1990: Epstein took ownership of the Palm Beach mansion and smaller house nearby, from Laurel Inc, a company based in Tampere, Finland.
The Finnish connection was arranged by Robert Maxwell who introduced Epstein to the ultra-Zionist and gangster friendly, Finnish-British, Zabludowich (J) family who had worked with him from the 1940s smuggling mortars ad other munitions from Tampere, to Jewish terrorist groups in Palestine.
Shlomo Zabludowich later formed a joint arms manufacturing venture between Tampella and Israel.
For over half a century Shlomo, the patriarch of the Zabludowich family, and his son Poju have been members of a close-knit group of ultra-Zionist billionaires who maintained close links to the Kosher Nostra.
Son Poju, emerged unscathed from many self created difficulties, including allegations of sexual harassment, questionable sex parties and the Panama papers scandal. He was also suspected of bribing the Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu. The Times of Israel called it the ”gifts affair.”
Poju was the largest landowner in Las Vegas and owned other properties in the US. He resides in London. He is a significant financial donor to the Conservative Party and enjoys friendships with many senior government ministers, in particular David Cameron, one of the UK’s sleaziest P.M . : Full history of Cameron and his links to the money laundering, HSBC.
His co-investor partner also exposed in the Panama Papers revelations was Scot Young, born in a tenement in Dundee, mixed with local thugs then moved on to serious crime. He and his team hooked up with a Russian Oligarth and ripped off the Russian Mafia the , “Moscow scam”. Was found impaled on railings outside his London flat in 2014. An inquest on his death found insufficient evidence of suicide, and his family suspected he had been murdered. Full expose here:
Lord Andrew Hay of the elite real estate broker Knight Frank wrote letters of recommendation describing Young as “the most important single private client the firm has within the UK”.
Emails reveal he and Berezovsky were invited to a “boys’ dinner” in London with Bill Clinton, by the Finnish billionaire and major Tory donor Poju Zabludowicz. Young was also a friend of retail billionaire Sir Philip Green, the Ivy group owner Richard Caring, and the reality TV mogul Simon Cowell.
Poju himself long enjoyed a lifestyle to which Epstein himself aspired and the Florida properties he off loaded provided the means that allowed Epstein to entertain important people and couple them with young girls provided by ?
Ghislaine Maxwell was not involved with Epstein at that time. More on her next time
The sordid details of California Governor Gavin Newsom’s unwholesome dealings with communist China continue to emerge, including the shocking revelation that Newsom is quietly funnelling hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to the communist Chinese regime in exchange for political favours.
Because California is certifiably bankrupt and on the verge of total economic collapse, Newsom appears to have forged a backroom deal with the Chicoms that involves him handing over taxpayer dollars in exchange for political bailouts. These include keeping California artificially afloat, as well as Newsom in office, at least until China can get troops on the ground as part of a planned nationwide takeover.
As it turns out, China fully supports, and is possibly even a financial backer of, Black Lives Matter (BLM) and Antifa, the two most well-known domestic terrorist groups making the rounds destroying property, tearing down statues, burning entire city blocks, and shooting innocent people. The destabilization these groups are causing is all part of the Chinese takeover plan, in other words. Natural News has already established that China is providing full-auto weapons upgrade parts to Black Lives Matter through a smuggling operation that was interdicted by U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP).
How Newsom fits into the picture is that he has turned California into a port of entry for China to smuggle in weapons and other gear for the soon-to-be second civil war that has been planned for America. And the truly sick part is that Newsom is laundering money back and forth with the Chinese under the guise of “coronavirus aid.”
Back in April, even the mainstream media was questioning what Newsom was up to when it was revealed that he had wired half a billion dollars to an electric car company in China to supposedly purchase “N-95 masks” for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19). This decision was never voted on or approved by legislators, and when pressed about the details of the deal, Newsom refused to disclose them.
Keep in mind that this half a billion dollars was just the first of two installments amounting to a full billion dollars being sent China to supposedly purchase face masks for Californians – face masks that never actually arrived, by the way. As of this writing, the Chinese electric car company in question, BYD, still has the money and has yet to send over a single face mask.
“That’s because this isn’t a billion dollars for ‘masks,'” writes Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, in an exposé on Newsom’s treasonous criminality. “It’s part of a massive money laundering operation to funnel money to China, so that China can funnel money and weapons back to Newsom in preparation for the civil war that they’re launching.”
None of this is conjecture, by the way. Newsom himself admitted to it personally during a television interview, though he refused to provide any details about the nature of the agreement that was made with BYD.
This massive transfer of taxpayer money to some obscure Chinese vehicle manufacturer was never voted on by the taxpayers from whom the money was stolen, nor has there been any accountability concerning how it was used. In fact, nobody even knows how it was used because the whole thing took place under the table.
Instead of using this money to help actual Californians, many of whom are jobless and barely scraping by, Newsom instead redirected it to his communist buddies across the Pacific under the guise of purchasing face masks.
Even if it was true that all this money went towards masks, which we know it certainly did not, Newsom at the very least could have instead invested it locally to have the masks produced in the state of California by actual Californians. This would have helped the state economy by keeping people employed.
But no, that was never what this was all about. Newsom pretended to spend this pile of taxpayer cash on face masks as cover for a massive money laundering scheme that effectively hands the reins of power over to China in exchange for Newsom’s own political protection.
