caltonjock

2014: Protecting the Children-the regime’s first attempt at gaining control of children

The Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 was an Act of the Scottish Parliament passed on 19 February 2014.

The legislation was part of the SNP Government’s “Getting it right for every child” policy implementation.

The scope of the act made provision for the rights of children and young people.

The provision of services and support for or in relation to children and young people. Children’s hearings, detention in secure accommodation and consultation on certain proposals in relation to schools.

The provisions of the act gained the support of parents, professionals involved in childcare provision, children’s organisations and charitable institutions and implementation of the new measures was scheduled to be implemented from 2015.

But the public became increasingly concerned about the wisdom of a “Named Person” when press coverage revealed the propensity for the abuse of children.

Press Report:

Dayna Dickson-Boath was appointed one of the first Named Persons in Scotland, but is now banned from working with children for the rest of her life. 

She had held a senior position at a secondary school in Moray, but yesterday consented to being struck off by the General Teaching Council for Scotland on the charge that, between 8 August 2014 and 10 September 2014, she “did send, by means of a public electronic communications network, messages to another person that were grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character, in that you did converse regarding the sexual abuse of children”.

Dickson-Boath was placed on the Sex Offenders’ Register and ordered to undergo treatment when she was convicted in Elgin Sheriff Court.

A trickle of protests reached tsunami strength at the start of 2015 as concerns were raised about aspects of the legislation which were draconian, poorly drafted and “Big Brother State”.

The SNP government ignored requests for a dialogue and forced the new measures through.

But the public would not be denied and a number of Scots parents and Christian organisations took the SNP government to court in an effort to get parts of the act repealed.

They failed in their efforts and all appeared to be lost. But they gathered strength from increasing support of Scots who had been alerted to what the SNP government was seeking to impose on the nation.

They appealed to the UK Supreme Court.

2016: The Supreme Court Judgement – The Named Person Scheme

In their summary ruling against the introduction of the scheme the Supreme Court judges noted that the appropriateness of the novel new legislation hinged on the government’s assertion of a need to ensure the “wellbeing” of the child.

But “wellbeing” was not defined and reliance on SHANARRI indicators (standing for Safe, Healthy, Achieving, Nurtured, Active, Respected, Responsible and Included) were also not defined and were in some cases notably vague.

A unanimous ruling of Supreme Court judges also stated: “The first thing that a totalitarian regime tries to do is to get at the children, to distance them from the subversive, varied influences of their families, and indoctrinate them in their rulers’ view of the world.

They were also agreed that the idea that parents must comply with any advice given “could well amount to an interference with” Article 8 of the ECHR (the right to respect for private and family life).

The Court also held that the legislation’s data sharing provisions, which they held were central to the role of the named person, “are not within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament”.

And yet, In his 2016 speech to the Scottish Parliament following receipt of the judgement Swinney insisted that the judgment itself did not require current policy to change.

His message to local authorities and health boards was to continue to develop and deliver the named person service.

Encouraging the disregard of the Supreme Court ruling set a dangerous precedence since in continuing the development of the named person provision, its information gathering and sharing processes the Deputy First Minister encouraged unlawful practice by state bodies.

Dr Jenny Cunningham, a recently retired community paediatrician from Glasgow said that the named person scheme was “illegitimate and illiberal” and argued that an open democracy depended on the principle that “parents ought to be autonomous in relation to their own families”. he continued saying: “The underlying assumption by the SNP government is that adults are unable to identify vulnerable children – so the state has to intervene! This belittles parents. She concluded: “We should strongly resist and argue against this idea that parents are incapable of assessing children’s wellbeing needs and accessing services – parenting is about establishing good relationships with children and establishing parental authority.”

Maggie Mellon, an independent social work consultant said: “It’s important that we understand the rationale and the ideas underpinning the legislation. The SNP government has made it clear it thinks the Supreme Court judgment is purely technical and they’re going to plough on regardless. But there is no duty under the Act to consult or collaborate with parents. It’s just not there. We’ve been treated to flights of complete fancy about the voluntary nature of the scheme. We were told it was in response to parents’ demands – then we were told it was to save children from their parents. A Named Person can’t provide a hot meal, a pair of shoes, a warm home but they can spend time doing SHANARRI somersaults with 300 wellbeing outcome signifiers and 200 risk indicators! It wont work.”

Aug 2018: Plan B to by-pass MSP’s and implement the Named Person Scheme by the Backdoor

The SNP Scottish Government is considering controversial proposals to implement the detested named person scheme “by the back door” even if MSPs refuse to support changes to the law.

Discussion of a so-called “Plan B” is revealed in documents which were only made public, after a Freedom of Information (FoI) request was submitted.

The papers were produced following a meeting of unnamed top level government officials and advisors in February 2018. An annex under the headline “CONTINGENCY” stated: “Contingency plan?

What if the legislation is not passed?” And adds: “Plan B for if Bill fails to make sure parts 4&5 can be implemented without information sharing.” The scheme was riddled with problems and a delay was revealed.

Swinney set up a panel to produce a Code of Practice by September 2018, after Holyrood’s Education and Skills Committee said it would not pass the legislation without one.

But Professor Ian Welsh, chair of the panel, wrote to Mr Swinney to inform him that the panel would not be able to meet this deadline.

Lesley Scott of the TYMES Trust, said: “These worrying documents show the focus is clearly on implementing Named Person Scheme by the back door, regardless of whether the new Bill gets through Parliament.

Clearly, we are now dealing with a Government which is ignoring the UK Supreme Court, has no regard for the elected representatives of the Scottish people and is determined to shun public opinion. They are riding roughshod over the democratic system in pursuit of a flawed, failed and discredited project.”

Lesley asked to be provided with details from three key meetings of the Statutory Guidance Framework Group tasked to review the named person scheme in October and December 2017 and in February 2018.

Subsequently only one set of minutes was released and was useless since the names of all persons in attendance had been redacted. An appeal was submitted to the Information Commissioner’s Office seeking a review of this decision to withold the documentation.

