The Labour Party Leader Sir Keir Starmer is a member of an organisation that believes, we the people have too much freedom. Too much democracy.
An organisation that believes the working class and the masses should be removed from any democratic process leaving the issues of democracy and government to the elite, the establishment.
It is therefore incumbent on all who might vote for the Labour Party to understand that Sir Keir Starmer is a member of such an organisation, a very powerful undemocratic organisation that advocates a ‘New world order‘ one in which the people’s role in government and democracy is greatly reduced.
This blog was written by a creditworthy Labour Party insider and is disturbing reading: I commend it to all those who follow my blog.
On 28 Dec 2016, within the “Presidential Transition Period” outgoing President Obama, well knowing the allegations to be a concoction of lies invented by himself and a team of senior Democratic Party adherents or discussion or briefing of President Elect Trump, signed an executive order imposing extensive sanctions on Putin’s Russia alleging his interference in the 2016 US presidential election.
The act which was without precedence was a “spoiler” designed to create major difficulties for the Trump administration and it worked a treat since President Trump was prevented from establishing any meaningful dialogue with Putin in the term of his presidency.
I covered the Obama scam in the attached blog in December 2017
Scotland’s secrecy watchdog, the Information Commissioner, and Scotland’s Auditor General expressed public concern about the more than 300 advisory and 131 public bodies that SNP Government Ministers have set up since taking office and advised they were not confident they had discovered secretive quangos many of which were put in place further increasing the already bloated expenditure of billions of pounds of public money.
WOKE Activist Civil Servants Dominate Scottish Society
The number of Civil Servants employed by the Scottish Government at the start of February 2025 has doubled since the start of Nicola Sturgeon took up the post as Scotland’s First Minister and now exceeds 600,000, (nearly 25% of Scotland’s workforce).
Scottish Civil Servants are Entitled to a Weekly Chill-Out Hour
In the “Wellbeing Hour“ Staff are encouraged to do yoga, read or take a walk to “de-stress” from the heavy toll of being a civil servant. Though they can decide themselves what they do with their free hour. The entitlement is estimated to cost the public purse around £7 million per year in wages.
John O’Connell, Chief Executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, blasted the programme saying :“While ministers squeeze ever more tax out of pay packets, bureaucrats are being granted a siesta. The Scottish Government should put a stop to this.”
The SNP Government is also committed to civil servants pay bands much higher than similar staff in England a policy that incurs vastly increased employer National Insurance costs since the Treasury at Westminster restricts reimbursement expenditure to the Scottish Government to the lower level.
Opposition Parties expressed shock and horror at the profligate industrial-scale abuse of taxpayers’ money funding a supersized state of bloated quangos and talking shops.
Third sector support is another concern. A myriad of Government Minister favoured supposedly charitable organisations are delivering often duplicated services, (with a significant bent to supporting WOKE policies) without account or independent audit whilst in receipt of millions of pounds from the public purse.
The Scottish Government’s wanton expenditure of public funds without accountability is indefensible. Scottish voters need to be alerted to this so they can express their displeasure at the Scottish General elections in 2026.
The absence from mainstream media, newspapers and politicians at Holyrood of any coherent defence of children and parent rights in regard to many aspects of their place in society is worrying and needs to be addressed and resolved so that Scots are able to enjoy family life without oppressive State interference.
The heavily promoted by many pundits and SNP politicians and tacit support of transgender issues has brought about a climate of near anarchy in Scotland witnessed by an increasing number of young Scots being provided with State supported gender affirming medical treatment which is offensive to the vast majority of Scots.
Fortunately an American politician, Senator Kennedy of Louisiana, in an impassioned address to the American Senate spoke up for children and parents of any country.
All Scots should be guided in their actions protecting their children from the insidious attacks on freedom by Holyrood politicians and their determined onslaught imposing a WOKE agenda riddled with radical paediatric policies including the chemical castration of children, often without parental consent using powerful drugs routinely used to castrate paedophiles. resulting in bodily changes that cannot be undone.
I commend the video to you. It should be required viewing in all Scottish educational establishment’s.
Scottish judges are unelected “kings and queens” and there is no impartiality within the nobility.
They will defend their interests from any threat even if their judgements are unfair and against the “servants” they are pledged to serve.
