with Matthew Gould, (then the British ambassador designate to Israel).   As a private citizen, with no official locus, it was inappropriate for Werritty to have attended any of these meetings.

Fox, accompanied by Werritty, but without MoD officials, met with Harvey Boulter in Dubai, to discuss a defence contract,  which was a breach of protocol.

Fox arranged for Werritty to meet a donor from Pargav, the company that funded his trips exposing the links between Fox, Werritty and Pargav giving rise to the perception of a conflict of interest placing in doubt the probity  of financial donations made by the company.

Fox failed to inform the MoD permanent secretary of his close friendship with Werritty and his links to Pargav, which was financed by a number of private donors, some of whom had also provided funding to Dr Fox when the Tory Party was in opposition.”

Fox fuelled the impression that Werritty spoke for the British government through his “close and visible association” with his friend.

Werrity was allowed to use “misleading business cards” printed with the parliamentary Portcullis describing himself as an adviser to Fox.

 

IMG-5353

 

 

The money men supporting Liam Fox

O’Donnell, named prominent pro-Israel business figures who donated over £140k through Pargav to Fox/Werrity, funding Werritty’s jetset lifestyle of first class flights and five star hotels.

Mick Davis

Mick “the miner” Davis, the South African-born mining magnate known for his pro-Israel views,  is boss of the FTSE 100-registered mining company Xstrata, with an annual salary of £21m he is one of the highest paid executives in the world.

Davis donated £150k to the Tory Party in  2010/11 and gave £7,500 towards  Michael Gove’s election campaign.

A leading figure in the UK Jewish community Davis is chairman of the charity, ” The United Jewish Israel Appeal”.

He also serves on the “Jewish Leadership Council”, a powerful body with representatives from community and religious groups. He has been chairman of the council’s executive committee since 2009.

Poju Zabludowicz

The father of Finnish born, Poju Zabludowicz built his fortune from the defence industry and retired to Israel. His son Poju, founded  an investment company: “Tamares Real Estate”. The property developer is now a very rich man.

He is the chairman, of the Israeli pressure group , “British Israel Communications and Research Centre” (BICOM).

He maintains a close working relationship with Tory Party officials and met with the Foreign Secretary, William Hague to discuss the impact of the Arab spring on Israel. Donated £600,000. to the Conservative Party in advance of the 2010 general election.

Lee Petar

Petar, previously communications chief for BICOM, is now with Tetra Strategy, the lobbying firm that introduced a Dubai defence contractor to Werritty.

G3

An international investigation company run by former MI6 employees.

John Moulton

Private equity tycoon Moulton, who owns the “Reader’s Digest” said that Pargav was “a not-for-profit” organization supporting the Middle East.

IRG Ltd.

A mysterious source of funds referred to only as “IRG Ltd”.

Possibly,  The “International Resources Group,” a US company owned by L-3 Communications denied any involvement.

Or maybe the, “Iraq Research Group” said to be led by Stephen Crouch, former chairman of the Tory Party’s Camarthen West and South Pembrokeshire constituency.

Simon Hart, MP for Camarthen West, said Crouch used to make frequent trips to Iraq and said it was understood locally that he had a background in the military or intelligence. “We always thought he was working for the programme rebuilding Iraq and that he was working for an American company,” Hart said.

Hart also said Crouch once helped arrange a £5,000 donation to the local party from Tony Buckingham, an oil tycoon with interests in Kurdistan.

More on this later in the post.

 

Gabby-Bertin-leaving-10-D-007

 

 

Labour opposition demand a proper investigation

Harriet Harman,  deputy leader of the Labour Party, said that the internal inquiry was at odds with parliamentary protocol and demanded that the matter be referred to Sir Philip Mawer, the independent adviser on ministerial standards for an impartial investigation.   Cameron, setting the agenda refused to budge on the issue.

 

Adam-Werritty-and-Liam-Fo-005

 

 

Defense Secretary row is distracting MoD staff

The row over Fox is “making it very difficult for Ministry of Defense staff to get on with their jobs supporting soldiers in Afghanistan”, said former Army officer, and Tory MP, Patrick Mercer.

He went on to say that the defense secretary is running a department “under serious financial strictures”, and fighting military campaigns in Afghanistan and Libya. Adding: “The last thing that busy civil servants and busy uniformed staff need inside the MoD is this sort of distraction with their boss”.

A staff intensive search of MoD records revealed that Werritty, had joined Fox, on 18 out of 48 trips abroad since he took up office in May 2010. Including visits to Singapore, Bahrain, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Hong Kong, Israel, New Zealand, Australia, Qatar and Sri Lanka.

Werritty also visited Tampa in Florida, where he dined with General John Allen, now head of NATO forces in Afghanistan.

 

David-Cameron-and-Liam-Fo-007

 

 

Fox says he’s sorry to MP’s

Fox rose to cheers from Tory backbenchers. They who accept a myth that he was one of the finest of all defence secretaries. He certainly gave us an aircraft carrier without aircraft, and arranged for armed forces members to be sacked while at war.

In a carefully constructed personal statement to MPs, in the Commons he apologized for breaching the ministerial code over his friendship with Werritty  but he was careful not to say directly that he had breached it.

In a sentence, he said:

“The ministerial code has been found to be breached. For this I am sorry. I accept it is not only the substance but [also] perception that matters. That is why I chose to resign. I accept the consequences for me without bitterness or rancour.

He then  attacked the media for pursuing him with “vindictiveness, and hatred and hit out at Harvey Boulter, a Dubai-based businessman who confirmed a 45 minute meeting with Werrity and Fox, without an MoD official present, in Dubai’s five-star Shangri-La Hotel.

After which Boulter had emailed a lawyer from 3M, a firm with which he was involved in a business dispute, to warn that new information had come to hand which if made public could result in a “rather embarrassing situation” over the recent knighthood awarded to the 3M head, George Buckley.

Boulter had admitted the Buckley knighthood had not been raised at the Fox/Werrity meeting, but he had discussed it with Werritty beforehand.  Fox said it was wrong of the press to report the allegations when Boulter was the defendant in a blackmail case.

He concluded:

“Last week’s media frenzy was not unprecedented, and it happens where a necessary free press and politics collide. But I believe there is, from some quarters, a personal vindictiveness, even hatred, that should worry all of us.”

 

11174908_899738300083865_2185826260044367931_n

 

 

Boulter rejected Fox’s criticism, saying:

“It is most certainly not fair or correct for Fox to again brand me as a blackmailer. He knows very well that I was trying to settle a legal dispute between 3M and Porton/Ploughshare (part of his former ministry) … How is that possibly blackmail? – this is a negotiation. The fact Fox is continuing to pursue me makes him look more than a little silly. If he had not issued an incorrect statement in the first place, which the Guardian forced him to correct publicly, then he would not have exposed Werrity, his adviser to public scrutiny.”

A number of Tory MPs, led by Desmond Swayne, the prime minister’s parliamentary private secretary (who hugged him) lined up to congratulate Fox after his statement.

 

foxwerr

 

 

The press reply to the Fox allegations of harassment

Although the former defence secretary’s Commons statement started well, he badly misjudged parts of it and ended up sounding like a man who still doesn’t quite get it

When a politician takes a poke at the modern media, as Liam Fox did in his personal resignation statement to MPs, there is always a danger that journalists immediately focus on the affront to their dignity and motives.

Fox’s attack on the media (“some sections”) hounding of family and friends, together with the hatred he detected in some coverage, is not the most important aspect of the saga.

It’s also likely to be half-true. The pack in full pursuit can be pretty ugly, though on this occasion it was chasing a legitimate target. It’s what the media are for, not rummaging through footballers’ tangled love lives.

Not that you would have learned much from Fox’s statement. He started well, albeit without much concession to the faults found by the cabinet secretary as well as the media – in his conduct towards his department in relation to his chum, Adam Werritty.

But he misjudged the next bit badly. “Oh no, he’s another victim,” MPs must have muttered. Most of the “media frenzy” turned against him was not true, he insisted:

‘”I have always believed in personal responsibility and I accept the cabinet secretary’s conclusions. I am pleased at the explicit acknowledgement that I neither sought, expected, nor received any financial gain that was being widely and wrongly implied. “I also welcome the clarification of the fact that no national security issues were breached, no classified documents made available, and no classified matters briefed. These accusations were also widely made and deeply hurtful.”

Nope. All he’d done was breach the ministerial code of conduct. Perception, as well as substance, matters, he conceded – a touch ungracious there.

“And how,” someone might have heckled. But the Commons tradition is that personal statements – usually about wrongdoing, sometimes about reasons for a principled resignation, sometimes a mess like this one – are usually heard in silence.

A good rule in life anywhere. It’s understandable that a man who loved his job, and had sat for 17 years on the frontbench waiting to get it, is angry and disappointed, a “deep personal disappointment”, he said, at losing it over what he clearly thinks is a bogus controversy.

He managed to be gracious again towards the end, thanking friends, family, political colleagues – including David Cameron – as well as his Somerset constituents for their support. “You do not turn your back on friends and family in times of trouble”.

“As I said in the house last week, I accept that it was a mistake for distinctions to be blurred between my professional responsibilities and my personal loyalty to a friend. I accepted then it was a mistake to attend a meeting with a potential supplier without an official present and, with hindsight, I should have been more willing to listen to those around me.”

But Fox also sounded like a man who still doesn’t quite get it. So many questions remain to be asked about what Werritty did on those foreign trips and why he did it. Did he think he was a latter-day Lord Palmerston? A James Bond or a George Smiley? A patriotic businessman? Or a smart hustler getting his bills paid by suckers? What about Israel? And Iran? What about lobbyists and financial backers who must have hoped to benefit at some stage? Not everyone is a noble patriot.

And what about the role of senior civil servants? Should they have done more to alert No 10? Or were they too timid, worn down by decades of politicization, which started with Margaret Thatcher’s “is he one of us?” question and was carried forward by Tony Blair.

In a government of pals Werritty sounds like a reprise of the Andy Coulson problem. Did no one warn Cameron properly? If not, why not? We just don’t know. But in time we may. Labour went immediately on the attack – as oppositions are meant to do (after all Labour had its scandals in office, as David Cameron pointed out at PMQs) and the media will not let go a juicy and mysterious story with plenty of mileage left in it. Fox pledged his total loyalty to the cabinet and to Cameron. But he isn’t going anywhere, not after this. (the Guardian)

 

size 500x500Sir Howard Daryl Leigh

 

 

Exposed: The link between Tory HQ and the Liam Fox donors

Downing Street’s tactic of distancing itself from Fox (saying that he was operating on his own) has been exposed as a lie.

The Tory party admitted that its senior treasurer was the conduit for donors to Liam Fox who passed their details to Werritty.

Sir Howard Darryl Leigh, (granted a political peerage in 2013) is a British businessman and Tory Party politician.

He serves on the “Jewish Leadership Council”, a powerful body with representatives from community and religious groups.

He passed on the details of donors who wished to support Fox’s campaign during the 2005 Tory leadership contest.

They were later persuaded by Fox to give money to organizations that supported Werritty, according to a source, and some of the money was spent visiting Fox on lavish trips abroad.

The disclosure is an embarrassment for the Tories and will pose further difficult questions for Fox, who has been told that he faces another parliamentary inquiry into his behavior and Werritty.

A Tory spokesman confirmed Leigh’s role in helping to introduce Fox to the donors whose recent support was used by Werritty to fly around the world to meet the former defence secretary.

The spokesman told the Guardian: “Howard Leigh introduced donors to Liam Fox’s office during the 2005 leadership campaign.

Some of them subsequently maintained contact with Dr Fox’s office. Leigh had no personal knowledge of Pargav and has not introduced donors to Dr Fox for some time.”

A source close to Leigh said: “Howard Leigh was as shocked as anybody to find that donors’ funds were being used to fund Werritty’s trips. There is no way that he would have countenanced that.”

Leigh is the senior treasurer of the Tory Party and has met Werritty on a number of occasions, but does not regard him as a friend.

A party source says the donors approached Leigh asking to donate money to Fox’s campaign, not that they were solicited by Leigh.

The Tory spokesman declined to say which donors had been introduced to Fox by Leigh, and did not expand on whether they knew of how their money had been spent by Werritty.

Another source said there had been no co-ordination between the Jewish donors to fund Werritty, though some had initially felt well-disposed to help Fox because of his pro-Israel position.

Leigh chairs the elite Leaders’ Group, which has more than 70 members who pay up to £50,000 a year for the privilege of meetings with the Prime minister.

Tory insiders say he has helped to bring in more than £2m a year through fundraising events, according to reports.

He is also the managing director of “Cavendish Corporate Finance”, which helped Cameron’s wife, Samantha, collect a windfall following the £18m sale of “Smythson”, the stationery and leather goods emporium company where she was creative director.

Leigh passed the donors over to Fox in 2005. At that time, Fox was the leading candidate of the party’s right in the leadership campaign against Cameron and David Davis.

Tory sources claim Fox maintained contact with the donors and was responsible for passing them to Werritty, who then funnelled £150,000 to Pargav.

 

BORIS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scottish Independence Referendum – The Unsettled Will Of The Scot’s – The Inside Story Of The Unionist’s Campaign Of Fear

 

 

HomeCounties dunlop3Andrew Dunlop (R)dunlop6Four comrades

 

 

18 March 2012: Cameron’s recruits Andrew Dunlop (SPAD) to his referendum team

Scotsman, Dunlop 52, was quietly recruited by Downing Street as the Prime Minister’s personal adviser on Scottish affairs, with a special remit to help defeat independence. He is a genuine greybeard in his 50’s, several years older than the Prime Minister.

Dunlop who graduated in economics from Glasgow University has spent most of his working life south of the Border. He is a well-known right wing Thatcherite in the Conservative power structure.

His CV includes spells working for George Younger and John Major, as well as the discredited and subsequently banned Atlantic Bridge charity run by Liam Fox’s friend Adam Werrity.

He is also a councillor on Horsham District Council and lives in the exclusive commuter village of Partidge Green, on the edge of the South Downs National Park.

By 1988, he graduated to Mrs Thatcher’s inner circle as one of the seven members of her “policy unit”, specialising in defence, employment, tax reform and Scotland.

In that capacity, he played a key role in discussions over the introduction of the hated Poll Tax in Scotland in 1989 – a year earlier than the rest of Britain. After leaving No 10 Downing Street, he became the founding member and managing director of top lobbying firm Politics International.

Yesterday SNP MSP Stuart Maxwell said: “Questions must be asked on what role a young Mr Dunlop – a policy adviser to Thatcher in tax reform and Scotland in the late Eighties – had in the implementation of the Poll Tax in Scotland.

