caltonjock

Scottish and Uk Politics


Tory – Labour – Lib Dem – Discredited Right to Buy Scheme – Buying and Selling Ex-Council Properties – A Story With a Moral

 

 

 
Sale of an ex-council house – This story is set in Aberdeen, but it could be applied anywhere in Scotland
On or around 2007, an Stonehaven couple reaching retirement age (lets call them Dougal & Ermitrude) purchased their council flat at a knockdown price of £21,000. They took out a mortgage to cover the cost of the purchase plus fees.

Formal advice, given to them in writing was that they could not sell the flat for at least 3 years without returning, to the council a significant part of any profit that might be realised from any such sale.

Their children, both adult were now married with children of their own. They lived locally, in Aberdeen, about 10 miles distant.

Ideally Dougal and Ermitrude would have preferred to be located nearer to their grandchildren but Aberdeen housing was extremely expensive and in any event they would need to sell their flat first. They were stuck. The years passed.

Around 4 years later a friend provided a possible solution which if implemented would provide opportunity allowing Dougal & Ermitrude to sell their house for much more than they had paid for it.

 

 

The plan formulated required only that they would be able to display an pressing need supported by medical evidence (if possible) to be nearer their immediate family, in Aberdeen. All necessary measures were put in place.

Dougal & Ermitrude completed and submitted application forms to two Housing Associations, in Aberdeen. They struck lucky. The Hanover Housing Association, (provider of sheltered housing for the over 60’s) undertook to provide a one bedroom flat in Aberdeen (http://www.hanover.scot/).

There was only one catch. Housing provision was on a first come first served basis, meaning that refusal of accomodation considered suited to their needs could signifacntly delay any other offer. Normally housing would not be forthcoming for around 3-6 months, which gave Dougal & Ermitrude time to sell their flat in good time.

Then the bombshell. Roughly 3 weeks after submitting the application forms they recived a letter of offer of accomodation from Hanover advise that a one bedroom flat would be ready for occupation within the month. The location of the flat was ideal, being within walking distance of their grandchildren’s homes. What a quandry.

Dougal had made arrangements placing details of their flat with a local solicitor so that it could be sold. There had been a couple of viewings but no offers had been forthcoming due to the extensive refurbishment that would be necessary to bring the flat up to an acceptable standard. An added difficulty was that the local housing sales market had taken a downturn. Things did not look good.

 

 

 

The friend who first muted the move to Aberdeen came to the rescue once more with a recommendation that they consider selling the flat to an equity buyer. The price realised would be much reduced over the market rate,(between 25-30%) but in the circumstances it seemed to be the only viable option. Arrangements were put in place so that such a sale would be achieved without undue delay. Dougal & Ermitrude accepted the offer of accomodation from Hanover.

The equity buyer valued the flat at £75,000 and offered to purchase it for £50,000. The offer would be available for 48 hours after which it would be withdrawn. Dougal was inclined to hold out for more money but Ermitrude insisted he accept. Which he did. The outstanding amount of the mortgage loan taken out on the flat was £15,000. This provided Dougal & Ermitrude with a windfall cash sum of £35,000 after paying off the mortgage.

In 2011, Dougal & Ermitrude moved into their new one bedroomed flat located within walkng distance of their grandchildren. They were content and reasonably well off in their retirement since their needs were centred around their grandchildren.

The moral of the story:  It is within the grasp of any ex-council house buyer under the right to buy scheme to do what Dougal and Ermitrude did. But they should have sold their flat before completing the application form seeking sheltered accomodation.

 

 

 

 

Afternote. The SNP government brought the right to buy scheme to an end since it had brought about an appalling shortage of council owned property for rent. Many properties sold off under the right to buy scheme had been susequently sold on to entrepreneurs increasing housing in the private sector which brought with it much increased rental charges  for vulnerable Scots. http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/right-to-buy-council-homes-to-be-scrapped-1-2986947

 

The scheme, introduced by the Thatcher govenment was supported by Labour government’s under Blair or Brown and the three  Labour governments in Scotland led by Dewar, McLeish and McConnell. Indeed Labours council house building record  in Scotland is disgraceful.  In the first 6 years of  the SNP government 4,432 new council homes were completed – compared to only 6 under in the last 4 years of the Labour-Lib Dem administration.