Maggie Mellon, former chair of the Scottish Child Law Centre, said: “The names of all present including the chair are all redacted. So much for open government. There is no way of identifying which agencies are providing wrong advice or whether the persons present represent their colleagues and agencies properly.

Is it now so toxic to be associated with the named person scheme that people are not willing to have their names made known”? Adding: “These are presumably many of the same people who advised the government so badly first time round, that breaching confidentiality is ok even when any concerns fall well below the proper threshold. What is so important about this flawed scheme that it has to be pushed through” ?

Sep 2019: Named Person Scheme Scrapped?

Deputy First Minister John Swinney announced in the Scottish Parliament:

“We will now not underpin in law the mandatory named person scheme for every child. We will withdraw the Children and Young People (Information Sharing) (Scotland) Bill and repeal the relevant legislation. Instead, existing voluntary schemes that provide a point of contact for support will continue, under current legal powers, when councils and health boards wish to provide them and parents wish to use them.”

Summary

The July 2016 UK Supreme Court judgment stated:

“The sharing of personal data between relevant public authorities is central to the role of the named person scheme” and concluded that the information-sharing provisions were incompatible with the rights of children, young persons and parents under article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and may in practice result in a disproportionate interference with the article 8 rights of many children, young persons and their parents, through the sharing of private information were “not within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament”, deeming the legislation “defective” and blocked it from coming into force:

Bizarrely, Swinney responded to the ruling saying:

“I welcome the publication of today’s judgment and the fact that the attempt to scrap the named person service has failed”.

So after nearly three years of battling against the wishes of Scots and an order from the Supreme Court he refused to accept that his mandatory named scheme, with legal powers to grab and share private information could not be imposed without breaching the human rights of children and families. It had to be scrapped.

So, where did we go from there? Swinney, issued his dictate saying:

“Existing schemes that provide a point of contact for support will continue, under current legal powers, where councils and health boards wish to provide them and parents wish to use them.”

So schools are still able to operate a voluntary named person service, but it will have to adhere to current data sharing frameworks. There will no longer be a statutory Named Person service imposed on every child in Scotland.

As the 2016 Supreme Court judgment stated:

“Care should therefore be taken to emphasise the voluntary nature of the advice, information, support and help which is offered”.

https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2015-0216.html
https://no2np.org/ Comprehensive coverage here

The SNP government’s agenda for change

Nicola Sturgeon and her personal advisors decided the WOKE agenda for change would be fully supported by the Scottish government

When complete Scottish society would be turned on its head fitting the concept of a fully integrated society modelled to the thinking of the WOKE activists.

But all of the electorate had to be on-board or there would be stress unhappiness and strife. The breakdown of the electorate in Scotland:

Heterosexual: 95%. LGBTQ/WOKE: 5%, of which 0.5% are transgender.

The adoption of the WOKE agenda by the SNP Government required full transparency in public life, (since WOKE was a campaigning body within the Party) and the change would introduce a legal obligation for any person seeking public office to declare their sexuality so the electorate would be informed before choosing a candidate at an election. A requirement callously ignored by Sturgeon.

Political representation

Why should Scots care about what is happening in the SNP? Canaries in coal mines springs to mind!

Political coups can be achieved through violence or WOKE style!! by abusing the institutions of democracy circumventing and ultimately destroy it.

Sturgeon responded to younger members leaving the Party with an extraordinary video saying she would personally deal with ‘transphobia’ within the Party, but she neglected to say what that meant. This would decided on by the National Executive Committee (NEC).

But her comments were widely taken to be a warning to feminist SNP politicians such as Joanna Cherry. The ‘dog whistle’ was followed up by action.

Joanna Cherry was sacked as shadow spokesperson on justice and home affairs by Ian Blackford, the SNP’s Westminster leader.

It was left to Cherry herself to inform the world. She tweeted: “Despite hard work, results & a strong reputation I’ve been sacked today from @ the SNP front bench.”

On 31 January 2021, the National Executive Committee of the SNP passed an extraordinary motion for the Scottish elections in May.

Members of the Scottish Parliament were to be elected through a combined constituency and list system. This meant that each constituency had an MP, the numbers being topped up through a regional list to ensure equity in terms of the votes. There were eight regions.

The NEC decided that in four of the regions, the SNP person at the top of the list (and therefore likely to get elected) would be BAME, in the other four they would be disabled.

The NEC were advised by a QC that the proposal would almost certainly be ruled illegal if challenged in court. Despite this they passed it through a casting vote of the chair.

two problems arose!

First; the changes were discriminatory. In half of the regions, all are excluded unless they were BAME (even though they might be disabled).

Second; in the other four all were excluded unless they were disabled (even if they were BAME). If they happened to be white and non-disabled, they were excluded from standing at all!

It is the second reason that was astonishing. The SNP – following the WOKE guide to self-declaration declared that disabled status would be granted by ‘self-declaration. The list included, asthma, depression, Tourette’s syndrome, borderline personality disorder, and diabetes.

The changes resulted in open warfare within the SNP between WOKE activists and traditional members which included feminists who were disparagingly referred to as TERFS (Trans-Exclusionary Reactionary Feminists).

The self-identification process meant that any wrong headed individual could legally self-identify as a disabled, BAME woman in order to get a job or political position and there would be nothing that anyone could do!

And in the night of the long sgian dubhs, Blackford, got rid of Joanna Cherry one of the most effective and intelligent politicians within the shadow cabinet.

The gerrymandered WOKE activist takeover of the NEC, heralded early dismissal from the Party for anyone not in support its agenda.

Scotland had morphed into Sturgeon’s WOKE Republic

SNP WOKE representation at Westminster

The demographics of Scotland indicated 95% of the population were heterosexual. LBGTQ/WOKE factions took up 5%, of which 0.5% claimed to be transgender.

The population of Scotland was around 5.5 million providing a split of 5,225,000 heterosexuals and 275,000 LBTQ/WOKE. The latter group would comprise 1375 people claiming to be transgender.