It is also interesting that the Prime Minister has employed a so-called expert on Scotland who lives in the south of England. The people of Scotland deserve transparent politicians, not Tories who don’t even live in the country they hope to rule over. Cameron’s new Thatcherite appointment will result in even more people opting for home rule with independence.” http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/308827/Questions-over-Cameron-s-new-independence-adviser-s-link-to-poll-tax

 

 

 

 

Andrew Dunlop  Former Horsham District Counciler and Advisor to David Cameron in scotland Web grabsDownton Setmedia-alex-salmond

 

 

24 March 2012: Rich Boy Andrew Dunlop – watches the pennies – caught abusing his free council parking permit

Mr Dunlop has already found himself embroiled in controversy in his new role after it emerged he had been abusing his free council parking permit. He was avoiding a £7.50 a day charge by leaving his £30,000 Jaguar XF in a council- car park near Horsham station before catching the London train. Yesterday, after being caught out by his local newspaper, he was forced to apologise and offered to repay the charges. He said: “Four weeks ago I started commuting daily to London to attend a new full-time job at 10 Downing Street. “On a limited number of occasions, when I was not on council business, my car has been parked in an HDC car park adjacent to the council’s offices. “When it was brought to my attention by a council officer that car passes should only be used exclusively on council business, I immediately refrained from using this car park.”
http://www.wscountytimes.co.uk/news/local/parking-exclusive-hits-national-headlines-1-3662200

 

 

Baroness+Thatcher+Holiness+Pope+Benedict+XVI+G4PY6aoExDFlMoS2 Template Master4b4f9590c80a3029258e0ac75593f45e

 

 

2 July 2012: The attorney general, the charity and a lucky escape

A return for Liam Fox as he steps back into the harsh glare of public debate with words on Europe to cheer the Tory right. All seems clear ahead. And yet he cannot quite leave what’s behind behind. For there is a epilogue to the saga of the Atlantic Bridge, the faux charity he chaired. It was wound up last year after complaints to the Charity Commission that its business was not charity but politics.

The Trustees were Professor Patrick Minford, of Conservative Way Forward, Lord Astor of Hever and the Tory lobbyist Andrew Dunlop. Forgive them, said the commission; they didn’t know the law governing their responsibilities. And with the release of a supplementary report, we have a better sense of one of the factors the commission had to consider in deciding what to do about the misapplication of charitable funds and the possible recovery of those funds from the trustees themselves.

For “such proceedings can only be brought with the consent of the attorney general”. No evidence of bad faith was found, the commission makes clear, so perhaps the issue is moot. But it would have been fascinating to see what Dominic Grieve would have done, had the hot potato of Tory charitable shenanigans reached his desk.

 

 

dunlop310931336_10205889965678081_7544592235941572411_n65537_1487204698209301_6690318264521167764_n
September 2014: Scottish Independence Referendum – The Unsettled Will Of The Scot’s – The Inside Story Of The Unionist’s Campaign Of Fear

When scholars come to write the history of Scotland’s 2014 independence campaign they may conclude the United Kingdom was saved by an opinion poll. It was the startling lead for a referendum Yes vote reported by YouGov on the evening of September 6 that finally shattered the complacency of UK political elite that had previously failed to realise the 307-year-old union between England and Scotland was really at risk.

The extraordinary story of how the dream of Scottish independence – long nurtured by a third or fewer Scots – suddenly turned into an existential threat to one of the world’s premier powers is a lesson for leaders everywhere of the danger of taking voters for granted.

And while the No campaign eventually won by a margin of 55 to 45 per cent, the panic that engulfed the Westminster elite as polling day approached laid bare the fragility of the union and raised searching questions about the way mainstream politicians dealt with the threat.

It is a mark of how overconfident pro-union UK politicians were about the possibility Scots might vote for independence that many initially welcomed the prospect of a referendum. Thursday’s vote had its roots in the Scottish National party’s stunning success on May 5 2011, when it won a majority of seats in Scotland’s devolved parliament.

During its previous minority administration, the SNP under Alex Salmond, first minister, had put independence on a backburner. Now opponents thought Salmond, long a proponent of gradual progress toward independence, would be forced into a referendum before he was ready – and would suffer a defeat that would drain the SNP of its raison d’être.

“I sat there watching television and found myself cheering on the SNP,” said one Liberal Democrat minister in the UK government, recalling the night the Scottish election results came in. “If they were going to win, the best we could hope for is that they got a majority and were forced to hold a referendum and finally put the independence issue to bed.”

The next day, David Cameron, UK prime minister, immediately conceded that Scotland should be granted an independence referendum if the Scottish government wanted it. It was a decision some colleagues would later bitterly criticise. Other states such as Spain have been much less accommodating towards secession demands.

“When I talk to my counterparts in other countries, they cannot understand why we had a referendum at all,” says one UK minister. “Where were the crowds on the street demanding such a thing? Why did you need to do it?”

 

A-right-pair-of-cuntsBx5_3kkIIAI3GzR10313359_632088540199769_6748727047123860742_n

 

 

But other UK prime ministers including the late Margaret Thatcher had previously accepted that Scotland, an independent nation until its parliament voted to unify with England’s in 1707, would have the right to leave the UK if it opted democratically to do so.

For a long time, the threat to the UK unity seemed small. The 2011 SNP victory was followed by an 18-month phoney war dominated by argument over the referendum process.

Cameron and his allies were exasperated by what they saw as quibbling over details. They wanted a clear and straight forward Yes-No vote on independence, fearing that allowing a third question on greater devolution within the UK – which polls made clear would be the most popular option among Scots – would allow Salmond to claim victory even if independence was rejected.

To secure a single question referendum, Cameron gave in on a series of other points, including on the framing of the question. This allowed Mr Salmond to campaign for a Yes vote. Perhaps most importantly, Cameron also allowed the Scottish government to decide the timing of the vote. Eventually set for September 18 2014, this gave the SNP plenty of time to build its case.

As recently as the summer, senior No campaigners were more concerned about the size of the victory than the fact of it. “We need to get 60 per cent if we are to avoid a neverendum,” said one campaign insider several weeks before the vote, referring to the possibility of another ballot being called within years or even months in the event of a close result.

All this time a broad Yes movement was developing, reaching far beyond traditional SNP support. At first it seemed to have little impact. The official pro-union Better Together campaign pummelled the SNP over the uncertainties of independence. The party’s 667-page vision for an independent nation, published in November 2013 and including promises of better childcare, lower taxes and more generous social security, brought no immediate boost to nationalist support.

 

 

1924386_1583245425294772_2404802118282311511_n10978624_433808866783994_747877177723272237_nimagesjjScotland Team 800 2

 

Scottish Independence Referendum – The Unsettled Will Of The Scot’s – The Inside Story Of The Unionist’s Campaign Of Fear

In early 2014, the No camp lead started to narrow. So pro-union politicians prepared what they hoped would be a fatal blow to Salmond’s plans.

Many who were in the conference room in Edinburgh where Osborne on February 13 ruled out a post-independence currency union thought that a killer blow was exactly what had been delivered. Speaking in front of a plate-glass window looking out at Edinburgh’s Castle Rock, the UK chancellor targeted the biggest weakness in the SNP’s economic case – its claim Scotland would continue to use the pound as it does now, a promise dependent on London’s consent.

Osborne was backed by the leaders of all three main UK parties – and given unprecedented public support by Sir Nicholas Macpherson, the Treasury’s top civil servant.

The assault, delivered by a Conservative chancellor deeply unpopular in Scotland, had mixed results. The SNP dismissed it as bullying and bluff – and polls showed many voters in Scotland agreed. But Osborne insists he was right and that this week’s No vote vindicated his strategy of highlighting the risks of independence. “It’s a No campaign, so of course it’s going to be negative,” the chancellor has said.

Meanwhile the Yes campaign was developing into a grassroots movement far more energetic and organic than Better Together could muster. SNP strategists were building on the databases and tactics that had delivered the 2011 landslide. Their strategy aimed to first persuade voters that Scotland could be independent, next that it should be, and finally that it must be.

Still, Westminster was untroubled. Two months ago, Cameron had dinner with a close friend from the corporate world, according to one senior business figure. Of all the things in his prime ministerial in-tray, the business figure recalls Cameron saying, Scotland was “the least of his worries”.

Cameron and Osborne departed for their summer holidays in August in confident mood. Osborne was heard to remark breezily to colleagues that he would “take 60-40” as a final result.

 

 

10405508_818905011498032_7364655500765974693_ngordon-brown-budgetposthealey

 

 

Polling advice provided by Populus suggested the No lead was solid and backed up Osborne’s conviction that Better Together’s focus on the drawbacks of independence rather than the benefits of union was working to stop wavering voters following their emotions and voting Yes.

But public opinion was turning toward Yes. Some credited Salmond’s strong performance in a second televised debate against Alistair Darling, former UK chancellor and Better Together leader. There he warded off challenges on currency and scathingly portrayed Darling as being “in bed with the Tories”, and the National Health Service as under threat from continued union.

By the weekend of September 6-7 there was panic inside Number 10, while Cameron was obliged to leave London with a knot in his stomach to stay with the Queen at Balmoral. Alexander and Danny Alexander – the Treasury minister overseeing the Lib Dem campaign – reported that the momentum to Yes might become unstoppable. That fateful YouGov poll put the Yes side ahead.

“We knew a poll was coming which would give the Yes side a lead – it turned out to be YouGov in the Sunday Times. We were at a point where we had to reframe the campaign,” Douglas Alexander said later.

 

 

nashmurray-460x335Nicholas_Macpherso_2724400bBtncnggCQAAdrYG

 

 

Frantic discussions took place over that weekend between “the two Alexanders” and Andrew Dunlop, who by now were the principal players in the fight to save the union. Dunlop hit the phones to try to corral a business onslaught, joined by Danny Alexander and Alistair Darling. By Wednesday a trickle of companies led by Shell and BP were speaking out; by Thursday there was a torrent.

Cameron himself turned up the heat on business leaders to intervene in the debate, hosting a reception on September 8 in Downing St. “He left us in no doubt we should speak out,” said one chief executive who attended. The prime minister was also hitting the phones. “Those phone calls can be very persuasive,” said one business figure familiar with the operation.

The result was a wave of business opposition to independence, with companies such as Aviva and Prudential coming out to bat on the prime minister’s behalf, although a few – including J Sainsbury, National Grid and Tesco – could not be persuaded.

On the Thursday before the referendum five Scottish-based banks said they would move their registered headquarters south if there was a Yes vote. But the orchestrated campaign also risked fuelling Scottish resentment of Westminster. Salmond loudly protested against Downing St “scaremongering” and blamed a hostile BBC for playing along.

 

 

After the Scottish referendum.brown-thatcher_2532387bB0BQhVdIMAAJPNS.jpg largeCAuLDuzWYAEN8-C.jpg large

 

Even the Queen joined the fray, her media advisers orchestrating a “chance remark” to a churchgoer near Balmoral that Scottish voters should “think very carefully about the future”. Buckingham Palace said she was strictly neutral but royal watchers had little doubt about the Queen’s concerns about the breakdown of the union, despite Salmond saying he looked forward to her becoming Queen of Scots.

The fightback also had a new public face: Gordon Brown. The former Labour prime minister had been on the fringes of the No campaign for months, but his refusal to work with the Tories and tense relations with Darling, his former chancellor, meant that he often operated alone. Now he was brought centre stage, making the “positive case” for a No vote: promising a swift transfer of new powers to the Scottish parliament to demonstrate to wavering Labour voters that a No vote did not mean “no change”.

The combination of economic scare stories and promises of future power seemed to work, while it proved harder than independence campaigners had hoped to mobilise the disaffected urban population.

By the last days of the campaign, pro-union leaders were increasingly confident they could hold the line. On Friday morning they were shown to be right. The victory when it came was clear. But by voting for independence, 1.6m Scots graphically demonstrated the depth of popular discontent with Westminster rule. For pro-union politicians the two-year campaign race ended not in a triumphant last lap but a panicky late sprint over the winning line. This was far from the emphatic reaffirmation of union they had expected.

Culled from Financial Times http://www.punchng.com/politics/scotland-how-britain-nearly-lost-a-united-kingdom/

 

 

 

Scottish-Referendum42Scottish-referendum46Scottish-Referendum43

 

 

 

 

 

Liam Fox – His rise to the top echelons of the Tory Party funded by indecently rich people who supply huge amounts of finance in support of the Tory ideal. “I’m only in it for the money”

 

 

 

 

Liam-Fox-005

 

Liam Fox – caught in a web of lies

In a previous post I presented details of the 2011 self induced ritual political suicide of ultra right wing Liam Fox, triggered by an inappropriate friendship with Adam Werrity which compromised the MoD at the time Fox was Secretary of State for Defence.

Link here:

https://caltonjock.com/2015/05/21/liam-fox-the-most-committed-tory-brexiteer-still-in-the-cabinet-is-lurking-like-a-snake-in-the-grass-waiting-to-strike-at-theresa-may-take-a-look-at-who-is-supporting-him/

The purpose of this follow-up post is to chart the rise of Fox, on the backs of powerful friends in high places, exposing the well practiced  jiggery-pokery of the top echlons of the Tory Party and the indecently rich people who supply huge amounts of finance in support of the Tory ideal. “I’m only in it for the money”

 

foxwerr

 

 

Thatcher’s inner circle also known as the “Scottish Rat Pack”

The under noted individuals were part of the driving force behind many of the brutal policies  imposed on Scotland in the 11 years Thatcher was Prime minister.

Dr Liam Fox: Maggie’s blue-eyed boy. Tipped to take over the crown on her departure but got sidelined when the party lurched to the left and elected John Major.

Martin Rifkind: Softened his image after the demise of Thatcher. Rewarded by John Major who promoted him to high office

Michael Gove:  Dittered around the edges of power without setting the world on fire. Given a number of fringe roles in the Major’s government.

Andrew Dunlop: Reputed to be the architect of the “poll tax”. Departed politics after Thatcher and founded a “political agency”. David Cameron’s right hand man, (the brains) at the time of the 2014 Scottish referendum. Rewarded with a peerage by Cameron and appointed Minister of State at the Scottish Office adding political backbone for Mundell.

Michael Forsyth: In his time possibly the most hated politician in Scotland. When Scottish Secretary was  personally responsible for forcing through many unpopular policies, converting Scotland from an “industrial” to a “service” economy, driving heavy industry out of Scotland to England. sentencing many hundreds of thousands of Scottish workers onto the dole. In many cases those over the age of 30 would never work again. Departed front line politics after Thatcher. Elevated to the House of Lords by Thatcher where he continues his attacks on Scots.

David Cameron: Sort of, claims his Scottishness through Blairmore House, the family’s ancestral home near Huntly, Aberdeenshire. He was also a member of the circle and good friend of Andrew Dunlop.

 

Liam-Fox-with-Lady-Thatch-007

 

 

The Atlantic Bridge Research and Education scheme (Thatcher’s private bank)

The falsely named scheme claimed to be an educational charity, founded in 1997 with Thatcher as its President promoting “Atlanticism”, a philosophy of cooperation between the United Kingdom and the United States promoting political, economic, and defence issues.

Its work was aimed at uniting British and American Conservatives and foreign policy hawks.

Patrons included major Tory Party donors, Michael Hintze and Michael Lewis of the British Israel Communications and Research Centre (BICOM) and healthcare conglomerate, Pfizer.

The scheme was a partnership programme with the right wing “American Legislative Exchange Council” (ALEC), a free-market organization with extensive links to American State Legislators and corporate and industrial groups.

The “charity” also co-hosted events with the “Centre for Security Policy”, “the Heritage Foundation” and “Lehman Brothers.”

In 2003, then Shadow Secretary for Health, Fox chaired a conference on “Scientific Research and Medical Provision”.

Speakers included Grace-Marie Turner of the Galen Institute, Timothy Morris of Glaxo-Smith-Kline and Peter Farrow of Pfizer.

Early moves to dismantle the NHS??? (the Guardian)

 

Adam-Werritty-and-Liam-Fo-005

 

 

The Scheme is exposed as a fraud

US and UK charity rules explicitly forbid charities from participating in politics, stating:

“Charitable organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office.”

In September 2009, the UK Charity Commission was forced to conduct a regulatory compliance investigation into the affairs of “Atlantic Bridge” after receiving complaints about  political partisanship.

Namely:

 Amanda Bowman, Chief Executive Officer, Atlantic Bridge had said:

“Americans should look forward to 6 May 2010, after which David Cameron and his government will likely assume power. He will be good for America and better for the Special Relationship.”

