For Queen and Country-But What Country?

1. Lord Dannat & David Cameron

a. General, (now Lord) Dannatt was Chief of the General Staff from 2006 to 2009. In this period he had military responsiblity for the conduct of major army operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. His resume reminds the reader that as a young officer, at the start of his military career, from 1971, he served, with distinction, a number of tours, with the Green Howards, in Northern Ireland. His Regiment sustained heavy casualties whilst on operational duty in Belfast. He was required to stand down from his post in 2009 and took up an advisory position with David Cameron as Defense Advisor to the Tory party. Cameron rewarded his assistance by gaining him a Knighthood, denied him by Gordon Brown. He stood down from his advisory position on defense at the time the Tory’s were elected in 2010. He now sits, as a cross bench member in the House of Lords.

b. I fully expected Cameron to play the military broken hearts, sympathy card attempting the emotional blackmail of Scot’s seeking add guilt to anyone voting Yes to independence. I was not wrong. In a headline article published in the, “Telegraph” 13 September 2014 Lord Dannat, (friend of David Cameron) made an impassioned appeal to Scots to reject independence, in the name of their countrymen who “fought and died” to keep the United Kingdom safe. In seeking to add substance to his article he reminded families, relatives, friends and colleagues of brutal murder of three young Scot’s soldiers in Belfast in 1971. Whilst the intent of his approach is evident his desire to raise hurtful memories is crass.

c. What Lord Dannat fails to mention is that one of the, “honey Trap” girls that lured the soldiers to their deaths might well be a well connected and greatly respected Tory Party Councillor. Strange bedfellows indeed.
Lord Dannat’s press articles
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scottish-independence/11093425/Scottish-referendum-Scottish-soldiers-have-died-to-keep-the-UK-together.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scottish-independence/11094769/Scottish-independence-Our-soldiers-lost-their-lives-trying-to-preserve-the-UK.-What-will-their-families-say.html

IRA Councillor welcomed back to Tory bosom. In a dramatic u-turn, Maria Gatland has been accepted back into the Conservatives.
http://www.croydonguardian.co.uk/news/4045346.IRA_Councillor_welcomed_back_to_Tory_bosom/

2. The 1971 Belfast Murders Explained

a. March 1971 Belfast. Three young soldiers from the Royal Highland Fusiliers (RHF), (stationed at Girdwood Barracks, Belfast), Dougald McCaughey (23) and two brothers, John and Joseph McCaig, aged (17) and (180 years respectively, were having a drink in at Mooneys bar in the centre of Belfast. In those days. despite some localised rioting, off duty soldiers could still come and go as they wished in the bars, clubs and discos of Belfast. Out of uniform, off duty and well intoxicated, they were not thought to be targets. In a previous bar, two young woman had attached themselves to the soldiers, (the women were members of PIRA’s women’s group, the Cumman – na – mBan, one unconfirmed was rumoured to be Maria McGuire). After a few more drinks the party was approached by a young man and a male friend. After a drink or two it was suggested that they should go off to a party. What the three young Scottish soldiers did not know was that the friendly former soldier was the leader of an IRA group from Ardoyne. Well plied with drink, McCaughey and the McCaig brothers were driven to a lonely mountain road outside Belfast where they stopped to relieve themselves. As they did so they were shot through the back of the head and their bodies left by the roadside.

b. The horrific killings, the cowardly manner in which they were carried out, sent shock waves through the province and the rest of the UK. Both the Official and Provisional IRA issued statements maintaining that none of their units were involved. The Provo’s statement was carefully worded since, although the killings were carried out by members of the IRA, those responsible had not been authorized to do so. It is known that Billy McGee, by then commander of the Provo’s in Belfast had not given the go ahead for the operation. He regarded it as unsoldierly and contrary to the principles of Republicanism.

c. The former British Army soldier who had enticed the three young men to their deaths came from Ardoyne. At the time he was serving in Cyprus he applied to join the SAS, but was deemed to be mentally unsuitable. On his return to the UK he left the army disillusioned. The Special Branch knew him to be a psychopath who, (whilst deployed to anti terrorist duties in Cyprus had executed a civilian in controversial circumstances). The Ardoyne IRA knew he had had served with the British Army but were not aware of his controversial history. Special Branch officers were not at all surprised he was prepared to kill, it was his way of getting back at the British Army.

d. The entire Nationalist community, were deeply ashamed that such barbarity had been conducted in it’s name. The vast majority were not prepared for a campaign against the British Army, RUC and the political system but this proved to be the turning point. Had the government introduced internment at this time it is entirely possible the troubles would have been avoided.

e. The Winds of Change. Although not formally stationed in Belfast in a policing capacity the death of the youngest soldier at age 17, (by only 1 week) was unacceptable to the UK public and rules were changed immediately after instructing that soldiers could not be deployed to active service before age 18.

