February 2014: Obama told Fareed Zakaria, a member of both the Council For Foreign Relations (CFR) and Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission, that the United States “brokered” the coup in Ukraine in February 2014.
Obama’s candid admission should not come as a surprise following the release of a surreptitiously recorded conversation between Victoria Nuland, the US-Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, and Geoffrey R. Pyatt, the US Ambassador to Ukraine.
The conversation centred on ousting Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych and replacing him with one of several hand-picked State Department choices. Nuland instructed Pyatt to “have the UN glue this thing” and then dismissively added “fuck the EU” for its role negotiating the crisis.
The U.S. orchestrated “transition,” as Obama characterized it, resulted in the appointment of fascists to key positions in the Kiev government and led to the current war in eastern Ukraine launched by Petro Poroshenko, the former confectionery magnate turned Ukrainian president.
Poroshenko’s war on those who did not accept the nationalist government in Kiev has thus far killed more than 5,000 people, although unofficial tallies are far higher.
In the not too distant past, the U.S. government attempted to hide its involvement in coups and the removal of democratically elected leaders relying on the CIA to ferment coups and counter-revolutions.
However, since the advent of NGO and foundation spawned “colour revolutions” attributed to the people of target countries, while in actuality were orchestrated by USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy, the U.S. government has admitted its role in overturning governments.
Back in 2020 the former First Minister launched the “Promise” which vowed to make the care of vulnerable young people an SNP Government priority.
A special taskforce directorate was recruited and setup comprising, The “Promise” Scotland control body. The “Promise” Partnership Fund. The “Promise” Whole Family Wellbeing team. The “Promise” Foster and Kinship Carers Team and other subsidary “Promise” support teams.
5 Years later very little of substance is in place and working due to a lack of ministerial interest and effective leadership and the frittering away of £235m on staff salaries, associated costs, commissioning of many progress (lack of) reports and other expenditure.
An oversight board reviewed the development and discovered that progress has been desisory due to “unforseen events” and “systemic delays”, and there was no chance a completion deadline of 2030 would be met and vulnerable young people will continue to be at unnecessary risk.
Sturgeon, who was in charge of the Scottish Government for the majority of the time the policy has been in place commented:
“On the fifth anniversary of my vow everyone has to be “brutally honest” about the progress the SNP Executive had made, which is not good enough. In order to deliver the “Promise”, there must be an increase in the scale and pace of change. Continuing without improvement is not good enough. We should rightly celebrate any steps forward that have been achieved but we must also be brutally honest about the areas where progress is needed. A promise is not kept until it is delivered. We all need to raise our game. Politicians, Councils, Government. We must show the leadership that all of the children and young people in Scotland deserve.”
£235m spent and nothing of note achieved. The final bill, should the project be delivered by 2030, will be around £750m with an attaching unspecified annual revenue commitment. The incompetence of the SNP Government ministers is staggering bad. Others could surely do much better.
Ukrainian soccer players ploughing their trade for megabucks overseas and Starmer is pledging our youth to fight in Ukraine which will most likely lead to some form of conscription since the army is a a record low level.
This lot and many thousands of other Ukrainian sports people should return to Ukraine to defend their country before any UK forces involvement in the carnage
The record evidence shows that Maxwell shared a household with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein for many years. While there, she actively took part in recruiting underage girls and young women for sex with Epstein, as well as scheduling the girls to come over, and maintaining a list of the girls and their phone numbers.
Ms. Giuffre was a minor when Maxwell recruited her to have sex with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Thereafter, Ms. Giuffre flew on Epstein’s private jets – the – Lolita Express” – with Maxwell at least 23 times.
Multiple witnesses deposed in this case have testified that Maxwell operated as convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s procurer of underage girls.
Ms. Sjoberg’s evidence
Q. When did you first meet Ms. Maxwell? A. 2001. End of February/beginning of March.
Q. How did you meet her? A. She approached me while I was on campus at Palm Beach Atlantic College.
Q. How long did you work in that position answering phones. A. Just one day.
Q. And what happened that second time you came to the house?
Emmy Tayler & MaxwellEmmy Tayler
Q. And what happened that second time you came to the house? A. At that point, I met Emmy Tayler, and she took me up to Jeffrey’s bathroom and he was present. Maxwell and I both massaged Jeffrey. She was showing me how to massage. He then he got off the table. She took off her clothes and got on the table, and then he was showing me moves that he liked. Then I took my clothes off. They asked me to get on the table so I could feel it. Then they both massaged me.
Q. Who did Emmy work for? 2. Maxwell.
3 Q. Did Maxwell ever refer to Emmy by any particular term? A. She called her her slave.
Q. Did Jeffrey ever tell you why he received so many massages from so many different girls? A. He explained to me that, in his opinion, he needed to have three orgasms a day. It was biological, like eating.
Q. Was there anything you were supposed to do in order to get the camera? A. I did not know that there were expectations of me to get the camera until after Maxwell had purchased the camera for me, and I was over there giving Jeffrey a massage. I did not know that she was in possession of the camera until later. She called me after I had left and said, I have the camera for you, but you cannot receive it yet because you came here and didn’t finish your job and I had to finish it for you.
Q. And did you — what did you understand her to mean? A. She was implying that I did not get Jeffrey off, and so she had to do it.
Q. And when you say “get Jeffrey off,” do you mean bring him to orgasm? A. Yes.
Q. Based on what you knew, did Maxwell know that the type of massages Jeffrey was getting typically involved sexual acts? A. Yes.