Accepting Sturgeon’s declaration of equality for all, the split of MP’s at Westminster should have been; Heterosexual: 42: LBGTQ/WOKE: 2:

But the gerrymandered NEC had done its job. The bulk of candidates selected were LGBTQ/WOKE. Sturgeon had succeeded The SNP was now a political Party in her own image.

The General Election contingent sent to Westminster comprised around 40% WOKE/transgender. The Party was unrepresentative of Scottish society.

Exacerbating the situation all but two were appointed to senior posts within the SNP Westminster leader’s Shadow Cabinet, (straight from the dole to cabinet status office). and there were financial perks/rewards.

Shadow ministers are not normally remunerated for duties additional to their MP commitments, (since there are none), but favoured WOKE/transgender MP’s were provided with additional payments using £1.5m short money allocated to the party which was a misuse of the finance and provided a motive explaining the methodology behind the group’s reluctance to fight for an independent Scotland.

The SMP shadow cabinet

Stuart McDonald: Home Secretary. LGBTQ

Stewart McDonald: Defence Secretary. LGBTQ

John Nicolson: Culture, Media and Sport. LGBTQ

Alyn Smith: Foreign Secretary. LGBTQ

Martin Docherty-Hughes: Industries Future/Blockchain LGBTQ

Joanna Cherry: LGBTQ

Angela Crawley: Attorney General. LGBTQ

Hannah Bardell: Foreign Affairs Team. LGBTQ

Mhairi Black: Secretary of State for Scotland. LGBTQ

Kirsten Oswald: Deputy & Minister for Women & Equalities. LGBTQ

Kirsty Blackman: Economy Team. LGBTQ

Patrick Grady: Chief Whip LGBTQ

Owen Thompson: Chief Whip. LGBTQ

Not declared status

Stephen Flynn: Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Dave Doogan: Defence Team and Agriculture
Brendan O’Hara: Cabinet Office
Allan Dorans: Foreign Affairs
Steven Bonnar: Agriculture and Rural Affairs
Stewart Hosie: Independence campaigning
Chris Law: International Development
Douglas Chapman: Small Business & Innovation
Tommy Sheppard: Cabinet Office Minister
John McNally:  Environment Spokesperson
David Linden:  Work and Pensions
Chris Stephens: Fair Work & Employment
Peter Grant: Chief Secretary to the Treasury
Richard Thomson: Northern Ireland and Wales
Ronnie Cowan: Infrastructure & Manufacturing
Drew Hendry:  for International Trade
Alan Brown: Energy and Climate Change
Martyn Day: Public Health & Primary Care
Angus MacNeil:
Gavin Newlands: Transport and Shadow Sport Spokesperson
Pete Wishart: Leader of the House of Commons
Ian Blackford: Westminster
Dr P. Whitford: Health, Social Care and Europe
Amy Callaghan: Pensions & Intergenerational
Dr Lisa Cameron: Mental Health
Deidre Brock: Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Alison Thewliss:  Chancellor
Carol Monaghan: Education and Armed Forces and Veterans
Marion Fellows: Deputy Whip and Disabilities
Patricia Gibson: Housing, Communities, Local Government

Westminster controlled Scotland with an iron fist from 1707 through to the 1920s: The only thing devolved was contempt, poverty, poor housing and starvation.

Hope of change for the better arose in the early 1920s as a direct consequence of Irish indpendence, which encouraged debate and activism within intellectual communities.

Through this medium discussion evolved in differing ways leading to an expansion of , “the Scottish Home Rule Association (SHRA) which embraced the concept of “home rule” and the recently formed and fast growing Scottish National League (SNL) which was adamant that independence, (as the Irish had achieved) was the only way forward.

The political differences between the two groups was fundamental and discouraged any coordinated political activity.

The first sign of positive connection between the SHRA and SNL arose in 1930 when both groups marched together for the first time, in Stirling.

The message the parade broadcast was that the SHRA under the leadership of Roland Muirhead, a Westminster parliamentarian had given up trying to grow the movement with support of the Labour Party.

Muirhead and Thomas Gibson, leader of the SNL met soon after the march and were agreed the best tactic to take both groups forward was to form a new political party.

But the gap in the aspirations of their supporters was a difficult nut to crack. Would the way forward be devolved governance or independence. Discussions between the two sides was protracted and seemingly impossible to resolve.

They needed someone to hold their jackets and John McCormack, former member of the Glasgow University Scottish Nationalist Association ( GUSNA) and the Independent Labour Party (IDP) was available and willing to take the task on.

McCormack had been active in Scottish politics for some time and persuaded Muirhead and Gibson to his view that there would be no progress without compromise.

They achieved this agreeing the best thing to do was to unite their supporters under one flag, (the saltire) other less pressing matters would be resolved at a later date.

The two groups, together with the Scottish National Movement (SNM) formed the National Party of Scotland (NPS) in 1928.

Bickering continued in the newly formed Party. One side preferring to campaign for home rule. The other, for independence, like Ireland.

A majority of Party members backed McCormick and Muirhead’s claims that the election of NSP, MP’s to Westminster provided the best opportunity with the assistance ot the Labour Party, to gain home rule within the Union.

The NSP had decided its political future. The nationalist faction went along with the policy in the belief that independence would evolve from a devolved government.

But the new party failed to make an impact. It had no clear policies to offer Scots beyond home rule, campaigning was uncoordinated and mixed messages promoted by candidates who reverted to advancing views at odds with Party policies.

McComack, a shrewd political operator knew urgent changes were required to ensure a future for the Party after the Labour Party ended its political friendship with Muirhead, compromising his usefulness.

There was another nationalist cause, the Scottish Party (SP) with policies much in line with those of the NSP. The barrier to linking the two parties was the radical members of the NSP. McCormack, agreed and in 1933 he banished independence activists from the Party.

An election opportunity surfaced providing an early test for the two Party’s, who agreed to campaign together. Their candidate did well gaining seventeen percent, exceeding anything previously achieved.

The Party’s merged in 1934 forming the Scottish National Party (SNP). Unity of purpose, home rule within the UK had been achieved, albeit without the independence activists on-board.