3. Maria McGuire, (Maria Gatland) Tory Councillor in Croydon, London for the last 20 years, Her life with the IRA in her own words.

a.In September 1971 Maria McGuire was one of the most wanted terrorists in the world. Armed with a .38 automatic weapon and carrying £20,000 in cash, she was being pursued by security forces from several countries over her role in a huge arms deal. More than 160 crates containing bazookas, rocket launchers and hand-grenades had been seized at an airport in Amsterdam, and a warrant had been issued for her arrest. McGuire found herself on the run with a member of the Provisional IRA’s ruling council – with whom she was having an affair. In Ireland, plans were afoot to kidnap the Dutch ambassador if she and David O’Connell were arrested. But despite a massive media frenzy, she and O’Connell were able to escape the Netherlands through Belgium and France before returning to Ireland to a hero’s welcome.

b. Even though their mission had failed, the pair became – for a brief period – the golden couple of the Irish Republican movement. In her book To Take Arms: My Year With The IRA Provisional’s, published in 1973, McGuire wrote candidly: “The press had made great play of the fact that we had escaped the British secret service; we had achieved another glorious failure. “It was better even than if we had been successful, because then the public would have had to confront reality. “Why did we want the guns? To kill people.” She learnt two months later that she faced three years in prison if she re-entered Switzerland, where she had exchanged currency.

c. In the space of just one year, McGuire became a close confidante of many of the Provisional IRA’s top leaders, before disillusionment set in over the group’s methods. She had signed up after seeing the Provisional’s publicity officer, Sean O Bradaigh, on Irish television. So keen was McGuire to talk to him that she rang the TV studio straight away and left a message. Within weeks she was put forward to the British press as an example of the new middle-class membership the movement was attracting.

d. But as violence escalated in Belfast following a failed ceasefire in July 1972, McGuire decided she could not support the sectarian killing, and fled to England. There she gave extensive interviews in the British press and published her book hoping to lift the lid on IRA brutality. Her defection prompted the Provisional IRA’s chief of staff, Sean MacStiofain – who she described as “narrow minded” – to warn that if she ever returned to Ireland she would face a court martial and possibly execution.

e. Her book – which caused a storm on its publication – revealed her thoughts on one of the most intensive bombing campaigns ever carried out. Following an IRA bomb in Donegall Street, Belfast, which killed six men and injured 146 in March 1972, she wrote: “I admit that at the time I did not connect with the people who were killed or injured in such explosions. “I always judged such deaths in terms of the effect they would have on our support – and I felt that this in turn depended on how many people accepted our explanation.”

f. Maria McGuire on her affair with Provisional IRA ruling council member David O’Connell, which started in Amsterdam. “It just happened, and seemed perfectly natural, even though our situation was very unnatural. We were under considerable stress together, and became very close, depended on one another, because of that. Possibly it meant more to Dave than it did to me; but when we managed not to worry about the outcome of our mission and our own chances of escaping, we were very happy.”

g. Maria McGuire on meeting the Provisional IRA chief of staff, Sean MacStiofain. “He seemed short and squat, and lacked Dave’s physical presence: only later did I realise he was in fact over six feet tall. He appeared a little taken aback by me too; I knew he had heard about me, but possibly he wasn’t expecting someone wearing hot pants to be interested in the Provisional IRA.”

h. Maria McGuire on the IRA’s bombing campaign in Northern Ireland. “The intention behind the bombing campaign was to cause confusion and terror. In 1971 bomb explosions averaged three a day throughout the six counties, and it was very easy to create confusion in the centre of Belfast. Sometimes the Belfast Provisional’s would give a succession of false alarms, and then just as the city was enjoying the lull, plant half a dozen bombs on the same day. We believed that the bombing campaign had a greater psychological effect in this way. By causing such terror we demonstrated that whatever steps the army took, the Provisional’s could continue the military campaign; half a million people in Belfast would be kept wondering where the Provisional’s would strike next, and would be forced to tell the British to make peace with us.”

i. Maria McGuire on killing British soldiers. “I agreed with the shooting of British soldiers and believed that the more who were killed the better. I remember occasions where we heard late at night that a British soldier had been shot and seriously wounded in Belfast or Derry – and we would hope that by the morning he would be dead.”

j. Maria McGuire on killing civilians. “I accepted too the bombing of Belfast, and when civilians were accidentally blown to pieces dismissed this as one of the unfortunate hazards of urban guerrilla war.”

k. Maria McGuire on being banned from entering Switzerland. “I happened to hear a television news item that two Irish citizens had been excluded from Switzerland – Dave O’Connell and myself. We had done nothing illegal in Switzerland that I could recall. Then the Swiss Embassy in Dublin telephoned Dave and asked us to call at the embassy to collect our exclusion orders. We naturally refused.”

l. Maria McGuire on becoming disillusioned in the face of escalating violence. “I could not avoid the conclusion that the probability of civilian casualties had been accepted, and perhaps even planned. Whenever such casualties had occurred before, there had always been the pressure of events to take my mind off them. But now, almost for the first time, I wondered about the crippled and the widowed and the lives that had been changed forever.”

http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/Revealed-Maria-Gatland-s-life-IRA-words/story-11363460-detail/story.html

I agreed with the shooting of British soldiers and believed that the more who were killed the better.
http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/news/article-1091364/The-truth-Tory-council-education-chief-used-IRA-moll.html