Congressman, John Campbell, who sat on the Atlantic Bridge advisory board, wrote:

“Britain’s socialized medicine system is enormously inefficient, wasteful, and costly. This is part of the reason why Britons have seen higher costs and the rationing of care.”

And it was alleged that Tory Party,  shadow cabinet ministers, had been incorrectly appointed to serve on the management team of the charity and in that capacity they had rubbished the UK, NHS in healthcare debates with US officers.

 

Anita-and-Poju-Zabl_228561kPoju Zabludowicz & Wife Anita

 

 

A critical report by the Charity Commission ruled that:

“it is not evident that the scheme has advanced education and this might  lead members of the public to call into question its independence from party politics.

The scheme is to review its policies bringing them into line with its charitable objectives.  The “Atlantic Bridge” was dissolved  soon after.

Final accounts showed that 58% of the income of the charity had come from one source: the Hintze Family Foundation.

 

Liam-Fox-answers-question-007

 

 

The Atlantic Bridge Board Members

The Atlantic Bridge drew upon the experience and expertise of a board of directors, advisory council and an executive council.

Each entity included experienced individuals from political, business and academic backgrounds on both sides of the Atlantic.

Honorary Patron:  The Rt Hon. The Baroness Thatcher

Advisory Council: UK (at some time)

UK Chairman: Dr Liam Fox. MP: Eleanor Laing. MP: John Whittingdale. MP: Michael Gove. MP: George Osborne. MP: William Hague. MP: Chris Grayling. MP:

Advisory Council: US (at some time)

US (hon) Chairman: Jon Kyl. Senator: Council members: Lindsey Graham. Senator: Joe Lieberman. Senator: Mel Martinez. Senator: John Campbell. Congressman: Adam Putnam. Congressman

 

fox hinze

 

 

Executive Council

Chairman: Scott Syfert: Frank Fahrenkopf, Jr.: Alan Guarino: Nicholas Howard: Clark S. Judge: Malcolm Scott: Michael Hintze:

A hedge fund, owned by Hintze, the world’s 880th richest person and one of the Tory Party’s biggest donors, donated substantial amounts of money to “The Atlantic Bridge” .

 

hinze34Michael Hintze

 

 

Board of Directors

Ross Bevevino: Amanda Bowman: Craig Earnshaw: John Falk: Professor Robert MacLaren:

Trustee’s

Professor Patrick Minford, Cardiff Business School: Lord Astor, MoD Junior Minister:  Andrew Dunlop. (yup!!! he keeps on surfacing.

Staff

Catherine Bray – US Executive Director
Adam Werritty – UK Executive Director
Kara Watt – Operations Director
Gabby Bertin – Later David Cameron’s spokeswoman.

 

David-Cameron-and-Liam-Fo-007

 

 

October 2011: Liam Fox: anointed by Thatcher, stymied by Whitehall

US benefactors and right-wing friends helped Fox to promote the Atlanticist agenda but he always stood out as the pre-eminent Atlanticist in the Tory cabinet, a man intent on carrying the flame of the Reagan-Thatcher years beyond the cold war and into modern global battles against Islamist terrorism.

In his speeches to the conservative US Heritage Foundation, Fox always hammered home the importance of the special relationship, the pre-eminence of NATO and the need for Britain to maintain a strong defence to maintain its global status.

Frequent speaking engagements to right-wing think-tanks in Washington gave him the chance to meet wealthy benefactors willing to finance his thinking. It was this belief in the pre-eminence of the Atlantic relationship that led him to form the “Atlantic Bridge”.

Some of his views set him apart from the rest of the cabinet and put him at odds with the defence establishment at the Ministry of Defence prompting a friend to say: “Some describe him as vain, but he has something to be vain about. He is a genuine intellect and thinks big picture”.

In speech after speech he warned the EU was intent on building a rival military command structure.

The presence of Lady Thatcher at his 50th birthday party in Admiralty House was an act of anointment as leader of the Conservative right.

In office he prided himself on developing what he described as his own defence diplomacy, trying to redress the damage he believed Labour had inflicted by neglecting key allies.

Confirming his global activism, he signed 27 defence agreements around the world while in office.

He formed the “Northern Group” with Nordic and Baltic countries and held the first bilateral visit by a UK minister to India in five years , to Turkey in seven years and signed the UK-France defence treaty. (Scoops)

 

Liam-Fox-arrives-at-the-P-008

 

 

15 October 2011: Tory Party links to US radical right exposed

David Cameron stands accused of allowing a secret right-wing agenda to flourish at the heart of the Conservative party, as fallout from the resignation of Fox exposed his close links with a US network of lobbyists, climate change deniers and defence hawks.

Fox falling on his sword will not mark the end of the furore engulfing the Tories,  as opposition politicians stepped up demands for the prime minister to explain why several senior members of his cabinet were involved in an Anglo-American organization apparently at odds with his party’s environmental commitments and pledge to defend free healthcare.

At the heart of the complex web linking Fox to a raft of businessmen, lobbyists and US neocons is the now defunct charity, “Atlantic Bridge”, which was set up with the purported aim of “strengthening the special relationship” but became mired in controversy.

And there is the seedy partnership with an organization called the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEX).  A  powerful US lobbying organization, which, in addition to receiving funding from pharmaceutical, weapons and oil interests, is heavily funded by the Koch Charitable Foundation whose founder, Charles G Koch, is one of the most generous donors to the Tea Party movement in the US and, via a series of foundations, Koch and his brother, David, have given millions of dollars to global warming skeptics, according to Greenpeace.

 

article-0-02CADB2400000578-486_468x421

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rennie – A Consummate Liar and His Similar Minded Colleagues Are Anticipating Scottish Voters Will Forgive Them Their Trespasses – This Reminder Will Hopefully Remind the Electorate of The Treacherous Willie and His Wonka Gang

 

rennie5611043093_1565752753706989_9065576706820729752_n

 

 

William Cowan Rennie – Liberal Democrat

William Cowan Rennie was born in Fife and grew up in Strathmiglo, where his family ran the village shop and still live today. His mother was secretary of the local community association and his grandfather was the local Minister. He lives in Kelty with his wife Janet and their two sons, Alexander and Stephen. He is a keen runner and is a member of Dunfermline’s Carnegie Harriers. He was also runner-up in the 2006 Scottish Coal-Carrying Championships held in Kelty. Rennie was one of the 50 MPs who ran a mile to raise money for Sport Relief finishing close behind the winner, David Davies.

He went to Bell Baxter High School in Cupar, Fife, before going to Paisley College of Technology, where he graduated with a B.Sc. degree in Biology. After that, he received a Diploma in Industrial Administration at Glasgow College. After college, Rennie spent most of his early career as a Liberal Democrat election campaigner and official before working as a public relations consultant in the private sector. He became the Member of Parliament (MP) for Dunfermline and West Fife after a by-election win in February 2006.

 

 

rennie7imagesbg

 

 

He lost this seat to Labour in the May 2010 UK general election but was subsequently appointed in the same month by the newly formed UK Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition as a Special Government Adviser (SPAD) working for the Liberal Democrat Scottish Secretaries of State Michael Moore then Danny Alexander at the Scotland Office. He later resigned from his special adviser role in June 2010 to stand for the Scottish Parliament in the May 2011 elections. Despite the overall collapse of the party in the election he was elected as a list member for the Mid Scotland and Fife region. He was soon after elected unopposed as leader of the decimated Scottish Liberal Democrat party, replacing Tavish Scott.

While a student at the Paisley College of Technology he was depute president of the student union. Rennie ran the Scottish Young Liberal Democrats (later reformed as Liberal Youth Scotland) and after graduation went on to work for the English Liberal Democrats in Cornwall. He then went on to work for the Liberal Democrats’ campaigns department, and was the successful agent in the 1993 Christchurch by-election in Dorset. After managing the party’s campaigns in the South West England region, securing the return of a sizeable number of new MPs in the 1997 General Election, he moved back to Scotland where he was Chief Executive of the Scottish Liberal Democrats from 1997 to 1999, and then the party’s Chief of Staff in the new Scottish Parliament from 1999-2001.

From 2001 to 2006 he worked for the small Scottish communications firm McEwan Purvis as an account director helping advise businesses and charities such as the Royal Society of Chemistry and Asthma UK. During his time at McEwan Purvis, Rennie was a press adviser to Fife Council’s Liberal Democrat Opposition Group and a member of the Dunfermline Focus editorial team, working with Dunfermline’s Lib Dem councillors on local issues.

 

 

mh

 

 

Following the death of Rachel Squire MP, Rennie stood in the Dunfermline and West Fife by-election on 9 February 2006 and overturned a huge Labour majority to win the seat. In the House of Commons, he was a member of the Liberal Democrat shadow defence team, chair of their parliamentary campaigns unit, and a member of the Commons Defence Select Committee. During his time as an MP, he campaigned on local constituency issues such as abolishing the bridge tolls, changing the law to protect female learner drivers from sex offenders, improvements to cancer services at Queen Margaret Hospital, and local jobs (including at Longannet Power Station and Rosyth Dockyard). In the General Election of 6 May 2010 Rennie lost his seat to the Labour candidate Thomas Docherty.

Rennie returned to front-line politics as an MSP when he won a regional list seat for the Liberal Democrats in the Scottish Parliament’s Mid-Scotland and Fife region at the Holyrood elections on 5 May 2011. He was the only new Lib Dem MSP to win a seat in this election. After the resignation of the Scottish Liberal Democrats’s leader, Willie Rennie was made their new leader. He vowed to stand up to the “SNP bulldozer” majority, and refused to distance his party from the UK Liberal Democrats.

 

 

rennie mag2
February 2006: Willie Rennie elected in Dunfermline by-election surprise

The one obvious thing that should happen – but probably won’t – in the wake of the ground breaking result in Dunfermline is that the ludicrous Labour-LibDem coalition that purports to run devolved Scotland should come to an end. That way we might return, at last, to a bit of honest politics.

Able candidate that he is,  the truth is that Rennie and the Liberal Democrats fought an entirely fraudulent campaign based on a wholly bogus prospectus. The plain fact is that, while that perennial curse of governing parties – the fed-up factor – as well as general disillusionment over things like the Iraq war played a part in turning voters against Labour, the big issues were local issues.

And whereas in the past the Lib Dem “pavement politics” enabled them to cash in on these local gripes they were, in those cases, a party of opposition. In Dunfermline and West Fife they were in part responsible for the causes of these local gripes. They are a party of government in Scotland but they pretend, when it suits them, to be something else.

The deciding role on the Forth Road Bridge tolls and the downgrading of Queen Margaret Hospital is the responsibility of the Scottish Executive, yet the Lib Dems come over all hurt and innocent – who us? – when you remind them that their ministers play key roles in that administration.

The writing was on the wall for this disaster for Labour last May when the Lib Dems finished second in 15 Westminster constituencies. I wrote then that Alistair Darling, for one, was getting mightily fed up of Holyrood Labour’s accommodations with the greatest bunch of chancers Scottish politics has ever seen. With just over one year to go before the elections to the Scottish Parliament, is Labour to continue allowing the Lib Dems to claim all the credit for what little good has come out of devolution, yet blame them when things come unstuck? If they do, they might well find that this cuckoo in their nest will oust them completely.

They must tear up the partnership agreement as soon as possible, form a minority administration and bring back some plain dealing into our political life. That way might threaten Jack McConnell’s continued tenancy of Bute House, but it would also get the Lib Dems out of their limousines and back on the buses. I suspect the pressure for this sort of draconian action must be ferocious right now from the likes of Mr Darling and his boss, Gordon Brown. Devolution is killing off what we used to know as the Scottish Labour Party.

Westminster Labour and Holyrood Labour is the real coalition in Scottish politics now. It’s not a proper party any more, merely a loose grouping of disparate politicians all pulling in different directions and held together by an increasingly distant folk memory of how things used to be. Devolution did this to them. And don’t let them say they weren’t warned. Only scrapping their dirty deal with the Lib Dems can save them. http://www.scotsman.com/news/make-the-coalition-chancers-come-clean-1-1409170

 

 

rennie10Fib launcherRaytheon Cluster Bomb Launcher

 

 

November 2006: Ban the bombs I helped sell! says Willie Rennie

This weeks’s Westminster PMQ’s were full of Fibdem screamers! Rennie (Libdem defence spokesperson) did not want to be outdone by his leader,(Clegg) so he decided to get in on the fibbing. He asked the Prime Minister:

Rennie (Dunfermline and West Fife) (LD): “After the conflict ended, cluster bombs used in Lebanon by Israel had resulted in 159 casualties, including 23 deaths so far. In Geneva last week, why did the UK not support calls from the UN Secretary-General, the International Committee of the Red Cross and 27 nations for urgent action? In Oslo next year, will the Prime Minister push for a ban on those indiscriminate bombs, or does he agree with the Minister of State, Ministry of Defence, who has responsibility for the armed forces, who strongly advocates the use of such bombs?”

But he should have declared an interest. Faithful readers will be aware we flagged up Rennie’s past before and his association with Raytheon. He was a top PR man at McEwan Purvis who had the merchants of death as their client. Yes, it is the Raytheon – the weapons manufacturer. Looks like Oor’Willie is not only a political opportunist but the worst kind of hypocrite seeing as Raytheon is a proud manufacturer of, you guessed it, CLUSTER BOMBS.

You can see also see Willie meeting the Acting Director of Raytheon in a press release drafted by none other than McEwan Purvis! Of course he went to the factory in his capacity as a new MP. (Note the picture of the F-18 that carries the very same cluster bomb below. Also his ol’workmate’s email address at the top. Willie, Willie, Willie, we couldn’t even make this stuff up.) Is there no depth-charge to which two-faced fibbers will sink?

http://fibdems.blogspot.co.uk/2006/11/ban-bombs-i-helped-sell.html
http://www.fibdems.blogspot.co.uk/2006_11_01_archive.html
http://chrispaul-labouroflove.blogspot.co.uk/2007/01/lib-dem-willie-rennie-mp-happy-burns.html

 

 

 

Willie+Rennie+Scottish+Liberal+Democrats+Launch+QsbW46qUUodl

 

 

December 2006: The Dundee Courier – Willie Rennie – for whom the bridge tolls

The Lib Dems pledged their support for The Courier’s “Scrap the Tolls” campaign yesterday when they launched a petition to abolish the “Toll Charge” to cross the Forth. Until yesterday, the party had been sitting on the fence in relation to the Forth Road Bridge toll. Lib Dems sitting on the fence?!? Surely not! But it gets better.

Dunfermline and West Fife MP Rennie said he had been reluctant to jump on the anti-tolls bandwagon because of concerns about congestion. Really?!? This wouldn’t be the same Rennie who centred his Dunfermline & West Fife by-election swindle victory on a petition against an increase in tolls, would it?!?! I mean, there cannot be any photographic evidence of Willie being against tolling on the Forth Road Bridge, can there?

The article then continues at pace to point out that the person in charge of tolling on the Forth, is none other than our favourite road safety campaigner and property market guru, Ravishing Tavish-ing Scott. So, Willie, when will you be lobbying your own party hierarchy on this one then? Rather than duping the electorate with a “petition” which always seems to rear its head at election time? http://fibdems.blogspot.co.uk/2006_12_01_archive.html

 

 

cef026b7-1d51-46c6-8bb7-cd882f8a1201-620x372

 

 

February 2007: Rennie just can’t help himself.

After the fraudulent and bogus circumstances of his election which saw him take a low profile and the blasting he got for his hypocrisy and lack of commitment on cluster bombs, we have his latest initiative to con the good people of Fife – abolishing tolls on the Forth Road Bridge.