Andrew Pierce of the Scottish Daily Mail penned an article on McSweeney and I am posting it unchanged from the original since it succinctly summarises the activities of the man himself and a brief peek at the early career of his wife.

9 Jul 2024: At Home

Welcome to the home of Morgan McSweeney – a £750,000 sandstone mansion, set in glorious Lanarkshire countryside, it even comes with stable blocks. Now the second most powerful man in the country – the pictures wouldn’t look out of place in Country Life magazine. An ostentatious chandelier, a three-oven Aga in the flagstone-floor kitchen, while the stylish study features floor-to-ceiling custom bookcases.

At Work

Tony Blair employed the thuggish Alastair Campbell as his chief spin doctor, while Peter (now Lord) Mandelson revelled in his nickname ‘The Prince of Darkness’.

Yet McSweeney, Starmer’s new ‘head of political strategy’, stands to be more influential than either of his Downing Street predecessors. As one senior party figure puts it: ‘No unelected figure in postwar Labour history wields as much power as Morgan McSweeney.’

The redhead Irishman, who was the brains behind Starmer’s triumphant election victory, also helped to install Starmer as leader and purge the party of the far-Left. Ruthless and calculating, McSweeney now has significant control over messaging and policy.

Though he rarely credits him publicly, Starmer has McSweeney to thank more than anyone for making it to Downing Street. Yet even many Labour MPs have probably never met McSweeney, who at party conferences shuns the bars and spends most of his time in the leader’s hotel suite.

The anonymity suits the workaholic McSweeney, who was invariably at his desk at Labour’s South London HQ by 6.30am. He will not show any signs of slowing down now that Labour is in government. And from his new desk in No 10 he will be closely observing exactly who visits Starmer.

When key aides lined Downing Street to welcome the incoming Prime Minister, McSweeney was already inside. Starmer made a beeline for his adviser – who was suited and booted rather than casually dressed in his customary jeans – and made sure his was one of the first hands he shook.

McSweeney’s word is law. One top party figure tells me: ‘Every minister defers to him. He is Keir Starmer’s friend, confidant and enforcer. There is no higher praise at HQ than: “Morgan loves it.”’

YET perhaps not from all quarters. Relations between McSweeney and Sue Gray, the former ‘impartial’ civil servant whose excoriating Partygate report triggered the ultimate downfall of Labour’s nemesis Boris Johnson, are said to be prickly. Gray is now the Prime Minister’s chief of staff — another vital Downing Street role.

One source says: ‘Keir needs Morgan by his side. Morgan’s desk will be outside the No 10 study, and he will be in and out of Keir’s office more than Sue. But look out for the fireworks.’

Morgan the Irishman From Cork

So who is Morgan McSweeney — and what does he plan to do with the power he now wields?

The 47-year-old was brought up in Macroom in County Cork, and still speaks with a soft Irish lilt. His grandfather, Michael, won a medal from the IRA for his service during the 1916 war of independence from Britain.

His father, Tom, was an accountant and his mother, Carmel, worked in an office. Yet politics runs in the family: cousin Clare Mungovan was a special adviser to Taoiseach Leo Varadkar.

In the summer of 1994, when Tony Blair became Labour leader, McSweeney, then 17, left Cork for a new life in London.

Blair knew he had to modernise the Labour Party, which had lost four successive elections, and McSweeney watched with interest.

He was a restless spirit, dropping out of the London School of Economics and working for a time on building sites. After time in the U.S., he came back to London to study politics and marketing at Middlesex University in 1998.

He then joined the Labour Party in 2001 – the year of the second Blair landslide – and played a key role organising for marginal seats in 2005’s election, which delivered a third successive Labour victory.

He then hitched his colours to Steve Reed, a Labour councillor in Lambeth, South London, who was trying to wrest control of the authority from the hard-Left.

Under ‘Red Ted’ Knight, Lambeth was infamous, beset by mismanagement, corruption and a historical child-abuse scandal. McSweeney – who I’m told was ‘solid, not spectacular’ at the time – threw himself into the battle.

Imogen Walker

In Lambeth he met his future wife, Imogen Walker, who became deputy leader of the reformed council.

McSweeney moving on and up in the Labour Party

After Lambeth, McSweeney went to Barking and Dagenham in East London to help vanquish the hard-Right BNP, which had won a dozen seats on the local council.

Jon Cruddas, now Dagenham MP, tells me: ‘He has the psychology of an organiser, and he’s quite brilliant at it. These political skills have been chiselled out over years, so he’s no blow-in to anything.’

A Labour source says: ‘He saw himself as a modern-day Witchfinder General. Except it wasn’t witches in the ducking chair but extremists from the Left or Right.’

Within a few years, the BNP had lost every one of its council seats.

Closing in on Power within the Party

McSweeney then turned his eyes to the national stage, running the 2015 leadership campaign of Liz Kendall, a moderate. Kendall came last with a paltry 4.5 per cent of the vote – as Corbyn romped home.

Aghast at the result, McSweeney established and became director of a new group, “Labour Together”, whose goal was to drag the party back into the centre. Early recruits included Rachel Reeves, now Chancellor, and Health Secretary Wes Streeting. They -unlike Starmer, who referred to Corbyn as his ‘friend’- had both refused to join Corbyn’s shadow front-bench, and were seeking an alternative leader.

As “Labour Together’s” influence grew, McSweeney was becoming the respected backroom player he had always aspired to be.

After the 2019 election, when Labour under Corbyn suffered its worst defeat since 1935, Starmer asked McSweeney to run his leadership campaign. They had at least one thing in common: they were both passionate Remainers.

Starmer ran on an extravagantly Corbynite ticket, pledging to scrap university tuition fees, defend free movement across Europe and hammer the rich with punitive taxes.

The hard-Left policy document did the trick to satisfy the Corbynistas and Starmer won decisively in the first ballot. All ten pledges were later abandoned – on the orders of McSweeney.

He has since ensured the Party’s rules were altered to make it harder for Leftwingers like Corbyn to win again.

