Author: caltonjock

In 1934, Samuel Bronfman was made president of the National Jewish Peoples Relief Committee of Canada.

In 1939, he was named director of the Jewish Colonization Committee, formerly the Baron de Hirsch Fund (the same agency that had paid his father’s way to Canada exactly fifty years earlier).

Links to David Ben-Gurian and the Haganah (Israeli Defence Force)

At the close of World WWII, Samuel Bronfman established the National Conference of Israeli and Jewish Rehabilitation. Despite the fancy name, the organization was principally involved in smuggling military equipment to the Haganah Jewish underground in Palestine.

In the spring of 1947, David Ben-Gurion took it upon himself to direct the general policy of the Haganah, in preparation for the impending Arab attack. On May 26, 1948, the Provisional Government of Israel decided to transform the Haganah into the regular army of the State, to be called “Zeva Haganah Le-Yisrael” the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).

On May 31, 1948, as part of the order of the day establishing the IDF, David Ben-Gurion said: “With the establishment of the State of Israel, the Haganah emerged from the underground to become a regular army. Both the yishuv and the Jewish people are greatly indebted to the Haganah for its contribution during the various phases of its existence and development….In the chronicles of the people of Israel, the saga of the Haganah will shine with splendor and majesty that eternally will never dim.”

By this time, the Bronfman sons had transformed their bootleg fortune into a “legitimate” business-Seagrams Distillers of Canada.

In the next generation, the family would move, by marriage, into the very center of the Zionist Establishment of North America.

Edgar Bronfman married Ann Loeb, thereby becoming attached to the Loeb Rhodes interests of Wall Street.

Phyllis Bronfman married Jean Lambert, and suddenly the Bronfman’s were in the extended Rothschild family. Baron Lambert was part of the Belgian branch of the Rothschild clan. The New York investment house of Drexel Burnham Lambert, which had a pivotal role in Kenneth Bialkin’s later corporate takeover schemes, was drawn into the Bronfman’s orbit.

The family history of Zionist, Edgar Bronfman, honorary national vice chairman of the Jewish, Anti-Defamation League, (ADL) sheds light on the process of how organized crime networks were absorbed wholesale by the ADL, and covered with a veneer of respectability.

Edgar Bronfman’s grandfather Yechiel emigrated to Canada from the Bessarabia region of Romania in 1889. He came as a virtual indentured servant to the Baron de Hirsch Fund, by then already closely allied with the B’nai Brith.

At this time, top British Zionists, including Moses Montefiore, Baron Alfred de Rothschild and Maurice de Hirsch, had struck a deal with the Hudson Bay Company, the British Colonial Office corporate front in charge of the administration of Canada, to finance a wave of Eastern European Jewish colonization in the barren provinces of Manitoba and Saskatchewan. It was here that Yechiel Bronfman settled.

The first generation Bronfman (in Yiddish literally means (liquorman”) to land on the shores of North America immediately got himself involved in the rackets, eventually opening up a string of whorehouses.

When Canada adopted Prohibition in 1915, Yechiel Bronfman’s whorehouses became illegal nightclubs, where bootlegged whiskey, smuggled across the border from the United States, was served.

Canada’s experiment with Prohibition ended just as American Prohibition was beginning and Yechiel Bronfman and his sons, Abel and Samuel, were already in a position to shift from purchasers to suppliers of illegal whiskey-and narcotics. In 1916, Abel and Samuel Bronfman had moved the family’s bootleg and prostitution revenues into the ownership of the Pure Drug Company.

The company, according to some accounts, began importing narcotics from the Far- East into Canada. The production facilities of the Pure Drug Company began churning out cheap whiskey to flood the American markets once Prohibition began in the United States.

The Bronfmans were the principal suppliers of bootleg alcohol to the Zionist, Meyer Lansky National Crime Syndicate throughout the Prohibition period and the family amassed a fortune selling their “chickencock” whiskey.

The bootlegging business was conducted at great risk being faced with stiff competition from declared antisemite, Joseph Kennedy.

According to U.S. government records, between 1920 and 1930, over 34,000 Americans died of alcohol poisoning as a result of drinking the Bronfman’s “chickencock”, making the Bronfman family the biggest murderers in the history of North American crime.

When Canadian police moved against the “Bronfman Gang” in 1926, the family set up the Atlas Shipping Company to ship their whiskey to the Caribbean, where it was transferred to boats owned by the Reinfeld Syndicate. the Cleveland based “Jewish Navy” and other Lansky syndicate rum runners.

