caltonjock

In 1963, in Dallas, a Jewish alcohol wholesaler, Julius Schepps, held the distribution rights for the Bronfman family’s Seagram’s products.

Jack Ruby was on the payroll of the Bronfman family, whose fingerprints are to be found all over the JFK assassination conspiracy.

JFK’s Dallas trip was officially designated as “non political” in contrast to other Texas stops such as Houston and Austin which were designated “political”.

This provided the opportunity for the private entities paying for the Dallas trip to gain control of the agenda, taking it out of the hands of the JFK-controlled Democratic National Committee.

A “host committee” was established, the chairman of which was Dallas Jewish leader and public relations man, Sam Bloom.

There was an immediate confrontation between Bloom and Jerry Bruno, JFK’s veteran advance man. Bruno wanted the president to speak at the Women’s Building, but the committee insisted JFK speak at the Trade Mart.

Applying pressure the committee gained control. Bruno commented later: “this was one of the few fights like this that I had lost. On things like this my judgment was usually taken. This time it wasn’t.”

In forcing JFK to speak at the Trade Mart, the committee had positioned the JFK motorcade to take the now-infamous “dog-leg” turn into what was a classically sniper friendly “kill zone” on Elm Street just below the Texas School Book Depository (T.S.B.D), from where it later was claimed the alleged assassin, T.S.B.D employee Lee Harvey Oswald, fired the fatal shots.

The spot was also in easy range of the “grassy knoll” and the nearby Dal-Tex Building, where assassination researchers believe snipers were located.

Had JFK’s security team prevailed, JFK (on his way to the preferred location) would have travelled two blocks farther away from the T.S.B.D out of the kill zone at a greater speed.

The Secret Service also objected (for security reasons) to the publication of JFK’s motorcade route, but Bloom ensured a map of the route was published in the Dallas newspapers providing a plausible explanation as to how Lee Harvey Oswald knew JFK would pass by his workplace.

That an assassin most likely fired at JFK from the Dal-Tex Building is most relevant in the context of an Israeli connection since JFK was trying to stop Israel’s nuclear arms program, which had smuggled uranium from U.S. sources.

Co-owned by David Weisblat, a major financial backer of the Israeli lobby’s Anti-Defamation League, Dal-Tex housed, on different floors, a number of firms that utilized the telephone number of Morty Freedman, an attorney, garment manufacturer, and activist in Jewish affairs.

One of the Dal-Tex firms linked to Freedman was the Dallas Uranium & Oil Company. This is relevant since one of Freedman’s Dal-Tex business partners was Abe Zapruder, the Jewish dress manufacturer who filmed the assassination and profited immensely. It is conjectured that Zapruder had advance knowledge of the assassination.

Once Oswald was in custody, it was Sam Bloom, who pressured Elgin Crull, the city manager, to apply pressure on Dallas Police Chief Jesse Curry into making Oswald accessible to the press and to move him publicly from the Dallas police station to the city jail providing the opportunity for Jack Ruby to assasinate Oswald.

A number of sources, including Dallas FBI agent James Hosty, stated that Bloom and his backers were the forces behind the incident and when the police searched Ruby’s home, they found a slip of paper with Bloom’s name, address and telephone number on it.

Events in Dallas will be difficult to accept by those who believed the city to be an anti-Jewish stronghold when in reality it was was an outpost for the advancement of the interests of Israel and seekers of the truth should be guided by the “Final Judgement”.

(https://ia802304.us.archive.org/8/items/final-judgment-michael-collins-piper/Final_Judgment%20Michael%20Collins%20Piper.pdf

Edgar Bronfman, the president of the World Jewish Congress, the honorary vice chairman of the Anti-Defamation League and the chairman of th ADL’s key fundraising arm, the Northeast Appeal, was a major beneficiary of the Skadden Arps law firm’s expertise in corporate takeovers.

In the mid-1980s, Irving Hapiro, the chairman of the board of the DuPont Company, one of America’s oldest and largest industrial concerns, retired from his corporate post to become a partner in Skadden Arps.

Shortly after his arrival at the law firm, Edgar Bronfman’s Seagrams Corporation began buying up stock in the DuPont Company, eventually taking over a controlling interest.