It is high time for judges to be elected by the people of Scotland so that they become people’s “advocates” requiring them to pass judgments “in the name of and not against the people”.
The Rotten System in place under the Nicola Sturgeon SNP led Scottish Executive.
James Wolffe: the Lord Advocate was the chief legal officer of the Scottish Executive and the Crown in Scotland for both civil and criminal matters falling within its devolved powers. This is a long-standing feature of Scots law requiring that the Lord Advocate performs two quite incompatible roles.
The Lord Advocate is the Head of the Scots state prosecution service, the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS)
He or she is also a minister of the Scottish Government and acts as its Chief Legal Advisor. An anomalous and unsatisfactory situation.
The Alex Salmond Debacle
Lord Wolffe in his evidence to the Holyrood Inquiry said the handling of sexual misconduct complaints against Alex Salmond had been delegated and all decisions were made by the Crown Agent and neither he nor the Solicitor General took any part in the proceedings.
He also expressly stated that “any suggestion from any quarter that the Crown’s decision making had, at any time been influenced by irrelevant considerations or improper motivations would be wholly without foundation and insinuations or assertions to the contrary are baseless.”
David Harvie the Crown Agent, was the head of Scotland’s prosecution service:
It is unclear at what stage he got involved. but the record shows that he tried and failed to brief the police or to hand over to them information passed to The Crown Office by the SNP investigating officer. That the police refused to get involved at that time was laudable.
At the last general election the SNP took a hammering from the Scottish electorate which almost eliminated any Nationalist representation at Westminster.
Political expediency dictates that radical reorganisation follows catastrophes but the SNP hierarchy declined to do in preference for retaining the status quo.
Their lack of action confirms that the Party leadership no longer considers a position at Westminster to be a career to which aspiring Nationalist politician’s should aspire since their presence in the House of Commons is mere tokenism and achieves nothing of substance.
Acceptable future governance of Scots has been clearly mapped out by the SNP.
Political doctrine, of any substance will be dictated by the government at Westminster. SNP politicians will have no influence over it.
The Scottish Executive, (not government) will be permitted to exist until the need to replace Holyrood arises (probably around 2030) at which time its being will be terminated to be replaced by an extension of the Westminster Government operating out of a leased property in Edinburgh.
Devolution is a near dead duck, (good riddance say a reducing rump of Party members who never subscribed to it).
In the main thanks to a radical WOKE agenda imposed on Scots, first by stealth then brazenly openly by a corrupt regime of radical activists put in place by a small group of fifth columnists, aided by strategically placed British MI 5/6 agents who hi-jacked the Party and eliminated any opposing views.
And what does the future hold for Scots. until 2030!!!
More of the same since the impact of the Westminster debacle will be to reward those who failed at Westminster as candidates in the 2025 Scottish General Election, further strengthening the stranglehold of WOKE over the Party encouraging its to continue imposing radical leftish policies so damaging to Scottish society. And Sturgeon will return to politics taking up leadership from Sweeney who will most likely retire.
The perils of transitioning were ignored by the WOKE driven SNP leaders and their acolytes and many young Scots will spend their lives in constant pain and regret.
Sturgeon’s admiration and support for Hillary Clinton was badly misplaced as was her stealthy imposition on Scots of the LGBTQ agenda for change, conduct foreign to the beliefs of the vast majority of the population of Scotland.
Political opportunists
In her first years in politics, it was evident Hillary Clinton lacked any credible political skills and her political career would be wholly reliant on the support of her husband President Bill Clinton who opened many doors for her.
Following her husband’s retirement, she decided to take her political career forward without him and failed badly.
The career of Nicola Sturgeon fits the same pattern. She failed in her chosen career in Law then followed up with nearly 10 years of failure in politics only succeeding when Alex Salmond gave her a political “leg up” mentoring and protecting her from her many inadequacies then handing over to her the leadership of a thriving SNP at the end of 2014.
Mirroring the career of Clinton, Sturgeon failed. leaving the SNP members despondent and divided.
2003: Hillary and the Whiney women
The “The Hillary Papers.” was a document compiled from the records of Diane Blair, a friend of the Clintons’ who kept journals describing her many conversations with Hillary and their work on the Clinton campaigns.
