Broadcast Media and the Press in Scotland – The Scottish Electorate Places Its citizenship In Trust With Journalists – But Is the Trust Misplaced

Broadcast media and the Press in Scotland were heavily biased (in their reporting to the Scottish public) against  the “Yes” campaign. The  shameful behaviour has continued unabated in the period since.

I recently read an analysis of the Scottish Press written by Jennifer Rachel Birks BA (Hons). I commend it to you.

 

 

 

 

 

Newspaper Campaigns, Publics and Politics

This thesis examines the practice of campaigning journalism, where a newspaper seeks political influence and claims to do so on behalf of its readers or a wider public. It is a production and content study of campaign journalism in the Scottish press, examining the journalists’ orientation to their readers, both in terms of social responsibility toward them in facilitating their citizenship, and in terms of accountability or answerability to them as their quasi-representatives.

The study also analyses the newspapers’ representation of the substance and legitimacy of public opinion to politicians at the Scottish Parliament, in particular the governing Scottish Executive (now Scottish Government), and the framing of politicians’ obligation to respond to public demands as formulated by the newspapers. In short, it seeks to investigate newspapers’ democratic claims to be the voice of ‘the public’

Jennifer Rachel Birks BA (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy – Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Applied Social Sciences Faculty of Law, Business and Social Science – May 2009

Newspaper Campaigns, Publics and Politics – Jennifer Rachel Birks BA (Hons)

 

 

 

 

 

Social Responsibility of the Press in Scotland (extracted and altered for presentation purposes only)

The Scottish public “entrust a measure of their sovereignty to journalists”, or at least newspapers claim that sovereignty on their behalf. This increasingly extends beyond dispassionately judging performance of citizens’ elected representatives; there is typically an emphasis on expressing outrage at wrongdoing, mistakes and indiscretions and demanding resignations. It is characterised by the adoption of ‘professional’ norms designed to facilitate the informed democratic engagement of citizens. In publishing only what is objective, accurate, impartial, balanced and fair journalists allow their readers to vote in accordance with their views, values and interests.

Journalists imagine a Scottish public that is often too preoccupied and too distracted to be active citizens. Therefore citizens entrust a measure of their sovereignty to journalists just as people entrust a measure of control over their bodies to doctors. Journalists are professionals who hold citizenship in trust for us, and we rely on their expertise or political analysis when we want information about the state of the country.

The autonomy of journalists from political interference does not mean that they will necessarily be oriented to the public interest, but it is an important condition under which journalists are free to adhere to professional norms. Such norms are governed by the authority of rules and procedures and journalists are expected to represent events, issues and proposals objectively and impartially rather than selectively in loyalty to preferred groups or in exchange for political or economic advantage. However, critics argue that in reality journalism is subject to the rationale, interests and influence of commerce.

Newspaper owners enjoy considerable political influence over journalists and their output via mechanisms of reward and sanction and career progression. These captains of the means of publicity, and national newspapers have endured losses for many years simply for the gain of political prestige and impact. Rupert Murdoch is the most commonly cited contemporary example for his alleged sway over the Blair government.

It is also argued that journalists absorb hegemonically inflected newsroom assumptions to the point where they become invisible, and which can privilege certain social groups, such as the preference of elite sources as the credible “primary definers”. Journalists self-selected into positions at newspapers with whose editorial line they already sympathise, internalise the editorial policy and anticipated preferred angles or even factual distortions from previous editorial revisions, and learnt by example from more senior colleagues.

Newspaper journalists are supposed to be held to their professional principles through codes of practice such as that of the National Union of Journalists and the industry self-regulatory body the Press Complaints Commission. However, unlike the medical and legal professions, there is no force of accountability to the NUJ code since journalists are not formally accredited by the union and therefore cannot be struck off for misconduct. Similarly, the PCC can only request printed apologies, unlike the state regulator Ofcom for the broadcast media, which has legal force.