How I brought the Provisional IRA girl with a gun in from the cold. Last week a Tory local Councillor was revealed as Maria McGuire, a former IRA activist
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2008/dec/07/ira-northern-ireland-conservatives

Was it fair Gatland had to resign because of her past IRA links?
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/opinion/was-it-fair-gatland-had-to-resign-because-of-her-past-ira-links-28461624.html

IRA Councillor welcomed back to Tory bosom. In a dramatic u-turn, Maria Gatland has been accepted back into the Conservatives.
http://www.croydonguardian.co.uk/news/4045346.IRA_Councillor_welcomed_back_to_Tory_bosom/

Croham, a Ward in the London Borough of Croydon, elects Maria Garland as a Councillor 2006, 2010 & 2014.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croham_%28ward%29

Liar Liar – Not the Movie Just John Reid, (the baron)

Baron John Reid, man of principle or Just a wee liar, history judges him to be the latter- his legacy to his constituents is, “see you suckers”. I witnessed his speech and noted the bulk of those in attendance were from places other than that which he claimed to represent. Most were not even from Glasgow or the West of Scotland. Talk about rent an audience. This was it in spades.

John Reid, (Sorry Baron Reid, he took the ermin) represented for many a year an area of Glasgow which suffered the worst social deprivation, lowest life expectancy and highest infant mortality in the developed world, not a lot was done in his time in office or since, (under the stewardship of his successor) to improve matters.

Set against these damming facts is that the Labour Party and John Reid knew full well, (for the last 40 year’s) that Scotland had massive oil and gas wealth and that the Scottish people were being conned and lied too for decades.

I wondered at his behaviour and the justification of it then remembered the Labour party creed allows the sacrifice of the electorate for perceived good of the bigger picture of the Labour Party and it’s manifesto.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scottish-independence/11094182/Scottish-independence-the-English-are-not-our-enemies-says-ex-Labour-home-secretary-Lord-Reid.html

Summary of Events That Happened on Saturday 13 September

Just another march Saturday 13 September 2014

Perth Saturday 13 September 2014 – Caledonia

Rory’s Cairn on the border 13 September 2014

Edinburgh Castle Saturday 13 September 2014

Inverness Saturday 13 September 2014

Dunfermline Saturday 13 September 2014

Glasgow Saturday 13 September 2014

Complaint about Nick Robinson and BBC Reply
https://www.change.org/p/the-bbc-immediately-suspend-nick-robinson-pending-investigation-for-breach-of-bbc-trust-charter-article-44/u/8142695?tk=XBgdyHPI9l5HP2pXV07l0eGriTMAf8Kame2pTg5j5ow&utm_source=petition_update&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=petition_update_email
https://www.change.org/p/the-bbc-immediately-suspend-nick-robinson-pending-investigation-for-breach-of-bbc-trust-charter-article-44/u/8142695?tk=XBgdyHPI9l5HP2pXV07l0eGriTMAf8Kame2pTg5j5ow&utm_source=petition_update&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=petition_update_email

Imperial Master MP’s flying visit to Glasgow -(cost to taxpayer £40,000)

Bonnie Greer gives her view on impartiality of Independence reporting. Brilliant defense of Yes campaign getting screwed by a biased press.

Top American Press Baron supports an Independent Scotland
http://www.forbes.com/sites/brettarends/2014/09/12/would-scottish-independence-destroy-britain/

Retailers backlash – Asda Under the Cosh as Consumers hit back
http://www.thedrum.com/news/2014/09/13/asda-faces-social-media-boycott-backlash-after-declaring-independent-scotland-retail

BBC Media Coverage Wrong and Biased
http://www.thedrum.com/news/2014/09/12/balance-failure-bbc-scottish-independence-referendum-coverage-wrong-and-not

Academic Bullied by BBC
http://www.thedrum.com/opinion/2014/06/30/i-was-bullied-bbc-over-academic-report-indyref-bias-scottish-media-blackout-must

BBC presentations lead news website to question impartiality of BBC presenters around Scottish Independence
http://www.thedrum.com/news/2012/04/16/leaked-bbc-presetations-lead-news-website-question-impartiality-bbc-presenters

What I wrote in September 2014 – Scottish Parliament to be Emasculated – Vote “No” and Powers Will Be Returned to Westminster Post Brexit – And Another Independence Referendum Ruled Out.

this in autumn, this will be a significant change for the Scottish parliament because devolution to Scotland and other parts of the UK was predicated on membership of the EU, we won't be the EU and therefore that will bring change with it." David Mundell, 18 Jan 2017'

Heed the Words of William Hague and Craig Murray

Prior to the 1997 referendum William Hague said the official position of a UK government was to retain a right to reverse any or all aspects of power that might be devolved to a Scottish parliament.

The “no” vote in the referendum sent a resounding message to Westminster that Scotland wished to embrace all of the, “National” aspects of UK government policy.