Shapiro, who worked closely with Bronfman during his tenure as president of the Business Roundtable, was reportedly a key inside player in the Bronfman takeover of DuPont.

After his move from DuPont to Skadden Arps, Irving Shapiro helped recruit his son Isaac to the firm. Isaac brought with him the lion’s share of Japanese real estate investors in the United States, who had been his clients at his previous firm, the blueblood-run Milbank, Hadley, Tweed and McCoy.

Armed with a string of prestigious titles as a leading Zionist philanthropist and corporate billionaire, Edgar Bronfman launched a systematic effort in the mid-1980s to implement Meyer Lansky’s second dream the syndicate takeover of Israel.

If there was a single official of the ADL equipped to convince the Soviet government to open the floodgates of Jewish emigration and to ensure that the Russian Jews landed in Israel, it was Edgar Bronfman.

Through his Seagrams distributorships, Edgar and his brother Charles had cultivated a cozy relationship with some of the most powerful and brutal figures in the Communist world, beginning with East German Communist Party chief Erich Honecker.

Through the West German branch of Seagrams, the Bronfmans had arranged to supply the East German Communist Party with unlimited quantities of Seagrams alcohol, which was provided free of charge to the most senior ranking members of the party.

By 1986, a Bronfman emmisary in East Berlin had established close ties with the East German minister of religious affairs and Gregor Gysi the father of Honnecker’s successor as head of the the Communist Party (SED). The Gysis are Jewish.

In 1988, Edgar Bronfman travelled to East Berlin to meet with Honecker and East German Communist Party official Herman Axen. During the visit, Bronfman pledged to arrange a state visit for Honecker to Washington, D.C.

A year later, on the eve of Honecker’s ousting and the overthrow of the communist dictatorship in East Germany, Bronfman received the highest civilian award given by the state, the “Peoples Friendship Medal in Gold.”

Even as the Berlin Wall was on the verge of collapsing, Bronfman began an ambitious diplomatic drive on Moscow, paralleling his successful courting of the East Germans.

On Jan. 23, 1989, according to a report published by syndicated columnists Evans and Novak, Edgar Bronfman held a secret meeting at his New York City penthouse to plan out the Soviet Jewish exodus.

In attendance at the session was Dwayne Andreas, the chainnan of the grain cartel Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), who was identified in the Wall Street Journal as Gorbachov’s “closest pal ” in the West.

Bronfman’s plan was simple: in return for assurances that the United States would supply urgently needed grain shipments to the Soviet Union, Moscow would allow Soviet Jews to move to Israel.

To assure that the Soviet Jews who arrived in the West would have no alternative other than immediate migration to Israel, Bronfman’s World Jewish Congress had already launched a vicious slander campaign against Austrian President Kurt Waldheim, branding him as a wartime Nazi collaborator who had participated in the extermination of the Jews of Eastern Europe.

Bronfman campaign was aided by forged documents allegedly provided by the Soviet KGB and other Soviet bloc secret police agencies.

The scandal led to a serious rift in American-Austrian relations. As a result, Austria, which had previously been the major transit point for Soviet Jews fleeing to the West, was shut off to Soviet Jewish emigres. Alternative routes were established through Hungary and Poland-with the caveat that the Soviet Jews would only be allowed to emigrate to Israel.

Evans and Novak denounced the Bronfman scheme as a cynical effort to trade “Jews for rain.” The harsh words did not bother Bronfman in the least. As the heir to the “Bronfman Gang, ” his family had been called worse. Besides, the ADL man realized that he was personally repaying a longstanding family debt to Meyer Lansky-and was fulfilling the second grand dream of the crime czar: the takeover of Israel.

Click to access eirv19n27-19920701_019-the_bronfmans_rags_to_rackets_to.pdf

Even while the Bronfman family maintained a steady march toward respectability, some members of the family could not wholly abandon the old syndicate ties.

In 1972, the Montreal Crime Commission issued a report identifying Edgar Bronfman’s nephew Mitchell Bronfman as a crime partner of Willie Obront, one of Montreal’s leading gangsters, .

According to the report, Mitchell Bronfman’s link to Obront “extends into illegal activities in which they mutually or jointly indulged The special kinds of favours they did for each other and the resulting advantages of each in the fields of loan sharking, gambling, illegal betting, securities, tax evasion and corruption.”