At the close of Prohibition, Bronfman negotiated a deal with the U.S. Treasury Department to pay several million dollars in back taxes, a miniscule portion of the illegal profits the family derived from the Prohibition whiskey sales and drug-running.

The purpose of the payment was to clear the decks for the Bronfman family’s overnight transformation into leading lights of the Canadian Zionist establishment.

The Bronfman’s went on to found the Distillers Corporation in Montreal in 1924 and built one of the world’s great fortunes on whisky brands like Crown Royal and Chivas Regal and further expanded their empire becoming the largest shareholders in DuPont establishing a new dynasty and enjoyed the title, “Canadian Rothschild’s” wielding power, and global political influence.

So the way forward is established. Murrell is to stand alone to face as yet unspecified charge off embezzlement. But all is not yet lost. The many Scots who donated to the SNP Independence fund might yet claim a “failure to exercise due diligence”, through the civil courts against the the officers who signed off the accounts namely: Murrell, Beattie and Sturgeon. A liability for the recovery of £600 plus interest would bankrupt

The publication date, early March 2018, is very relevant. This was a Scottish Government survey conducted right at the start of the efforts to destroy the reputation of Alex Salmond.

The report was a political bombshell, and yet it never appeared in any of the copious senior management texting correspondence. Nicola Sturgeon maintained she knew nothing about anything, which is impossible to believe since she read and commented on the document.

The October 2017, “Me2” campaign and the Westminster sex scandal arising from it prompted the completion of a confidential survey of people employed at Holyrood, including MSPs, their staff, parliamentary workers, and news reporters. Over 1000 individuals responded and the results were shocking.

The Holyrood sexual harassment report was sent to Nicola Sturgeon at the beginning of March 2018. It listed more than 200 allegations of harassment, most dating from 2016. Of the 137 women who said they had been sexually harassed, 67 reported that the perpetrator was an MSP. The report was quickly buried, and only Alex Salmond was put through the ringer. Why?

The findings showed that Holyrood perpetrators were nearly always male, regardless of the gender of the victim and in the majority of cases, the alleged perpetrator was in a position of authority.

Reports included 5 instances where the perpetrator had attempted to pinch or grope the victim’s bottom, and 10 where they had tried to kiss their victim. There was even 1 attempt to grope the breast of a woman, and another attempt to grab at a victim’s crotch.

The report also indicated that victims and their perpetrators were “most likely” to come from the same group of people. Nine of the 13 MSPs who had reported sexual harassment said their abuser had been another MSP.

Some 40 percent of respondents said they had been targeted by a parliamentary worker, and a further 20 percent by a member of MSPs’ staff. The total percentage exceeds 100 percent, as some respondents reported more than one case of harassment.

A total of 29 percent of respondents – which is approximately 300 people – said they had witnessed sexual harassment. One-in-five women said they had received sexist comments, 16 percent reported unwanted looks or leers, and another nine percent reported unwanted physical contact.

Of concern was that 11 people who had reported harassment said their cases were not taken seriously or acted on by their managers, while four said their complaints had caused problems for them at work. Most had taken no action at all, and a quarter of respondents said they didn’t feel confident that they knew how to report such incidents.

The Scottish National party (SNP) is the only party in Scotland that cannot provide evidence of overhauling its sexual harassment policy following the #MeToo revelations of November 2017. This after a confidential survey conducted on 01 March 2018 found that one in 10 staff had experienced sexual harassment, 45% of whom said that the perpetrator was an MSP.

After note: All political parties, apart from the SNP, introduced revised procedures after 2017. Asked for comment, the SNP said it “continually looks to improve [its] policies and processes” and planned to introduce, in time, trained sexual harassment advisers.

The SNP is the only party which did not at the time display a code of conduct and relevant harassment policy on its website, or offer an easily searchable contact phone numbers or email to make a complaint. Indeed, the SNP code of conduct made no mention of sexual harassment specifically.

“Where allegations are made against people or institutions in which the public have placed trust, it is the responsibility of the authorities to conduct a thorough investigation to determine if there is evidence that criminal conduct has occurred.

“We understand public curiosity about this investigation. However, the Crown does not publicly share details of confidential inquiries where there are no proceedings in court. This protects the rights of the individuals concerned who are entitled to a presumption of innocence.”

Seems like the Crown prosecuters decided prosecuteral follow up was not in the public interest and decided on a “psuedo not proven” verdict.

Scotland’s Civil Service

The Civil Service in Scotland went WOKE in 2014/2015, at the start of Sturgeon’s tenure as First Minister when, under her direction, supported by her Permanent Secretary, Liz Evans (who led the attack on Alec Salmond) priority was given to promoting, nuturing and sustaining left-wing WOKE activism over the legitimate business of Scotland, raising fundamental questions about competence and professionalism.