This will contribute to a creeping reverse of, “devolution” where any powers prove to be at odds with the wishes of the Westminster government.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2017/03/theresa-may-moves-replace-devolution-westminster-control/

Powers There will be no more Powers

So much for Gordon Brown and his new set of devolved powers, details of which only Gordon knows.

What we do know is that there is absolutely no chance of anything more being devolved.

The reverse is the future if Scotland votes no.

A Scotland capable of challenging the Status Quo will not be allowed to remain a threat.

Scotland will be neutered, powers removed and other methods of control introduced.

The last time Scotland stood up and said, “I want to be free” Thatcher moved in and removed Scotland’s perceived power; Coal, Steel, Ship Building, Car Production, any manufacturing company employing more than 500 staff e.g. Caterpiller production at Uddingston.

Anything and everything that exuded power was removed from Scotland and transferred to England.

Scotland was well and truly sorted.

Thatcher did what Westminster excels at subjugation.

So, here we are again; echoing a well loved figure from the past Robert Bruce who said to the Scot’s at Bannockburn, “Do you want to be free to decide your own future and that of your children, OR are you content to remain subjects of a political system that is corrupt and bloated with money stripped from your purses, leaving you at the mercy of, “Wonga” money lenders and wholly reliant on food banks to feed your children and yourselves”?

Remember this. Devolution was not given freely to Scotland in 1997. Westminster was instructed to decentralize government as a condition of membership of the EU.

Even then it took Westminster MP’s, (including those Scotland sent to London to fight their corner) 20 years to comply with the European Commission.

They fought tooth and nail to protect what they believed was theirs.

Even then devolution was designed, organized and implemented in such a way as to ensure, through a hybrid, “hotch potch” electoral voting system of proportional representation that the Scottish National Party would never be able to have an overall majority in the new Scottish parliament.

So Westminster cooked the books, yet again so as to ensure continued dominance over Scotland. Thatchers Legacy lived on.

But the civil servant’s and their masters got their figures wrong, (seems to be a bad habit picked up and absorbed by Westminster).

The Scottish National Party turned devolution on it’s ugly head and here we are again.

This time I urge Scot’s not to believe anything Westminster politicians say in defence of retaining the status quo.

They will lie, threaten and in any other way seek to cajole our nation. Love bombing, hate bombing, promises, promises, everything the Westminster elite has in it’s formidable armoury will be used against Scotland all with the single purpose of continued subjugation.

If Scotland blinks next week and succumbing to the subterfuge elects to stay with the Union then shades of Thatcher you ain’t seen nuthin’ yet.

Over time, any remaining asset of any economic strength e.g. banking will be removed from Scotland.

Delegated powers will be stripped away and taken back to Westminster e.g. Health, Energy policy, Planning, Welfare.

Holyrood will become a wee talking shop filled with a bunch of nobody’s.

Scotland has a choice a, “Yes” vote will transfer power back to the Scot’s, (not just to Scotland).

We will then be enabled as is our right as a nation, once more to decide for ourselves the nature, policies and governance we wish to be in place.

“Welcome to your gory bed or to victory”

Corporates Give Warning. Our Profits Will be Maintained

UK lax tax laws provide a myriad of loopholes which are widely used for tax avoidance and the Treasury is losing many £ billions of tax revenues each and every year.

Five of the UK’ largest banks use tax havens, namely Barclays, Lloyds, TSB, HSBC, and the Royal Bank of Scotland.

Just about all of the larger retailers, (supermarkets) and food manufacturers compete for places in the top 10 tax haven users A survey of the UK’s largest 100 public companies revealed that there are over 8,000 linking offshoots involved in business activities, (onshore and offshore) all registered in tax havens. Only 2 out of the 100 public companies had no offshoots registered in tax havens.

George Osborne, in a recent speech brought the issue to the attention of the UK public stating the matter needed to be resolved. The task of closing the loopholes and recovering tax due is proving to be just about impossible since the bulk of the offshoot companies were registered in UK Crown dependencies such as, Bermuda, Gibraltar and Jersey.

Recent Scare stories broadcast by Asda, John Lewis, B&Q, Tesco, Virgin, Timpsons and many of the other large retailers providing goods & services to Scotland should be considered against the fact that just about all of them and their management teams pay little or no tax to the UK Treasury.

So a load of tax dodgers, briefed, instructed and to be rewarded by David Cameron, (over 100 lords created in 3 years) fully utilizing a Westminster compliant and corrupt BBC, press and other media outlets spread rumor an innuendo about unspecified price increases just before the referendum .

Cameron and Osborne and the rest of the political elite at Westminster should be ashamed allowing Trillions of tax to be dodged by billionaire owners and their management teams whilst harassing Scot’s earning a pittance for every penny they are able to screw them for.

Not any more I fully expect Scot’s will exact their right next week and vote, “Yes” in the referendum so that our nation can once more stand proud amongst all the other countries of the world

Scotlands Day of Reckoning

Powers There will be no more Powers

So much for Gordon Brown and his new set of devolved powers, details of which only Gordon knows. What we do know is that there is absolutely no chance of anything more being devolved. The reverse is the future if Scotland votes no. A Scotland capable of challenging the Status Quo will not be allowed to remain a threat. Scotland will be neutered, powers removed and other methods of control introduced.