By selling Californians down the river and giving China the beachhead it has been trying to establish on America’s western coast, Newsom is ensuring that he will remain on China’s good side once the dust settles and the new world order emerges.
As we reported, Newsom is directly facilitating the transfer of weapons and ammunition from China to the United States, where much of it is now being stored at the Easy End Complex in Sacramento. Pallets upon pallets of Chinese munitions are being stockpiled right underneath our noses, and Americans have Newsom the traitor to thank for what is soon to transpire.
“Essentially, Gov. Newsom has been stockpiling weapons and ammo in preparation for a civil war that he’s been helping to make reality,” notes the Health Ranger, who further warns that this all aligns with Barack Obama’s infamous vision concerning the future of America:
“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set … We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded,” Obama proclaimed to his cheering worshipers.
To sum it all up, Newsom is quietly paving the way for Obama’s civilian national security force to come to fruition by working directly with China to stockpile weapons and ammo. He is also helping to foment the violent division that is tearing apart our country so that China and other new world order players can swoop in when the time is just right and seize control.
Following a series of other preliminary events, many of which we are now witnessing on a daily basis, the eventual outcome will be mass death in America followed by a staged military invasion by China. This will spell the final end of America as we know it, and Americans will have Newsom, among others, to thank.
An a-z list of US Senators in receipt of pharma donations: 1990-2024. I expect the total for each Senator will reflect their usefulness to the Pharma cause.
Group 1: $1,000 – $4,000: Definitely In the clutches of Big Pharma
Biden, Joe (D) $3,338,303
Obama, Barack (D) $2,649,958
Harris, Kamala (D) $2,570,369
Clinton, Hillary (D-NY) New York $1,869,374
Hatch Orin (R-UT) Utah $1,327,307
Romney, Mitt (R-UT) Utah $1,079,285
McConnell, Mitch (R-KY) Kentucky $1,027,79
Group 2: $500,000-$999,000: Very possibly in the clutches of Big Pharma
Menendez, Robert (I-NJ) New Jersey $986,695
Burr, Richard (R-NC) North Carolina $873,391
Casey, Bob (D-PA) Pennsylvania $865,420
Murray, Patty (D-WA) Washington $797,518
Specter, Arlen (D-PA) Pennsylvania $772,829
Schumer, Charles E (D-NY) New York $761,406
Blunt, Roy (R-MO) Missouri $680,650
Blackburn, Marsha (R-TN) Tennessee $627,718
Carper, Tom (D-DE) Delaware $612,393
Sanders, Bernie (I-VT) Vermont $603,406
Mcain, John (R-AZ) Arizona $591,107
Crapo, Mike (R-ID) Idaho $573,587
Warnock, Raphael (D-GA) Georgia $511,268
Group 3: $350-$499: Strong candidate for the clutches of Big Pharma
It is crucial for the future of sustainable Health Service provision that he wins the day, but he is dependent on retaining the so far unswerving support of President Trump and a small group of people who are financed by means independent of the Government.
Money from Pharmaceutical Manufacturing to US Senators, 1990-2024: Donations, ($200 or more) is supposedly from employees or PACs affiliated with the industry, but not necessarily from the companies themselves. (Nudge Nudge: Wink Wink).
Abraham, Spencer (R-MI) Michigan $166,900 Adams, Brock (D-WA) Washington $6,300 Alexander, Lamar (R-TN) Tennessee $366,550 Allard, Wayne (R-CO) Colorado $48,819 Allen, George (R-VA) Virginia $244,700 Alsobrooks, Angela (D-MD) Maryland $45,068 Ashcroft, John (R-MO) Missouri $112,499 Ayotte, Kelly (R-NH) New Hampshire $213,170
Baldwin, Tammy (D-WI ) Wisconsin $133,504 Banks, Jim (R-IN) Indiana $86,798 Barrasso, John (R-WY) Wyoming $474,266 Baucus, Max (D-MT) Montana $417,790 Bayh, Evan (D-IN) Indiana $274,169 Begich, Mark (D-AK) Alaska $45,249 Bennet, Michael (D-CO) Colorado $318,447 Bennett, Robert F (R-UT) Utah $190,000 Bentsen, Lloyd (D-TX) Texas $4,000 Biden, Joe (D) $3,338,303 Bingaman, Jeff (D-NM) New Mexico $83,900 Blackburn, Marsha (R-TN) Tennessee $627,718 Blumenthal, Richard (D-CT) Connecticut $142,587 Blunt, Roy (R-MO) Missouri $680,650 Bond, Christopher (R-MO) Missouri $230,943 Booker, Cory (D-NJ) New Jersey $362,272 Boozman, John (R-AR) Arkansas $66,750 Boren, David Lyle (D-OK) Oklahoma $3,500 Boschwitz, Rudy (R-MN) Minnesota $41,519 Boxer, Barbara (D-CA) California $130,330 Bradley, Bill (D) $163,740 Braun, Carol Moseley (D) $71,932