Blair’s husband donated the papers to the University of Arkansas and although available to the public they had not been examined until the “Arkansas Free Beacon” published extracts from the 1992 Clinton Presidential campaign the bumpy first years of the Clinton Administration and the Monica Lewinsky saga.
In the papers, there is information that is telling and unappealing as repeatedly women’s groups are referred to as bodies to be managed rather than listened to.
Blair often complained about how underappreciated Hillary was, repeating Hillary’s view that much of the blame lay with the press: a bunch of “complete hypocrites” with “big ego’s and no brains.”
Indeed, Hillary seemed to think that a lot of people were just dumb, or annoying and she should be forgiven for calling Lewinsky, the White House intern with whom her husband became sexually involved, a “narcissistic looney tune” who they had tried to “manage” without success.
Blair’s comments on a conversation from December 1993, in which she and Hillary “discussed books, movies, Packwood”. Senator Bob Packwood, was accused of sexual misconduct involving women who worked for him.
Blair noted: Hillary is tired of all those “whiney” women, she needed to back Bob so he would be with her on health care). Serial female abuser Packwood was subsequently forced to resign from the Senate, in 1995.
2016: Hillary and the Ukrainian Oligarch
A word can mean the difference between night and day and the inclusion of the word “family” in the “Clinton Foundation” name provides just that distinction. The “Clinton Family Foundation” is a charitable organisation that has, over many years, given millions of dollars to people in need in Arkansas.
But then there is the “Clinton Foundation” an organisation whose political influence is funded by the financial contributions of oligarchs, corporations, foreign groups and governments, to the tune of many hundreds of millions of dollars. Foreign influencers include the governments of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Brunei and Algeria.
Corporations include American companies such as Coca-Cola and ExxonMobil and Britain’s Barclay’s Bank. The list is not exhaustive and there are many donors who have given millions to be sure of gaining the support of the foundation in their activities.
Some financial donations are suspect, such as those of Victor Pinchuk, a notorious Ukrainian oligarch who contributed between $10m and $25m to the “Foundation”, and loaned his private jet to the Clintons and attended President Clinton’s 65th birthday extravaganza in Los Angeles. He also attended around a dozen private meetings with State Department officials between September 2011 and November 2012.
Public statements in support of Pinchuk, issued through the “Clinton Foundation” closely mirror American foreign policy when Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State and the American public and Clintons political opponents are keen to gain sight of the Clinton emails which she saved at home onto an illegal server allegedly to deny prying eyes the details of her many intrigues.
2016: Hillary Clinton and the 2016 Presidential election
The New York Times reported that Clinton and her aides had decided on a strategy making the Trump-Russia allegation a “theme” of the campaign.
The Times wrote. “Even at the height of the Cold War, it was hard to find a presidential campaign willing to charge that its rival was essentially secretly doing the bidding of a key American adversary. But the accusation is emerging as a theme of the Clinton campaign, as part of an attempt to portray Trump not only as an isolationist but also as one who would go soft on confronting Russia.”
The Clinton campaign engaged a political research firm Fusion GPS who, in turn, hired a former MI5 British spy, Christopher Steele, to compile what became known as the Steele dossier in which he claimed there was a “well-developed conspiracy” between Trump and Russia and that a low-level campaign adviser named Carter Page was at the centre of it.
Steele claimed that the Russians had offered Page billions of dollars, to end U.S. sanctions if Trump became president. In a follow-up, Steele said Trump fixer Michael Cohen had secretly met with Russians in Prague to work out the details of the collision.
In conclusion, he included the piece de resistance that became known as the “pee tape.” Thee allegation that, in a Moscow hotel room in 2013, Trump had watched as prostitutes performed a kinky sex act while Russian spy cameras captured the whole scene on video.
It was all rubbish. The supposed master spy Steele had no current sources in Russia and it was revealed later that his many “Russian Contacts” was in fact one man, Igor Danchenko, who worked at liberal Washington think tank the Brookings Institution.
Danchenko simply regurgitated allegations passed to him by a Clinton-related PR man named Charles Dolan, who sent in stuff that he had read in the newspapers claiming it had come to him from people closely linked to Trump. The dossier was an elaborate joke.