Q. What was Maxwell’s main job with respect to Jeffrey? A. Well, beyond companionship, her job, as it related to me, was to find other girls that would perform massages for him and herself.
Right Click to open the full transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial
Oct 2019: The National Parent Forum of Scotland (NPFS) conducted an online meeting to discuss matters arising from John Swinney’s new curriculum for Scottish children.
Right from the start parents expressed anger at his addition without discussion and agreement of a new relationship, sexual health and parenthood programme to the curriculum.
Providing graphic descriptions of what was being taught to kids a father said:
“Right from the beginning of primary school they are teaching that sex is assigned at birth and gender is a subjective factor. I think that is a very dangerous and confusing message for young people. Masturbation is being positively promoted in schools. Children as young as 6yo are getting compulsory sex education lessons on ‘self-stimulation’ and touching themselves.”
WOKE activists in the USA promote their questionable agenda using the SNP modus operandi
April 26, 2024: Former Democratic State Senator Tony Navarrete was sentenced on Friday to one year in prison after being charged with seven felony counts involving sexual misconduct with his two young nephews.
35-year-old Navarette, a “rising star” in the Arizona Democrat party, was arrested and charged with a felony described as “knowingly engaging in intercourse or oral sex with a minor.”
Navarette and his Democrat colleagues drafted a bill requiring all Arizona schools to teach sexual education instruction starting in Kindergarten which would have required schools to begin sexual education instruction with students as young as four years old.
The Westminster Government has never published a signed copy of the founding, constitutional declaration for the establishment of Great Britain which allegedly provides a script for the unification of the peoples of England & Scotland under a common flag. It follows therefore that the “United Kingdom” is a fictious concoction created by Westminster politicians who having repeatedly failed to conquer the Scots in open combat published an unsigned “Treaty of Union” and incorporated Scotland into a union, by sleight of hand.
The so called pact, made without the consent of the People of Scotland, is claimed by Westminster to be the unquestionable basis for its total authority over Scotland whilst in truth it is an absolute shambles.
Westminster politicians know this and claim their authority is based on established practice, but the People of Scotland are entitled to terminate over three centuries of civil abuse when they are knowledgeable of their rights.
Sturgeon & Swinney – Devoid of spirit and character in a crisis
The Sturgeon and Swinney led Scottish Government’s crisis management of the coronavirus pandemic was modelled on a singular desire to prove to the world that they were strong, decisive leaders of a Government totally independent from Westminster. In that respect they will, one day be held to account by the Scottish public.
Actions at the start of the pandemic
A study of events, which the Scottish government chose not to publicize was conducted by a team of scientists at Edinburgh University and revealed that the death rate in Scotland could have been reduced by about 80% with earlier action. (around 2,000 deaths) if lockdown measures had been introduced two weeks earlier in Scotland in response to a spate of coronavirus infections at a business conference in Edinburgh.
Events of note – The first confirmed coronavirus case, in Tayside, was announced on 1 March 2020.
But the outbreak began at the Hilton Carlton Hotel, in Edinburgh on 26 and 27 of February2020, at a conference for the sportswear giant Nike, attended by more than 70 employees from all over the world. One of the delegates from abroad had the virus and infected at least 25 other delegates, (8 of whom were resident in Scotland).
Nike acted timeously by closing its UK stores and worldwide and instigating enhanced measures, including contact tracing and increased cleaning and disinfection processes in their stores and offices, and reported that all its infected delegates had recovered.
Scottish Health authorities were fully aware of the outbreak by 2 March 2020, but the public were not told about it.
The Scottish government confirmed health authorities were alerted to the potential outbreak on 2 March 2020 and said that the 8 cases resident in Scotland had been identified, their close contacts had been traced and public health authorities were satisfied there was no further infection risk.But a guest who had been staying at the hotel during the conference said he had been in close contact with numerous Nike delegates and he had not been contact traced by anyone from the Scottish health service to tell him about the risk.
Well aware the virus had been in Scotland since at least late February, the Scottish Government did not ban mass gatherings until 16 March 2020, and did not go into lockdown until 23 March 2020.
25 March 2020- Scottish Government sets up it’s advisory panel
The leader, Professor Devi Sridhar, chair of public health at Edinburgh University said there had “definitely” been more than enough information about the coming pandemic for action to have been taken much sooner. Adding: “We should have been acting by mid-February 2020. We could see that this was not easily a virus to be contained.”
Professor Dame Anne Glover, President of the Royal Society of Edinburgh and former chief scientific advisor to the Scottish government, said: “Mistakes have been made and that has resulted in lives being lost.”
A team of epidemiological scientists at the University of Edinburgh, led by Professor Rowland Kao (using figures published by the National Records of Scotland, (reporting that a total of 2,795 people had died with a confirmed or suspected case of the virus) modelled what might have happened to Scotland’s death rates had the lockdown been imposed around 2 weeks earlier. The model, allowing for uncertainty, predicted the death toll would have been around 577 – about 80% lower than the actual total.
Deputy first minister John Swinney’s view
Responding to the findings. He said: “I think what the figure represents is the retrospective application of a model to an earlier date from when lockdown started so I don’t think the conclusion is particularly surprising, but what we have to look at is the scientific advice that was available to us at the time. The Scottish government acted “promptly and swiftly” on the basis of the scientific advice available and in some respects, such as the ban on large gatherings, was ahead of this advice.
Scottish political journalist Ben Wray, commented: “when the death tolls are tallied up and compared internationally, Scotland is going to look to be very far from a star performer.”
caltonjock 