 

An aside: The couple in the news, Douglas and Jacqueline Wright sold their Cumbernauld property to M & F Property Solutions 2011. They took up residence in a one bedroomed flat, in pristine condition in a sheltered home complex in Bishopbriggs, (about 10 miles from Cumbernauld). The complex is one of a number of similar amenities built throughout Scotland over the last 10 years. It is run by the Hanover Housing Association

 



10 responses to “Tory – Labour – Lib Dem – Discredited Right to Buy Scheme – Buying and Selling Ex-Council Properties – A Story With a Moral”

  1. “Great Tory housing shame: Third of ex-council homes now owned by rich landlords”

    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/right-to-buy-housing-shame-third-ex-council-1743338

    The point of not building new council houses was to push up house prices, make people feel rich, widening the class divide, put people into debt, make more money for the already rich.

    You are correct, ALL three main parties were at it!.

    Like

    1. “Ex-council housing racket: Private landlords charging several times council levels with taxpayer footing difference”

      http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ex-council-housing-racket-private-landlords-1745460

      Like

  2. You got to watch this, sums up the world we live in!!!.

    “money laundering and yet happily pump big bucks into the property market in the UK”

    http://www.maxkeiser.com/2015/10/kr819-keiser-report-money-laundering-and-bitcoin/

    Like

    1. “American War Machine: Deep Politics, the CIA’s Global Drug Connection, and the Road to Afghanistan.”

      http://www.peterdalescott.net/q.html

      Connection.

      Like

  3. This storm in a teacup is exactly that. Many years ago when first married we were unable to buy a property, living and working in Edinburgh made it impossible unless you had family money at your back and we assuredly did not have that. We eventually got a New Town Council House and were considering applying for a house where we could purchase when we got our hands on a bit more money, enough to buy outside of this.
    Now over the years we have moved onwards and upwards, some we made money on, some we merely scraped by. Our last property in Edinburgh, we bought for £141k and with improvements we sold it 18mnths later for $176k. I can assure you that this property was improved but needed more. Should we be reporting to the Police as per Michele Thomson?

    Like

    1. The Tories created the buying and selling market in ex-council houses and Labour Lib Dems further enforced the scheme. It’s an absolute nonsense that the Unionist party’s are finding fault with people taking advantage of an opportunity to make some money The buyer/seller market is not one that can be regulated so that all is fair. Let the buyer and seller beware.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Well done Calton Jock. Your tale with a moral has certainly shed some light on the murky innuendo that the msm gas been engaged in. More power to you.

    Like

  5. Correction: has. Though gas may be more appropriate! 😄

    Like

  6. Whilst I totally agree that the mp wummin did nowt lwgally wrong.
    I also know that the owner of wonga et al is doing nowt legally wrong.
    But given that she is/was a member first and an elected rep of a party second, that stopped this right to buy scheme supposedly because of this very practice, there are certainly some double standards at play here.
    Just sayin like

    Like

    1. The property portfolio of mainly ex-council houses she developed with her husband was put in place a number of years before her involvement with the SNP. She advanced her case for selection as an MP candidate on her exposure and successful business background. Her role in Westminster was to represent the SNP as the spokesman for business affairs. In regard to the sale of council housing stock I am in agreement with yourself that it is/was a policy mired in greed. But it is churlish that elements of the press in scotland castigated the MP with wanton disregard of any search for the truth of the matter. Very poor journalism driven by a london based who are increasingly delivering the daily agenda for consumption by Scots still minded to take and read a newspaper on a daily basis. If the press industry progresses the agenda which they are agreed upon in 10 years there will be no national daily newspapers in Scotland. The regional press will continue to florish albeit with little political output. The national press will sold in Scotland will be The Mirror, Sun and other right wing rags and will contain very little localised political comment

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.