Obviously Rennie is desperate to protect his ill gotten seat by getting a FibDem MSP elected in the area. However this little local plan has now gone a bit awry leaving Rennie’s future as an MP after the next election a little forlorn.

In true FibDem hypocrisy the party most to blame for the continuation of tolls on the Forth Road Bridge is, erm, the FibDems since the Scottish Transport Minister is, aherm, a FibDem – aka the hapless Tavish Scott. It all came to head this week when a vote on abolishing tolls on the Forth Road Bridge saw Mr Scott lead the opposition and say it would be bad for the environment if they were scrapped. However Tavish seems to have missed how this statement has screwed up not only his party’s chances of taking Dunfermline West from Labour but effectively ended Rennie’s future as an MP.

No wonder Rennie was squirming on Politics Scotland as Isobel Fraser skewered him into saying he had “faith” in Tavish after exposing the lack of “credibility” he now has on the issue of tolls. Poetic justice indeed. Elected on the issue of tolls and exposed and rejected on the issue of tolls.

 

 

rennie fleet

 

 

May 2008: Rennie enjoy’s a fully funded 5 day trip to Israel

Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel (LDFI). Air travel, transport within Israel and West Bank and some hospitality paid for by LDFI. Accommodation paid for by our hosts the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

 

 

article-2284225-121EC0D3000005DC-123_634x642

 

 

July 2009: Willie Rennie in sleaze probe

A Parliamentary sleaze probe is to be held into expense claims made by Liberal Democrat Willie Rennie MP who paid his local party £14,000 for an office which cost them half that to lease. John Lyon, the parliamentary standards commissioner, has agreed to Labour Party calls for an investigation into the rental arrangements of Rennie, Lib Dem MP for Dunfermline.

Last month, it emerged that Rennie and fellow Lib Dem MSP Jim Tolson had paid a total of £21,000 in rent to the local Lib Dems who paid just £7,050 to lease the property in the Fife town. Rennie denies channelling funds to his local party and insists that the sums he and Tolson pay are justified as they include bills for telephone and electricity costs which, he says, make up the difference between the two amounts. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-20528679.html

 

 

Liberal+Democrats+Launch+Their+2015+Election+8TXiPw8XPNel

 

 

May 2010: Former MP Willie Rennie to repay £2,000 in office costs

Rennie, the former Liberal Democrat MP, who lost his Dunfermline and West Fife seat at the general election and now working as a SPAD for the Scotland Office has apologised after he wrongly claimed for office costs on his local office, premises shared with his local party. He has accepted he will be required to pay back more than £2,000.

House of Commons authorities found that Rennie, who now works as a special adviser to the Scottish Secretary, was paid £2,647 too much for the upkeep of the office and equipment since 2006. Political opponents said the findings were “deeply embarrassing” for the Lib Dems as they accused him of trying to divert funds to the party’s election campaign.

Thomas Docherty, the Labour MP who unseated Rennie at the general election, said: “(Rennie] has been ordered to repay thousands of pounds of money and has had to apologise for the misuse of his expenses. “He wrongly directed public funds towards the Lib Dem election drive.”.

Mr Docherty also questioned the decision to appoint Rennie to such a high civil service role, adding: “Now he has been rewarded with a job as a special adviser, a political appointee who has access to extensive government facilities, (the Scottish Secretary] must guarantee his new employee does not misuse public resources once again.”

Rennie defended his conduct, saying: “The matter, as far as the standards commissioner is concerned is now concluded. There were end-of-year adjustments and mistakes made in the paperwork, but I have agreed to settle all of those matters.” http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/former-mp-willie-rennie-to-repay-163-2-000-in-office-costs-1-806396

 

Comment: Despite the foregoing nonsense Danny “Beaker” Alexander the newly appointed Chief-Secretary to the Treasury, gave Rennie a job as his SpAd after he lost his seat to Labour in the general election.

Rennie was using a scam widespread amongst LibDem MPs, renting his constituency office off his local LibDem constituency party and shifting his campaign costs onto his parliamentary expenses. It is usually difficult to prove, Rennie was unlucky to get caught, it was only that his campaign team made canvassing telephone calls to Labour activists from a phone number paid for out of parliamentary funds that also appeared on his party letterhead that did for him.

Rennie was according to a report in the Scottish Sunday Post renting the office space off his party, which meant that Commons expenses cash was going directly into the local LibDem coffers. Effectively the local LibDem party was his landlord and taxpayers’ money was being used for LibDem campaigning. Not a frugal sign from the right-hand-man of a Chief Secretary charged with cutting public expenditure.

 

 

austeritywki
April 2011: The Scottish Parliamentary election – Why did the Sun back the SNP?

Just under three weeks before the election the Sun gave it’s backing to the SNP. Rennie was not happy and started to stir the ****, but without foundation his attempts at smearing Alex Salmond were doomed to fail.

It was the judgement of the public that the decision to support the SNP had been based on blatantly obvious commercial logic. The Sun’s main competitor, the Record, being unshakably Labour, a traditional position it has taken for decades.

Taking a contrary position to the Record made obvious sales sense, particularly outside the Record’s core area of Glasgow, but the Sun could equally be agnostic; after all, not all of its readers would vote SNP. Insiders say the paper likes winners, and since in the last election when it unfairly suggested Scotland might need to consider suicide if Salmond was elected, it evidently decided this time round that the SNP leader was indeed a winner.

They also argue the SNP’s aspirational tax-cutting, and upbeat electioneering is more in tune with their readers’ outlook than the Record’s more biased reporting. Sun readers are younger, more upwardly mobile, as are SNP voters. Salmond’s advisers deny that the first minister and Murdoch have recently met, but do not deny that conversations have taken place at a senior level between Salmond and senior News International (NI) officers.

Other political observers – including those with powerful Tory allegiances – took a more jaundiced view of NI’s motives. Preventing Labour from winning back power in Edinburgh suited the Tories in London very nicely indeed, cynics say.

So with Salmond happy to do business with the Tories at Holyrood and clearly unable to deliver independence in the near future, backing the SNP is a much more attractive short-term bet for Wapping. At least, that is the very strong suspicion, and in Tory quarters too.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/2011/apr/18/why-is-the-sun-backing-alex-salmond?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A%20theguardian%2Fmedia%2Frss%20%28Media%29

 

 

rennie56s
July 2011: Willie Rennie tries to pin Alex Salmond down on News International dealings

“Dear First Minister, In light of the deeply shocking events, (phone hacking) that have unfolded over the last week, I am writing to urge you to disclose the details of your dealings with News International while seeking their endorsement. Following the criticism that you levelled at the corporation this weekend, it is inconsistent for your party to continue to accept News International’s support.

The allegations that have surfaced over recent days are dreadful, yet these follow on from those that were made a number of years ago. People in Scotland want to know what questions you asked of News International before accepting their backing for the election in May. Did you raise any concerns about phone hacking during these discussions and, if so, what assurances did you seek about the previous allegations? This scandal has shocked people throughout the country and I believe that, as First Minister, you must now make your position clear. Will you now set out the details of all discussions and negotiations between your party and News International?

http://carons-musings.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/willie-rennie-tries-to-pin-alex-salmond.html
http://carons-musings.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/back-from-holiday-have-i-missed.html
comment: As the old saying goes “Empty vessels make the most sound” and Rennie is just confirming that. For a career politician I suppose that is all he has had any experience at just to please his boss Nick. The Sun endorsed the SNP on the 19th of April less than 3 weeks before the election because they saw that they were going to be the winners. See previous post

 

 

renniemag1
May 2011: Willie Rennie, newly-elected Liberal Democrat MSP, has become the party’s Scottish leader from a short list of one.

Rennie took over from Tavish Scott when the deadline for the contest passed at noon without any other candidates stepping forward. The Lib Dems were reduced from 16 to just five MSPs in a disastrous election result earlier this month. The other Lib Dems re-elected to Holyrood are Alison McInnes on the North East list, Jim Hume on the South of Scotland list and Liam McArthur, in the Orkney constituency. Two days after the election, Shetland MSP Mr Scott resigned as leader with immediate effect.

 

 

rennie salmond cartoon

 

 

October 2011: Willie Rennie involved in a controversy over an unjustified attack on Alex Salmond

Rennie was at the centre of controversy after an offensive cartoon was published in his name depicting Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond MSP in Arab dress with his skin apparently artificially darkened. The cartoon, which was published on Rennie’s Facebook page and through his Twitter feed, followed a comment in which Alex Salmond noted “remarkable similarities” between Scotland and Qatar.

The cartoon suggested an independent Scotland would share such attributes of Qatar as an absolute monarchy, the rejection of gay rights and the imposition of the death penalty. Rennie later publicly apologised for the cartoon.

http://mpsallowances.parliament.uk/mpslordsandoffices/hocallowances/allowances-by-mp/willie-rennie/

 

 

jo-swinson-morning-star2

 
November 2011: Rennie highlights independence threat to Scottish research funding

He said: “Scotland is at the cutting edge of research and development work in the UK. Our universities are doing work which is producing technologies which the applications for could almost be limitless. The expertise exists in Scotland, but we could not do all of this exciting new research without the extra bonus funding that we receive from across the border.

The real danger of splitting Scotland from the UK is that you also split our universities from this vital source of funding which helps to fuel the innovation. We do not want to see a repeat of ‘Silicon Glen’ or cause a brain-drain to better funded projects south of the border.

Scotland is punching well above our weight in terms of funding. I am puzzled why the SNP would want to jeopardise this. Mr Salmond cannot guarantee that there would be alternative funding sources to fill the funding gap of £210 million every year.

It is clear that remaining a strong and prosperous part of the UK is best for Scotland’s bright future in research and development.” http://carons-musings.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/rennie-highlights-independence-threat.html

 

Comment: Usual Rennie twaddle. Read these: https://caltonjock.com/2014/08/30/research-funding-scares/ https://caltonjock.com/2014/08/28/major-indian-medical-and-biological-research-institutions-with-scottish-universities/

 

 

imagessc

 

 

December 2011: Wise words from Willie Rennie at Christmas

This is a brief extract from Scottish Liberal Democrat Leader Rennie’s 2012 Christmas message: “While the Nationalists play a game of political poker, bluffing their way from one missed opportunity to the next”

Full text: http://carons-musings.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/wise-words-from-willie-rennie-at.html

 

Comments:

“A sad and inaccurate statement. But just what we’ve come to expect from Rennie. Sold out in England and nasty in Scotland with no Christmas spirit of goodwill. Oh and remember that the cuts in Scotland are due to the imposition of much reduced financial allocations from Westminster don’t you ? From Danny and his team ? You know Danny from up in Moray who closed Leuchars and kept Lossie open ? And that the Lib Dems reneged on their pledge to scrap tuition fees in England ? Just checking.”

 

 

 

renni578

 
January 2012: Rennie Raises Salmond’s disrespect in Parliament

Ever the opportunist, Rennie complained that Alex Salmond arranged news interviews, where, appearing in front of a cosy fire and saltires at Bute House, he made his announcement of the referendum date before briefing his MPs who were in the Commons listening to Moore. It had all the impression of being done completely on the spur of the moment. But, why the need for the high drama? Why not just make a statement to Parliament on Wednesday lunchtime? and it was disrespectful to the Holyrood Parliament. He said:

“On a point of order, Presiding Officer. Yesterday, Scotland’s ministers at Westminster set out the United Kingdom Government’s proposals for a fair, legal and decisive referendum in two statements: one to the House of Commons and one to the House of Lords. They took 47 questions from members of Parliament.

In Scotland, the First Minister announced his date for the referendum, not to the Scottish Parliament but to Sky News. Given that the decision relates to what the First Minister called the biggest question for Scots in 300 years, and given that the Scottish Government is always concerned about the respect agenda, has the Scottish Government made a request to make a statement to this Parliament today?

Is there any reason why you, Presiding Officer, would not be able to respond positively to such a request if it were made by the Scottish ministers?” Presiding Officer Tricia Marwick said she’d not had any request for a statement.

Rennie followed up outside parliament “This shows the SNP’s disrespect for the Scottish Parliament. Instead of choosing to make a statement to the Scottish Parliament on Scotland’s biggest question for 300 years, Mr Salmond instead chose to make his statement to the media. With the SNP’s majority in Parliament, it is obvious that they feel they can do anything. The bulldozer is out of the garage.” http://carons-musings.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/rennie-highlights-salmonds-disrespect.html

 

Comment: I think the headline should read “Rennie highlights his total lack of judgement yet again”.

It is public knowledge that Salmond expressed only his PREFERRED TIMELINE for a Referendum in advance of publishing a CONSULTATION document. Therefore, whatever the language used, there is no question that ‘the date of the Referendum was announced’ anywhere other than in Rennie’s head. All that has been done is an expectation set. And by the way, why should Salmond announce anything to the Scottish Parliament when, in Rennie’s view, the Scottish Parliament doesn’t have the competence to legislate for the Referendum? Rennie’s intevention yesterday was sheer petulance probably borne out of frustration that Michael Moore was getting all the attention after he had been chosen by his Tory bosses to make a clown of himself on Tuesday. I don’t think Cameron could believe his luck that he found such a willing and able stooge.

 

 

imagessc

 

 

March 2012: Rennie attacks Alex Salmond stating he would dine out with Devil to further independence cause

Rennie alleged “By seeking to exploit Rupert Murdoch’s spiteful revenge for phone hacking the First Minister has confirmed that he will dine out with the devil to get his way on independence. The First Minister has already defended News International in his recent Sun on Sunday column and now he’s seeking a grubby deal with the media tycoon to support splitting Scotland from the rest of the UK.

This is a cynical attempt to exploit Rupert Murdoch’s personal grudge and grievance against UK politicians who rightly criticised the News of the World and the Sun over phone hacking. The real substance of last week’s cosy fire-side chat with Rupert wasn’t jobs but his revenge over Leveson. Has the First Minister no shame?”  http://carons-musings.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/rennie-salmond-would-dine-out-with.html

 

Comment: Alex Salmond is well aware he is taking a risk being seen with Murdoch but until it is proven that he was doing anything other than his job as Wee Rennie’s comments are, as usual, an attempt to smear his and the SNP’s name!!

Speeches by libDem leaders at their conference showed an incredible level of duplicity on Home Rule and disgusting slurs on the party you hate show much..I hope there is somewhere for the membership to go when the LibDem party is cast into the wilderness for a generation.

In fact their only hope for the future is Independence when honest Scottish Liberals may be able to regroup – having fired their previous leaders!

Lets just look at how the two partys compare. Alex Salmond meets Rupert Murdoch who through his large shareholding in Sky TV has 6000 employees in Scotland.

The Lib Dems take £2.5 million of what turns out to be stolen money from a donor. Now any party that is happy to criticise another party over just about anything, and had any scruples themselves, would return that money, but it appears the Lib Dems have no such scruples.

Keep up the moral indignation all you Lib Dems, you will find out in May just what the Scottish electorate think of you.

 

 

Cartoon--Maguire-Benefits-Cap
April 2012: Willie Rennie: Murdoch says “Jump”, Alex Salmond says “How high?

Rennie, Leader of the Scottish Liberal Democrats, said that First Minister Alex Salmond had been sullied by James Murdoch’s revelations at the Leveson Enquiry. Amongst e-mails filed for the Enquiry to consider, was one from Frederic Michel, News International’s Director of Public Affairs, about a meeting with Alex Salmond’s advisers on 15 June 2010: Rennie called for an urgent investigation into the circumstances behind this exchange. He said:

“It is difficult to understand why the First Minister has allowed himself to be sullied to such an extent. When the troubled media mogul said jump, it is clear that Alex Salmond was quick to say ‘how high?