Burr, Richard (R-NC) North Carolina $873,391
Campbell, Ben N (R-CO) Colorado $33,855 Cantwell, Maria (D-WA) Washington $96,885 Capito, Shelley Moore (R-WV) West Virginia $237,351 Cardin, Ben (D-MD) Maryland $186,100 Carnahan, Jean (D-MO) Missouri $5,500 Carper, Tom (D-DE) Delaware $612,393 Casey, Bob (D-PA) Pennsylvania $865,420 Cassidy, Bill (R-LA) Louisiana $474,025 Chafee, John H (R-RI) Rhode Island $50,250 Chafee, Lincoln (L) $61,350 Chambliss, Saxby (R-GA) Georgia $107,099 Cleland, Max (D-GA) Georgia $69,550 Clinton, Hillary (D-NY) New York $1,869,374 Coats, Dan (R-IN) Indiana $271,662 Coburn, Tom (R-OK) Oklahoma $139,201 Cochran, Thad (R-MS) Mississippi $147,809 Cohen, William S (R-ME) Maine $15,750 Coleman, Norm (R-MN) Minnesota $214,250 Collins, Susan M (R-ME) Maine $273,221 Conrad, Kent (D-ND) North Dakota $132,000 Coons, Chris (D-DE) Delaware $495,945 Corker, Bob (R-TN) Tennessee $209,490 Cornyn, John (R-TX) Texas $495,666 Corzine, Jon S (D-NJ) New Jersey $9,375 Cotton, Tom (R-AR) Arkansas $51,855 Cranston, Alan (D) $8,000 Crapo, Mike (R-ID) Idaho $573,587 Cruz, Ted (R-TX) Texas $265,227
D’Amato, Alfonse M (R-N) New York $132,350 Daines, Steven (R-MT) Montana $226,550 Danforth, John C (R-MO) Missouri $2,000 Daschle, Tom (D-SD) South Dakota $61,050 Dayton, Mark (D-MN) Minnesota $1,000 Deconcini, Dennis (D-AZ) Arizona $16,810 DeMint, Jim (R-SC) South Carolina $56,950 DeWine, Mike (R-OH) Ohio $273,200 Dixon, Alan J (D-IL) Illinois $7,000 Dodd, Chris (D-CT) Connecticut $466,073 Dole, Bob (R) $123,350 Dole, Elizabeth (R-NC) North Carolina $250,847 Domenici, Pete V (R-NM) New Mexico $117,800 Donnelly, Joe (D-IN) Indiana $296,857 Dorgan, Byron L (D-ND) North Dakota $33,000 Duckworth, Tammy (D-IL) Illinois $112,209 Durbin, Dick (D-IL) Illinois $149,229 Durenberger, Dave (R-MN) Minnesota $23,350
Edwards, John (D) $51,000 Ensign, John (R-NV) Nevada $219,549 Exon, Jim (D-NE) Nebraska $8,750
Feingold, Russ (D-WI) Wisconsin $43,709 Feinstein, Dianne (D-CA) California $237,970 Fetterman, John (D-PA ) Pennsylvania $162,099 Fischer, Deb (R-NE) Nebraska $121,810 Fitzgerald, Peter G (R-IL Illinois $27,050 Flake, Jeff (R-AZ) Arizona $64,000 Ford, Wendell H (D-KY) Kentucky $2,000 Fowler, Wyche Jr (D-GA) Georgia $13,000 Frahm, Sheila (R-KS) Kansas $5,000 Franken, Al (D-MN) Minnesota $22,286 Frist, Bill (R-TN) Tennessee $164,523
Gallego, Ruben (D-AZ) Arizona $86,876 Gardner, Cory (R-CO) Colorado $300,198 Gillibrand, Kirsten (D-NY) New York $343,947 Glenn, John (D-OH) Ohio $2,500 Gore, Al (D) $73,050 Gorton, Slade (R-WA) Washington $57,007 Graham, Lindsey (R-SC) South Carolina $320,929 Gramm, Phil (R-TX) Texas $107,020 Grams, Rod (R-MN) Minnesota $69,900 Grassley, Chuck (R-IA) Iowa $429,821 Gregg, Judd (R-NH) New Hampshire $216,798
Hagel, Chuck (R-NE) Nebraska $86,565 Hagerty, Bill (R-TN) Tennessee $79,784 Hassan, Maggie (D-NH) New Hampshire $112,334 Hatfield, Mark O (R-OR) Oregon $15,000
Hatch Orin (R-UT) Utah $1,327,307
Hawley, Josh (R-MO) Missouri $28,577 Heflin, Howell (D-AL) Alabama $16,250 Heinrich, Martin (D-NM) New Mexico $227,104 Heinz, John (R-PA) Pennsylvania $2,000 Heitkamp, Heidi (D-ND) North Dakota $207,975 Heller, Dean (R-NV) Nevada $193,235 Helms, Jesse (R-NC) North Carolina $69,275 Hickenlooper, John (D-CO) Colorado $95,154 Hirono, Mazie K (D-HI) Hawaii $125,825 Hoeven, John (R-ND) North Dakota $143,960
Inhofe, James M (R-OK) Oklahoma $99,320 Inouye, Daniel K (D-HI) Hawaii $14,200 Isakson, Johnny (R-GA) Georgia $390,772
Jeffords, James M (I-VT) Vermont $89,200 Johanns, Mike (R-NE) Nebraska $57,600 Johnston, J Bennett (D-LA) Louisiana $8,250 Jones, Doug (D-AL) Alabama $149,469 Justice, Jim (R-WV) West Virginia $5,215
Kaine, Tim (D-VA) Virginia $260,273 Kassebaum, Nancy (R-KS) Kansas $9,000 Kasten, Bob (R-WI) Wisconsin $40,750 Kelly, Mark (D-AZ) Arizona $303,536 Kempthorne, Dirk (R-ID) Idaho $12,000 Kennedy, Edward M (D-MA) Massachusetts $162,717 Kennedy, John (R-LA) Louisiana $72,103 Kerrey, Bob (D-NE) Nebraska $106,450 Kerry, John (D-MA) Massachusetts $445,396 Kim, Andy (D-NJ) New Jersey $99,350 King, Angus (I-ME) Maine $8,400 Klobuchar, Amy (D-MN) Minnesota $104,899 Krueger, Robert (Bob) (D-TX) Texas $2,250