This demonstrates how, accountability of the press is consistent with its freedom, in terms of a positive (enabling) definition of freedom. But, like the PCC, this is an internal industry form of accountability, whereby journalists regulate one another nominally in the public interest, but without recourse to public engagement on the issue. Whilst the PCC does respond to external complaints, only individuals who have been sources for stories or otherwise represented within the pages of the newspaper are considered valid complainants, whilst the general public is not able to formally complain about being misinformed or misled, so it is questionable to what extent the PCC code really defends the democratic public interest.

Unrestricted freedom of the press is something that should be championed, but only if that includes freedom from state and commercial influence

 

 

 

Advertisements

12 thoughts on “Broadcast Media and the Press in Scotland – The Scottish Electorate Places Its citizenship In Trust With Journalists – But Is the Trust Misplaced”

  1. I was initially a little disapointed at the lack of feedback against your “stuff” as sometimes it makes a blog interesting.

    But it is worth remembering people think “Can’t argue with that” and follow through by aggressively not arguing.

    In my pretend job, I write about financial markets and have noticed that if I write something, suddenly folk in whatever discussion forum stop posting their usual verbal nonsense. Whilst it is worrying as I know the usual culprits are waiting in the wings, it is also my specialist subject and they will not be able to write anything. Thankfully my track record lets me get away with murder.

    This is a complement btw.

    Like

    1. I write my blog to inform and widen debate over the many matters that get my attention whilst others seem to confine their posts covering one or two specific subjects. My approach might well be a factor in the lack of comments. Many of my posts attract upwards of 600 hits over one day and there are often 2000 hits if a number of subjects attract attention.

      The bulk of readers access my blog through facebook and there is a great deal of feedback through that medium.

      But I confess to being a bit disappointed at the lack of comments. No matter I will just keep plodding on.

      Like

  2. Don’t know if Wastemonster has changed the English Media rules cos in Maggies days D notices were issued if the PM / Cabinet wished to suppress the English Media – back then press , radio, TV, even books. Fleet Street owners / editors were ‘encouraged’ to follow the UK Gov. line – which still happens today ( thats why they’re in Londons perks/ tax free haven) . An ‘errant’ English Press Editor simply had to Quote ‘yesterday it was reported in *** (Scots press )’ to bypass a D notice . The most obvious breach’s to England Home Rule mentality was during ‘The Troubles NI.’ when ‘The Establishment’ wished to suppress the publicity re current events in NI. – Scots press published these events!

    Like

    1. Thatcher and Murdoch arranged the Press systems to suit his needs and not a lot has changed since. Murdoch might be on the wain but his power over the westminster establishment is absolute. Goodness he even placed his daughter at the centre of things as insurance against anything going awry.

      Like

  3. I’ve been reading your articles for about 2 years now and very much admire them. There are always interesting facts to mull over.

    It never occurred to me to leave a comment:)

    Thank you for all your hard work. Please keep on doing what your doing.

    Like

  4. Likewise…I read your blog weekly, and always enjoy it. Never left a comment…until now. Please keep going. Interesting…I’ve just read a piece on Wings Over Scotland about how the print media spun the fact the the SNP govt will not means test eligibility for winter fuel payment. Irresponsible, lazy journalism, but they know they can write this stuff with impunity. A point well made in your blog piece.

    Like

    1. Thank you for your kind comments. It is time the Scottish government called time on the abuse of Scottish citizens of all persuasions. Broadcast media and the Press should be subject to an enquiry by a team of impartial persons based in Scotland.

      Like

      1. I was in touch with Prof John Robertson on the Newsnet Scotland website recently (via Comments section). He plans to again kick off his nightly review of the news as presented by Reporting Scotland and STV, assessing these for fairness and bias, in January.
        It would be great if someone – not just WOS – did the same thing for the print media.

        Like

      2. He most certainly rocked the boat. He should chair a committee of investigation set up by the Scottish government to investigate broadcast media and the Press in Scotland. In my view both have abused the citizens of Scotland enough and the government needs to intervene to ensure journalists are discharging their responsibilities in line with their organisations code of conduct

        Like

    1. I suspect The SNP government might take the view it is a matter for the people of Berwick to decide upon. Might be worthwhile to get an SNP candidate to stand in the next general election to test the water.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s