We need an immediate investigation into the circumstances which led to such an outrageous exchange taking place. Alex Salmond will do anything to split Scotland from rest of UK, even cosy up to a disgraced media tycoon. http://carons-musings.blogspot.co.uk/2012/04/willie-rennie-murdoch-says-jump-alex.html

Comments:

I agree that there should be an inquiry into the alleged suggestion that a News International (NI) employee emailed advice that Mr Salmond could seek to influence “Hunt” if he was asked to. (Rennie seems to be keen to accept without question what an NI employee had written about what spokesmen for the First Minister might have have said. I’m sure there must be some doubt about the credibility of NI staff…?)

Mind also that Hunt was always 100% for Murdoch in the first place, so any need for a functionary of the FM to contact Hunt would be in doubt. A note to Cable, who had declared war on Murdoch would have been a different story.

But yes. Absolutely 100% let’s have an inquiry into Salmonds relationship with Murdoch, Hunt, Cable and anyone else. We absolutely need to know that despite the LibDem Westminster government being corrupt beyond belief and having no regard whatsoever for the law, the Scottish government and its first minister MUST be above that.

Incidentally the gripe about only the two possible first ministers debating in Scotland: The LibDem’s were happy to take part in a debate that ignored anyone but the three party leaders from England. No UKIP, BNP, or Celtic country parties involved.

The LibDem’s are given mention twice in the “extracts” supporting Murdoch’s bid? Very strange. They further quote the support of the Scottish LibDems.

Tavish Scott has already denied this. But, is Tavish to be believed yet Salmond must be a liar? Seems to me Willie Rennie is making an excellent attempt to steal Labour’s mantle for hypocrisy. http://www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Exhibit-KRM-18.pdf

 

 

rennie anti toll charge

 
August 2012: The Herald and Willie Rennie accuse the SNP of secret push to obtain a devo max option

Private correspondence obtained by The Herald shows Mr Salmond’s office had been helping campaigners wanting to widen the referendum to build the case for putting “devo max” to voters in the poll. Publicly Mr Salmond has maintained his preference is for a single question on independence, while leaving the door open in case other options emerge.

He has argued it would be his duty to include a second question if there is a groundswell of support. However, an email obtained by The Herald shows the First Minister has been working behind the scenes to generate such support.

The message was sent from Mr Salmond’s special adviser Alex Bell to Martin Sime, chief executive of the Scottish Council for Voluntary Services (SCVO) and a leading proponent of a two-question poll.

The SCVO is the driving force behind the Future of Scotland group, a loose coalition of charities, churches, student organisations and trade unions which, since launching earlier this year, has been developing a possible second question on greater devolution.

Mr Bell’s email, on June 14, provides a link to an internal report by the Unite trade union showing 62% of their members favoured a second question on devo max, according to a poll. A message attached said simply: “Read this.”

Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Rennie said: “Despite his public protestations, Alex Salmond is increasingly desperate to get a second question on the ballot paper. The fact his henchmen are manipulating independent organisations behind the scenes to achieve that second question shows just how desperate he is.”

Yesterday, an SNP representative said “Unlike the anti-independence parties, we acknowledge the strong support within civic Scotland for a second question, as underlined by the poll of Unite members.” http://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/salmond-in-secret-push-to-obtain-a-devo-max-option.18556202

But, determined to make mischief, as is his want Rennie put pen to paper and wrote to Alison Elliot, the Convener of SCVO, asking her to consider the position of Martin Sime. His letter said:

“I am sure your members will be dismayed to learn that Mr Sime is allowing the SNP to use the SCVO as a front organisation to make its case for a second question. As you are more than aware the SVCO exist to represent the views and interests of Scotland’s third sector.

Mr Sime has displayed poor judgement by involving himself in a highly polarised debate on matters of process regarding the constitutional referendum. SCVO provides expert opinion to decision makers on a range of subjects including health, education, justice and regeneration.

I value the critical role the organisation plays. However, Martin Sime is undermining the impartiality of that opinion by backing the SNP in a highly polarised debate on constitutional process matters on which he has neither locus nor expertise. I believe that Mr Sime should consider his position as Chief Executive of SCVO.”

Alison Elliot’s reply: “I consider your allegations preposterous, your interpretation of the incidents fanciful and your attempt to interfere in the business of an independent organisation unworthy of a public leader. I have no intention of asking Martin to resign.” http://carons-musings.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/scvos-alison-elliot-proves-willie.html

Rennie’s further comment: “I’ve clearly touched a raw nerve. These are serious concerns about the impartiality of the Chief Executive of SCVO and clearly deserve a better response. I think people will be concerned that SCVO has taken one side of a highly polarised, political debate.

First we had the attempt to undermine the launch of Better Together and now hard evidence of collusion with one of Alex Salmond’s close advisers. SCVO are in serious danger of undermining their reputation.”

Final comment from Rev Stu: I’m still keen to hear what Mr Sime actually did to merit Willie Rennie’s ire other than RECEIVE an UNSOLICITED email. Perhaps there’s a vital aspect of the story I’ve missed, because it’s staggeringly, blindingly obvious even to a total idiot that calling for someone to lose their job because SOMEONE ELSE sent them an email is a twisted, moronic absurdity.

 

 

rennie8

 

 

August 2012:  Willie Rennie attacks Alex Salmond for “pandaing” to China over Dalai Lama

So, now we know. Rennie was right all along. Scotland’s First Minister didn’t put up any sort of a fight when China sent the boys round to talk about the Dalai Lama. Today’s Scotsman has the details.

The Scottish Government didn’t get involved in meeting the Dalai Lama when he visited Scotland between 21 and 24 June. Alex Salmond refused point blank to meet him, and nor did any other member of his Government. He had no problem giving time to the Chinese Consul General two weeks before, though. The Scotsman have obtained a record of that meeting and it makes no mention of any discussion taking place on human rights.

This is what the note says about the Dalai Lama’s visit:

“The Ambassador asked the First Minister about the Dalai Lama’s visit to Scotland in June. The First Minister clarified that is a private visit at the invitation of the Conference of Edinburgh’s Religious Leaders and the Edinburgh Interfaith Association, amongst others. The Scottish Government is not involved in the visit.”

It almost sounds apologetic. A “Yes, he’s here, but it’s now’t to do with us.” Not “We welcome the fact that he’s coming. He’s an important figure in the world who stands for peaceful protest and human rights. I’m going to meet him. I know you don’t like it, but that’s the way it is. I hope that you’ll reflect on the way your Government treats your citizens.” http://carons-musings.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/willie-rennie-was-right-alex-salmond.html
Comment: Rennie Quote – “This is what the note says about the Dalai Lama’s visit:

“The Ambassador asked the First Minister about the Dalai Lama’s visit to Scotland in June. The First Minister clarified that is a private visit at the invitation of the Conference of Edinburgh’s Religious Leaders and the Edinburgh Interfaith Association, amongst others. The Scottish Government is not involved in the visit.”

So – it was a pastoral visit, not a political one, as I believe the Dalai Lama himself confirmed. No Government ministers anywhere in the UK met with Tenzin Gyatso during his recent visit. When he visited the religious communities, the Dalai Lama did not request a meeting with any political figures in the UK. Why should Scotland’s First Minister be the only one in the UK to be criticised for not forcing his presence on this homophobic, pro-life, CIA-backed religious leader? If Rennie care’s so much about Human Rights, then why didn’t he take up the issue of the Dalai Lama’s persecution, discrimination and repression of the Dorje Shugden sect?

 

 

lib-dems-party-con_1999913c

 
August 2012: Rennie questions Alex Salmond’s £400k spend on “London embassy” for the Olympics

The Scottish Government, understandably enough, had decided to showcase Scotland to the representatives of business and government from all over the world who are currently visiting London for the Olympics. Showing Scotland off is never a bad thing, especially when we are hosting the Commonwealth Games in 2 years’ time. http://wayback.archive-it.org/3011/20130201200407/http://www.scotland.gov.uk/News/Releases/2012/07/FM-Scotland-House27072012#

“They have, bizarrely, blown £400,000 on hiring the Army and Navy Club in Pall Mall and renaming it Scotland House. There, according to First Minister Alex Salmond, visitors can see what a great place Scotland is to have a holiday or do business in, and what wonderful food and drink and culture we export all across the globe – not to mention our pride in our sporting history, personified by heroes like Eric Liddell.

That’s all very well, but it turns out that they were offered the use of rooms in Dover House, where the Scotland Office is based not just at cheaper cost, but at no cost whatsoever. Not only that, but that building overlooks Horse Guards Parade, so they would have been able to take in the Beach Volleyball at the same time. What possible reason could they have had for refusing that offer?”

It’s a bit rich for Mr Salmond to complain about a lack of funds for schools and hospitals while spending almost half a million pounds on a plush London address during the Olympics. Spending the equivalent of a nurses’ annual salary every day on the exclusive Pall Mall address when Dover House was available free of charge is a colossal waste of money.

An invitation was made to the Scottish Government to use Dover House to promote Scotland, something that both the UK and Scottish Government are keen to do during the Olympics. It is one of the government’s finest buildings and Michael Moore has already hosted receptions there this week to take advantage of its prime location to promote Scotland on the world stage.” http://carons-musings.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/rennie-questions-salmonds-400k-on.html

 

Comment: Widely distributed, Westminster Council Public Notice: “The area where Dover House is located will be extremely busy throughout the entire Olympic Games as Beach Volleyball is also taking place at Horse Guards Parade. Whitehall and Parliament Street will be access only 6am – midnight between 25 July – 14 August as the road will be used for athlete and other Olympic Family members to access the Horse Guards venue. Roads in the area (particularly Trafalgar square, Parliament square and Victoria Embankment) will be busiest when spectators, workforce and members of the Games Family are travelling to and from venues before the start and after the end of sessions. There we have it. An underhand offer from the Lib/Dem Scottish Minister of State. Use of Dover House would have been a disaster.

But surely this can’t be right, cynical, or at the very least, Wee Rennie (the man who can do no wrong) must not have been aware of that fact. After all, Wee Rennie is a man of integrity.

Recently, after writing to the head of Scotland’s civil service to complain about their politicisation, he was straight on the blower to Whitehall, complaining about the UK government using departments such as DWP and HMRC to come up with positive arguments for the Union. Oh, wait, I remember now, “No” he didn’t because he has no integrity, no principles and absolutely zero credibility. To say Dover House would not have been suitable simply makes no sense. It smacks of putting party politics ahead of taking advantage of the Olympics to benefit Scotland.

 

 

rennie mag1

 

 

October 2012: Willie Rennie’s leader’s speech to Scottish Liberal Democrat Autumn Conference in Dunfermline.

I am not printing it but you can read the entire long winded diatribe here: http://carons-musings.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/willie-rennies-speech-in-full-to-lib.html
Comments:

“I.AM. Jolly is funny. Wee Rennie is just pathetic. Congratulating a council candidate who came third in a three horse race! How high the fortunes of the Lib Dems are at present. If you ever come second any place will you have aparty?

“I was going to read Rennie’s speech but I see that its only slightly longer than the Gettysburg Address so I can’t be bothered. The first few gripey lines are enough to more than set the tone and calibre of all the rest.

“Rennie and his erherm….”parliamentary party” turned up in a Mini. And instead of an inspiring eulogy he delivered a 3,000 word address that was an inspiration to nobody at all. Full of catty remarks, trite rather than pithy and much much too long. Clearly he has not heard that brevity is the sole of wit!

 

 

rennie6

 
March 2014: Willie Rennie unhappy with his own party’s bedroom tax said in a BBC webcast that the bedroom tax ‘should just go’.

Lib/Dem leader Rennie has called for the bedroom tax to be axed because the controversial welfare reform isn’t “working as intended.”

The measure has been at the heart of the welfare reforms being imposed by the Coalition Government and Rennie has steadfastly defended it. But, in a shock climbdown today and contrary to his own party policy, he said it should be scrapped. Asked if the “tax” should go, he told the BBC: “I don’t think it should stay.”

Rennie had always described the changes to housing benefits as “tough”, but had never signalled that he may be in favour of scrapping the policy altogether. But he said in a BBC webcast today: “The principle behind [the spare room subsidy] I can understand, but to be honest I don’t think it is working as it was intended and I think it should just go, and it should go quickly.”

Meanwhile, his Westminster colleagues continue to support the tax on the poor. Here are the names of 7 Scottish LibDem MPs who voted against scrapping the bedroom tax:

Sir Alan Beith (Berwick-upon-Tweed), Sir Menzies Campbell (Fife North East), Alistair Carmichael (Orkney & Shetland), Michael Moore (Berwickshire, Roxburgh & Selkirk), Sir Robert Smith (Aberdeenshire West & Kincardine), Jo Swinson (Dunbartonshire East), John Thurso (Caithness, Sutherland & Easter Ross.)

And the names of 3 Scottish LibDem MPs who abstained from voting against the bill:

Danny Alexander (Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch & Strathspey), Charles Kennedy (Ross, Skye & Lochaber), Alan Reid (Argyll & Bute.)

http://www.scotsman.com/news/uk/willie-rennie-calls-for-bedroom-tax-to-be-axed-1-3356980

 

 

343774-liberal-democrat-leader-willie-rennie-msp-at-pedal-on-parliament-event-april-25-2015-quality-news-im

 

 

April 2015: GPS tracking system puts Willie Rennie in the spotlight after he leaves it on following a bike ride only for it to record his car breaking the speed limit.

Rennie had just led the Fife feeder ride to a “Pedal on Holyrood” event on Saturday using a state of the art tracking application called Strava to log his route and time. The application, popular with runners and cyclists, uses GPS sateliite technology in mobile devices to map a user’s position and speed. Users sign up to the service and can then share their journeys publicly. Throughout the event the 47-year-old was logged at an average of a leisurely 11mph.

But after returning to Inverkeithing it appears he got into his car to drive home and forgot to switch off his GPS. Strava then tracked the MSP’s journey back to his home near Kelty, Fife. At one point on the M90, near Hill of Beath, the tracker clocked him travelling at 81.2mph. A Scottish Liberal Democrat spokesman said: “This is an app for measuring running and cycling, not cars travelling on motorways. “Willie always tries to stick to the speed limit and does not believe he broke it on this drive, but it is always worth everyone remembering the importance of driving safely.”

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics/cycling-app-shows-lib-dem-5596733

 

 

rennie1

 
April 2015: Before the general election – For Willie Rennie, the Scots Lib Dem leader, it seems tactical voting has begun to haunt his dreams.

Here is his favourite story from the campaign trail so far. “I met a lady in Crammond,” he says. “She said to me, ‘I hate you. I hate your leader. I hate your party. You’ve done nothing in the coalition. I love Ruth Davidson. I love the Conservatives, I’ve always voted for them. But I’m going to have to vote for you to stop the SNP’. “If we can get people like that voting for us, anything is possible.”

Such unabashed talk of tactical voting is a sign of how the country has split down the middle since the referendum. It is also an unsubtle commentary on the Lib Dems’s whole campaign.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:387XjWsLadEJ:www.heraldscotland.com/politics/scottish-politics/willie-rennie-why-scots-should-vote-tactically.123924166+&cd=16&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk

 

 

refer rennie
April 2015: Willie eyes a return to power

He laughs a lot, Rennie. It is a contagious chuckle, the kind blurted by a duvet-cloaked schoolboy tearing through a Beano annual by torchlight. Contrition, though, is his main thing. An outmoded virtue, perhaps, but the leader of the Scottish Liberal Democrats happily admits to some conservat… well, let’s say old-fashioned values.