The last time Scotland stood up and said, “I want to be free” Thatcher moved in and removed Scotland’s perceived power; Coal, Steel, Ship Building, Car Production, any manufacturing company employing more than 500 staff e.g. Caterpiller production at Uddingston. Anything and everything that exuded power was removed from Scotland and transferred to England. Scotland was well and truly sorted. Thatcher did what Westminster excels at subjugation.

So, here we are again; echoing a well loved figure from the past Robert Bruce who said to the Scot’s at Bannockburn, “Do you want to be free to decide your own future and that of your children, OR are you content to remain subjects of a political system that is corrupt and bloated with money stripped from your purses, leaving you at the mercy of, “Wonga” money lenders and wholly reliant on food banks to feed your children and yourselves”?

Remember this. Devolution was not given freely to Scotland in 1997. Westminster was instructed to decentralize government as a condition of membership of the EU. Even then it took Westminster MP’s, (including those Scotland sent to London to fight their corner) 20 years to comply with the European Commission. They fought tooth and nail to protect what they believed was theirs.

Even then devolution was designed, organized and implemented in such a way as to ensure, through a hybrid, “hotch potch” electoral voting system of proportional representation that the Scottish National Party would never be able to have an overall majority in the new Scottish parliament. So Westminster cooked the books, yet again so as to ensure continued dominance over Scotland. Thatchers Legacy lived on.

But the civil servant’s and their masters got their figures wrong, (seems to be a bad habit picked up and absorbed by Westminster). The Scottish National Party turned devolution on it’s ugly head and here we are again. This time I urge Scot’s not to believe anything Westminster politicians say in defense of retaining the status quo. They will lie, threaten and in any other way seek to cajole our nation. Love bombing, hate bombing, promises, promises, everything the Westminster elite has in it’s formidable armory will be used against Scotland all with the single purpose of continued subjugation. If Scotland blinks next week and succumbing to the subterfuge elects to stay with the Union then shades of Thatcher you ain’t seen nuthin’ yet.

Any remaining asset of any economic strength e.g. banking will be removed from Scotland. Delegated powers will be stripped away and taken back to Westminster e.g. Health, Energy policy, Planning, Welfare. Holyrood will become a wee talking shop filled with nobody’s.

Scotland has a choice a, “Yes” vote will transfer power back to the Scot’s, (not just to Scotland). We will then be enabled as is our right as a nation, once more to decide for ourselves the nature, policies and governance we wish to be in place.

“Welcome to your gory bed or to victory”

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=592543857520831capable of challenging the Status Quo will not be allowed to

Margaret Curran & Johaan Lamont Ladies with a Past, But Hopefully No Future

Margaret Curran Labour Party MP for the East of Glasgow and Shadow Secretary of State for Scotland is a Labour Party animal.

1. Labour Party Doctrine;

a. The Labour Party comes, first, last and always.

b. The Labour Party is infallible. Any thing she does or is done in the party name is explained away as always being for the better good of the people.

c. The Labour Party provides a vehicle allowing officers of the party to manipulate the needs and wishes of the electorate so that they are in harmony with the Party’s wishes and the promotion of the officers of the Party.

d. Local officers of the Party promote the myth that they are in place and trusted implicitly to service and protect the needs and aspirations of the local electorate.

e. Nepotism is a good thing since it ensures continuity of electorate representation.

f. Promotion of religious division is to be encouraged, nurtured and maintained in electorate areas where there might be a significant majority of one religion over another. Popularly called, “Divide & Rule.
2. Denis Healey – Oil & Gas Finds – The McCrone Report

a. Healey admitted that the Labour government cheated the Scottish electorate out of the oil and gas finds reported on in the McCrone Report.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/scottish-independence-blog/2013/may/29/scottish-independence-oil-healey

Click to access mccronereport.pdf

b. Margaret Curran, (at that time) was a senior officer of the Labour Party, (through her duties in the University) and enjoyed regular contact with officers of the party of all levels. It is expected Margaret and her close working colleague Johaan Lamont would have been aware of the existence and content of the McCrone document. If not at the time it was presented then soon after.

c. Margaret and Johaan represent, (still do) areas of Glasgow with the worst social deprivation, lowest life expectancy and highest infant mortality in the developed world and not a lot has or is being done to improve matters. Set against this damming situation is the fact that the Labour Party and both Margaret and Johaan knew full well, (for the last 40 year’s) that Scotland had massive oil and gas wealth and that the Scottish people have been lied to for decades. I wondered at their behavior and the justification of it then remembered the Labour party creed allows the sacrifice of the electorate for perceived good of the bigger picture of the Labour Party and it’s manifesto.

http://bellacaledonia.org.uk/2013/05/28/being-there/ Full expose of Margaret Curran et.al.