Landrieu, Mary L (D-LA) Louisiana $217,946 Lankford, James (R-OK) Oklahoma $129,000 Lautenberg, Frank (D-NJ) New Jersey $312,072 Leahy, Patrick (D-VT) Vermont $124,800 Lee, Mike (R-UT ) Utah $122,414 Lemieux, George S (R-FL) Florida $6,500 Levin, Carl (D-MI) Michigan $16,950 Lieberman, Joe (D-CT) Connecticut $485,790 Lincoln, Blanche (D-AR) Arkansas $189,575 Loeffler, Kelly (R-GA) Georgia $187,339 Lott, Trent (R-MS) Mississippi $105,000 Lujan, Ben Ray (D-NM) New Mexico $222,440
Mack, Connie (R-FL) Florida $62,000 Manchin, Joe (D-WV) West Virginia $404,543 Markey, Ed (D-MA) Massachusetts $243,047 Marshall, Roger (R-KS) Kansas $105,120 Martinez, Mel (R-FL) Florida $77,700 Masto, Catherine Cortez (D-NV) Nevada $205,318 Mathews, Harlan (D-TN) Tennessee $1,000
Mcain, John (R-AZ) Arizona $591,107
McCaskill, Claire (D-MO) Missouri $135,077 McClure, James A (R-ID ) Idaho $1,000 McConnell, Mitch (R-KY) Kentucky $1,027,79 McCormick, Dave (R-PA) Pennsylvania $63,231 Menendez, Robert (I-NJ) New Jersey $986,695 Merkley, Jeff (D-OR) Oregon $39,367 Miller, Zell (D-GA) Georgia $3,250 Mitchell, George J (D-ME) Maine $6,000 Moran, Jerry (R-KS) Kansas $173,850 Moreno, Bernie (R-OH) Ohio $28,079 Moynihan, Daniel P (D-NY) New York $63,000 Mullin, Markwayne (R-OK) Oklahoma $188,280 Murphy, Christopher S (D-CT) Connecticut $109,312
Murray, Patty (D-WA) Washington $797,518
Nelson, Ben (D-NE) Nebraska $289,483 Nelson, Bill (D-FL) Florida $160,071 Nickles, Don (R-OK) Oklahoma $106,096 Nunn, Sam (D-GA) Georgia $9,500
Ossoff, Jon (D-GA) Georgia $326,791
Packwood, Bob (R-OR) Oregon $78,725 Padilla, Alex (D-CA) California $23,155 Paul, Rand (R-KY) Kentucky $132,359 Pell, Claiborne (D-RI) Rhode Island $1,000 Perdue, David (R-GA) Georgia $292,824 Peters, Gary (D-MI) Michigan $363,612
Portman, Rob (R-OH) Ohio $435,085
Pressler, Larry (I-SD) South Dakota $39,110
Reed, Jack (D-RI) Rhode Island $85,376 Reid, Harry (D-NV) Nevada $320,100 Ricketts, Pete (R-NE) Nebraska $15,786 Riegle, Donald W Jr (D-MI) Michigan $2,500 Risch, James E (R-ID) Idaho $52,925 Robb, Charles S (D-VA) Virginia $34,847 Roberts, Pat (R-KS) Kansas $321,228 Rochester, Lisa Blunt (D-DE) Delaware $254,164 Rockefeller, Jay (D-WV) West Virginia $109,450 Romney, Mitt (R-UT) Utah $1,079,285 Rosen, Jacky (D-NV) Nevada $208,847 Roth, William V Jr (R-DE) Delaware $138,725 Rounds, Mike (R-SD) South Dakota $56,345 Rudman, Warren B (R-NH) New Hampshire $2,000
Salazar, Ken (D-CO) Colorado $38,000 Sanders, Bernie (I-VT) Vermont $603,406 Sanford, James Terry (D-NC) North Carolina $37,250
Santorum, Rick (R) $442,995
Sarbanes, Paul S (D-MD) Maryland $11,000 Sasse, Ben (R-NE) Nebraska $90,340 Sasser, Jim (D-TN) Tennessee $2,250 Schmitt, Eric (R-MO) Missouri $44,920 Schumer, Charles E (D-NY) New York $761,406
Scott, Tim (R-SC) South Carolina $477,571
Sessions, Jeff (R-AL) Alabama $137,555 Seymour, John F (R-CA) California $18,550 Shaheen, Jeanne (D-NH) New Hampshire $85,768 Sheehy, Tim (R-MT) Montana $26,219 Shelby, Richard C (R-AL) Alabama $130,715 Sinema, Kyrsten (I-AZ) Arizona $270,451 Slotkin, Elissa (D-MI) Michigan $45,040 Smith, Bob (R-NH) New Hampshire $28,750 Smith, Gordon H (R-OR) Oregon $208,184 Smith, Tina (D-MN) Minnesota $13,271 Snowe, Olympia (R-ME) Maine $105,626 Specter, Arlen (D-PA) Pennsylvania $772,829 Stabenow, Debbie (D-MI) Michigan $116,645 Stevens, Ted (R-AK) Alaska $68,850 Strange, Luther (R-AL) Alabama $23,000 Sununu, John E (R-NH) New Hampshire $179,548 Symms, Steven D (R-ID) Idaho $13,933
Talent, James M (R-MO) Missouri $159,600 Tester, Jon (D-MT) Montana $471,237 Thompson, Fred (R) $92,389 Thune, John (R-SD) South Dakota $352,160 Toomey, Pat (R-PA) Pennsylvania $384,068 Torricelli, Robert G (D-NJ) New Jersey $280,903 Tuberville, Tommy (R-AL) Alabama $14,430
Vance, J D (R-OH) Ohio $8,795 Vitter, David (R-LA) Louisiana $32,000 Voinovich, George V (R-OH) Ohio $100,000