Yet incredulously Clinton’s operatives got a willing FBI to take the report seriously. Bureau Director Comey included extracts from the dossier in the Intelligence Community Assessment, an ongoing investigation into claims of Russian hacking and the FBI then used the dossier to win court approval to wiretap Trump’s campaign offices.
The FBI’s Deputy Chief in his evidence to Congress stated that without the Steele Dossier the FBI would not have sought the wiretap so it is a fair assumption to conclude that Hillary Clinton played a critical role in pressing the FBI to spy on the Trump campaign.
But coupled with the foregoing Clinton’s real goal was achieved in that she attracted a great deal of public discussion of the allegations just before the election.
Clinton’s tactics finally came unstuck in January 2017, when President-elect Trump was first informed of the “pee tape” allegation.
Hints of the scandal were selectively leaked to the media by Clinton’s campaign team in an attempt to further compromise Trump.
Buzzfeed screwed the Clinton move on Trump by publishing the complete Steele Dossier.
The “sh*t hit the fan” when political conversations throughout the States and other parts of the world derided its scurrilous contents.
A recap:
A special counsel, Robert Mueller, conducted a two-year investigation into the Trump-Russia charge, which came to be known as the “collusion.”
With unlimited financial resources and all the power of U.S. law enforcement, Mueller could not establish any collusion and did not allege that a single American, from Donald Trump down, took part in any such scheme.
The infamous Steele Dossier proved that Clinton had placed false and/or unverified scandals about Trump with a compliant media. Without evidence or corroborating facts, her team roped in the nation’s most powerful intelligence and law enforcement agencies into the Clinton opposition research team.
An effort that continued after the election and by any measure, the dossier was a smashing success. The damage it inflicted on President Trump lasted the entire length of his term of office.
2017: Sturgeon’s tour of the US and her meeting with trailblazer Hillary
A heavily criticised Sturgeon tour of the US was judged by some to be a “selfie Queen” jaunt at the Scottish taxpayer’s expense. Sturgeon insisted the visit had been trade-focused, although without tangible evidence of any deal saying: “there is, I detect, a real desire to strengthen economic links between the United States and Scotland. That’s been the focus of the trip.”
In the course of the grand tour, Sturgeon and Hillary Clinton both addressed the “Women in the World” summit and, prior to meeting “trailblazer” Clinton, Sturgeon exclaimed “I’ve got to be careful I don’t act like a fangirl.” before posing for publicity photos together. Journalist Tina Brown, who founded the event, also shared a photograph of herself with the political “power couple”, calling them “two women I admire most anywhere”. So all bestie friends together.
In conversation with Brown on stage, Sturgeon said: “I look at Hillary and she has been a trailblazer for women. Her sheer resilience I find utterly amazing, she has made it easier for women like me in politics, and I think that I and women across the world really owe Hillary a debt of gratitude.”
2019: LGBTQ Advocate ‘Disappointed’ With How Hillary Clinton Denied Lesbian Rumors
Shock jock Howard Stern pushed more than a few of Hillary’s buttons when he asked rather forthrightly on his radio show if she “Swung for the other team”
“Contrary to what you might hear, I actually like men,” Hillary told Stern.
“Raise your right hand and confirm you’ve never had a lesbian affair” he responded.
A laughing Clinton said “never, never, never! Never even been tempted. I dated a lot of different people, and I liked a lot of them. I was pretty popular. I was OK popular……. boys were not my problem.”
Reporter Trish Bendix, a member of the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association and winner of the 2015 Sarah Pettit Memorial Award for excellence in LGBT media, said: “I do not appreciate her salacious comments about lesbianism, in particular her use of the word “tempted” It’s so frustrating when public figures like Hillary feel the need to dispel lesbian rumours in a way that equates lesbianism or queerness with salaciousness, and that’s ultimately what I dislike about the way she phrased it. I think there’s a way to refute untrue ideas about one’s own identity without saying something damaging to others.”
Gabriel Hays of the Media Research Center had fun with Hillary getting scolded for not being “woke enough” when talking about her sexuality. with her comment: “Tsk tsk, Hillary. The former presidential candidate is taking heat for her response to old rumours about her being a lesbian,” And while we’re not bashing her for her sexuality, it’s a hilarious predicament for the woman who fancies herself a de facto leader of the LBGTQ agenda.”