This is a man worth the watching. Strives to present as affable yet underneath that is a chauvinistic nature. In debate with Nicola Sturgeon he repeatedly said ‘she’ and ‘her’ as if she didn’t warrant enough respect to be called by her name.
Comment: This is a joke right? Why is this clown being given media coverage, he is an embarrassment, his party is poison, Its Ex leaders Steel and Ashdown covered up and protected paedophile Cyril Smith, offered him up for a knighthood and refuse to discuss the child sex abuse scandals which their MP was involved in. and this paper gives them good press. What a joke.

http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/interview-willie-rennie-eyes-a-return-to-power-1-3746783

 

 

rennie 5
April 2015: Liberal Democrat Party and Willie Rennie hypocrisy continues

The Liberal Democrats are running their election campaign on double-standards, the Scottish Conservatives said, today. LibDem leader Rennie is quoted as openly criticising plans for English votes for English laws (EVEL) today. However, in the UK Government paper on the issue, the Liberal Democrats section reads:

“It cannot be right that a future government could pursue policies in England in areas devolved to the Scottish Parliament using the votes of Scottish MPs, even if this was not supported in England.

The so-called West Lothian question can no longer go unanswered. The Liberal Democrats believe that English MPs at Westminster should have a stronger voice and a stronger veto over purely English only issues.”

http://www.scottishconservatives.com/2015/04/liberal-democrat-hypocrisy-continues/

 

 

Willie+Rennie+Scottish+Liberal+Democrats+Launch+7gEs3DliKNtl

 

 

April 2015: Rennie appeals to public for tactical voters

Rennie has backed an anti-SNP tactical voting strategy in the hope that it will shore up his party’s dwindling support going into the general election.

The leader of the Scottish Liberal Democrats said that unionist Scots were already backing the party in some seats to stop the Nationalists. He made a direct plea to others who “might oppose a lot of what we say” to use “smart thinking” when they voted.

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/scotland/article4403966.ece

 

 

new-liberal-democrat-anorak

 
May 2015: Before the general election – Vote intelligently says Willie Rennie

The Scottish Liberal Democrat leader said the choice voters are facing in the general election is “quite straightforward”, adding: “No one party will have a majority, so therefore we have to decide who do we want to have the biggest influence in the next parliament?
Comment: The hatred of the SNP knows no bounds from these utter cartoon politicians. Willie Rennie is a complete balloon, whom, like his lapdog Unionist companions are saying absolutely anything to win votes, I heard him this morning literally trying to take credit for anything that was remotely positive.

He forgets that the facts are public knowledge and he and his party sold their political soul 5 years ago never to be forgiven. As soon as they are gone the better it will be for Scotland. We do not need two faced political parasites and that is what the Fiberals are.

http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/vote-lib-dem-to-stop-snp-says-willie-rennie-1-3750795

 

 

Lembit-Opik-Book

 
May 2015: Post election – Willie Rennie claims he is ‘hopeful for the future’ after SNP tsunami sweeps across Scotland.

The Liberal Democrats lost 10 of the 11 Scottish seats they had held at Westminster.

Nicola Sturgeon’s party now has 56 MPs, with only Alistair Carmichael, who had been the Scottish Secretary in the coalition government, managing to retain his Orkney and Shetland seat.

Despite that Rennie said: “Our vision for Scotland is hopeful for the future, founded on opportunity and liberty for all.

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics/despite-losing-10-out-11-5668091

 

 

 

Leader of the Scottish Liberal Democrats, Willie Rennie, speaks during the Liberal Democrats annual conference in Brighton, southern England September 25, 2012. REUTERS/Luke MacGregor (BRITAIN - Tags: POLITICS)

 
May 2015: Post election – Message to Liberals from Willie Rennie

“We have an ongoing duty to the people who voted for us to promote liberal values.”
Comment: I’m sorry but Rennie has his head in the sand. I can’t understand why, as a failed leader, he hasn’t come under pressure to stand down in the same way that Murphy has. I think it is more to do with the fact that he is not taken seriously really by anyone in politics.

http://www.libdemvoice.org/a-message-from-willie-rennie-45851.html

 

 

 

stevebell
May 2015: Salmond given new foreign affairs role

Alex Salmond has been named SNP foreign affairs spokesman at Westminster.  Lib Dem Leader Willie Rennie said “Alex Salmond’s recent mantle of foreign affairs spokesperson for the SNP is the equivalent of putting Mr Bean in charge of the World Bank.”

http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/salmond-given-new-foreign-affairs-role-206654n.126009784
Comment: The bile from Rennie knows no end. His blind hatred of Alex Salmond and the SNP is well documented and the Scottish public are fed up with the constant “SNP Bad, Bad, Bad,” utterings. Rennie should do the honourable thing and resign his position as have other political leaders tarnished with the mantel of failure.

 

 

Scottish-Referendum43Scottish-Referendum42Scottish-referendum46

 

 

 

Blair – Brown – Balls – Miliband – Darling – The Real Story Of The New Labour Finance Team That Brought The UK To It’s Knee’s

 

 

10603288_10152667059726047_8782007870087924874_n10429238_845482792148489_3740684647203776803_n

 
1986: The British American Project – The USA Groomed Gordon Brown and the Labour Party for office in the 1980s

The US, International Visitor Program is a subtle exercise that trades heavily on America’s considerable cultural and social capital, in other words its soft power. But the altruistic aspect of providing the trip is always balanced with the intention of some kind of return. An invitation offered at the start of a young, obviously talented politician’s career can pay off later if, as expected, that politician rises through the ranks in the following years.

A US funded trip has the potential; thanks to the extra information sources or contacts it can provide, to be career enhancing, particularly for those in the media or academics but also for MPs. It is not a case of undue influence but of pragmatically attempting to establish favourable, constructive relations early on with someone expected to achieve greater influence in the future. The element of chance that it will succeed in the long term is of course large. In 1984 the International Visitor Program showed the first signs of this approach, with an invitation, (accepted)  to Gordon Brown.

 

 

article-1216555-069CAFEC000005DC-334_634x49710856590_439328616232019_452178123173838636_o

 
1998: Ah !!! The Private Finance Initiative, (PFI).

Lest we forget. The PFI presented as one of the greatest financial cock-ups in modern times, recklessly committed to by the Labour government, smitten by the spell of Thatcher’s acolytes Blair & Brown.

The sell-off, of, in excess of 1000 UK taxpayer owned buildings to private enterprise was a disgrace then and is even more so now. The UK will effectively be handing over vast amounts of rent money, (leasing back, formally owned depreciating assets) from a foreign owned conglomerate, (Mapeley Steps) almost without limit of time. What a disaster.

Adding insult to injury the company, having bought the properties at a knock down price then immediately transferred ownership title and all other aspects of the contract to a Caribbean tax haven so that all revenue gathered from the UK government would be free of any form of UK tax liability.

Embarrassing indeed, but there’s more. The property sell off, included the entire HM Revenue and Tax Office estates UK wide, who, at the time of the sale were officially committed to the closure of tax haven loopholes. You couldn’t make it up.!!!!! Scotland needs to be rid of these extortionately financially draining PFI schemes.   http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmpubacc/553/553.pdf

 

 

Gordon-Brown11021076_1020649231296638_5026923398780419747_n

 
THREE FULL YEARS BEFORE THE (TOTALLY UNEXPECTED) FINANCIAL DISASTER HIT THE UK

 

 

article-2270948-1541BC71000005DC-446_308x425Peter Mandelson Mellowing

 

 

2004: Warnings Ignored – Warnings Ignored – Warnings Ignored – Warnings Ignored – Warnings Ignored

Lyndon H Larouche jr. ranks highly among the world’s most influential international political figures. His exceptional qualifications as a long-range economic forecaster, was confirmed when, in 2004 he forewarned in the “Executive Intelligence Review” of the erupting, global systemic crisis of the world’s economy.

 

 

brownmandelson

 

 

2004: Warning of Unsustainable House Prices

House prices in Southern England were at the outrageous level of 7.5 times local earnings. Nationwide, the multiple was 5.6. Since 2001, house prices had risen by one-third in Greater London, but almost two-thirds in the rest of the UK. Halifax Bank, The UK’s biggest mortgage lender, reported that the average UK property now cost nearly £158,000.

UK householders were borrowing heavily on the bubble. In April, they took out a record £6.4 billion against the value of their houses, household debt was at a record 120% of disposal income, up from 100% during the pre-crash 1980s. as a direct result of ever increasing net mortgage borrowing which year on year was up:

* 27% over April 2003

* 60% over April 2002

* 131% over April 2001!

In France, by comparison, household debt was 58.7% of disposable income. Bets were being taken, which would burst first, the UK debt bubble, or Tony Blair’s political career.

 

 

10993098_436475866517294_2032262041814994997_n10405508_818905011498032_7364655500765974693_n

 

 

2004: Economy Overheating – Brown Dithering

Then, there was the economy. The Bank of England chose 10 June 2004 to announce it was raising interest rates by a quarter-point for the second time in two months.

This was even a greater blow for Blair.  Bank Governor Mervyn King followed up, four days later, with a blunt speech warning price inflation was now over 20% a year in Britain.

With credit card and other debt added on to mortgage obligations, British households were £1 trillion ($1.835 trillion) in debt — a bubble just as bad, per capita, as that in America.

One trillion pounds debt equals Britain’s annual output, the Financial Times noted sourly on 2 June 2004.

 

 

brown pocketmoneytrident

 

 

2004: Britain’s Housing Bubble Surfaces.

Already, the Bank of England had carried out four 0.25% to bring its base rate up to 4.5%, and there was widespread discussion that the rate would need to be raised to 5% before the year end.

Bank Governor Mervyn King’s June 14 statement that British home prices were not sustainable shook up the financial markets, and in a limited way, acknowledged the problem.

But while King and Greenspan made different public statements, both they and their respective central banks indicated that they hoped for a miraculous soft landing for their twin housing bubbles.

That is a fantasy wish: such highly-leveraged, immense housing would suffer a hard landing.

Synarchists Cheney and Blair would need to be prudent and prepare to experience their very brief last days in office.

Click to access eirv31n25-20040625_068-election_fiasco_kicks_blair_new.pdf

 

 

catholic-blairCash_682_1383604a

 

 

2004: Local and European Election Fiasco – Blair Takes A Kicking

British Prime Minister Tony Blair suffered his worst humiliation, in the June 2004 local elections and European Parliament contests across England and Wales, since he was elected in May 1997.

The result of Blair’s Labour Party’s miserable showing in both, is that the Prime Minister is now, at best, a lame duck, In the local council elections, ripe to be removed from power at some early date in the coming months.

In London on June 15, Blair showed the strain in his monthly press conference; he was rambling, losing track of his thoughts in mid-sentence, and issuing contradictory political assertions.

British press the next day noted that the best indication that Blair was losing it, was that he broke down amidst the subject he loves best: praising himself and the great domestic “successes” of his New Labour regime. He resigned not long after.

 

 

brownAfter the Scottish referendum.

 
2006: Gordon Brown,  “The Leaker”  sets the standard for Jim Murphy and fellow Labour politicians to follow

During his long years in opposition Brown became a regular conduit for publicising confidential documents leaked to him by civil servants and he was admired for the way he could put them to good use when attacking the Conservatives. Once Labour were in power, he demonstrated an equally deft touch when making use of the journalists he could trust.

The press build-up his Budgets and financial statements was always carefully manipulated to prepare the ground for any changes which he intended to make and Brown continued as Prime Minister to be Labour’s leading exponent of institutionalised leaking.

At the time he was interviewed by the BBC’s Frank Bough in July 1985 he just couldn’t avoid gloating and smirking about the leaks he had orchestrated, received and passed on through his network of minions who were always eager to do his murky deeds.

Many people will have cause to have hatred in their hearts for him. He has departed the scene as a politician, but he leaves a foul stench that will linger for years to come.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIrweIqqsOc

 

 

BbpF-aECUAAgP752561734259_ecc1c63036_o

 

2007-2008: Financial Disaster

In the period 2004-2008  Brown then Alistair Darling ignored much repeated advice and public warnings issued by Lyndon H Laroche JR, many other eminent economists and Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England of the rapidly overheating British economy.

The financial “blow out” that hit the world financial markets in 2007 was brought about by defaulting mortgage holders in the USA and the UK who had been contracting to significant additional debt against their properties through excessive loans creating an unsustainable housing bubble.

Brown and Darling, conspired to divert blame away from the Labour government and had the audacity to blame the Royal Bank of Scotland for the financial disaster that befell the UK when it was clear the mismanagement of the economy was entirely the fault of a Labour Party leadership who had been warned in 2004 of an impending financial wipeout.

At a time the UK should have been introducing measures taking the heat out of the economy Brown and Darling instead played fast and loose with the electorate pushing on with a wilful expansion of the financial market, approving bank mergers funded by borrowing, looking forward only to the next General Election.

 

 

29405-royalty-free-cartoon-clip-art-of-a-stack-of-gold-coins-near-a-pot-of-leprechauns-gold-by-andy-nortnikhjs-murphy-jpg

 

 

March 24 2009; European Parliament, Strasbourg – British Prime Minister Gordon Brown Is Taken Apart By European MEP’s

An unelected Prime Minister, never elected to office who forced through the Westminster parliament ratification of the ill judged European treaty setting aside a clear Labour Party manifesto commitment allowing the British electorate the decision in a referendum. A really nasty man who will depart politics leaving a foul odour.

In office he sold large amounts of Britain’s gold reserves for a pittance, losing the country many billions and when this didn’t give up enough to fund the largesse of the Labour Party he raided the pension funds of Britain’s pensioners asset stripping, rendering them in danger of collapse.

In his unadulterated flannel of a speech to the European Parliament he exposed a nightmare vision of a Labour Party dominated future state. A loathsome man indeed!!   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1WlpzvgciY

 

 

Scottish-Referendum42Scottish-referendum46Scottish-Referendum43

 

 

Labour – LibDem Minority Government Proposal – Miliband Taking Bad Advice From Preacher Brown – Remember Browns Double Dealing and Petulant Behaviour At The Time The First SNP Government Was Formed In Scotland

 

brown pocketmoney

 

 

May 2007: Scottish General Election

The SNP won the Scottish General Election with 47 MSP’s to Labour’s 46. Despite all the odds being stacked against them the SNP formed a minority Government and retained power for the full term of the parliament.

But Brown, assisted by his network of spies, the Civil Service and rumour mongers continued with vindictive attacks on Alex Salmond and his government making life extremely difficult for the newly elected SNP government turning down meetings delaying and denying Scotland effective governance.

But due to the dogged and unstinting efforts of Alex Salmond a way forward was finally agreed through the establishment of a new “Joint Ministerial Committee” comprising the leaders of devolved administrations and representatives of the Westminster government.

Adding insult Brown insisted that the First minister of Wales should undertake responsibilty for agreeing the format and chairing the body at the first plenary session after which Jack Straw would take the chair at meetings. What a control freak. No Gordon Brown Alex Salmond meetings.

 

 

article-1380915-039E0A4F0000044D-344_634x432gordon_brown_the_graduate

 

 

May 2007: Labour Backstabbers

Brown was so desperate to keep Alex Salmond from being First Minister he tried to cut a deal to keep him out of power. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuHoijTQ3Y8

 

 

10993098_436475866517294_2032262041814994997_n4469610650_ba92acfcd9

 
May 2007: Sir Menzies Campbell And Gordon Brown’s Secret Talks On Pact To Deny SNP The Right To Govern Scotland

Brown held two secret meetings with Sir Menzies Campbell during the 2007 Scottish election campaign in an attempt to forge a new Labour-Liberal Democrat coalition and keep the SNP out of power, it emerged last night. Brown, the then Chancellor tried to get the agreement of the former Lib Dem leader for an anti-SNP coalition – even though neither had the authority to make such an agreement. The secret meetings, held behind the backs of their respective Scottish parties and leaders, were disclosed in Sir Menzies’ recently released autobiography.

