The Downing Street memos Revealed


Pressure is being applied by MP’s insisting that the Chilcott Report be published in full before the end of February. It might be further delaying tactics will be put in place with the purpose of burying the report until after the GE in May.

In terms of actions taken or not by a number of persons of note there is a definitive record available for study from which it is possible to apportion events and authority. Ignore the hype, check the facts. Go to:


Scottish Referendum

The Chilcott Enquiry

The 2002-3 Iraq war and the Chilcott Enquiry The cost to date, nearly £8 million. The report is yet to be published. Why wont they release the information?

Two million people marched against the war, many more were profoundly disturbed by the suspicion that our government had lied and dissembled in order to please the Americans. For young people in particular, the controversy seemed to confirm that politics was inherently corrupt. In this context, the ludicrous farce of the Chilcott Inquiry is even more damaging. To many people, it will inevitably appear that the Whitehall establishment is protecting its own.

The more you hide, the more people suspect and fear you – and the more you play into the hands of juvenile nihilists who prattle about revolution without really understanding what it means. But as the popularity of conspiracy theories suggests, people always like to believe the worst.

What, they will wonder, do Blair and Brown have to hide? What did they tell President Bush? What promises did they make, and what secrets are lurking in the documents? The great irony, of course, is that the Chilcott Inquiry was meant to shed light on the dark corners of British foreign policy, to heal the wounds of the Iraq invasion, and to restore public faith in the political process.

Yet all of this is so unnecessary. For decades, successive governments have come to power promising to roll back the culture of secrecy, yet none of them has done it. Why the mandarins and their political patrons are so frightened of openness is simply beyond me. Their American friends, for example, are much quicker and keener to open their archives and to air their dirty linen in public, and it never does them any harm.

Scottish Referendum

Hoon Defence Secretary-Iraq No Answers

Commons Select Committee for Defence 22 Mar 2002, (before the 2003 invasion of Iraq).

Answering a question about weapons of mass destruction Geoff Hoon, Defence Secretary, (much scandalised and forced from office) said, “Saddam Hussein can be absolutely confident the UK is willing to use nuclear weapons in the right conditions”.

Chairman’s End of Session Summary

“Thank you very much. I cannot say the sum total of human knowledge has increased significantly, Mr Hoon. You “out-Boycotted” Boycott, and all I can say is that if you were playing for Derby County this season in goal then Derby would be up with Manchester United and going into Europe, because you did not concede many goals. However, we will ask you exactly the same questions again in due course, when we will expect totally, totally different answers.

A careful read of the notes, (see attached) of the meeting will leave you breathless. The contempt Mr Hoon had for the committee was breath-taking.

Scottish Referendum

Iraq Back to Haunt the UK

The undernoted statements were made before the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

1. Nelson Mandela. ” An arrogant and short sighted Mr Blair is “no longer Prime Minister of Britain” but, “the Foreign Minister of the United States”.

2. Prince Saud al-Faisa, Saudi Foreign Minister. “Regime change will lead to the destruction of Iraq, and will threaten to destabilise the entire Middle East region, “If change of regime comes with the destruction of Iraq, then you are solving one problem and creating five more.

But Westminster wouldn’t listen. Many hundreds of thousands dead and wounded and there is no end in sight. Now we are warned to expect similar incidents in the UK. What a mess. Scotland needs to be independent so that our nation can be free to decide our own foreign policy

Scottish Referendum

Part-Time Defence Secretary at a Time of War

Is Part-Time Good Enough?

It was 2006. UK forces were deployed to war, on two fronts, (Iraq & Afghanistan). Action in both countries was fierce, and UK military casualties were mounting. The Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, had moved Baron John Reid away from Defence to Health, (replacing Alan Milburn who had been removed, under a cloud). The absence of anyone suited to the ministry gave problems. Baron Des Browne of Ladyton, (a lawyer prior to taking up politics) was appointed.

The problem of inadequate equipment and support, for the military came to the fore and resultant of relentless pressure from the media and public finance was released so that helicopters, protective clothing and suitable vehicles could be purchased.

Lack of military experience soon took it’s toll on Browne, (a compassionate person by nature) who found it extremely difficult to provide leadership coping with ever increasing casualty levels. Uncomfortable in his role he wisely delegated operational oversight to persons more suited. He then worked assiduously supporting, improving welfare support to families.

In 2007, following the debacle of the 2007 Scottish elections Douglas Alexander was removed from office. Browne’s role at the MOD was formally reduced to part-time, (yup! indeed). Browne was instructed by Gordon Brown to take on the portfolio of Scottish Secretary, (in a part time capacity). The unique dual role was heavily criticised by the opposition, media and public, to no avail. Browne, (removed from the offices and moved to the back benches in 2008) later commentated, “I don’t think it would be wise for any future prime minister to recreate that strategy.”

Questioned at the Iraq Inquiry he stated;

1. “I do not believe the UK had sufficient resources to take part in two major deployments”.

2. “I found it very difficult to come to terms with the deaths of our people in an operational environment”.

3. “I found it difficult to personally deal with the losses of our people”.

4. “The decision to deploy thousands of British troops to Southern Afghanistan in 2006 had a negative impact on operations in Iraq”.

5. Service families were unhappy with me simultaneously holding the job of Scottish Secretary

There you have it!!! What a nonsense.

His successor John Hutton said a lack of helicopters had “undoubtedly been a factor” in the UK’s mission in Iraq. “I don’t think there is any point pretending otherwise,” he said. “The military would have liked more helicopters and the politicians would have liked to make more available.”

Mr Hutton acknowledged the death toll among Iraqi civilians since the March 2003 invasion had been, “disastrous” but he defended the war as it had transformed Iraq from a “pariah” state to a democracy that was a full member of the international community.

Des Browne and John Hutton both served as defence secretary during a period when there was dual pressure on the military. It was natural that they would be questioned about the impact of Afghanistan on Iraq, especially in the wake of Geoff Hoon’s evidence.

Last week, Mr Hoon told the inquiry that he had not agreed with Tony Blair’s announcement in 2004 that led to a troop commitment to Afghanistan, at a time when British forces were still deployed in southern Iraq in significant numbers.

Today, Mr Browne and Mr Hutton both addressed the issue of over-stretch. They painted a picture of finite resources meaning that two simultaneous operations, such as Iraq and Afghanistan, could not be sustained indefinitely.

On a lighter note, Mr Browne said at that one stage Britain had successfully sourced “six Merlin helicopters” in Iraq. The hapless stenographer in the hearing room typed this as “six million helicopters”.

Mr Browne said his concerns about troops’ welfare meant he chose to devote a lot of his time to helping the families of personnel. But he said “perceptions” of his efforts were hampered after Gordon Brown asked him to combine the role as defence secretary with that of secretary of state for Scotland from July 2007 onwards – a dual role which was heavily criticised at the time by the opposition.

Although Mr Browne said he did not have any less time to devote to the defence brief – because he had an “able” Scottish deputy to rely upon and many Scottish issues were devolved – he said public reaction to the arrangement was “disadvantageous”. “I don’t think it would be wise for any future prime minister to recreate that strategy,” he said. Resources Mr Browne acknowledged there were “concerns” within the military about the number of helicopters available to British troops in Iraq