Summary:
Sturgeon’s admiration and support for Hillary Clinton are badly misplaced as is her pursuit of the imposition by stealth on Scotland of a minority LGBTQ agenda for change which is totally foreign to the beliefs of the vast majority of Scots.
Her progress is attributable to the apathy of many members of the SNP who have allowed narrow-focused groups to hijack party policies and to the support for the Scottish National Party (SNP) cause of seeking independence from England which has protected Sturgeon from exposure to the more challenging environment of international politics.
Her conduct and that of her agenda supporters in the Party, Government and the Crown Office, brought with it a realization within Scotland that she lacks the experience, wisdom and sound judgement necessary to be the leader of an Independent Scotland.
During the 2016 presidential campaign former CIA Director John Brennan, the FBI, and the Justice Department identified 26 Trump associates for targeting by the multinational “Five Eyes” intelligence alliance (U.S., Canada, Australia, U.K. and New Zealand) who spied on and reported on their activities in support of the 2016 Trump campaign team leading to false allegations that Trump had colluded with the Russians, an act of treason!!
The ruse was orchestrated by President Obama to cover-up illegal foreign financial donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Details of the operation were retained in a binder and reputedly stored in a secret room in Washington.
Soon after taking office President Trump ordered the affair to be declassified but the binder was allegedly not found.
Trump’s residence at Mar a Logo was raided by a team of CIA investigators at the start of the 2024 presidential campaign searching for the binder. It was not found.
“The whole Trump-Russia collusion story was a giant hoax started by Democrats. The FBI knew it was a hoax. The CIA knew it was a hoax. And Barack Obama knew it was a hoax. Everybody knew it was a hoax the whole time. But they acted like it was real. The CIA knew Hillary started the Russia collusion story and then went in and told Barack Obama all about it. That she was trying to link Trump with Russia to distract from her email scandal…
And the Durham report revealed that the FBI had shut down investigations into the Clintons after three separate FBI field offices reported the Clinton Foundation to be a foreign money laundering scam. Andy McCabe, married to a Clinton donor intervened and told the FBI to butt out.
Prosecutor Durham was appointed to urgently investigate the allegations but took over 2 years to produce a report and then followed attempts to impeach President Trump.
The House Judiciary Committee, in a later report stated that Obama’s deputy chief of staff, FBI Director James B. Comey had targeted Trump in June 2015 in an “off the book” operation and deployed two female FBI undercover agents who infiltrated the Trump 2016 campaign and acted as “honeypots” while travelling with the Trump campaign team. and Obama and his CIA initiated the Russia Collusion Hoax.
It also reported that Obama had planted around 2500 personnel to the 2017 Presidential transition team with the objective to undermine the transfer of power.
Challenged on the matter Obama characterized the conspiracy as “absurd.” and rambled on about “foundations of democracy” being so sacred that you “do not allow the politicization of the criminal justice system, the intelligence system [or] the military.”
So there it is fraud, racketeering, obstruction of justice, election interference, and conspiracy to overthrow the United States government. But will there be a reckoning after Trump takes office in January 2025? Assuming he is allowed to do so!!!
Extract: Starmer became head of the Crown Prosecution Service, Britain’s very politically correct overseers of the law, under Tony Blair.
In other words, he is a lawyer. And that’s a very bad sign for working-class Whites whom the Labour party was explicitly founded to defend.
Like the lawyer Tony Blair and the lawyer Barack Obama before him, Starmer heads a party that supposedly champions the downtrodden workers against the greedy bosses.
But Labour long ago abandoned the workers to side with the bosses. And that means that they side with Jews against Whites.
Blair and Obama both rose to power on a tide of Jewish money and media support. Starmer hopes to do the same. He married a Jewish woman and performed the goy grovel enthusiastically at the Jewish Chronicle:
He revealed he participates in Friday-night dinners with his family, at which his proudly Jewish father-in-law says prayers. The Holborn and St Pancras MP said he felt comfortable attending family and communal “bar mitzvahs, weddings, and funerals”.
He also said he had “no issue” with standing for the traditional toast to the president of the state of Israel at Jewish weddings or with any of the traditions.
caltonjock 