Reflecting on aspects of concern in the conspiracy to get Alex Salmond, I looked again at the conduct of those who participated in compiling the “deemed illegal”new procedure, and the knowledge it included at least one individual who later became an “accuser” in the second phase of the assault on Alex (the high court trial). Her, (their) actions should be referred to the trial judge, since her (their)involvement revealed that her (their) malice aforethought was a “contempt of court”, and the instruction of the judge that the names of those who falsely accused Alex should not be released to the public, should not include her, (them) since her (their) conduct cast doubt on their motives, and those of the of the Scottish government and possibly the police.
- Comment
- Reblog
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
caltonjock 
At this stage (now), it is difficult to believe the trial judge was not aware then that those involved perjured themselves before and in her Court!
LikeLike
If this information was withheld from the judge it places the entire trial in disrepute. If the judge was aware of the participation of one or more individuals in th compilation of the illegal procedure then she would be guilty of abetting the conspiracy. and her instruction banning any publication of the names of the acusers who falsely made claims against Alex would be considred null and void
LikeLike