Referendum Wrecking Tactics – Supermarkets – Banks & Retailers

Referendum Wrecking Tactics – Supermarkets – Banks & Retailers

1. Wrecking tactics, (conceived, organized and ordered by David Cameron) require the billionaire heads of banks and businesses to issue, “gloom and Doom” messages to their Scottish staff and the public in the last few days before the referendum. Frighteners such as; transferring banking activity and employment to London, (adversely affecting 30,000 people employed in the Scottish financial sector). Price increases, across the board in the case of retailers and in particular Supermarkets, (designed to spread negative messages to retailing staff and shoppers).

2. The Banks

3. But the devil is in the detail and David Cameron may yet be hung by his own petard

a. The total cost of employing 30,000 highly trained finance staff in Scotland is approximately £1 Billion.

b. Assuming it might be feasible to locate and purchase 30,000 homes in or near London and transfer staff and their families relocation cost would be in the region of £10 Billion.

c. On-costs, house purchase, mortgage support, travel and other aspects of relocation would require another £50 Billion.

d. Then there is the additional wage bill for 30,000 staff who would attract salaries in line with those in place for London staff .750 Billion.

e. Total cost £61 Billion.

f. Is it financially prudent to relocate staff? No it most certainly is not.

g. I n any event it would not be possible to recruit new staff in London and financially prohibitive to relocate Scottish staff and there is insufficient housing stock available.

h. The solution? Move the brass plate to London effectively registering the banks there, ensuring any financial deficit carried over from the financial crash are retained in London with the UKr Treasury. Note: This will happen regardless of the outcome of the referendum

i. Retain all 30,000 staff in Scotland, effectively outsourced from London. Discharging the same duties as before. Might need some IT investment but this would be minimal.

j. Result. Everybody happy. No unnecessary financial expenditure associated with the changes
4. Supermarkets and Retailers

5. Retailers were put under ruthless, unfair and persistent pressure from David Cameron to back and make public their support for a no vote in the Scottish referendum, (but most refused). However the attack dog, (self appointed) is Sir Ian Cheshire, the, (soon to be replaced) Chief Executive of Kingfisher, the business behind B&Q, the DIY chain. His position is that, “business leaders need to speak out and get the facts in front of Scottish voters who need to make a decision”. “It’s not scaremongering. Independence is possible but there are costs and consequences of separation. I think the current system works well, but people have to decide if it is better.”

6. The thrust of the intervention by the Chief Executives of a few retailers and two of the largest supermarkets, (since withdrawn) is centered around the probability of, “Increased Prices” for goods and services in the event of a, “Yes” vote. Such increases would be justified since goods distribution costs to Scotland are higher than in the rest of the UK.

7. If Scotland votes, “yes” in the referendum, at the date of change supermarkets and retailers would be free to establish new markets in Scotland. Assuming Scotland would retain, “special membership status” within the EU all, “new” markets would be governed by internal market regulations operating within Europe. To that extent any restriction of trade measures that Supermarkets might seek to introduce would need to meet all aspects of the aforesaid regulations. The European Commission may, if provided with reference, decide to order a market investigation so as to ensure a fair extension of the frontiers of competition within Supermarkets operating within England & Scotland.

8. Any costs inflated by carriage charges would need to be measured and imposed equally across the entire supermarket distribution area, (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland). eg Asda, (based in Leeds) would need to introduce an added carriage cost for distribution to Glasgow, Edinburgh, London, Plymouth, Portsmouth and Cardiff. It would not be permissible to add carriage costs to goods for sale in Scotland to the exception of the same goods for sale in England.

9. Tax – Now That’s Another Thing to Sort

10. UK lax tax laws provide a myriad of loopholes which are widely used for tax avoidance and the Treasury is losing many £ billions of tax revenues each and every year. Five of the UK’ largest banks use tax havens, namely BARCLAYS, LLOYDS, TSB, HSBC, and the ROYAL BANK of SCOTLAND. Just about all of the larger retailers, (supermarkets) and food manufacturers compete for places in the top 10 tax haven users A survey of the UK’s largest 100 public companies revealed that there are over 8,000 linking offshoots involved in business activities, (onshore and offshore) all registered in tax havens. Only 2 out of the 100 public companies had no offshoots registered in tax havens. George Osborne, in a recent speech brought the issue to the attention of the UK public stating the matter needed to be resolved. The task of closing the loopholes and recovering tax due is proving to be just about impossible since the bulk of the offshoot companies were registered in UK Crown dependencies such as, Bermuda, Gibraltar and Jersey.

EU Referendum – Cameron resurrecting 2014 Scottish Referendum Project Fear Incorporating Big Business bullying tactics

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The UK before joining the EEC

I lived in Hampshire, England from 1970-1973. Almost weekly local newspapers carried graphic reports of huge numbers of French and Belgian shoppers travelling across the channel to Dover, Folkestone etc.  to purchase food, drink and many other household items. Significant savings were achieved even after adding in the cost of a return ticket. In light of the foregoing  we considered ourselves lucky that Harold Wilson’s bid to join the EEC in 1967 had been vetoed by General de Gaulle.