Warner, John W (R-VA) Virginia $72,120 Warner, Mark (D-VA) Virginia $332,106 Warnock, Raphael (D-GA) Georgia $511,268 Warren, Elizabeth (D-MA) Massachusetts $406,727 Webb, Jim (D) $13,550 Welch, Peter (D-VT) Vermont $61,068 Wellstone, Paul (D-MN) Minnesota $3,250 Whitehouse, Sheldon (D-RI) Rhode Island $96,948 Wicker, Roger (R-MS) Mississippi $145,619 Wilson, Pete (R) $32,500 Wirth, Timothy E (D-CO) Colorado $1,750 Wofford, Harris (D-PA) Pennsylvania $25,750 Wyden, Ron (D-OR) Oregon $370,422
Alec Salmond warns Scots of more of Swinney’s treachery
Alex launched a brutal broadside against Swinney as he accused him of “making independence impossible” in this General Election. And he also claimed that the First Minister was “reprising” his failed 2003 Holyrood campaign where he lost eight seats.
Alec was reacting to an interview Swinney did with ITV News in which he confessed that he would support Devo Max instead of gaining a second independence referendum.
The SNP strategy is to win a majority of the seats at the next General Election and then plead with the Prime Minister to give them the power to hold another vote. but Westminster has already rejected the notion of such an event.
Swinney was asked whether he would support more powers for Holyrood instead of a referendum, and admitted he would.
He said: “I have never, my record says that I have never resisted strengthening of the powers of the Scottish Parliament. I was part of the Smith Commission which brought more power, the very tax powers that you’ve asked me about, came from the Smith Commission, of which I was a member. So I will always try to build the powers of the Scottish Parliament. I’m a believer in independence, I think independence is the answer for Scotland, but I will always work constructively to strengthen the powers of the Scottish Parliament. The real challenge we face is over the last few years since Brexit the powers of the Scottish Parliament have been eroded by the UK Government.”
He was asked if he wanted to see these extra powers being offered in the Labour manifesto and confirmed he did, and wanted Scots to “have the opportunity to decide their own future.” But the interview was highlighted by Alec Salmond as proof that the SNP had given up the push for Scexit.
Alec said: “Now we know why independence is off the SNP ballot paper. These interviews from Swinney are so wrong on so many levels. All experience shows that the ONLY circumstances when Westminster offers more powers for Scotland, is when they are frightened of independence and since the SNP are not campaigning for independence then Labour have no need to concede anything. As Swinney told Nick Robinson, of the BBC, the SNP is campaigning for a ‘democratic effect’ forcing Starmer to permit a referendum to which he already knows the answer is “no”.
A timely reminder
In 2003, Swinney led the SNP to a calamatous result in the Holyrood election, losing eight seats and seeing the vote share drop by 4.9% which was the beginning of the end for his reign as he was forced to resign after another bad showing in the European Parliament elections and was replaced by Mr Salmond. Luddite as he is Swinney is destined to repeat his mistakes condemnimg Scots to many more years of Westminster abuse. Thank you Mr Swinney.
Summarised from an article written by the political correspondent David Walker,
Ask most people about Zionism and they will say “that’s the Jews”, but while this is the impression the Rothschild networks in politics and the media have sought very successfully to “sell” as “common knowledge”, it is not true.
It represents only a minority of them and many others who are not Jewish.
Rothschild Zionism in its public expression is a political ideology based on a homeland for Jewish people in Palestine and a belief that the Jews are God’s ‘chosen race’ with a God-given right to the ‘promised land’ of Israel.
They also believe that the real borders of Israel must encompass what is now Israel, including Gaza and the West Bank still officially occupied by the Palestinians, plus Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Egypt and Jordan, or, as Genesis puts it: “… from the brook of Egypt to the Euphrates”.
That’s the public expression of Zionism, but at its inner core, it is a secret society created and controlled by the House of Rothschild.