In the mid-1970s, Obront and another Mitchell Bronfman crony, Sam Rosen, were both jailed for drug-money laundering.

One joint venture of Obront and Bronfman, the North Miami nightclub Pagoda North was identified by American law enforcement authorities as a syndicate hangout frequented by Vito Genovese, the New ‘York City mafia boss.

During 1963, President John F. Kennedy was preoccupied with issues such as Vietnam, the nuclear test ban negotiations, civil rights protests, and Cuba. It is less well known, however, that one of his most abiding concerns was whether and how fast Israel was seeking a nuclear weapons capability and what the U.S. should do about it. Beginning in April 1963, Kennedy insisted that the Israeli leadership accept regular bi-annual U.S. inspections, or in diplomatic language, “visits,” of Israel’s nuclear complex at Dimona in the Negev Desert. Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion and his successor, Levi Eshkol, tried to evade and avoid inspections, but Kennedy applied unprecedented pressure, informing them bluntly, in a near ultimatum tone, that Washington’s “commitment to and support of Israel “could be “seriously jeopardized” if it was thought that the U.S. government could not obtain “reliable information” on the Dimona reactor and Israel’s nuclear intentions.

https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/nuclear-vault/2019-05-02/battle-letters-1963-john-f-kennedy-david-ben-gurion-levi-eshkol-us-inspections-dimona

A significant fact pointing to Israeli involvement in President Kennedy’s assassination was Samuel Bronfman’s mysterious oil investments.

In 1963, the former bootlegger embarked on an unfamiliar business venture by aggressively purchasing the huge oil holdings of “Ranger Oil” and “Texas Pacific Oil” and its subsidiaries in India, Malaysia, Guatemala, Indonesia, and Italy. plus.

When John F. Kennedy became President in 1961, the oil industry felt secure. But he soon began an assault on the power of the oil giants directly, introducing the Kennedy Act, and shortly after the “oil depletion allowance.”

The Kennedy Act, passed on October 16, 1962, removed the distinction between repatriated profits and profits reinvested abroad. Both were now subject to US taxation. The measure also was aimed at preventing taxable income from being hidden away in foreign subsidiaries and other tax havens. While this law applied to industry as a whole, it particularly affected the oil companies, which were greatly diversified with large overseas operations.

By the end of 1962, oilmen estimated their earnings on foreign investment capital would fall to 15 percent, compared with 30 percent in 1955.

One of the most sacred of provisions in the eyes of oilmen was the oil depletion allowance, which permitted oil producers to treat up to 27.5 percent of their income as tax exempt. In theory this was to compensate for the depletion of fixed oil reserves but, in effect, it gave the oil industry a lower tax rate. Under this allowance, an oilman with a good deal of venture capital could become rich with virtually no risk. For example, a speculator could drill ten wells. If nine were dry holes and only the tenth struck oil, he would still make money because of tax breaks and the depletion allowance.

It was estimated that oilmen might lose nearly $300 million a year if the depletion allowance was diminished.

Attempts to eliminate or reduce the depletion allowance were rebuffed year after year by congressmen, many of whom were happy recipients of oil-industry contributions.

Speaking of his tax reform act of 1963, President Kennedy pointed the finger at the oil companies, saying: “… no one industry should be permitted to obtain an undue tax advantage over all others.”

Included in Kennedy’s tax package were provisions for closing a number of corporate tax loopholes, including the depletion allowance. Needless to say, oilmen both in Texas and elsewhere felt threatened by Kennedy and his policies.

By 1975, Texas Pacific had paid off its debt, while in the process its oil and gas reserves expanded phenomenally. A handsome legacy to Seagram, bought with only US$50M in borrowed cash, it was sold in 1980 to the Sun Oil Company for a grand total of US$2.3B.

https://www.islam-radio.net/jfk/astucia/08.htm

In 1934, Samuel Bronfman was made president of the National Jewish Peoples Relief Committee of Canada.

In 1939, he was named director of the Jewish Colonization Committee, formerly the Baron de Hirsch Fund (the same agency that had paid his father’s way to Canada exactly fifty years earlier).