The buzzwords “diversity, equity and inclusion” (DEI) provided countless opportunities for LGBTQ+ “activity groups” to promote their kinks and beliefs as official business.

These groups devoted a deal of their time recruiting activists and attending endless meetings discussing “Privilege,” “Awareness,” “Pride,” and “Transgender Inclusion” all with the full support of the political leaders of the SNP Government, which repeatedly declared DEI to be an imperative priority.”

Recent reports revealed a similar pattern of disturbing events within the Intelligence Service of the USA, which went WOKE under the Biden Presidency.

https://www.city-journal.org/article/national-security-agency-internal-chatroom-transgender-surgeries-polyamory

February 2014: Obama told Fareed Zakaria, a member of both the Council For Foreign Relations (CFR) and Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission, that the United States “brokered” the coup in Ukraine in February 2014.

Obama’s candid admission should not come as a surprise following the release of a surreptitiously recorded conversation between Victoria Nuland, the US-Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, and Geoffrey R. Pyatt, the US Ambassador to Ukraine.

The conversation centred on ousting Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych and replacing him with one of several hand-picked State Department choices. Nuland instructed Pyatt to “have the UN glue this thing” and then dismissively added “fuck the EU” for its role negotiating the crisis.

The U.S. orchestrated “transition,” as Obama characterized it, resulted in the appointment of fascists to key positions in the Kiev government and led to the current war in eastern Ukraine launched by Petro Poroshenko, the former confectionery magnate turned Ukrainian president.

Poroshenko’s war on those who did not accept the nationalist government in Kiev has thus far killed more than 5,000 people, although unofficial tallies are far higher.

In the not too distant past, the U.S. government attempted to hide its involvement in coups and the removal of democratically elected leaders relying on the CIA to ferment coups and counter-revolutions.

However, since the advent of NGO and foundation spawned “colour revolutions” attributed to the people of target countries, while in actuality were orchestrated by USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy, the U.S. government has admitted its role in overturning governments.

https://www.infowars.com/

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957

Another SNP Government “Promise” not kept

Back in 2020 the former First Minister launched the “Promise” which vowed to make the care of vulnerable young people an SNP Government priority.

A special taskforce directorate was recruited and setup comprising, The “Promise” Scotland control body. The “Promise” Partnership Fund. The “Promise” Whole Family Wellbeing team. The “Promise” Foster and Kinship Carers Team and other subsidary “Promise” support teams.

5 Years later very little of substance is in place and working due to a lack of ministerial interest and effective leadership and the frittering away of £235m on staff salaries, associated costs, commissioning of many progress (lack of) reports and other expenditure.

An oversight board reviewed the development and discovered that progress has been desisory due to “unforseen events” and “systemic delays”, and there was no chance a completion deadline of 2030 would be met and vulnerable young people will continue to be at unnecessary risk.

Sturgeon, who was in charge of the Scottish Government for the majority of the time the policy has been in place commented:

“On the fifth anniversary of my vow everyone has to be “brutally honest” about the progress the SNP Executive had made, which is not good enough. In order to deliver the “Promise”, there must be an increase in the scale and pace of change. Continuing without improvement is not good enough. We should rightly celebrate any steps forward that have been achieved but we must also be brutally honest about the areas where progress is needed. A promise is not kept until it is delivered. We all need to raise our game. Politicians, Councils, Government. We must show the leadership that all of the children and young people in Scotland deserve.”

What is the promise?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4T9wwgGynY

The Promise Scotland Podcast Episode 2: Young people and Hearings System redesign
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37n9rnutJWc

The Promise Scotland Podcast Episode 3: Hearings System Working Group conclusions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3o8Fq2WcIdQ

The Promise Scotland Podcast Episode 4: Working Together for Whole Family Support
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxvEKy_FEcw

Shameful’ failure to improve lives since The Promise care vow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBLZKuY7eK4

Comment:

£235m spent and nothing of note achieved. The final bill, should the project be delivered by 2030, will be around £750m with an attaching unspecified annual revenue commitment. The incompetence of the SNP Government ministers is staggering bad. Others could surely do much better.

Ukrainian soccer players ploughing their trade for megabucks overseas and Starmer is pledging our youth to fight in Ukraine which will most likely lead to some form of conscription since the army is a a record low level.

This lot and many thousands of other Ukrainian sports people should return to Ukraine to defend their country before any UK forces involvement in the carnage

https://uk.soccerway.com/players/players_abroad/ukraine/