‘He has been purging Lefties to ensure that after Starmer goes, a centrist takes over,’ said another Labour figure who is not a fan of McSweeney. ‘If he’s successful he will be trying to write himself into the succession plans.’

He’s even curbed the influence of Tony Blair, whose grandly named “Institute” provided staff and policy papers for the Labour frontbench.

A senior Labour source said: “Morgan thinks Blair has had his time. While Blair can call Starmer whenever he likes, it’s McSweeney whose advice he ultimately takes. Morgan thinks Blair’s ideas are from a different era — that he’s yesterday’s man.”

Another senior figure said: “If it goes wrong for Starmer, he will find out how ruthless McSweeney is. Just as Boris found with [ex-adviser] Dominic Cummings.”

One Labour parliamentary candidate said: “Starmer won the leadership on a lie because every single policy commitment he made has been junked by McSweeney. Will they do the same thing with the promises made in the election campaign? If they do, the voters will be much less forgiving.”

STOCKWELL LABOUR COUNCILLOR the Useless IMOGEN WALKER should have seen the STOCKWELL light by now but no chance – NO WOMEN’S PUBLIC TOILETS PROVISION in STOCKWELL exists and nor does it exist in CLAPHAM HIGH STREET. What an utter crap LOCAL COUNCILLOR – credit where its due namely that her only consistency is her total uselessness.  Hope she does better in Hamilton!!!

Imogen Walker

New to Scottish politics she was parachuted into the Hamilton & Clyde constituency team by the Labour Party controllers in London and in last week’s election, she won the safe Labour seat of Hamilton and Clyde Valley, by more than 9,000 votes. She is expected to be fast-tracked for ministerial promotion.

A few day’s later

Hamilton and Clyde’s new MP has been appointed as a parliamentary private secretary (PPS) to the Chancellor.

Sharing the news of her role at Westminster on social media, she added that she had, had an “incredible” first few weeks at the House of Commons following her election earlier in the month.

With the new government now taking shape, on ” X” last week she posted: “I’m delighted to have been appointed as parliamentary private secretary to Rachel Reeves who has begun work rebuilding our economy. I’m so proud to be part of that effort and looking forward to getting started alongside the brilliant [Hitchin MP] Alistair Strathern.”

The official parliament website describes the PPS role as an appointment of a backbench MP by a minister “to be his or her assistant, selected as the “eyes and ears” of the minister in the House of Commons” and which helps “gain experience of working in government”.

Graham Mann: Crime reporter for the “Scottish Sun” published a report on 24 Jun 2025, In it he made a number of allegations including the statement:

“Sex crimes in Scotland have rocketed with a shocking eight rape incidents reported every day. The shameful figures show almost 15,000 sickening incidents were logged by cops in just 12 months, the second highest level on record since 1971. Rape and attempted rape surged by 15% in the past year from 2,522 to 2,897 in 2024-25 – representing a 60% rise over the last decade.

My comment advises caution since Police Scotland, unlike England does not record crime statistics, including sex crimes, by nationality or specific ethnicity of offenders in their standard recorded crime data making detailed analysis by groups like Asian, Romanian, Scottish, English, Welsh impossible. The limitation renders claims about immigration not causing increased crime rates unreliable for verification, as there is no direct evidence to support such claims. The practice highlights the gap between perception and the paucity of available facts, with the evidence being warped toward other more acceptable factors to the Government like “increased reporting” and “socioeconomic conditions.”

Scottish Conservative shadow justice secretary Liam Kerr MSP commented:

“These shocking rises are the inevitable consequence of the SNP’s savage and sustained cuts to frontline policing. Whether it’s sexual crimes, other violent offences, shoplifting or domestic abuse, the trend is up, and Scotland’s streets are becoming less safe. “

“Worse still, the SNP’s use of diversion of prosecution orders often means criminals are not being properly punished – and therefore not deterred.”

“The increase in weapons being carried by school pupils exposes the epidemic of violence in Scotland’s schools – and the woeful inadequacy of nationalist ministers’ response to it. The buck stops with the SNP, who have undermined our police and left our justice system at breaking point.”

The Recorded Crime in Scotland 2024-25 bulletin shows that total crime remains at similar levels to 2023-24. However, overall sex crimes rose by 3% from 14,484 in 2023-24 to 14,892 in the latest annual tally.

Elsewhere the document reveals shoplifting shot up by 16% from 38,674 to 44,730 in the past year and 57% in the past 10 years.

There was a 50% increase in handling and using an offensive weapon within Scotland’s prison system from 72 cases to 108. And schools were also blighted by weapon-carrying offences with 152 crimes committed – an increase of 11%.

There was a 26% increase in domestic abuse crimes in the past year, 20 serious assaults on police officers and 12 serious assaults on emergency workers in the past year.

Supplying drugs increased by 14% in the past year from 4,223 to 4,802 crimes.

Another disturbing trend is a rise in crimes of indecent photos of children – up 11% from 747 to 828.

Other alarming increases noted in the Scottish Government report include youth violence, weapons in schools and shoplifting.

More positively, levels of non-sexual crimes of violence dipped slightly over the year and continue to be 23% lower than in 2006-07.Serious assault and attempted murder now at their lowest level since 1977.

Justice Secretary Angela Constance admitted ‘concern’ over the rise in sex crimes, adding:

“Violent crime is down significantly in the past 20 years, with serious assaults and homicide levels at record lows. However, we cannot afford to be complacent and I have been consistently clear that any instance of violence is one too many. That is why we are taking a wide range of actions to prevent, reduce and tackle violence, with more than £6 million funding invested over the past three years.”

“I am concerned these figures also show a rise in reported sexual crimes.
Multiple factors lie behind this and our action to tackle sexual offending includes increasing confidence in the justice system so more victims come forward, improving support for victims and modernising the law on sexual offences. “

“Police Scotland has also had a £3 million budget boost to work with the retail sector and the Scottish Government has invested £4.2 billion across the justice system including a record £1.64 billion for policing – an increase of £70 million on 2024-25.”