They have sought to sell the ‘Zionism-means-all-Jewish-people’ lie so that they can condemn as ‘anti-Semites’ and ‘racists’ anyone who exposes the truth about Rothschild Zionism and its agents in government, banking, business, media, military etc.
This is why, (with the exception of one) politicians and political commentators decline to make any negative comments about Israel
1 Nov 2016: SNP Deputy Leader says Scotland can play a constructive role in the Middle East as he leads official Israel visit
The SNP launched its first official trip to Israel as part of ambitious plans for Scotland to play a role in helping achieve peace in the Middle East.
Angus Robertson led an official delegation to the region, saying he had been “encouraged to explore whether there was any way Scotland could offer help and assistance.”
He added that both the Israeli Ambassador and the Palestinian envoy to the UK welcomed his interest adding that small nations had already shown they could play a positive role, citing the example of the Oslo accords.
It was good to witness the SNP government adopting an enlightened view of politics in the middle east. It deserved praise.
Scottish Jews should step up and get involved in Scottish politics After all they fought and died for the right to be counted in
Scottish Jews should be encouraged to fully participate in the struggle for independence and when achieved the development of an independent Scotland free of any racist policies or activities.
Scotland has a proud record of welcoming immigrants of all nationalities. It is the only country in Europe that has never forced Jews to leave. The Declaration of Arbroath States “There is neither weighing nor distinction of Jew and Greek, Scotsman or Englishman.”
Scottish Jews: France 1917
Many of these young men never made it home and are buried in the fields of Flanders. There is one distinguishing factor linking these brave soldiers. They were all Jews.
The lack of any Jewish contribution to the independence debate and subsequent referendum, over the future of Scotland was a cause for concern.
While not huge in number in Scotland the Jewish community is, (and has been for many centuries) an integral and important part of Scottish society. It was crucial for them to be involved in mainstream Scottish politics so that their voices would be heard.
A “Friends of Israel” group should be set up within Holyrood so that voices of moderation can be heard. The people of Scotland fully support the State of Israel and it’s right to exist, in peace with it’s neighbours.
But Scotland also supports the Palestinians and their right to exist also as a country, at peace with its neighbours. The Scottish public, (and I include Scottish Jews) do not condone the aggression of the “Rothschild Zionist” government of Israel and it’s the pursuit of policies directed against the Palestinians.
“Might is not right”.
Scottish Jews march with Palestine supporters for a just peace
The Jewish Chronicle published an article penned by a Scottish Jew and I added it to this blog
Why I want Scottish Independence By Frank Angell
I am a Scottish Jew — and I am wholeheartedly voting Yes on September 18, and so are others of my acquaintance. Scotland’s strength is the diversity of the many cultures and faiths that thrive in our communities. Each culture brings with its values, ideas and innovations that enrich our arts, our language and our lives. It is fewer than 200 years since Jews first came to Scotland in significant numbers. Since then, Jewish workers and entrepreneurs have helped to grow Scotland’s economy, while Jewish writers, artists and performers have contributed to our culture. Our community may be a relatively small one, but we have been shown every courtesy and respect by First Minister Alex Salmond and his team of ministers since they came to office in 2007. Indeed, one of Mr Salmond’s early acts as First Minister was to visit Scotland’s only Jewish school at the start of Chanukah and to meet representatives from the Scottish Council of Jewish Communities. In 2009, the Jewish community was, rightly, included in the first meeting to take place between the Scottish government cabinet and faith group leaders in Scotland. And I was proud when the SNP government became the first administration in Scotland to directly fund visits by school children to Auschwitz-Birkenau, under the Lessons from Auschwitz Project run by the Holocaust Educational Trust — with an additional £500,000 funding announced just last year to secure the future of this vital project. These are just some examples of the interaction that takes place between Jewish representatives and the Scottish government, with positive outcomes on virtually every occasion. I would hazard that it is a rather closer relationship with the leading ministers in Scotland than our fellow Jews south of the border enjoy with Westminster — and one which is replicated by other communities and interest groups in Scotland, whether that be other faiths, business organisations, trade unions, and so on. I do not claim that Scotland is perfect, with no problems of intolerance or prejudice. But our history is at least unstained by anti-Jewish discrimination, rare among European nations, and our 14th-century independence Declaration of Arbroath contains the statement:
“There is neither weighing nor distinction of Jew and Greek, Scotsman or Englishman.”
These are ancient words, but they still seem a fine sentiment to usher in a new Scotland in the 21st century. As we look forward to the referendum, there is a wave of optimism, and people across Scotland are realising that we now have a chance to make our country better for all who live here and reshape the way we are regarded by the rest of the world. I want independence, and I also want the common ground across all the strands that make up our Scottish tartan to be the foundation for the new Scotland. I want Scotland to embrace the future as an independent country — and I believe that we will do so with conviction and tolerance.
The 2014 Independence Referendum and – Mrs Mundy a charity worker from Edinburgh.
She was undecided on which way to vote when interviewed a year ago. But with less than a week to go, she decided to tick the yes box. She said:
“I do prefer the devo-max option and it’s interesting but disappointing that Westminster and the media offered us that at the last minute but I’ll not change my vote now, adding. I think Westminster politicians did not take the needs of the Scottish people seriously and now they are panicking. I am not sure what Scotland’s foreign policy will be towards Israel but Scottish Jews will have a much closer connection to its politicians and greater influence than is the case at the present time.”