Links to David Ben-Gurian and the Haganah (Israeli Defence Force)

At the close of World WWII, Samuel Bronfman established the National Conference of Israeli and Jewish Rehabilitation. Despite the fancy name, the organization was principally involved in smuggling military equipment to the Haganah Jewish underground in Palestine.

In the spring of 1947, David Ben-Gurion took it upon himself to direct the general policy of the Haganah, in preparation for the impending Arab attack. On May 26, 1948, the Provisional Government of Israel decided to transform the Haganah into the regular army of the State, to be called “Zeva Haganah Le-Yisrael” the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).

On May 31, 1948, as part of the order of the day establishing the IDF, David Ben-Gurion said: “With the establishment of the State of Israel, the Haganah emerged from the underground to become a regular army. Both the yishuv and the Jewish people are greatly indebted to the Haganah for its contribution during the various phases of its existence and development….In the chronicles of the people of Israel, the saga of the Haganah will shine with splendor and majesty that eternally will never dim.”

By this time, the Bronfman sons had transformed their bootleg fortune into a “legitimate” business-Seagrams Distillers of Canada.

In the next generation, the family would move, by marriage, into the very center of the Zionist Establishment of North America.

Edgar Bronfman married Ann Loeb, thereby becoming attached to the Loeb Rhodes interests of Wall Street.

Phyllis Bronfman married Jean Lambert, and suddenly the Bronfman’s were in the extended Rothschild family. Baron Lambert was part of the Belgian branch of the Rothschild clan. The New York investment house of Drexel Burnham Lambert, which had a pivotal role in Kenneth Bialkin’s later corporate takeover schemes, was drawn into the Bronfman’s orbit.

The family history of Zionist, Edgar Bronfman, honorary national vice chairman of the Jewish, Anti-Defamation League, (ADL) sheds light on the process of how organized crime networks were absorbed wholesale by the ADL, and covered with a veneer of respectability.

Edgar Bronfman’s grandfather Yechiel emigrated to Canada from the Bessarabia region of Romania in 1889. He came as a virtual indentured servant to the Baron de Hirsch Fund, by then already closely allied with the B’nai Brith.

At this time, top British Zionists, including Moses Montefiore, Baron Alfred de Rothschild and Maurice de Hirsch, had struck a deal with the Hudson Bay Company, the British Colonial Office corporate front in charge of the administration of Canada, to finance a wave of Eastern European Jewish colonization in the barren provinces of Manitoba and Saskatchewan. It was here that Yechiel Bronfman settled.

The first generation Bronfman (in Yiddish literally means (liquorman”) to land on the shores of North America immediately got himself involved in the rackets, eventually opening up a string of whorehouses.

When Canada adopted Prohibition in 1915, Yechiel Bronfman’s whorehouses became illegal nightclubs, where bootlegged whiskey, smuggled across the border from the United States, was served.

Canada’s experiment with Prohibition ended just as American Prohibition was beginning and Yechiel Bronfman and his sons, Abel and Samuel, were already in a position to shift from purchasers to suppliers of illegal whiskey-and narcotics. In 1916, Abel and Samuel Bronfman had moved the family’s bootleg and prostitution revenues into the ownership of the Pure Drug Company.

The company, according to some accounts, began importing narcotics from the Far- East into Canada. The production facilities of the Pure Drug Company began churning out cheap whiskey to flood the American markets once Prohibition began in the United States.

The Bronfmans were the principal suppliers of bootleg alcohol to the Zionist, Meyer Lansky National Crime Syndicate throughout the Prohibition period and the family amassed a fortune selling their “chickencock” whiskey.

The bootlegging business was conducted at great risk being faced with stiff competition from declared antisemite, Joseph Kennedy.

According to U.S. government records, between 1920 and 1930, over 34,000 Americans died of alcohol poisoning as a result of drinking the Bronfman’s “chickencock”, making the Bronfman family the biggest murderers in the history of North American crime.

When Canadian police moved against the “Bronfman Gang” in 1926, the family set up the Atlas Shipping Company to ship their whiskey to the Caribbean, where it was transferred to boats owned by the Reinfeld Syndicate. the Cleveland based “Jewish Navy” and other Lansky syndicate rum runners.

At the close of Prohibition, Bronfman negotiated a deal with the U.S. Treasury Department to pay several million dollars in back taxes, a miniscule portion of the illegal profits the family derived from the Prohibition whiskey sales and drug-running.