National Police Force

In 2013 all eight of Scotland’s regional police forces were replaced with just one authority, Police Scotland a merger at odds with the long-established tradition of community-based policing and local accountability in Scotland.

The change brought with it the potential for damaging conflict between the new force lead officers and the unelected Scottish Police Authority Quango, which was given executive powers over finance, recruitment and personnel policy.

Control and oversight of 18,000 police and 6,500 civilian support staff was transferred to politicians in the Scottish Government.

The novel, untried system of providing policing support to the community through the Government has been a disaster from the time the changes were implemented, confirming the fears of many Scots who were opposed to the establishment of a national police force accountable only to a Government appointed authority. The changes should be abandoned and responsibility for policing returned to the regions and local communities.

A National Specialist Crime Team and police training unit should be retained at Tulliannan headed by a senior police officer accountable to the Chair of the Regional Police Leadership Authority.

Humza Yousaf – The Early Years

Yousaf worked in a “Call Centre” for a short time before becoming a spokesman for the controversial Islamic Relief. Controversial because in 2020 the entire UK board were forced to stand down after an antisemitism scandal.

As a Government minister, in 2013, he signed off a Scottish government donation for the organisation, totalling £398,000.

He was the President of the Glasgow University Muslim Students Association and a member of the Student Representative Council when he attended Glasgow University, where he graduated with a degree in Politics in 2007.

After graduating, he worked from 2007 as a parliamentary assistant to the first Scottish Muslim MSP Bashir Ahmadin, until the MSP’s death two years later.

He was first elected to Holyrood as a list MSP for Glasgow in 2011 and then the MSP for Glasgow Pollock in 2016.

The Increasing Influence of Islam

The Yousaf family acquired influence in the planning and execution of SNP politics soon after Humza joined the Party in 2007. A situation created by the rapid and continuing growth in the West of Scotland in the number of Muslim immigrants from Pakistan and Southeast Asia.

Muslim votes greatly assisted the SNP in its efforts to gain political power and governance in Scotland. All good things come at a price and the Yousaf family, (shades of the Kennedys in the USA) and their supporters called in favours.

They duly did so when Yousaf, as Justice Minister brought forward his flagship policy, “The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Bill” in 2019, which he promised would add many additional protections to minorities while maintaining existing rights to freedom of speech and freedom of expression. The bill becomes effective at the beginning of 2024 and despite many amendments, there are still concerns among many Scots about its draconian content, aspects of which continue to be subject to criticism by the Scottish public, the Catholic Church, the National Secular Society, the media and writers.

Yousaf’s links to Hamas – Holyrood Meeting With Former Hamas Leader

In 2008, Yousaf, then a parliamentary assistant to MSP Bashir Ahmad and his cousin Osama Saeed, who used to be an aide to former SNP leader and first minister Alex Salmond, arranged a meeting between Linda Fabiani the Scottish Culture and External Affairs Secretary and former *senior Hamas commander Mohammad Sawalha (described by BBC Panorama as the mastermind behind much of Hamas’ political and military strategy)

Sawalha was accompanied by two other Hamas supporting activists, Anas Altikriti and Ismail Patel.

Iraqi-born Altikriti frequently voiced support for Hamas, saying it was “fighting back” against Israeli occupation.

Patel, who founded the Midlands-based Friends of Al-Aqsa said: “The current political map of Palestine… will have to include Hamas and Fatah amongst other political groups. Hamas is a resistance movement against colonial oppression and the backbone of Palestinian resistance.”

Soon after the meeting Yousaf and Saeed established an Islamic lobbying group, The Scottish Islamic Foundation (SIF). Its first chief executive was Saeed who had previously expressed support for Islamists including Anwar al-Awlaki, the extremist preacher who inspired numerous Muslim terrorists, but who, he said, “preached nothing but peace.”

The SIF was awarded £405,000 in grants from the SNP government and announced the country’s biggest ever celebration of Islamic culture in Glasgow for June 2009.

But the project collapsed and SIF was forced to repay £128,000 of the taxpayer funds it had received, with £72,000 already spent.

Yousaf was also a director of SIF Ltd between May 2008 and September 2009.

Afternote: SIF was wound up after spending several hundreds of thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ money with almost nothing to show for it and with large sums unaccounted for. Humza Yousaf’s aunt and mother were employed by the charity which was placed on a watch list after being described as an entry-level group for Islamists.

*Sawalha was Hamas’ West Bank military chief before being appointed to its political leadership. He reportedly fled the Gaza Strip in 1990 after being placed on a wanted list by Israel.

Hamas had at the time been proscribed as a terrorist organisation by the US, but the UK did not follow suit until 2021.

Sawalha attended the meeting at Holyrood as a representative of Islam Expo, which was funded by a £2 million grant from Qatar and held in London in 2006 and 2008.

The Expos, run by Sawalha, included an appearance by Sheikh Qazi Hussain Ahmed, a Pakistani politician who praised the Taliban as “just and honourable men.”

Lord Carlisle, a former independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, said: “Yousaf must address the circumstances in which he judged it appropriate to have close contact with Hamas supporters.

Financial Aid to the Hamas Ruled Gaza Strip

The international community sent billions of dollars in aid to the Gaza Strip in recent years to provide relief to the more than 2 million Palestinians living in the isolated, Hamas-ruled territory.

The aid was intended to ease the burden on civilians of an Israeli-Egyptian blockade imposed on Gaza when the Islamic militant group seized power from rival Palestinian forces in 2007.

Israel says heavy restrictions on trade and movement are needed to keep Hamas from enhancing its military capability, while critics view it as a form of collective punishment. Israel and Hamas have fought five wars since 2008, the most recent in 2023.

Israel closely supervises aid to try to ensure it bypasses Hamas. But the Hamas-run government benefits from foreign countries footing the bill for schools, hospitals and infrastructure, allowing it to conserve its resources, including the taxes and customs it collects.

Scottish Financial Aid to the UN’s Gaza Appeal:

Yousaf pledged to donate $1 million as Scotland’s humanitarian funding to the UN’s Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) appeal.