Scottish Jew, Frank Angell, A former Scottish National Party council nominee, said:
“The anti-Israel feeling in Scotland does worry me but not as far as independence is concerned. It hasn’t been any better in England and although the Scottish Parliament is currently not pro-Israel, policies change. But we need strong convictions in taking the case for Israel to the wider community in Scotland and I’m not currently seeing that.”
Drug manufacturers and regulators have been under intense political pressure from Governments to deliver a safe vaccine. AstraZeneca reported it expected to be able to introduce a coronavirus vaccine with a success rate of 90%-10% before Christmas 2020, but the announcement was premature.
Shortly after the announcement, US (Food and Drug Administration) regulators, (FDA) stopped trials so it could conduct a probe into an adverse event reported in the UK involving a patient on a trial of the vaccine who fell ill with unexplained neurological symptoms, previously believed to be consistent with transverse myelitis.
At that time the regulation of vaccines, which are technically biologics, fell to the remit of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) which supported the American initiative. But Boris Johnson, the UK Prime Minister, announced that the UK would bypass the EMA’s regulatory regime and grant a production and distribution license to AstraZeneca enabling the roll-out of a vaccination programme in the UK, from December 2020. Take a look at the AstraZeneca share price below:
The EMA Rolling Review Procedure
At the beginning of October 2020, the EMA started the first ‘rolling review’ of the COVID-19 vaccine being developed by AstraZeneca in collaboration with the University of Oxford. This meant that the committee had started evaluating the first batch of non-clinical data on the vaccine. It did not mean that a conclusion would be reached on the vaccine’s safety and effectiveness, since much of the evidence had not yet been submitted.
The rolling review programme is a regulatory tool that the EMA used to speed up the assessment of a promising medicine or vaccine during a public health emergency. Normally, all data on a medicine’s effectiveness, safety, and quality, and all required documents must be submitted at the start of the evaluation in a formal application for marketing authorization.
Buy in the case of a rolling review, EMA’s human medicines committee (CHMP) reviewed data as it became available from ongoing studies. When the CHMP decided that sufficient data was available, the formal application would be submitted by the company. In reviewing the data as it became available, the CHMP would reach an opinion sooner on whether or not the medicine or vaccine would be authorized.
There were at least 64 companies worldwide involved in the research and production of a safe vaccine and many are nearing production. So it was expected that a number of vaccines, perhaps safer and more efficacious would be available to the market in the early months of 2021.
Time will be the judge that will decide if the UK Governments’ decision is right.
2 June 2014: Just let me ask the wife!!! says Civil Servant and UK Tory Government Cabinet Secretary
Sir Jeremy Heywood advised the Prime Minister to prevent a takeover bid from Pfizer for its British rival AstraZeneca.
And just as it happened that Heywood’s wife (who worked for McKinney’s) had only just recently written a report, circulated to Tory politicians, advising pharmaceutical firms to restructure, including mergers with rivals, ‘to navigate turbulent times’. What did she know that other’s didn’t?
The Pfizer bid was subsequently withdrawn. Heywood and his wife’s role’s needed to be independently investigated. But that didn’t happen.
Brexit Uncertainty
AstraZeneca, headquartered in Cambridge UK, is the world’s fifth-largest pharmaceutical company. It is on record as saying that a hard Brexit would mean moving some of its operations away from the UK.
An company spokesman said that moving manufacturing takes several years but the likelihood of the company relocating to the EU is high, in the event of a hard Brexit and the company had taken the first steps in planning for a scenario in which no divorce deal is reached between the UK and the EU by the 31 December 2020 deadline.
Yousaf’s links to Hamas – Holyrood Meeting With Former Hamas Leader
In 2008, Yousaf, then a parliamentary assistant to MSP Bashir Ahmad and his cousin Osama Saeed, arranged a meeting between Linda Fabiani the Scottish Culture and External Affairs Secretary and former *senior Hamas commander Mohammad Sawalha (described by BBC Panorama as the mastermind behind much of Hamas’ political and military strategy) who was accompanied by two other Hamas supporting activists, Anas Altikriti and Ismail Patel.
Iraqi-born Altikriti frequently voiced support for Hamas, saying it was “fighting back” against Israeli occupation. Patel, who founded the Midlands-based Friends of Al-Aqsa said: “The current political map of Palestine… will have to include Hamas and Fatah amongst other political groups. Hamas is a resistance movement against colonial oppression and the backbone of Palestinian resistance.
Soon after the meeting Yousaf and Saeed established an Islamic lobbying group, The Scottish Islamic Foundation (SIF). Its first chief executive was Saeed who had previously expressed support for Islamists including Anwar al-Awlaki, the extremist preacher who inspired numerous Muslim terrorists, but who, he said, “preached nothing but peace.”
The SIF was awarded £405,000 in grants from the SNP government and announced the country’s biggest ever celebration of Islamic culture in Glasgow for June 2009.
But the project collapsed and SIF was forced to repay £128,000 of the taxpayer funds it had received, with £72,000 already spent. Yousaf was also a director of SIF Ltd between May 2008 and September 2009.