But bad tidings awaited the UK in the form of the introduction of the “Common Agricultural Policy” (CAP). The  hugely expensive policy had been forced on the EEC by the French who intended retaining their vastly inefficient “peasant farmer”  agriculture system. Once this was in place France dropped their objections to the UK joining the EEC.  Informed politicians warned the UK public that France needed the UK in the EEC so that finance would be available to fund their  inefficient farmers and this proved to be the case.

In 1971 Ted Heath’s Tory government (prodded by the USA)  opened negotiations with the EEC once more. Simultaneously they launched an expensive political and media onslaught on the UK public broadcasting the subliminal message that the EEC was simply a trading agreement and there was no threat to the UK’s sovereignty. The conduct of discussions were not openly broadcast and in time many aspects of the agreement disadvantageous to the UK unravelled. But the (USA owned) UK media and press clamoured for membership, through their heavy use of emotive headlines shaping and promoting USA and Tory  agenda’s.

Yet again the UK public was subjected to a massive con trick orchestrated by politicians and the media who, whilst extolling the virtues, (as yet intangible)  gave no mention  of the extortionate costs of joining the EEC.  Nevertheless  Heath, (assisted by a compliant media and press) without affording the UK public the opportunity of a referendum, agreed a treaty committing the UK to  joining the EEC  in January 1972.

Within days of joining the cost of living in the UK increased by around 40%, (without any increase in wages). Those of us living in the South of England formed “shopper clubs”. These organised weekend trips to France to purchase, food, drink etc. “The shoe had been transferred to the other foot.” What a nonsense.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cameron resurrecting Project Fear bullying tactics in EU Referendum

David Cameron has come under renewed pressure over his conduct during Scotland’s independence referendum – after new revelations that his government put pressure on big business to try and play up anti-independence fears.

As reported today, a leaked letter from Serco has shown that the Prime Minister has pushed corporations to encourage the publication of anti-Brexit information – and makes clear that the UK Government did the same thing during the independence referendum and ‘managed to garner a lot of publicity’.

Commenting, SNP MSP James Dornan said:

“This damning new evidence lays bare the concerted effort of the UK Government to pressurise big business to try and whip up anti-independence fears – and gets to the heart of the sinister, behind the scenes campaign David Cameron ran in the final weeks of the referendum.

“Now we know that the UK government was pressing businesses to garner publicity for anti-independence scaremongering, people in Scotland will view every anti-independence pronouncement from the Tories in the same light – and won’t believe a single word they say on the issue.

“As Prime Minister of the whole UK, David Cameron had a duty to people in Scotland – instead, he put his partisan interest first and actively sought to undermine our economy, and it’s high time he apologised.

“But it’s clear that he hasn’t learned a single thing from the appalling way his government conducted their business during the independence referendum – and seems content to use the same Project Fear bullying tactics on the issue of the EU. “He should make clear that he will eschew the negative tactics of scaremongering from now until June 23rd – and make the positive case for being part of Europe.”

http://thehighlandtimes.com/news/2016/05/17/new-evidence-of-sinister-anti-independence-scheming-by-cameron/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014 – The Scottish Referendum

Retailers under pressure from David Cameron to back no vote in Scottish referendum

The UK’s biggest retailers are being ruthlessly pressurized by David Cameron forcing them to intervene in the Scottish referendum debate, pushing his message that a, Yes” vote next week will result in higher prices. He invoked Britain’s defeat of Hitler as part of a plea to around 200 business leaders aimed at preventing Scotland voting for independence. The Prime Minister said that it was as a United Kingdom that the Second World War had been fought and won, and that it was crucial that the country remained undivided.

Cameron’s remarks at the private gathering represent some of his most bizarrely impassioned comments so far, ahead of a referendum which is more finely balanced than at any stage since campaigning got underway. “He (Cameron) emphasized the need for us to do everything we can over the next few days to keep the union together,” said one of those present. “He wants us to highlight the dangers of a Scottish exit in any way we can.”

The so called, “initiative” will take the form of a letter to be released to the UK media in the next day or so. It is being led by Sir Ian Cheshire, the Chief Executive of Kingfisher, the business behind B&Q, the DIY chain. Other retailers understood to have agreed to back the initiative, so far include Marc Bolland, the chief executive of Marks & Spencer, and Charlie Mayfield, chairman of the John Lewis Group. Andy Clarke, the chief executive of Asda, and John Timpson, boss of the Timpson shoe repair business, also support it.

On Thursday night Cheshire confirmed his involvement: “Business leaders need to speak out and get the facts in front of Scottish voters who need to make a decision. It’s not scaremongering. There are costs and consequences of separation and I think the current system works better. Independence is possible but people have to decide if it is better. There needs to be measured debate.” So far, it is understood that Morrisons has refused to add its name and that several other leading retailers are holding back, fearing it would alienate vast numbers of Scottish shoppers. News of the move will fuel concerns in Scotland that a dirty tricks campaign is being co-ordinated through Downing Street

http://news.sky.com/story/1332422/pm-invokes-ww2-in-scottish-no-plea
http://news.sky.com/story/1332669/b-and-q-boss-warns-over-prices-if-scots-vote-yes

 

 

Queen “purred” at the good news her realm would stay intact (for now)

 

 

 

 

 
Competition and Supermarkets – A Guidance Note

In the event the Scottish referendum results in Scotland becoming an independent nation. At the date of change supermarkets would be free to establish new markets in Scotland in all respects. Assuming Scotland would retain, “special membership status” within the EU all, “new” markets would be governed by internal market regulations operating within Europe.