Cabinet Secretary for Justice (2018–2021)

Rewarding mediocrity, Sturgeon promoted the unqualified Yousaf to the post of Cabinet Secretary for Justice. The first ever person appointed to the role without holding a university degree in Law.

Yousaf, a champion of anti-free speech laws criminalising “stirring up” so-called “hatred” even in a person’s private home, ventured: “Are we comfortable giving a defence to somebody whose behaviour is threatening or abusive, which is intentionally stirring up hatred against, for example, Muslims? Are we saying that that is justified because that is in the home?”

He also ranted in the Scottish Parliament against the 91.8% of white people in high office in Scotland and asserted that “Scotland has a problem of structural racism.” Full details here:

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/07/05/racist-backlash-scotland-white/
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2023/03/27/anti-free-speech-separatist-who-wants-fewer-white-people-in-office-now-leads-scotland/
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/10/29/scottish-justice-sec-demands-hate-speech-home-be-prosecuted/

Political will

European countries do not have the political will, or the ability to take on the task of keeping their trading sea routes free from attack and the Red Sea bottleneck will become a stranglehold on the World’s shipping denying unrestricted access to the Suez Canal and Europe. It will be back to the “round the cape” journey for shipping and the difficulties arising from that are well known and unfeasible.

In consequence there will be a major shake up in the logistics of World trade and of particular relevance is the strategic location of Scotland which is best placed and able to provide deep water shipping facilities for containers. It is the natural gateway to the Atlantic and Europe.

The Impact of Global warming on World Trade

As the seas around Russia are released from the grip of the Arctic ice studies are projecting: “remarkable shifts in trade flows between Asia and Europe, diversion of trade within Europe, heavy shipping traffic in the Arctic and a substantial drop in Suez traffic.

Russia has not been slow to recognise the new opening for trade and is building nuclear powered ice-breaker ships well capable of keeping sea channels open to commercial traffic.

Cost savings achieved using a new “Northern Channel” are eye wateringly high and joint development, with Russia or China of a new trans container facility, at the southern end of the channel, in Orkney would bring significant benefits to participating countries.

Presently the channel is freely navigable in the summer and autumn months, ice breaker support is required over the winter period but a report by the Copenhagen Business School found that large-scale trans-Arctic shipping will soon become economically viable.

Click to access Arctic%20Shipping%20-%20Commercial%20Opportunities%20and%20Challenges.pdf

6 Sep 2017: The Northern Sea Route is completely ice-free and shipping thrives

As Russian Arctic ice shrinks to this year’s lowest, a big number of ships are moving in. In waters normally covered by thick ice, ships are today sailing easily and without escorts.

Ice data from Russia’s Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute show that the whole Northern Sea Route now is ice-free.

Even in the waters between the Kara Sea and the Bering Strait, normally a highly complex and ice-covered area, shipping appears smooth and easy.

The ice edge in the East Siberian Sea is now retreating to north of the 75th parallel and practically the whole Laptev Sea is ice-free.

There is only some scattered ice around the Vilkitsky Strait, the area separating the Kara Sea and the Laptev Sea.

https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/2017/09/northern-sea-route-completely-ice-free-and-shipping-thrives

The Northern Sea Route – The Russian Perspective

Due to global warming, it will become viable to deliver goods from Europe to the Pacific throughout the Arctic as ice floes melt.

There is reason to believe that China would be interested in participating in the development of the NSR, as the waterway will save time and can help China find a way out of the Strait of Malacca dilemma that has long plagued importers and exporters.

Efforts to open up the NSR would help pump fresh investment into the country and would benefit the development of Russia’s Far East.

The NSR has the potential to become a significant new area for cooperation between China and Russia. It is expected that the Belt and Road initiative will create an opportunity for Russia’s NSR ambitions to turn into reality.

https://sputniknews.com/infographics/201709051057097124-northern-sea-route-suez-canal-alternative/

The Northern Sea Route – The Chinese Perspective

The Northern Sea Route, one of three Arctic shipping routes that connect East Asia and Europe along the Russian coastline, is now subject to more attention than ever before. The Northern Sea Route Administration notes that in 2016 traffic volume on the Northern Sea Route reached 7,265,700 tonnes – an increase of 35 percent in comparison with 2015.

As the world’s third largest ship-owner, China has a strong interest in Arctic shipping, especially in the Northern Sea Route. That was reflected in China’s decision to include the Arctic in its Belt and Road Initiative.

On June 20, 2017, China’s National Development and Reform Commission and State Oceanic Administration published the “Vision for Maritime Cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative” (the Vision). The Vision officially incorporates the Arctic into China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

Moreover, before attending the G20 Summit in Hamburg, President Xi Jinping visited Russia and signed the “China-Russia Joint Declaration on Further Strengthening Comprehensive, Strategic and Cooperative Partnership” (Joint Declaration) on July 4, 2017.

Described as the Ice Silk Road, the development of the Northern Sea Route is a key area of cooperation between China and Russia.

The Ice Silk Road can be seen as a further step in shaping China’s Arctic policy. The three main pillars of this policy are: respect, cooperation, and sustainability.

Moreover, the BRI now officially extends to the Arctic, which could help achieve the objectives of China’s Arctic policy. It is now very clear that China is keen to play a role as a user of the Northern Sea Route.

As elaborated in the Vision:

China is willing to work with all parties in conducting scientific surveys of navigational routes, setting up land-based monitoring stations, carrying out research on climatic and environmental changes in the Arctic, as well as providing navigational forecasting services.

China supports efforts by countries bordering the Arctic in improving marine transportation conditions, and encourages Chinese enterprises to take part in the commercial use of the Arctic route.

So why is China keen to use the Northern Sea Route?

It is commonly known that the Northern Sea Route could shorten the distance of transportation between China and European ports.

China also sees the opportunity of resources development in the Russian Arctic. But perhaps more importantly, China believes that the Northern Sea Route is strategically important for its energy security.