Afternote: SIF was wound up after spending several hundreds of thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ money with almost nothing to show for it and with large sums unaccounted for. Humza Yousaf’s aunt and mother were employed by the charity which was placed on a watch list after being described as an entry-level group for Islamists.
Financial Aid to the Hamas-Ruled Gaza Strip
*Sawalha was Hamas’ West Bank military chief before being appointed to its political leadership. He reportedly fled the Gaza Strip in 1990 after being placed on a wanted list by Israel. Hamas had at the time been proscribed as a terrorist organisation by the US, but the UK did not follow suit until 2021.
Sawalha attended the meeting at Holyrood as a representative of Islam Expo, which was funded by a £2 million grant from Qatar and held in London in 2006 and 2008.
The Expos, run by Sawalha, included an appearance by Sheikh Qazi Hussain Ahmed, a Pakistani politician who praised the Taliban as “just and honourable men.”
Lord Carlisle, a former independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, said: “Yousaf must address the circumstances in which he judged it appropriate to have close contact with Hamas supporters.
The international community has sent billions of dollars in aid to the Gaza Strip in recent years to provide relief to the more than 2 million Palestinians living in the isolated, Hamas-ruled territory.
The aid is intended to ease the burden on civilians of an Israeli-Egyptian blockade imposed on Gaza when the Islamic militant group seized power from rival Palestinian forces in 2007.
Israel says the heavy restrictions on trade and movement are needed to keep Hamas from enhancing its military capability, while critics view it as a form of collective punishment. Israel and Hamas have fought five wars since 2008, the most recent in 2023.
Israel closely supervises aid to try to ensure it bypasses Hamas. But the Hamas-run government benefits from foreign countries footing the bill for schools, hospitals and infrastructure, allowing it to conserve its resources, including the taxes and customs it collects.
Scottish Financial Aid to the UN’s Gaza Appeal:
Yousaf pledged to donate $1 million as Scotland’s humanitarian funding to the UN’s Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) appeal.
Sturgeon claimed to be a progressive individual focussed on delivering good things for Scots through the outwardly appealing but internally dictatorial corporate lobby.
But in the wacky world of the Scottish National Party the interests and concerns of the many are subsumed by the financial rewards for those who are willingly supplicant to the demands of the party leadership.
Scotland’s National Investment Bank
Set up by Sturgeon to make strategic investments for the common good of the people of Scotland it morphed into a tool for corporate business to capitalise on.
Travelnest Ltd, received £3 million in start-up funding, with more finance promised. The company specialised in providing infrastructure for the rapidly growing number of holiday homeowners enabling them to list and rent their properties.
Comment: Encouraging the uncontrolled market expansion of 2nd and 3rd home purchases in Scotland’s rural areas by primarily English residents can be likened to providing billets for 20,000 English soldiers who through claim of residence are extended the privilege of a vote in Scottish elections. Kiss any successful independence referendum goodbye!!!
Take a look at some of the other corporate networks involved:
The Chair of SNIB is Willie Watt. Watt is an Advisory Board Member of Scottish Equity Partners, a private sector Glasgow-based investment consortia which is already investing in projects into which SNIB is investing.
Carolyn Jamieson is a Non Executive Director of the Scottish National Investment Bank and is also an Advisory Board Member of Scottish Equity Partners.
She is formerly Chief Legal Officer at Skyscanner. Interestingly the new “Chief Entrepreneur” is also formerly a top executive at Skyscanner. Small world.
All of the foregoing fits neatly into a climate of patronage set up around the leadership of the Scottish Government sprawling beyond the corporate sector and into wider parts of public life.
The Chair of the Economic Recovery Group, is also the Chair of Buccleuch Estates and is also Chair of the National Galleries of Scotland board, alongside Andrew Wilson of Charlotte Street Partners who is also the author of the Growth Commission, alongside Willie Watt who is also the inaugural chair of the Scottish National Investment bank.
The Sturgeon founded National Investment Bank is in deep financial trouble: Its closure will cost the Scottish taxpayer’s billion of pounds
The bank has struggled to make a profit despite having £2bn of public funding ring-fenced for it. It made a £14.6m pre-tax loss in 2023/24. Its latest accounts were published on Wednesday and showed that some of its investments had plummeted in value, meaning that they were worth less and led to the loss of £58.4m. The value of its portfolio slid by a hefty £77m as its decisions to plough money into some Scottish companies turned sour.
Scottish taxpayers stung again as Sturgeon’s founded investment bank faces a significant financial loss as a company it backed goes bust
The struggling bank founded by Nicola Sturgeon to fund up-and-coming entrepreneurs and businesses faces yet another huge taxpayer-funded loss as M Squared Lasers goes bust owing the public purse £34m.
The Glasgow technology company, founded by Graeme Malcolm and Gareth Maker has run out of cash and ceased trading in the latest embarrassment for the flagship SNP project. 28 staff are being made redundant.
The bank has written off financial losses by:
Krucial, a satellite and digital technology specialist which closed after netting £2.9m of public cash.
Circularity Scotland, formed by Green Party minister Lorna Slater to run the Scottish Government’s doomed deposit return scheme which folded in 2023, with a loss of £9m. The Scottish Government are facing a multi million pound lawsuit from suppliers to the now closed venture
caltonjock 