The purpose of the payment was to clear the decks for the Bronfman family’s overnight transformation into leading lights of the Canadian Zionist establishment.

The Bronfman’s went on to found the Distillers Corporation in Montreal in 1924 and built one of the world’s great fortunes on whisky brands like Crown Royal and Chivas Regal and further expanded their empire becoming the largest shareholders in DuPont establishing a new dynasty and enjoyed the title, “Canadian Rothschild’s” wielding power, and global political influence.

So the way forward is established. Murrell is to stand alone to face as yet unspecified charge off embezzlement. But all is not yet lost. The many Scots who donated to the SNP Independence fund might yet claim a “failure to exercise due diligence”, through the civil courts against the the officers who signed off the accounts namely: Murrell, Beattie and Sturgeon. A liability for the recovery of £600 plus interest would bankrupt

The publication date, early March 2018, is very relevant. This was a Scottish Government survey conducted right at the start of the efforts to destroy the reputation of Alex Salmond.

The report was a political bombshell, and yet it never appeared in any of the copious senior management texting correspondence. Nicola Sturgeon maintained she knew nothing about anything, which is impossible to believe since she read and commented on the document.

The October 2017, “Me2” campaign and the Westminster sex scandal arising from it prompted the completion of a confidential survey of people employed at Holyrood, including MSPs, their staff, parliamentary workers, and news reporters. Over 1000 individuals responded and the results were shocking.

The Holyrood sexual harassment report was sent to Nicola Sturgeon at the beginning of March 2018. It listed more than 200 allegations of harassment, most dating from 2016. Of the 137 women who said they had been sexually harassed, 67 reported that the perpetrator was an MSP. The report was quickly buried, and only Alex Salmond was put through the ringer. Why?

The findings showed that Holyrood perpetrators were nearly always male, regardless of the gender of the victim and in the majority of cases, the alleged perpetrator was in a position of authority.

Reports included 5 instances where the perpetrator had attempted to pinch or grope the victim’s bottom, and 10 where they had tried to kiss their victim. There was even 1 attempt to grope the breast of a woman, and another attempt to grab at a victim’s crotch.

The report also indicated that victims and their perpetrators were “most likely” to come from the same group of people. Nine of the 13 MSPs who had reported sexual harassment said their abuser had been another MSP.

Some 40 percent of respondents said they had been targeted by a parliamentary worker, and a further 20 percent by a member of MSPs’ staff. The total percentage exceeds 100 percent, as some respondents reported more than one case of harassment.

A total of 29 percent of respondents – which is approximately 300 people – said they had witnessed sexual harassment. One-in-five women said they had received sexist comments, 16 percent reported unwanted looks or leers, and another nine percent reported unwanted physical contact.

Of concern was that 11 people who had reported harassment said their cases were not taken seriously or acted on by their managers, while four said their complaints had caused problems for them at work. Most had taken no action at all, and a quarter of respondents said they didn’t feel confident that they knew how to report such incidents.

The Scottish National party (SNP) is the only party in Scotland that cannot provide evidence of overhauling its sexual harassment policy following the #MeToo revelations of November 2017. This after a confidential survey conducted on 01 March 2018 found that one in 10 staff had experienced sexual harassment, 45% of whom said that the perpetrator was an MSP.

After note: All political parties, apart from the SNP, introduced revised procedures after 2017. Asked for comment, the SNP said it “continually looks to improve [its] policies and processes” and planned to introduce, in time, trained sexual harassment advisers.

The SNP is the only party which did not at the time display a code of conduct and relevant harassment policy on its website, or offer an easily searchable contact phone numbers or email to make a complaint. Indeed, the SNP code of conduct made no mention of sexual harassment specifically.

“Where allegations are made against people or institutions in which the public have placed trust, it is the responsibility of the authorities to conduct a thorough investigation to determine if there is evidence that criminal conduct has occurred.

“We understand public curiosity about this investigation. However, the Crown does not publicly share details of confidential inquiries where there are no proceedings in court. This protects the rights of the individuals concerned who are entitled to a presumption of innocence.”

Seems like the Crown prosecuters decided prosecuteral follow up was not in the public interest and decided on a “psuedo not proven” verdict.