China is facing the dilemma that energy from Africa and the Persian Gulf passes through waters dominated by strategic competitors (the United States and India),   threatened by piracy, or bottle-necked at the Strait of Malacca. It would therefore be helpful to have an alternative shipping route along a politically stable area.

https://thediplomat.com/2017/07/china-russia-trouble-on-the-arctic-silk-road/

Container Transhipment and Container Terminal Capacity in Scotland

Scapa Flow in Orkney provides the best available deep water port in Europe with the potential to handle any amount of major transhipment of today’s mega-size container ships.

The container port market in Northern Europe is expected to continue its upward trend, demand more than doubled over the 2001-2015 and is expected to double again between 2015-2030.

With container traffic increasing faster than output, transshipment growth will be even more rapid as carriers, due to ship upsizing, reduce the number of direct port calls and move towards hub and bespoke services.

For the fast growing Russian, Chinese, Japanese, Australian, New Zealand, other Asian markets and existing European and North American Authorities, the efficiencies and economies will be matched by the opportunity to achieve through use of the Orkney facility, the secure gateways required.

Scotland will benefit directly from economic spin-off, and a major stimulus to the development of sea and water-borne alternatives.

Full details here:

2006: http://sutranet.plan.aau.dk/WP4/nov2006/SCAPA/FLOW/CONTAINER/TERMINAL/COASTLINK/PERTH/26/SEPT/2006.pdf

2011: https://www.computescotland.com/scapa-flow-crossroads-for-container-terminal-4184.php

2014: http://container-mag.com/2014/05/02/the-orkney-floating-container-terminal-alternative/

2004: http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2004/09/19885/42553

2004: http://www.napier.ac.uk/research-and-innovation/impact-case-studies/the-greenest-port

Nov 2010: Jack Straw Labour MP for Blackburn Alerts the UK to Sexual abuse of young white girls by Pakistani men

A gang of men were convicted of systematically grooming and sexually abusing teenage girls in Derbyshire. Many of the victims were given alcohol or drugs before being forced to have sex in cars, rented houses or hotels across the Midlands. One girl described a sexual assault involving at least eight men. The nine men were convicted during three separate trials at Leicester Crown Court.

Straw said increasing numbers of Pakistani Muslim men view white girls as “easy meat” for sex abuse and highlighted it was endemic in Blackburn and in many other areas with significant Muslim populations across England.

Aug 2014: Pakistani Grooming gangs reportedly raped near a million underage non-Muslim girls and the CPS failed their pleas for justice

Jack Straw’s warning was ignored by the DPP and the CPS. Four years and 1 million more rapes later the UK public was outraged and angered by party political attempts to shift the blame away from the State onto the victims. 

Reports suggested that there were around 1,400 raped Yorkshire children, (a conservative estimate) given there were multiple rapes on each child.

Adding in the Pakistani Muslim grooming operating in Oxford, Bradford, Rochdale, Newcastle and other cities in England takes the count of rapes committed by Pakistani Muslim men against white children into the millions.

The judge in the Oxford case said the brutal rapists demeaned their victims because they did not share the men’s “religion and culture”.

Nor is it a “small number” of Muslims. It is an endemic problem in Muslim-dominated towns and cities. 

The UK public needs to see justice. That means more than “historic abuse” “no blame game” “no party politics” “look to the future” and all the other rubbish politicians wheel out. We don’t need “the police”, “the council”, “the CPS”. We need names and prosecutions.

Police officers who abetted the rape of children need to go to jail. And another thing who will be responsible for prosecuting members of the CPS for their misconduct?

Keir Starmer, the compromised, politicised Director of Public Prosecutions, said his CPS did not prosecute because they made assumptions about the credibility of the evidence of victims. The DPP and the CPS took on the role of judge and jury and failed the abused children. Why? To win Muslim votes!!! Who will be responsible for prosecuting Starmer and members of the CPS for their misconduct?

It was Labour who did this in Rotherham and Rochdale to win Muslim votes. The police, Labour PCCs, Labour councillors, Labour-leaning prosecutors. 

The Rotherham report says a Conservative councillor brought his concerns to the leader but was told not to make it public.

The Head of Children’s Services Joyce Thacker told The Times she would punish the leaker and in 2008 Labour gave her an OBE for her Services to Young People.

Labour’s greedy, sleazy pandering to Muslim votes brought about the introduction of Sharia tribunals. Labour set them up in law.

Postal vote fraud, uncontrolled immigration, Trojan Horse schools, and now this sick hell.

The Pakistani immigrant community has not fully integrated into British life. Instead of spreading out over the country and adopting British values whilst retaining their own religion, they have been encouraged to massively dominate a few towns where they attempt to impose their culture on others.

Social planning needs to address the undesirability of one community” taking over an English town or city. We have seen that with our mixed Afro-Caribbean heritage Britons, with Jewish-heritage Britons and all classes and races up until now.

Politicians, the Media and the Press are persistent in their use of the expression “The Pakistani Community” providing confirmation of the failed immigration policy of the Labour Party who actively encouraged mass uncontrolled immigration of Pakistani immigrants so that they would be able to gain their votes in future elections.

Reference to “the community” should address all citizens regardless of ethnic origin. (The Sun)

White girls abused by Muslim child-rape gangs should shut their mouths for the good of diversity

Labour Party leader, Sir Keir Starmer promoted MP Naseem ‘Naz’ Shah, who infamously shared a tweet stating “Those abused girls in Rotherham and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths for the good of diversity”.

The British-Pakistani Labour MP for Bradford West liked and shared a tweet in 2017 admonishing white, English girls who spoke out about being raped and sexually enslaved by organised gangs of Muslim paedophiles.

The UK was rocked to its foundations by the never-ending stream of scandals involving predominantly Muslim men targeting white English girls from working-class backgrounds for sexual exploitation.

Most shockingly of all is the fact that authorities and the mainstream media were aware of this for years if not decades but refused to act, even when girls and parents pleaded for help, for fear of being accused of racism by PC fanatics.

The Labour MP for Rotherham, a town where Muslim child-raping gangs were allowed to operate for years with impunity, Sarah Champion, has said that up to 1 million English girls are likely to have fallen victim to Muslim rape gangs as of 2016.