 

 

campbellgordon-brown-diariesmedia-alex-salmond

 

 

In Menzies Campbell: My Autobiography,  Sir Ming described how he met Brown twice in Edinburgh during last year’s election campaign – once on Easter Sunday and on election day itself, when it was clear that the SNP was ahead in the polls and heading for victory. On both occasions, Brown asked for a new Labour-Lib Dem coalition as he did not want the SNP to control the Scottish Executive and its 30 billion budget. Sir Ming told Brown that, although he was also against an SNP-led devolved administration, he could not decide coalition policy, as that was in the hands of the party’s Scottish leader, Nicol Stephen.

 

 

jack-mcconnell-in-kilt-715380-743378500

 

Jack McConnell, the then Scottish Labour leader, was not invited to the meetings. Brown was operating without the knowledge or approval of the Scottish Labour leadership. News that Brown was working behind the scenes to forge an anti-SNP coalition will infuriate Nationalists and embarrass Scottish Labour leaders, particularly as Mr McConnell made it clear after the SNP won last year’s election that Alex Salmond would be given the chance to form a government.

 

 

imagesjjwhy

 

 

Sir Ming wrote that Brown first called him at home on Easter Sunday last year to ask for a discreet meeting. He stated: “Like me, he was anxious about the possibility of the SNP governing in Scotland, our own backyard. Was there common ground between Labour and the Lib Dems to tackle the SNP together? He made a number of suggestions. I told him I would have to discuss them with Nicol Stephen.

“He then raised possibilities for a new coalition between the Lib Dems and Labour on the assumption that the two parties had enough seats jointly to form a government. ” Sir Ming wrote that this was difficult for him as such decisions were for Mr Stephen.”

 

 

10881702_1551717875067997_8281966087651607890_narticle-2270948-1541BC71000005DC-446_308x425

 

 

As the election campaign drew to a close, Brown got in touch again. Sir Ming wrote: “We met at the same discreet place as before. Throughout the campaign, the polls had put the SNP ahead of Labour. Was there scope for an arrangement between our parties? “What would be the consequences for Scotland and our parties if the SNP used the 30 billion Scottish Executive budget to build support for independence over the next few years?”

 

 

10603288_10152667059726047_8782007870087924874_nBy0jX77CEAEDtgv

 

 

Sir Ming also explained how the Scottish Lib Dem leadership team met at his Edinburgh home the night after the SNP’s victory to eat pizza and decide what to do. “After two hours, we packed away our pizza boxes and any possibility of a coalition deal with the SNP.” Sir Ming also revealed that both he and Tavish Scott, the Lib Dems’ election campaign manager, were against an SNP-Lib Dem coalition, but a deal with Labour was still a possibility. Brown went on BBC Scotland’s Politics Show the following day, all forms of coalition had been ruled out for the Lib Dems, which is what Mr Scott then announced.

http://www.scotsman.com/news/sir-menzies-reveals-brown-s-secret-talks-on-pact-to-deny-snp-power-1-1158022

 

 

Scottish-Referendum43Scottish-Referendum42Scottish-referendum46

Gordon Brown – The Great Clunking Fist Keeps Resurfacing -The Long Goodbye Right Enough – Here’s Some Video’s of His Best Bits – Not

 

magaret-thatcher-and-gordon-brown-pic-pa-758894358

 

 

A video Selection of Gordon Brown’s best bits

* Brown gets beaten up by David Cameron over the BA and Unite Union strike by. https://youtu.be/Q-GkrHKcwvo

 

Gordon-Brown

 

 

* Brown gives a weak performance in Prime Ministers Questions. https://youtu.be/fvhgBV5YCZ4

 

 

brown

 

 

* Brown tries to say that David Cameron is Mr.10 per-cent. But in reality it is Brown who is Mr.10 per-cent. It was he who put the basic rate of tax up on the poor from 10% to 20% to pay for his rich banker friends. https://youtu.be/2tdPejENgms

 

 

brown pocketmoney

 

 

* Brown in his usual manner comes up with meaningless statistics to impress the gullible New Labour MP’s. https://youtu.be/qaDOIOkPlmc

 

 

1623566_460836310730482_406097192584783842_n

 

 

* In an effort to keep New Labour in power, Brown quits as Prime Minister. https://youtu.be/_0w9wGvWwnE

 

 

 

Bx5_3kkIIAI3GzR

 

 

* State Opening of Parliament. Closing remarks of Brown during the 2007 Queen’s Speech debate with Leader of the Opposition David Cameron. https://youtu.be/TsAa9VmwOaI

 

 

article-2270948-1541BC71000005DC-446_308x425

 

 

* The inside story of the credit crunch, charting the roller coaster journey of Gordon Brown’s fortunes from the moment the recession began. https://youtu.be/NL8A2fi3ols

 

 

Alistair+Darling+Johann+Lamont+Scottish+Referendum+isvGMymsqcIl

 

 

* Unfit for high office? It is a puzzle to me how such a flawed personality survived in politics for so long. https://youtu.be/fT0AtqaLbJY

 

 

 

4280206300

 

 

* Brown meets Gillian Duffy, who he was later heard off-camera describing her as a ‘bigoted woman’. https://youtu.be/CTr8IVWBuPE https://youtu.be/A-Ixqw85_P0

 

backstabbers

 

 

* Brown was so desperate to keep Alex Salmond from being First Minister he tried to cut a deal to keep him out of power. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuHoijTQ3Y8

 

 

Cash_682_1383604a

 

 

* The woman that Gordon Brown called a bigot gives her instant reaction to what Gordon Brown called her. https://youtu.be/yMTnvtZro7U#

 

Pension-cartoon

 

 

* And to think one of the worst ever financial disasters was caused by a man who wrapped himself in ‘prudence’. https://youtu.be/lRTg13dwttc

 

 

murphy

 

 

* Farage blasts Gordon Brown as he calls for “New World Order”. https://youtu.be/VUFdVkAsU0Q

 

 

10959602_1573471849559266_2127018768988301529_n

 

 

* An English voice speaks out. Brown and his vows, he has no right to speak for the English. I for one will not let a Scottish MP and the one who ran the UK into the ground make deals to his own people on my behalf. Make note Scots anyone telling you the English will bribe you to stay has no authority. Don,t think you can have your cake and eat it. If you want to stay then great but 60 million English will not pay you to stay whatever Gordon thinks he can say on our behalf. English Nationalism will make a comeback so get ready for it.

 

 

murphy nuc

 

 

* Labour managed to spend the 3G money as well ! And the £35 billion they raided from British Pension Funds and every other stealth tax they invented. 10p in the £ anybody? And if 40p was OK then why is 45p wrong now? Hypocrites! You only get into debt when you spend more than you earn and borrow to make up the difference. Its really very simple. Even before the Bank bail outs we were in the shit with Labour. It now turns out the 2008 / 09 recession was 2% worse than we were told. https://youtu.be/MRAn_SB1Q9w

 

 

d9acf90ec3af135713e54af66d743743

 

 

* British troops begin their withdrawal from Iraq after over six years of occupation. The war led to a disconnect between the British people and their elected representatives, as well as a backlash against the UK’s Muslim minority. It also led to much death and destruction in Iraq itself. https://youtu.be/oWeY2BVNAHY

 

Gordon-Brown-Willie-Bain--001

 

* Gordon Brown Launches Big Bribe timetable at yet another private, closed pensioners meeting, ( broadcast in full on BBC) in Loanhead Miners Club, (but there are no miners now) and they swallow it. https://youtu.be/4PShsBlrCDg

 

 

10405508_818905011498032_7364655500765974693_n

 

Preacher Brown Savages The SNP at Another Closed Meeting – Labour Still Living In The Past While Scotland Has Moved On – Even Their Own Party Policy Guru Despairs At Murphy And Browns Negative Campaigning

 

Jon-Cruddas-Launches-His--010Hardie_elect

 

 

Labour Party Head Of Policy Review  Jon Cruddas – Persuades Labour That There Is A Better Way

Jon Cruddas, Head of the Labour Party’s policy review, has been promoting a policy of “winning power to give it away”. In collaboration with Labour leaders of English cities, Cruddas has been pushing the devolutionary agenda since he was appointed to his role in May 2012.

The approach advocated by the policy review – whose recommendations have now been adopted as official party policy, for what it’s worth – involves something rather different: as one text co-authored by Cruddas puts it, transforming Labour “from a 20th century political party into a modern, democratic political movement for radical change”.

But some party insiders are gloomy about the sincerity of the two Ed’s and their leadership colleagues, convinced that they are not fully committed to the new way of thinking. In this view, Labour still remains too fond of centralised lever-pulling. It is also investing too much political capital in what Miliband calls “the cost of living crisis”, believing the answer to most voters’ grievances is to engineer financial remedies (cuts in household bills, incremental upticks in the minimum wage) from Whitehall.

 

 

imagesbghrevscotlogo01plan-for-scotland-graphic

 

 

Cruddas has spent two and half years working on a new vision of Labour’s future. The whole experience, he said, has changed him in all kinds of ways – and by way of showing how much new thinking is required to restore faith in politics, he quickly went radically beyond party policy.

“One of the things that is reflective of changes in me is, for example, proportional representation,” he said. “That’s now not some sort of middle class indulgent exercise – it’s a fundamental issue in terms of democracy and people’s rights. I never had a view on it before; now I think it’s central to the rebuilding of the whole thing. As is space for referendums, and recalls. These are really interesting questions.”

The officially adopted elements of what Cruddas has been working on since 2012 cover all areas of policy, and do so on the basis of a deep analysis of what has gone wrong with Britain, much of it inspired by the pioneering work of Compass, the left-aligned pressure group that still comes closest to representing Cruddas’s political tribe.

As well as devolution to cities and regions in England, the review has proposed regional banks to provide grassroots help to small businesses, a ramping-up of local planning control over high streets, an insistence on public sector competition in rail franchising, and more.

Some of those who have worked on the policy review echo such thoughts. They also talk about palpable tensions at the top of the party. The policy review, it is said, offered Miliband a basic narrative about  “national renewal” and people’s sense of powerlessness, about which he was initially enthusiastic – before it was dropped in favour of the cost-of-living agenda, and a more tactical, day-to-day approach.

 

 

unisonSunday-Times-dead-hand-Miliband-blasted-by-top-adviser

 

 

When I last met Cruddas, at Labour’s autumn conference, we talked about the sense of ferment in Britain, reflected in the transformation of politics in Scotland. Rather than being thrown by this, he seemed to be fascinated: “People are confronting orthodoxies, kicking over tables, creating a bit of energy … and I think that is absolutely fantastic,” he said. When we spoke this week, he made much the same points: that in England, there was an obvious symmetry between, say, Ukip on the right and the apparently insurgent Green party on the left, and “I find that exciting, rather than threatening. But there are threats: huge tripwires, all around.”

Such as? “The future existence of the Labour party. In the sense of, are there changes in the structure of society and the economy which are so demanding for political parties … well, can they change?”

Big debates, he said, were happening around ideas about “family, home, nation”, Labour, he said, had to guard against becoming “quite calculating in our politics, versus other groups that are more culturally aligned, swarming in and out of those issues”.

Was that his interpretation of what has happened to Labour in Scotland? “I think that’s exactly what’s happened. They’re not talking about cash transfers, are they?

Just about everything Cruddas said in London, Liverpool and Manchester underlined his belief that these are serious, seismic times, replete with threats to the normal way of doing things. “There is a democratic danger here,” he said. “Those parties that hoover up seats in Westminster have been dependent on shrinking portions of the electorate.

But the system puts them into power, and there’s a legitimacy crisis about how much people actually vote for them. There are issues there around PR, and referenda, and the architecture of England, and pushing out power from Whitehall.

A big part of what we’ve been doing in the policy review is this: can you win power to give it away? That is hugely counter cultural for Labour.” Once again, there was a clear sense of a fork in the road. “My view is, you either hide from these issues – or you run towards them.”

 

 

Tories 'obsessed by Grammar schools' claims BrownDaily-Record-on-Johann-Lamont

 

 

Debating the Scottish Independence Referendum: What Future for the United Kingdom and Scotland

After their humiliating defeat in the 2011 elections, the Scottish Labour Party have found themselves ensnared in a circular dialogue of apology and aggressive stereotyping. Breaking out of this requires a change of focus – away from Alex Salmond and the SNP and towards the party’s professed values of social justice.

It is then timely and apposite that the Fabian Society in association with Compass held a discussion under the theme, ‘Debating the Scottish Independence Referendum: What Future for the United Kingdom?’ with Labour MPs, Jon Cruddas, Anas Sarwar, Deputy Leader of Scottish Labour, and Gemma Doyle, along with myself, (Gerry Hassan) in the Houses of Parliament.

The evening showed some of the many comfort zones and delusions which Scottish Labour still hold to after its 2011 Scottish Parliament election humiliation.

scottish_labour_party_broken_bumper_sticker-r515f71123b6b4446ada7687fa5687568_v9wht_8byvr_324Alistair+Darling+Johann+Lamont+Scottish+Referendum+isvGMymsqcIl

 

 

The two Scottish Labour MPs and Anas Sarwar in particular, spoke a language of renewal and urgency but which seemed mostly devoid of real political understanding or content.

The thoughtful observations of the evening from the Labour MPs came almost exclusively from Jon Cruddas who talked with an acute eye about England, the absence of English Labour, and the shifts in the Tories with a brash, aggressive English nationalism emerging in the party.

Cruddas referenced the Australian debate under Paul Keating which redefined national identity, and cited Tom Nairn and the challenge of ‘the hyper-empire of capital’.

In terms of hinterland Cruddas as well as referencing Nairn and Keating, mentioned George Lansbury’s ‘My England’ and Clement Attlee.

Sarwar and Doyle, as representatives of today’s new political classes, showed their ‘thin’ external world, with not one wider reference or example all evening.

 

 

@zx_300@zy_200vow3

 

 

In my presentation, I suggested Scottish Labour stop talking to itself and stop using words such as ‘devolution’ and ‘separatism’ which gave the party succour and satisfaction but which were mostly meaningless to the general public.

“Devolution” was a narrow notion of political change and a concept born of 1970s compromise and accommodation. ‘Separatism’ which is how Labour describes the Scottish Nationalists is an archaic relic of a term which reveals much about who says it.

The SNP have never been ‘separatists’ and indeed the true, serious ‘separatists’ in the UK are the fossilised, fanatic parliamentary sovereignty fetishists of Euroscepticism.

Labour has to drop its own private world of language, stop talking process and embrace substance.

Labour’s obsession with the SNP has been an unhealthy one, destabilising and disorientating the party’s view of the world.

Despite the fact the SNP have been on the Scottish political scene for over 40 years, Labour north of the border have yet to fully come to terms with them.

The aggressive language and stereotyping which goes on between the two parties belies that these are two rather similar parties, both broad churches and both, in parts, significantly (small c) conservative.

 

 

CDHJEXXXIAA6XvO.png large010929033_1560317807541337_6159744010173511920_n

 

 

Sarwar and Doyle presented cartoon caricatures of the Nationalists, citing ‘separatism’ many times, with Sarwar articulating a convoluted definition when challenged on Labour’s constant of use of the big bogey word.

