Reflecting on aspects of concern in the conspiracy to get Alex Salmond, I looked again at the conduct of those who participated in compiling the “deemed illegal”new procedure, and the knowledge it included at least one individual who later became an “accuser” in the second phase of the assault on Alex (the high court trial). Her, (their) actions should be referred to the trial judge, since her (their)involvement revealed that her (their) malice aforethought was a “contempt of court”, and the instruction of the judge that the names of those who falsely accused Alex should not be released to the public, should not include her, (them) since her (their) conduct cast doubt on their motives, and those of the of the Scottish government and possibly the police.
- Comment
- Reblog
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
caltonjock 
I hope to live long enough to see them all back in court. I still hope that at least one, as they grow older and have to live with their past, decides to tell the whole horrible story. Westminster must be dreading that.
LikeLike
At this stage (now), it is difficult to believe the trial judge was not aware then that those involved perjured themselves before and in her Court!
LikeLike