To that extent any restriction of trade measures that Supermarkets might seek to introduce would need to meet all aspects of the aforesaid regulations.

The European Commission may, if provided with reference, decide to order a market investigation so as to ensure a fair extension of the frontiers of competition within Supermarkets operating within England & Scotland.

Any costs inflated by carriage charges would need to be measured and imposed equally across the entire supermarket distribution area, (England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland). eg Asda, (based in Leeds) would need to introduce an added carriage cost for distribution to Glasgow, Edinburgh, London, Plymouth, Portsmouth and Cardiff.

It would not be permissible to add carriage costs to goods for sale in Scotland to the exception of the same goods for sale in England.

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/cma-how-we-intend-to-use-market-investigations-to-extend-the-frontiers-of-competition

 

 

Unionist Party leaders in forefront of Better Together 2014 referendum campaign

 

 

Business for Scotland A few Posts of Interest

Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp

Gordon MacIntyre-Kemp is the Chief Executive of Business for Scotland. Before joining Business for Scotland he ran a small social media and sales & marketing consultancy and was the founding member of Business for Scotland. With a degree in business and economics, Gordon has worked as an economic development planning professional, and in marketing roles specialising in pricing modelling and promotional evaluation for global companies (including P&G). I rate his site very highly and recommend it to anyone who is seeking the truth on any matter regarding the Referendum

http://www.businessforscotland.co.uk/author/bfsgordon/
Businesses in Scotland View

Independence isn’t just for large companies. Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) make up 99.3% of all Scottish businesses and 97% of all Scottish exports. They create the majority of private sector jobs in Scotland. That is why we are sharing the names of another 100 plus job creators from our growing membership.

http://www.businessforscotland.co.uk/another-100-employers-declare-for-yes-through-business-for-scotland/
Scotland’s Food & Drink Industry Supports Independence

We believe the food and drink sector will have more opportunities and be a much great priority for an independent Scottish government than it will be for a UK government.

http://www.businessforscotland.co.uk/40-leading-food-and-drink-figures-declare-for-yes/
Scare Stories Debunked

The people of Scotland are making an important decision on September 18th. They are making a choice between becoming a self governing independent national democracy just like almost every other nation on earth or a decision to be governed by a distant, disinterested and dysfunctional Westminster government over which they have no control and absolutely minimal influence within.

http://www.businessforscotland.co.uk/5-biggest-no-campaign-economics-scare-stories-debunked/
Business for Scotland calls on BBC to leave CBI

The following is the text of a letter sent by Business for Scotland Chair Tony Banks to Tony Hall, Director General of the BBC, calling for the BBC to end its membership of the CBI.

http://www.businessforscotland.co.uk/business-for-scotland-calls-on-bbc-to-leave-cbi/
200 Business people declare for YES with an economic vision

Today 200 Business people from all sorts and sizes of companies from all over Scotland publicly declare that they are voting YES – they see it as “the business and jobs opportunity of a lifetime for this and future generations”.

http://www.businessforscotland.co.uk/200-business-people-declare-for-yes-with-an-economic-vision/
Leading surgeon says Yes vote will save Scotland’s NHS from Westminster privatisation

Dr Philippa Whitford, one of Scotland most respected surgeons, delivered an insightful and hard hitting guest speech at the 2014 Vision for Scotland conference.

http://www.businessforscotland.co.uk/leading-surgeon-says-independence-will-save-scotlands-nhs/
First Minister: No Currency Deal, no Debt Deal

This is because if there is no deal on currency there will be no deal on debt.

http://www.businessforscotland.co.uk/first-minister-no-currency-deal-no-debt-deal/
Top businessman says independence is ‘the jobs opportunity of a lifetime’

Ralph Topping, retiring as Chief Executive of betting giant William Hill plc and is one of Britain’s foremost business leaders with 44 years’ experience, said that a Yes vote will improve “life”.

http://www.businessforscotland.co.uk/top-businessman-says-independence-is-the-jobs-opportunity-of-a-lifetime/
Independence and the Economy – The Facts

Scotland can more than afford to be independent. Independence will make Scotland’s economy stronger and its people better off financially.

http://www.businessforscotland.co.uk/independence-and-the-economy-the-facts/
What big business has really said about independence

Many of Scotland’s most successful businesses operate globally. They work across many countries. For them Scotland gaining full economic powers to improve economic growth is a positive or neutral step.

http://www.businessforscotland.co.uk/what-big-business-has-really-said-about-independence/
New think tank: high-growth Scotland can be one of the most prosperous nations

It makes clear Scotland should benchmark itself against small independent and highly competitive economies such as New Zealand, Denmark and Singapore.

http://www.businessforscotland.co.uk/new-think-tank-high-growth-scotland-can-be-one-of-the-most-prosperous-nations/