The Nationalists talked left and right, he maintained, depending on the audience (just like New Labour), and as he accurately observed, have left independence so far undefined. Doyle talked from the old hymn sheet, talking of the SNP as having cornered ‘the right wing vote’ and being just like the Tories.

Scottish Labour has a proud history and story but they are currently in a terrible place and have barely begun to realise what has happened to them.

Both Sarwar and Doyle railed against the SNP Government for not using the Scottish Parliament’s existing tax powers, omitting that Labour in office for eight years had done exactly the same.

Similarly the SNP’s floated idea of cutting corporation tax was trumpeted as proof of their right-wing perfidy, ignoring New Labour’s cutting of it.

What this seemed to suggest was that the speakers had one rationale for an action when the SNP did it (bad), and another when New Labour had done it (good).

How does Scottish Labour get people to listen to them again? I suggested that the party apologise for 50 years of taking people for granted and for municipalism, cronyism, clientism and council patronage.

 

Graph-by-year11156342_816960831692450_892496525919344070_n

 

Cruddas immediately spotted that this was a wider Labour malaise, to which I agreed, pointing out that it was a Scottish variant of that crisis.

So far Scottish Labour has offered a half-hearted apology for losing in 2011, but hasn’t begun to understand why it was so soundly rejected.

Its public mantra has become ‘we have to stop apologising’ when the party hasn’t recognised the longer story of the machine politics it built in Scotland which it needs to take responsibility for and offer an explanation. Then and only then, people may begin to sit up and take notice. This is not just a Scottish but a British and international debate.

All evening Sarwar and Doyle defended a union which was in reality, a ‘Fantasy Island Britain’, the land of the most successful multi-national partnership in all human history, a place where redistribution and social enlightenment march proudly forward claiming the future.

At no point did they engage in some of the uncomfortable realities: of the UK as the fourth most unequal country in the rich world according to Danny Dorling, and on existing trends, set to overtake, Portugal, USA and Singapore, and become the most unequal country in the developed world.

Labour needs to embrace an agenda of social justice and stop talking about the constitution and being obsessed with the SNP and Alex Salmond.

 

 

alex-slamond

 

 

Twenty years after the Commission on Social Justice was launched perhaps Scottish Labour could revisit this terrain instead of talking all the time about ‘devolution’ and ‘separatism’.

What this could involve is renewing and marking John Smith’s values and coming up with a social justice covenant for the 20th anniversary of his tragic death, which coincides with the run-in to the autumn 2014 Scottish independence vote.

A Scottish Labour Party engaged with social justice would aid people in the SNP to develop a more distinct, radical social agenda and thus improve the quality of the entire Scottish debate.

It would reduce the superficial noise between these two parties and develop a debate with more substance addressing what Scottish voters want to see it engage with.

 

 

austeritywki9747629-large

 

 

Such a politics would entail addressing how we tackle and end child poverty, challenge welfare entrapment and despair, and address the huge gap in life expectancy between rich and poor across Scotland. It could even be called the John Smith social justice covenant.

Such a move would make the Scottish debate about self-government and independence both more subtle and real. It would take it away from the politicians’ love of the abstract and grandiose and connect it to the complex choices of modern life and challenges to progressive politics.

The values of solidarity, communitarianism and inclusion have always influenced and shaped much of the Scottish debate, driven in part by a distrust of British politicians and the state.

 

 

cruddas-alexanderbackstabbers

 

It is now crucial over the next two years that they are brought to the fore, from the implicit to the explicit.

We have to ask how do we best champion social justice in Scotland and in these isles?

That is what Scottish self-government and independent has to directly address; namely, the relationship between progressive values and government structures, and in so doing help all of us to make sense of how we all break out of ‘Fantasy Island Britain’ which has so served the forces of power and privilege.

 

 

Scottish-Referendum42Scottish-Referendum43Scottish-referendum46

 

Labour Needed To Learn Lessons From Past Failures And Change Their Approach – That They Didn’t Is Why They Are In Terminal Decline In Scotland

 

 

 

JS4382407510455324_10152545977986753_7487026676145808252_n

 

 

March 2012: Breaking the grip of ‘fantasy island Britain’: Social justice, Scotland and the UK by Gerry Hassan

Gerry Hassan, PhD, born in Scotland, is Research Fellow in cultural policy at the University of the West of Scotland who has recently been awarded his PhD on political and cultural contemporary debate in the public sphere of Scotland. Gerry is the author and editor of numerous books including ‘The Strange Death of Labour Scotland’ and the just published ‘After Independence’ (co-edited with James Mitchell). His most recent books are ‘Caledonian Dreaming: The Quest for a Different Scotland’ and the just published ‘Independence of the Scottish Mind: Elite Narratives, Public Spaces and the Making of a Modern Nation

 

@zx_300@zy_2003702099155

 
After their humiliating defeat in the 2011 elections, the Scottish Labour Party have found themselves ensnared in a circular dialogue of apology and aggressive stereotyping. Breaking out of this requires a change of focus – away from Alex Salmond and the SNP and towards the party’s professed values of social justice.

The Scottish independence debate had many dimensions, Scottish, English, British, European and global. It was also one that the insular London political class and media had only episodically covered the last forty years, being content to rest on ‘Braveheart’ and romantic, restless nationalist stereotypes.

It is then timely and apposite that the Fabian Society in association with Compass held a discussion under the theme, ‘Debating the Scottish Independence Referendum: What Future for the United Kingdom?’ with Labour MPs, Jon Cruddas, Anas Sarwar, Deputy Leader of Scottish Labour, and Gemma Doyle, along with myself, in the Houses of Parliament this week.

The evening showed some of the many comfort zones and delusions which Scottish Labour still hold to after its 2011 Scottish Parliament election humiliation. The two Scottish Labour MPs and Anas Sarwar in particular, spoke a language of renewal and urgency but which seemed mostly devoid of real political understanding or content.

 

 

_82285793_benn_973669_dewar_300

 

 

The thoughtful observations of the evening from the Labour MPs came almost exclusively from Jon Cruddas who talked with an acute eye about England, the absence of English Labour, and the shifts in the Tories with a brash, aggressive English nationalism emerging in the party. Cruddas referenced the Australian debate under Paul Keating which redefined national identity, and cited Tom Nairn and the challenge of ‘the hyper-empire of capital’.

In terms of hinterland Cruddas as well as referencing Nairn and Keating, mentioned George Lansbury’s ‘My England’ and Clement Attlee. Sarwar and Doyle, as representatives of today’s new political classes, showed their ‘thin’ external world, with not one wider reference or example all evening.

 

 

euro_elections_posterimages33

 

 

In my presentation, I suggested Scottish Labour stop talking to itself and stop using words such as ‘devolution’ and ‘separatism’ which gave the party succour and satisfaction but which were mostly meaningless to the general public. ‘Devolution’ was a narrow notion of political change and a concept born of 1970s compromise and accommodation. ‘Separatism’ which is how Labour describes the Scottish Nationalists is an archaic relic of a term which reveals much about who says it. The SNP have never been ‘separatists’ and indeed the true, serious ‘separatists’ in the UK are the fossilised, fanatic parliamentary sovereignty fetishists of Euroscepticism. Labour has to drop its own private world of language, stop talking process and embrace substance.

 

 

9747629-large74487894_saltireeu_gettytwo-150x150

 

 

Labour’s obsession with the SNP has been an unhealthy one, destabilising and disorientating the party’s view of the world. Despite the fact the SNP have been on the Scottish political scene for over 40 years, Labour north of the border have yet to fully come to terms with them. The aggressive language and stereotyping which goes on between the two parties belies that these are two rather similar parties, both broad churchesand both, in parts, significantly (small c) conservative.

 

scottish_labour_party_broken_bumper_sticker-r515f71123b6b4446ada7687fa5687568_v9wht_8byvr_324stream_img

 

 

Sarwar and Doyle presented cartoon caricatures of the Nationalists, citing ‘separatism’ many times, with Sarwar articulating a convoluted definition when challenged on Labour’s constant of use of the big bogey word. The Nationalists talked left and right, he maintained, depending on the audience (just like New Labour), and as he accurately observed, have left independence so far undefined. Doyle talked from the old hymn sheet, talking of the SNP as having cornered ‘the right wing vote’ and being just like the Tories.

 

 

10405508_818905011498032_7364655500765974693_nJS46323523

 

 

Scottish Labour has a proud history and story but they are currently in a terrible place and have barely begun to realise what has happened to them. Both Sarwar and Doyle railed against the SNP Government for not using the Scottish Parliament’s existing tax powers, omitting that Labour in office for eight years had done exactly the same. Similarly the SNP’s floated idea of cutting corporation tax was trumpeted as proof of their right-wing perfidy, ignoring New Labour’s cutting of it. What this seemed to suggest was that the speakers had one rationale for an action when the SNP did it (bad), and another when New Labour had done it (good).

How does Scottish Labour get people to listen to them again? I suggested that the party apologise for 50 years of taking people for granted and for municipalism, cronyism, clientism and council patronage. Cruddas immediately spotted that this was a wider Labour malaise, to which I agreed, pointing out that it was a Scottish variant of that crisis.

 

 

11156342_816960831692450_892496525919344070_nmedia-alex-salmond

 

 

So far Scottish Labour has offered a half-hearted apology for losing in 2011, but hasn’t begun to understand why it was so soundly rejected. Its public mantra has become ‘we have to stop apologising’ when the party hasn’t recognised the longer story of the machine politics it built in Scotland which it needs to take responsibility for and offer an explanation. Then and only then, people may begin to sit up and take notice.

This is not just a Scottish but a British and international debate. All evening Sarwar and Doyle defended a union which was in reality, a ‘Fantasy Island Britain’, the land of the most successful multi-national partnership in all human history, a place where redistribution and social enlightenment march proudly forward claiming the future. At no point did they engage in some of the uncomfortable realities: of the UK as the fourth most unequal country in the rich world according to Danny Dorling, and on existing trends, set to overtake, Portugal, USA and Singapore, and become the most unequal country in the developed world.

 

 

Daily-Record-on-Johann-Lamont10484949_726436334101043_1684413381150678248_o

 

 

Labour needs to embrace an agenda of social justice and stop talking about the constitution and being obsessed with the SNP and Alex Salmond. Twenty years after the Commission on Social Justice was launched perhaps Scottish Labour could revisit this terrain instead of talking all the time about ‘devolution’ and ‘separatism’.

What this could involve is renewing and marking John Smith’s values and coming up with a social justice covenant for the 20th anniversary of his tragic death, which coincides with the run-in to the autumn 2014 Scottish independence vote.

 

 

Hardie_electarbroath

 

 

A Scottish Labour Party engaged with social justice would aid people in the SNP to develop a more distinct, radical social agenda and thus improve the quality of the entire Scottish debate. It would reduce the superficial noise between these two parties and develop a debate with more substance addressing what Scottish voters want to see it engage with.

Such a politics would entail addressing how we tackle and end child poverty, challenge welfare entrapment and despair, and address the huge gap in life expectancy between rich and poor across Scotland. It could even be called the John Smith social justice covenant.

Such a move would make the Scottish debate about self-government and independence both more subtle and real. It would take it away from the politicians’ love of the abstract and grandiose and connect it to the complex choices of modern life and challenges to progressive politics.

 

labfirst10485307_10206031838613468_5034394981712833040_n

 

The values of solidarity, communitarianism and inclusion have always influenced and shaped much of the Scottish debate, driven in part by a distrust of British politicians and the state. It is now crucial over the next two years that they are brought to the fore, from the implicit to the explicit. We have to ask how do we best champion social justice in Scotland and in these isles? That is what Scottish self-government and independent has to directly address; namely, the relationship between progressive values and government structures, and in so doing help all of us to make sense of how we all break out of ‘Fantasy Island Britain’ which has so served the forces of power and privilege.
https://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/gerry-hassan/breaking-grip-of-%E2%80%98fantasy-island-britain%E2%80%99-social-justice-scotland-and-uk

 

plan-for-scotland-graphicBRITAIN-SCOTLAND-INDEPENDENCE-VOTE

 
Comments:

Great piece, I agree with a lot of what you say here, and I often find myself agreeing with John Cruddas who is one of the few gifted politicans we seem to have at the moment.

Labour’s problem in the Scottish election in 2011, and the General election in 2010, both relate to it taking people for granted so much that they lost all enthusiasm for the party which was once their own, it has yet to refind this either in Scotland or the rest of the UK. John Smith was a great man, and would have been a fantastic PM, I think if Labour can reinvent itself both UK wide and in Scotland by revisiting his legacy and perspective, then it can be revialised in Britain, regardless of whether Britain is made up of 2 sovereign states on 1.

Thanks for your thoughts. We need to bring the debate about the future of Scotland and the UK fundamentally on to what kind of future, what kind of society and economy.

 

 

CDHJEXXXIAA6XvO.png largeposthealey1345837499_0995

 

 

Sad and telling that Labour MPs still blindly defend the imperial centre as this great force of progressivism; a kind of blind faith ….

Absolutely, what really gets me about the modern Labour party is how soulless it has become. The 13 years they were in power were squandered, it was a real chance to help working people up and down the land, make a real difference to things such as housing, education, health and transport, but they wasted it, and now the Tories are back with their Lib Dem bag carriers.

There were some achievements, such as the Minimum Wage…any other good achievements currently escape me… The party needs to redefine itself and break away from it’s slavish ‘Thatcherism Lite’ type of ideal. The problem for me with Labour (& I am still a member) is that it totally lost touch with what it was about during the Blair/Brown era, people on the ground want things like decent housing, good transport, good schools and opportunities for their kids, good healthcare, and a decent Welfare State to support people when the fall on hard times.

 

 

Daily-Record-on-Johann-Lamont1531998_840234932709939_3385315916147037263_n

 

 

Labour needs to be on the side of the ‘little guy’ regardless of whether it is Labour in Scotland or wider Britain, too often it found itself on the wrong side in recent years, and that is something that I feel hasn’t yet changed. Markets, and big business have their place, and always need to be taken into account, and listened too, but they shouldn’t dictate everything in society. For me, the saddest, chapter in Labours’ recent history has to be when Gordon Brown met Gillian Duffy, a real person, and Labour supporter, who was concerned about immigration volumes, and he described her as a bigot…it kind of said it all, the arrogance and dislocation of the leadership from the supporters, from the average people in the street.

I am disenchanted with the current leadership, they have scored the odd victory like last year against the Murdoch Empire, Miliband did well, but they don’t have the vision or the passion to make (me at least) feel anything has really changed since they left power. Personally, I think that the ‘Blue Labour’ project that Jon Cruddas has been associated with is potentially the way forward, as it does seek to reconnect with our past as a party, and at the same time takes on board ‘the man on the streets’ concerns about immigration, law and order etc.

 

 

hjs-murphy-jpg11013081_599357796860910_9185575790238061152_n

 

 

More of the same from Labour just won’t work, at the moment it feels as though they are just waiting and hoping that the public get sick of the Conservative Party, but not providing any real hope for anything better.

I am English, so not mega hot on the Scottish political scene, however, I was disappointed with the Johann Lamont appointment as leader, as once again that spelt for more of the same. Looking into Scotland as an outsider, it would appear that the challenge again is to get back on the side of ‘the little guy – the man on the street – the working man’ (& women of course). The party obviously needs to take account of the current Scotland independence debate, and perhaps argue more vigorously for Scotland within a wider UK setting. It should also always seek to be more progressive than a nationalist party like the SNP, and only by reconnecting with it’s soul can it do this.

 

 

Scottish-referendum46Scottish-Referendum42Scottish-Referendum43